TBogg - "...a somewhat popular blogger"





Faithful husband, soccer dad, basset owner, and former cowboy
Return to TboggHomePage




FELLOW TRAITORS

*The Nether-Count*
100 Monkeys Typing
Ain't No Bad Dude
Alicublog
Americablog
American Leftist
Attytood (Will Bunch)
Bad Attitudes
Balloon Juice
Better Inhale Deeply
Bitch Ph.D
Bloggy
Bob Harris
Brilliant At Breakfast
BusyBusyBusy
Byzantium's Shores
Creek Running North
Crooked Timber
Crooks and Liars
Cursor
Daily Kos
Dependable Renegade
David Ehrenstein
Democratic Veteran
Dohiyi Mir
Down With Tyranny
Echidne of the Snakes
Edicts of Nancy
Elayne Riggs
Eschaton (Atrios)
Ezra Klein
Failure Is Impossible
Feministe
Feministing
Firedoglake
First Draft
Freewayblogger
The Garance
The Group News Blog
Guano Island
Hairy Fish Nuts
Hammer of the Blogs
Hullabaloo(Digby)
I Am TRex
If I Ran the Zoo
I'm Not One To Blog
Interesting Times
James Wolcott
Jesus' General
Jon Swift
Juan Cole
King of Zembla
Kung Fu Monkey
Lance Mannion
Lawyers Guns and Money
Lean Left
Liberal Oasis
Main & Central
Majikthise
Making Light (Nielsen Hayden)
Mark Kleiman
Martini Revolution
MaxSpeak
MF Blog
MyDD
Needlenose
The Next Hurrah
Nitpicker
No More Mr. Nice Blog
Norbizness
Norwegianity
Oliver Willis
One Good Move
Orcinus
Pacific Views
Pam's House Blend
Pandagon
Pharyngula
Political Animal(K.Drum)
The Poorman
Progressive Gold
Right Hand Thief
Rising Hegemon
Roger Ailes
Rude Pundit
Rumproast
Sadly, No
Seeing The Forest
Shakesville
Sisyphus Shrugged
Skippy the Bush Kangaroo
Slacktivist
SteveAudio
Suburban Guerilla
TalkLeft
The American Street
The Left Coaster
The Road To Surfdom
The Sideshow
The Talking Dog
The Talent Show
Tom Tomorrow
Tom Watson
Whiskeyfire
UggaBugga
Wampum
Wonkette
World O'Crap




TOSS ME
A BONE
Amazon Wish List







SOURCES
MSNBC
CNN
The Washington Post
Media Matters
The New York Times
The Guardian
Yahoo News
Salon
The Raw Story
Common Dreams
Media Transparency
The Nation
Alternet
Joe Conason

Talking Points Memo




THE VAST WASTELAND

Captain Corndog & Friends
Cheerleaders Gone Spazzy
80% True
Corner of Mediocrity and Banality
Village Idiots Central
Darwin's Waiting Room
News for Mouthbreathers






Mailbox
Your e-mail may be reprinted sans name and e-mail address. Think about how stupid you want to appear.




Blogroll Me!




Add to My Yahoo!



Site Feed

Archives:

Slightly Used Snark

  • 09/01/2002 - 10/01/2002
  • 10/01/2002 - 11/01/2002
  • 11/01/2002 - 12/01/2002
  • 12/01/2002 - 01/01/2003
  • 01/01/2003 - 02/01/2003
  • 02/01/2003 - 03/01/2003
  • 03/01/2003 - 04/01/2003
  • 04/01/2003 - 05/01/2003
  • 05/01/2003 - 06/01/2003
  • 06/01/2003 - 07/01/2003
  • 07/01/2003 - 08/01/2003
  • 08/01/2003 - 09/01/2003
  • 09/01/2003 - 10/01/2003
  • 10/01/2003 - 11/01/2003
  • 11/01/2003 - 12/01/2003
  • 12/01/2003 - 01/01/2004
  • 01/01/2004 - 02/01/2004
  • 02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004
  • 03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004
  • 04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004
  • 05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004
  • 06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004
  • 07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004
  • 08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004
  • 09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004
  • 10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004
  • 11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004
  • 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005
  • 01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005
  • 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005
  • 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005
  • 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005
  • 05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005
  • 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005
  • 07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005
  • 08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005
  • 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005
  • 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005
  • 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005
  • 12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006
  • 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006
  • 02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006
  • 03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006
  • 04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006
  • 05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006
  • 06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006
  • 07/01/2006 - 08/01/2006
  • 08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006
  • 09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006
  • 10/01/2006 - 11/01/2006
  • 11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006
  • 12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007
  • 01/01/2007 - 02/01/2007
  • 02/01/2007 - 03/01/2007
  • 03/01/2007 - 04/01/2007
  • 04/01/2007 - 05/01/2007
  • 05/01/2007 - 06/01/2007
  • 06/01/2007 - 07/01/2007
  • 07/01/2007 - 08/01/2007
  • 08/01/2007 - 09/01/2007
  • 09/01/2007 - 10/01/2007
  • 10/01/2007 - 11/01/2007
  • 11/01/2007 - 12/01/2007
  • 12/01/2007 - 01/01/2008
  • 06/01/2008 - 07/01/2008
  • 05/01/2009 - 06/01/2009

  • Monday, October 21, 2002

     

    Paul Krugman has lots of friends...

    Great piece of writing over at the Pennsylvania Gazette on Paul Krugman's recent article in Sunday's Times


    posted by tbogg at 9:59 PM

    |

     

    Can we get a table for eight...maybe a corner booth?

    All eight Black American conservatives are planning to visit a local Beltway Denny's to have a bitch session about Harry Belafonte. Apparently, he's not acting white enough. Denny's said that they would seat them, but they seemed kind of nervous about the whole thing and were calling in an extra busboy to stand by the door. Just in case.

    Clarence Thomas issued a press release stating that he couldn't attend on such short notice since he already paid for the Spice channel for the evening and he had "big plans" wink wink.



    posted by tbogg at 9:47 PM

    |

     

    That's Some Good Shit was already taken by the hemp store...

    Family Christian Stores objects to their new neighbor, The Bad Ass Coffee Company.



    posted by tbogg at 9:36 PM

    |

     

    I use drugs to get over the pain of losing my dwarf

    They found drugs on the Kid Rock's tour bus. It's hard to believe a guy who looks like this would use drugs.



    posted by tbogg at 9:30 PM

    |

     

    I love the smell of burning jelly dongs in the morning...it smells like...bankruptcy.

    Jesus took time out from his busy schedule being Lord and all, to tell a man in Kentucky to get out of the porn business.

    When contacted, Jesus said "So I told him it was like bad karma and shit, and he's all, "really?, and I'm all, 'Yeah. Ask my dad' and he's all, 'Um okay' and I said if he did it I would let him talk to Dale Earnhardt, and he was all, 'I'm on it, dude' ".



    posted by tbogg at 9:26 PM

    |

     

    More Sullivan's travails...

    I was going to bypass commenting on our pal Andy for a while since he is getting more blog time than he truly deserves. The fact of the matter is that Andrew Sullivan is a third-rate pundit who has become the flavor of the month since he has staked out his territory as the "gay, Catholic, neo-con" who latches onto every utterance from the administration as if were the revealed word, and then proceeds to use it to attack those poor, poor lefties who are only moments away from being swept into the dustbin of history. Meanwhile he gloms onto sodden contrarian Christopher Hitchens, by constantly exclaiming, " Look! It's me, Hitchens, and Orwell. The Abraham, Martin, and John of perspicacity! " In terms of vicarious glamour, that’s a pretty low bar, even by Sullivan standards..(The day that Hitchens turns on Sullivan, I want to be there.)

    So, having said all that…I want to note his little outtake from his Sunday Times column, which I'm not even going to link, that is up on his blog, which I'm also not going to link.

    THE LEFT'S NEGATIVISM: "Ask the average leftist today what he is for, and you will not get a particularly eloquent response. Ask him what he is against, and the rhetorical floodgates open. That tells you something. Similarly, ask the average anti-war activist what she is for with regard to Iraq, what exactly she thinks we should constructively do, and the stammering and stuttering begins. Do we just leave Saddam alone? Do we send Jimmy Carter to sign the kind of deal he made with North Korea eight years ago? Will pressuring the Israelis remove the nerve gas and potential nukes Saddam has in his possession? Will ceding the West Bank to people who cheered the destruction of the World Trade Center help defang al Qaeda? They don't say and don't know. But what they do know is what they are against: American power, Israeli human rights abuses, British neo-imperialism, the "racist" war on Afghanistan, and on and on. Get them started on their hatreds, and the words pour out. No wonder some have started selling the Protocols of the Elders of Zion in Central Park." - from my latest Sunday Times piece on the anti-Semitism hijacking the anti-war movement

    Aside from the fact that he now seems intent to convince us that the Left has become anti-Semitic just because we aren't in lockstep with the Sharon government, Andy posits that the Left can't tell him "what it is for", proving that his ears are closed as his mind. The world and the blogoshere are full of people that can explain to him in simple words, that even George Bush can understand, what it is that they are "for". He just has to choose to listen. But it's so much easier for Andy to play the obtuse game which allows him to be bitchy, hysterical, and self-obsessed, as if the world needed yet another Ann Coulter..

    So go ahead, Andy. Play the game to drive up those all-important hits to the Blog Where Logic and Reason Die. Maybe with a few more mentions of the dreaded Trinity of Streisand, Chomsky, and Sontag, you can attract the attention of a Scaife or Scaife-wannabe, which will lead to the Promised Land where all third-tier hacks ply their trade and fulminate for a meager paycheck: FrontPage magazine.

    Bye bye Andy…and don’t forget to write.


    posted by tbogg at 9:13 PM

    |

     

    As important as dogma 95

    Mona Charen says....oh... who cares... Mona Charen...pffftttt

    Nobody reads Mona Charen any more (if they ever did), and they can't remember why they read her in the first place. I mean, jeez, she was Nancy Reagan's speechwriter, so I guess we can give her credit for "Just say no", but other than that, like really, who cares?

    Sorry I brought her up.


    posted by tbogg at 2:15 PM

    |

     

    Disgruntled fired employee speaks out about guy who eventually replaced him

    George H. W. Bush, the Preppy Cadaver and failed former President who didn't win a Nobel Prize even though Michael Kelly seems to think he deserves one, and who was fired by the American voters in 1992 for poor performance, had a few thing to say in Des Moines:

    Former President George Bush said Sunday in Des Moines that his son faces the toughest times in the White House since the Civil War.

    "The fact is he is wrestling with problems probably as tough as any president has wrestled with since Lincoln," Bush said in headlining a fund-raising dinner for U.S. Rep. Greg Ganske's bid for the U.S. Senate.

    But what was more interesting was what he didn't say:

    Bush said nothing in his 15-minute address about his son's effort to oust President Saddam Hussein in Iraq - a nation whose army U.S. and allied forces drove from Kuwait in 1991, when the elder Bush was president.

    Bush also said nothing about the nation's wobbly economy, the very issue blamed for his re-election defeat in 1992

    snip

    Sunday's event in Des Moines was expected to bring in $250,000 for the Ganske campaign. The Republican congressman has raised $4.3 million for his Senate bid, and incumbent Democrat Tom Harkin has raised $8.1 million, according to the most recent campaign-finance reports.

    Bush said he wasn't visiting to disparage Harkin, although "I very rarely got a vote out of the guy," he quipped. He referred to Harkin's vote against the Persian Gulf War resolution in 1991. "Tom Harkin was unable to join me in that quest for the Senate to vote for that approval," he said.

    He later praised Iowa's Republican Sen. Charles Grassley, but he did not mention that Grassley also opposed the Gulf War resolution

    Poppy also made comments on his sons winning governerships and his marriage to this Barbara Bush, not this one, who is his granddaughter :

    Bush, now 78, joked about election night 1998 when then-Texas Gov. George W. Bush was re-elected to a second term and his brother, Jeb, was elected governor of Florida.

    He said he told his wife, Barbara, that "I believe this is the happiest day in my entire life."

    Bush said his wife responded sharply: "What about the day we were married?"

    "That was a very nice day, too," he said.

    Of course he neglected to mention his fling with Jennifer Fitzgerald, which was probably a doomed tragic affair and so it's best not to bring it up because he gets all weepy about it and probably has to go out on his cigarette boat and drive at high speeds while She's Out Of My Life blasts from the speakers....







    posted by tbogg at 11:10 AM

    |

     

    Charity begins at h----oly shit! Check out that rack!

    The YWCA in Janesville, Wisconsin didn't Hooter's dirty money.



    posted by tbogg at 10:31 AM

    |

     

    Did I mention how much I love Ann Telnaes?

    Her latest.


    posted by tbogg at 10:01 AM

    |

     

    Today's question: Nebraska?- Springsteen album or Bush hiding place?

    Apparently Yahoo is confused about German/US relations. Headline:

    Springsteen Heals U.S.-German Wounds with Concert



    The Germans like the US, they just don't like President Häschen-hosen. Hey. We don't either. That's why more of us voted for Gore.


    posted by tbogg at 8:11 AM

    |

     

    Is Garry Trudeau trying to tell us something?

    Ouch.


    posted by tbogg at 7:58 AM

    |

    Sunday, October 20, 2002

     

    Death, Taxes, and Republicans

    Someday I wanna to be able to write as well as James Capozzola (nice Italian boy that he is) over at Rittenhouse Review.

    THE PARTY OF FISCAL IRRESPONSIBILITY



    posted by tbogg at 11:26 PM

    |

     

    ...and I'll bring all eight of the people that are going to vote for me to the ticket...

    With Mike Taylor, Hairdresser to the Missoulans, dropping out of in the Montana Senate Race, the state of Montana has gotten more press than it really, really deserves. I mean, c'mon, it's Montana, for Christ's sake. When was the last time you stopped during the workday and thought "Man. I sure could use a vacation in Couer d'Alene" which is very sad because Couer d'Alene isn't even in Montana, it's in Idaho. You see, when people in Montana want to have a good time they go to Idaho, and I can't think of can't anything more pathetic than that.

    What the hell was I talking about...?

    Oh yeah. The Libertarian candidate for the Senate seat announced that he would switch to the Republican side if he won the election.

    HELENA - Stan Jones, Libertarian candidate for U.S. Senate, promised Friday to change parties to Republican if he is elected, to give the GOP control of the U.S. Senate.

    "I would do it only if (the Republicans) appointed me to the Senate Judiciary Committee so I could pass the final vote on judges," Jones said.

    When flamboyant and disturbingly fey Republican nominee Mike Taylor dropped out of the election because he was startled to find out that he was apparently gay back in the seventies, he was holding at about about 33% of the vote. If Stan Jones were to capture all of Taylors support, and combine it with his own, he would end up with about...33% of the vote.

    Missoulans were not available for comment as they were all in Couer d'Alene gawking at the bright lights and that big city living....

    (By the way...if you're interested in visiting Couer d'Alene here is how far they have gotten on their official website.)



    posted by tbogg at 11:03 PM

    |

     

    Yeah. We told Bush, but he had the blank expression on his face again. Come to think of it, he always has...

    Yeah, it's Newsmax, which is to journalism what Candy Crowley is to Jennifer Garner, but we thought it was an important story.

    PRAGUE, Czech Republic -- Czech intelligence officials have knocked down one of the few clear links between al-Qaeda terrorists and the Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein, UPI has learned.

    Senior Czech intelligence officials have told their American counterparts that they now have "no confidence" in their earlier report of direct meetings in Prague between Mohammed Atta, leader of the Sept. 11 hijackers and an Iraqi diplomat stationed in Prague who has since been expelled for "activities inconsistent with his diplomatic status."

    So that story that the CIA has been telling the administration is bullshit, but the administration has been peddling to a gullible populace as a cause for war, turns out to be...bullshit.

    We can expect an apology and a correction form the neo-cons...never.


    posted by tbogg at 10:38 PM

    |

     

    But can they play football?

    Apparently they have a big mold problem in Alabama schools:

    In the basement of Huntsville High School, Col. Bryan Bennett runs seven dehumidifiers. Over the years, he's heard Junior ROTC cadets complain of runny noses, watery eyes and other allergic reactions.

    "They don't normally know what's wrong," Bennett said. "I don't know that the students know so much about the mold."

    Apparently state school officials are torn about getting rid of the mold as some of the more advanced forms are keeping the average statewide SAT scores 20 points higher than Mississippi's.


    posted by tbogg at 10:14 PM

    |

     

    For when you don't find the Lincoln Log Cabin of Doom stimulating anymore

    More proof that the Internet is a vast wasteland...but a funny vast wasteland.


    posted by tbogg at 10:05 PM

    |

     

    Stuck inside of Amherst with those Harvard Blues again...

    As you may remember from last week, the state of Massachusetts (which I am really getting tired of typing) is looking for a new state tourism motto along the lines of Virginia is For Lovers or Alabama: Darwin’s Testing Ground. For our pals in Massachusetts, we present our Official State Motto finalists:

    Even Ted can get a Lass.....When he comes to Mass
    (He just has trouble getting her home)

    Massachusetts - Don't Laugh, or We'll Sic the Salem Witches on You

    Mass Kicks Ass!

    A Great Place to Get Scrod

    Without Us, McGovern Wouldn't Have Won Anything.

    Don't Bother Us -- We've Got A Haddock

    Ass and Class…That’s Mass!

    We’re Not New Hampshire

    Nobody Loves You, But We’ve Got Beer

    For cod and country

    Floundering for nearly four centuries now

    Home of That Other Clam Chowder (note: I grew up in Manhattan)

    Rum, Romanism and Rebellion: It's not just for breakfast anymore

    Home of Springfield: for when Cooperstown just won't do

    Yankees without Steinbrenner

    Massachusetts: Keeping Connecticut away from Vermont for over 300 years

    Massachusetts: proud home of free speech for a whole bunch of decades now

    No Chowdah for you!

    Chappabigdig

    Make Massachusetts your second 'home', just like Mitt Romney did!

    Massachusetts-where you can find a CVS, Dunkin Donuts, and Starbucks on every corner!

    "Massachusetts---Gary's dad pronounces it "Massatusetts"

    Visit Massachusetts. It's not Mississippi.

    Mass-achhoooo--setts. It's nothing to sneeze at

    Massachusetts: When you live here, you learn how to spell at least one really hard word correctly.

    Massachusetts: the only state Texans hate worse than California!

    Massachusetts, Gateway to Moby Dick

    Massachusetts - the state George W Bush thinks has a whole lot of chusetts in it

    Massachusetts: Wellesley Coeds!

    Massachusetts: We're not Puritans anymore.

    Massachusetts: It's easy to get to the Indian casinos in Connecticut from here.

    …and our winner:

    Massachusetts: Don't Blame Us We Voted for Gore

    Officials from the state may email me as to where to send the $300,000 check and I will forward it to the lucky winner minus the cost of my foosball table….and maybe that Thunderbirds DVD set that I’ve had my eye on…


    posted by tbogg at 9:58 PM

    |

     

    First things first

    If you are having trouble finding Eschaton, try here,


    posted by tbogg at 9:14 PM

    |

    Saturday, October 19, 2002

     

    Look! Up in the sky!

    As I mentioned in a previous post, I am currently reading Comic Book Nation: The Transformation of Youth Culture in America. As author Bradford Wright points out, it was Superman comics that really began the comic book revolution. What I didn't know, was that Superman was such a ...liberal. The following snippets are about Superman comics written in 1939.

    From the book:

    The young creators cast their superhero as a "champion of the oppressed...devoted to helping those in need!" In his initial episode, Superman saves a falsely accused prisoner from a lynch mob, produces evidence that frees an innocent woman on death row, and defends a woman about to be beaten by her husband. In the second issue of Action Comics, Superman crushes a conspiracy involving a U.S. senator, a lobbyist, and a munitions manufacturer who wish to embroil the United States in a foreign war. He then ends the fraudulent Latin American war by informing them that they have been manipulated by greedy American industrialists. Echoing the Nye Committee's conclusion that "merchants of death" had conspired to involve the United States in the Great War, Superman warns that moneyed self-interest remained a menace to the national welfare.

    snip

    Other Superman stories explore the conflict between corporate greed and the public welfare. One finds Superman crushing a plot by wealthy American financiers working for a foreign power to manipulate the stock exchange and plunge the nation into another depression. His mission accomplished, Superman assures readers that "the nation is once again returning to its march toward prosperity!"

    snip

    In another story, Superman encounters a pair of wealthy and murderous stockbrokers who sell worthless stocks to hundreds of clients, some of whom commit suicide after losing their life savings. Superman, not content to simply turn the crooks over to the police, first devises a complex scheme to swindle them out of all of their cash and investments so that they must endure the humiliating poverty that they inflicted on others. Once the brokers are themselves broke, Superman delights in their misery and advises them to stop selling stock and start selling shoelaces instead.

    snip

    Superman's America was something of a paradox- a land where the virtue of the poor and the weak towered over that of the wealthy and powerful. Yet the common man could not expect to prevail on his own in this America, and neither could the progressive reformers who tried to fight for justice within the system. Only the righteous violence of Superman, it seemed, could relieve deep social problems--a tacit recognition that in American society it took some might to make right after all.

    end

    Pretty interesting reading. Sure is a good thing that all of that bad stuff that Superman fought against is all behind us now...















    posted by tbogg at 5:10 PM

    |

     

    Inconsistency is the hobgoblin of a stunted mind

    Joe Sabria, who is in his ninth year at Cornell as a student, wants to welcome gays to the Republican party. Because, you know, the Republican party is all accepting and stuff, when it comes to gays.

    Except when they're not.

    To understand how Joe "College" Sabria can make these amazing leaps, one need only look at who his heroes are, which contains all we need to know about Joe:

    Contrary to liberals' assertions, Coulter's book is not an indictment of invective, nor is it a call for a "new tone" in Washington. In fact, Coulter is the antithesis of a "new tone" conservative. She says exactly what she thinks and does not hold back one iota. When she famously wrote of Arabs dancing in the street on 911, "we should invade their countries, kill their leaders, and convert them to Christianity," she meant each and every word (and she was exactly right on all counts).

    With so many years in academia, Joe recently took it upon himself to counsel some up-and-coming college Republicans on the finer points of being a college conservative:

    I have some news for you - acting like an uncivilized savage does not mean that you have joined the great battle against political correctness. In order to be able to intelligently argue you must know what you are talking about. You must become well versed in political thought. For some of you, that means reading John Locke, John Stuart Mill, and the Federalist Papers. For others, that means watching Bill O'Reilly, listening to Rush Limbaugh, and reading Ayn Rand's novels. Still others may look to Milton Freidman, Frederick Hayek, and Walter Williams. Whatever you choose, you must have some idea what you are talking about.

    Personally, I can't wait to see what he becomes when he grows up...



    posted by tbogg at 4:33 PM

    |

     

    This is probably a bad time for Harvey to ask for that raise again...

    Harvey Pitt may be taking a second job real soon. Not only didn't he get his raise, but Bush stiffed him and crawddaded back on the money he promised to the SEC.

    Less than three months ago, President Bush signed with great fanfare sweeping corporate antifraud legislation that called for a huge increase in the budget of the Securities and Exchange Commission to police corporate America and clean up Wall Street.

    Now the White House is backing off the budget provision and urging Congress to provide the agency with 27 percent less money than the new law authorized.

    snip

    Under the corporate clean-up legislation, the commission's budget — which for years has barely kept up with inflation, let alone the steep rise in stock ownership — was authorized to increase by 77 percent, to $776 million. But as Congress wrestles with the spending measures that actually appropriate money to federal agencies, the White House is requesting $568 million for the S.E.C., officials said, or an increase of about 30 percent over last year's budget of $438 million.

    Now, if we remember our current history, we have been told recently by thge administration that the war in Iraq (wghich Bush hasn't made up his mind on yet...snerk) is going to cost about a $200 billion dollars. So, if we like, you know, invaded Iraq a couple of days later, do you this we could throw some of that money the SEC's way? I didn't think so...

    Getting back to Harvey and his request for more money, I can't let pass a couple of great lines from the linked article:

    Harvey Pitt, the embattled chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission, was acting on his own in asking Congress for a promotion and a raise, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said Wednesday. ...

    Pitt, who chaired an SEC meeting Wednesday, did not mention the request and refused to answer questions from reporters afterward.

    SEC spokeswoman Christi Harlan defended Pitt's request to lawmakers.

    "It was an informal suggestion to the conference on behalf of the agency, to raise its profile to help investor confidence and to attract the most qualified accountants, lawyers and economists," she said. "It had nothing to do with the chairman."

    Pitt's lobbying efforts to elevate the SEC to full Cabinet status and to raise the chairman's salary from the present $138,200 to $166,700 was first reported in Wednesday's editions of The New York Times.

    Then there is the always reliable Ari Fleischer:

    "The president is focused on the strengthening of the SEC's structure and ability to fight fraud," Fleischer said. "That's where his focus is at. He's not focused on that issue"

    Anyone want to take a guess what was on Ari's Word of the Day calendar?

    Rittenhouse does a much better job on this than me.






    posted by tbogg at 4:10 PM

    |

     

    Freeper Poltical Science 101

    Lesson #3: In order to win people over to your side, you need to present an effective and logical argument. The voter must respect your reasoned point of view and wish to join you in it.


    posted by tbogg at 3:19 PM

    |

    Friday, October 18, 2002

     

    ...and one last thing...

    I would be remiss if I didn't point everyone in the direction of David Ehrensteins's blog and his piece on the new film version of The Quiet American. This is one of my favorite Graham Greene books and I'm really looking forward to seeing it, particularly based on David's recommendation.

    Read the book if you haven't, as well as Ward Just's A Dangerous Friend.


    posted by tbogg at 9:57 PM

    |

     

    ...as if you didn't already see this over at Eschaton...

    Sysiphus Shrugged has this up, and it's very important. It's all well and good to sit around on our blogs bitching and complaining about the state of the USA during these dark (Bush) days, but the time has come to get off your ass and do something about it. MoveOn, which should get consideration for the next Nobel Peace Prize (if it's okay with that dick, Michael Kelly, the potato-headed bastard) is helping to organize volunteers to help in important races throughout the country. You can't complain about what Bush is doing to the country unless you go out and fight back.

    If you miss the good old Clinton days of peace, prosperity, environmental protection, and sultry illicit blow jobs, this is a way to reclaim them.

    Remember: nothing is over until we say it's over.....

    I'll be back posting on Sunday night. Remember to send in your Massachusetts Tourist slogans. The fate of New England rests in your hands...


    posted by tbogg at 9:47 PM

    |

     

    Mama, take this badge off of me. I can't use it anymore.

    "For the first time in probably a decade, Congress has
    left town before an election without going on a spending spree using
    taxpayers' money. ... There's a new sheriff in town, and he's dedicated to
    fiscal discipline. And Congress for the first time in a decade has
    listened to the new sheriff." -- White House spokesman Ari FLEISCHER.


    Sheriff Bunnypants

    There was no mention as to whether the assembled press broke out in hysterical laughter.


    posted by tbogg at 1:40 PM

    |

     

    Our legal system in action

    I picked this up from Altercation today.

    Today is a big day. For the first time since the arrests of the six nearly a month ago, the judge is going to make an important ruling, on the bail question. An unusual amount of drama has surrounded this decision, usually a formality in criminal proceedings; many felony trials in this city would already have been finished in less time than this.

    Fascinating and brilliant.


    posted by tbogg at 1:17 PM

    |

     

    Andy does Orwell

    Whoa Andy! Let's look at yesterday:

    WORDS TO REMEMBER: "North Korea cannot be allowed to develop a nuclear bomb. We have to be very firm about it." - Bill Clinton, "Meet the Press," Nov. 7, 1993. Yet another lie; yet another betrayal. [my underlining]

    Now, Andy today:

    WORDS TO REMEMBER: "North Korea cannot be allowed to develop a nuclear bomb. We have to be very firm about it." - Bill Clinton, "Meet the Press," Nov. 7, 1993.

    We have always been at war with......



    posted by tbogg at 9:28 AM

    |

     

    I want to wear sandals, I want to go shopping...

    So...let's go shopping.

    On the second thought, let's not...

    I hear Jenna already has a set of these and these.



    posted by tbogg at 8:52 AM

    |

     

    More Friday fun

    Disclaimer: I don't recommend this one for the office, so save it for the privacy of your own home. It's not really bad, but it is sexist. WARNING: it comes with sound.

    Whoose boobs?

    If you think you might be offended don't go there. Go here instead.


    posted by tbogg at 8:34 AM

    |

     

    Paul Krugman

    ...has a few things to say about Charles Grassley, Hitler, and Bush.

    You see, some folks must be under the impression that as long as something is repeated often enough, it will become true. That was how George W. Bush got to the top.

    How come the two best political writers in the country are an economist and a former drama critic?


    posted by tbogg at 8:23 AM

    |

    Thursday, October 17, 2002

     

    Noonan does the Pope..okay..not really...but if he were a fireman, all bets would be off

    I'm not quite sure how to handle the lovely Peggy this week, and right now Paul Gigot is probably saying the same thing. I can only imagine the look on his face when the Pegster turned this in.

    Now I am what is generally called a "lapsed Catholic", which is a pleasant way of saying, when company is around, that my faith is deader than Bob Dole's dick. I don't harbor any malice towards the Catholic Church, I just tend to ignore it as much as I can, regardless of the headlines and the fact that those lunatics at Opus Dei are infiltrating the government. Because of that, it is hard for me to say much about Peggy's column this week (not that that will stop me...but I'll be brief).

    Her column reminds me of what I left behind in the church as well as why I don't miss it. I never was much into the cult of personality that surrounds the Pope du jour, all of whom have struck me a sort of uber-priests no better than the local monsignor. I guess Catholic school failed me in that way, among oh so many others. So when I read something by someone as Pope-smacked as Noonan, I am at as much at a loss to understand it as I am to understand people who want to learn to speak Klingon. It's easy to dismiss the obsessed particularly if it's not your cup of obsession, but you can't deny their existence or their right to be obsessed. If they harm no one, let them be (which is about as close to being Libertarian as I will ever get...and if you're a Libertarian, don't email me...you're the Amway of political parties). For some, like Peggy, religion can be a good thing. But for the Fred Phelps, Osama bin Ladens, Antonin Scalias, and Judge Roy Moores it can become a misused bludgeon of power.

    So with that, I think that we should leave Peggy Noonan with what little peace she has in the Pope, the Birth, the Resurrection, the rosary (in whatever form), and God. She's a believer, and that's all right with me. It seems like Ritalin for her soul.

    But if she starts up on Elian's god-sent dolphins again, her ass is mine...


    posted by tbogg at 10:04 PM

    |

     

    Digby Does Dubya

    The ubiquitous Digby who really should have his own blog because-he's-better-than-all-of-us-put-together manages to cut to the chase on the North Korea issue and how President Fool Me Once put one over on Congress. Compliments of Eschaton.


    All I can add to the situation in North Korea is, if they had oil, bombs would already be dropping.


    posted by tbogg at 9:02 PM

    |

     

    In dog years she would have been 98, which is actually pretty old

    Richard Gardner of Nevada isn't exactly a Republican dream candidate:

    Republican Assembly candidate Richard Gardner is not eligible to vote due to a felony conviction, and thus, cannot win his race for Assembly District 14, Clark County officials said Friday.

    Gardner said it is all a mistake and he never had his right to vote removed after he was convicted in California 15 years ago on a felony sex crime for lewd and lascivious behavior with a child under the age of 14.

    But he has good news:

    "I had a problem," Gardner said. He said he sought counseling at church, but the bishop said it was against the law.

    "And on my own, without being caught or anything else, I turned myself in," Gardner said. "I called them and told them what the difficulty was and everything went downhill from there. I was never arrested."

    Now, Richard, or should we call him Dick, thinks he should still be able to vote and hold office. Call me old-fashioned, but having sex with a minor qualifies you to be the King of Pop, not to be an Assemblyman. Even from Vegas.






    posted by tbogg at 8:30 PM

    |

     

    Well, you see, we got all caught up in American Idol, then there was that Jackass marathon on MTV...

    Looks like someone hasn't been doing their homework...:

    WASHINGTON –– Government attorneys admitted Thursday they haven't completely reviewed documents from Vice President Dick Cheney's energy task force, despite claiming that they "all involve sensitive communications between and among the president and his closest advisers" that should be kept secret.

    U.S. District Court Judge Emmet Sullivan ordered task force documents to be made public by Nov. 5 and said he was shocked the Justice Department attorneys had not examined all the documents after asserting for more than a year that each of them involved confidential information.

    "That is a startling revelation," Sullivan said, after rejecting the Bush administration's claim that he lacks authority to order the release of the task force papers.

    For clarity's sake:

    ~They said that the papers had "sensitive communications" between President Harken, Vice President Halliburton and their "advisors".

    BUT

    ~They actually hadn't read them

    MEANING

    ~They lied.

    Aren't there laws against that?

    Never mind. They're Crisco John's boys, They make law, they don't follow it.


    posted by tbogg at 8:04 PM

    |

     

    Oh! That's where the expression "numb-nuts' comes from...

    A condom that contains an anaesthetic to prolong lovemaking has smashed all sales records, its manufacturers say.

    Sales will not be allowed in Italy because, you know, the women will have to cook sometime...


    posted by tbogg at 7:01 PM

    |

     

    Shot in the ass and you're to blame, you give guns a bad name...

    NRA Dad of the Year candidate, Robert Schlabach, 44, of Fort Lupton,CO. taught his son an important lesson, the hard way.

    Robert Schlabach, 44, of Fort Lupton was hunting with his son and a half-dozen other people in Big Red Park on Monday evening. He had placed the high-powered rifle on a cot at their campsite when Schlabach's son sat down on it.

    Schlabach attempted to remove the rifle from beneath the boy when he accidentally pulled the trigger. The boy suffered a gunshot wound to the buttocks

    And remember:

    Warner cautioned hunters to always handle firearms as though the weapons were loaded




    posted by tbogg at 6:58 PM

    |

     

    Another contest.....wheeeee!!!!

    Jeepers, the Name that War contest was such a hit, I thought I'd try another one.

    The state of Massachusetts is trying to come up with a new advertising slogan. Now I don't live in Massachusetts but I like any state that gave us Barney Frank and Legal Seafood, so I thought we could all help out. Anything has got to be better than ``Massachusetts . . . Make it Yours''. The following slogans have already been passed over:

    Get Your Ass To Mass. (apparently the Boston Diocese owns that one...but it's on hiatus)

    Catch a Falling Kennedy!

    The Big Dig...It's Really.... Big

    The Other Thing That's Between Buckner's Legs

    Home of the Wappah

    and

    Baked Beans...and Senators, too!

    Anyway, email your suggestions and I'll put up the good ones Sunday night, if I'm not too sleepy.


    posted by tbogg at 12:36 PM

    |

     

    I can't (cough) come in to work today, I'm (cough) not feeling (cough) too good. BANG! Got'em!

    Good work from Andy X:

    Always enjoy your blog. Always hated jocks who are in politics, so I enjoyed reading about your take on the Oklahoma race and the usual GOP hypocrisy of Steve Largent. Something struck me though, he was hunting in Idaho on September 11??? Wasn't the House in session then? I thought it was, so I when to the legislative calendar on Thomas and sure enough, Congress took it's summer break from Aug 3 to Sept 5, 2001, returning to session on Thursday Sept 6 (gotta give those late starters a few extra days after Labor Day!) and was definitely in session the following week, during which Largent was off hunting in Idaho, rather than doing the "people's bidness"in Washington.Geeze, the guy had just had over a month off - shades of GW Bush - and here he is playing hookey going off hunting once things start up again. I wonder if anybody in Oklahoma noticed or cares.


    posted by tbogg at 11:53 AM

    |

     

    "You like kids? Me too! Can I buy you a Jagermeister?"

    Former father, and current Christian-singles sleaze-bag, Rusty Yates is getting on with his life. Some choice tidbits:

    Attorneys for Andrea Yates, the Houston woman who drowned her five children, can now proceed with her appeal. An anonymous donor last week agreed to pay the roughly $50,000 cost of preparing a transcript of her trial—the first step in launching her appeal.

    ATTORNEY GEORGE PARNHAM wouldn’t identify the donor. But Debbie Holmes, a close friend of Yates’s, questioned why Rusty Yates couldn’t come up with the cash himself to help free his wife. She noted that he recently moved out of the family home into a nearby luxury-apartment complex that boasts a stocked fishing pond, white-sand beach, resort-style pool with cabana and gym. One-bedroom units in the pink Mediterranean-style complex rent for nearly $1,000 a month.

    Rusty made his wife and 5 children live in a converted Greyhound bus during his old "ball and chain" days. Which leads to this:

    For his part, the NASA shuttle engineer told NEWSWEEK that he moved out of the house where his children died because he wanted to simplify his life. “I don’t want to spend my time cutting tree limbs,” he says. As for the appeal, which he gives only a 30 percent chance of success, Rusty says he’s paid all he’s going to pay. “What I spend on food and lodging is nothing compared to what I’ve paid in legal expenses,” he says. “I’ve lost money in this, not made it. I’ve given all that I want to give.” His pastor, the Rev. Byron Fike, says he remains involved in the church: playing basketball, attending men’s prayer sessions and becoming involved in the singles group.

    “Being apart from Andrea has been an extreme struggle,” he says, adding that he is allowed to hug her only once a month. “Andrea and I need to sit down and work out where we’re going from here.”

    Andrea Yates sits in a cell while Rusty Yates ponders which is better 'seduction' music: Enya or Jars of Clay.

    (Side-note: What kind of singles complex has a "stocked fishing pond"? Oh wait...we're talkin' Texas here, aren't we?)





    posted by tbogg at 11:17 AM

    |

     

    From the Dian Fossey Logbook...

    Noelle Bush, who has been caught twice with drugs, including crack, while in rehab received ten days in jail.

    Ten days.

    So what do the law & order types over at freerepublic think?:


    For whatever it is worth - the judge was black

    Probably was waiting for years to "Stick it to Whitey"

    32 posted on 10/17/02 8:21 AM Pacific by TexanAmerican
    [ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


    posted by tbogg at 10:00 AM

    |

     

    Because they don't have C-SPAN in Norway...

    Lecturer Trond Andresen of the Norwegian Institute of Technology in Trondheim accuses the media of discriminating against the ugly and emphasizing beautiful people whenever possible. Andresen wants higher ugly quotas on television.

    "Ugly people should be spotlighted in the media in the same way that the media wishes to emphasize persons from ethnic minorities," Andresen, a lecture at the Department of Engineering Cybernetics, said to newspaper Bergens Tidende


    posted by tbogg at 8:14 AM

    |

     

    Step one: Admit you have a problem...Step two: Score some crack

    Down in Florida, Judge Whitehead thinks Noelle is doing just dandy:

    Whitehead told Bush he was sending her to jail because he was aware allegations that she was found with crack cocaine in her shoe while at the treatment center.

    Bush's attorney had asked for leniency.

    "I would ask on Noelle's behalf that the sanctions imposed be in the mildest form," Peter Antonacci said. "Although these are serious allegations, we know that she has passed all of her tests."

    Whitehead told Bush that he was disappointed in her but he added he believed she could complete drug treatment successfully and was allowing her to stay in the program.


    posted by tbogg at 7:57 AM

    |

    Wednesday, October 16, 2002

     

    He only comes out at night

    Every night, just when I'm ready to go to bed, I end up checking on Sullivan, which is my equivalent of checking for monsters under the bed. He never fails to disappoint:

    SONTAG AWARD NOMINEE: "When asked by worried friends and acquaintances whether the President was borrowing his geopolitical theory from the diaries of Joseph Stalin and Adolf Hitler, I assured them that the President didn’t have the patience to read more than two or three pages of a Tom Clancy novel." - Lewis Lapham, editor of Harper's, in the print edition of the October issue (discovered by the More Than Zero blog.)

    Now, as I understand the "Sontag Award" it is in reference to putative "anti-Americanism" such as blaming the US for for provoking 9/11, ad nauseum. As I read Lapham's comments, he appears to be criticizing President Coloring Book for his lack of intellectual depth as well as his abbreviated attention span. So it would now seem that Andy has taken the great leap forward and equates criticism of Bush with criticism of America. After all, what's good for President Chimpy is good for the USA...

    Next:

    HE LINKED! It turns out Jim Romenesko actually linked to a piece criticizing the newly leftward spin of the New York Times. I under-estimated him. Let me know the next time he does, will you?

    Here's a better idea, Andrew. How about doing a little work and actually checking Romenesko out yourself instead of sitting on your ass whilst talking out of it, you lazy Tory slacker...



    posted by tbogg at 10:04 PM

    |

     

    If he were here (which he's not) he would say (which he didn't)...

    Uber-Christian and former football player Steve Largent, Republican nominee for governor in Oklahoma got a bit testy the other night on TV and uttered a "vulgaritry".

    OKLAHOMA CITY - Steve Largent, Republican nominee for governor, used a vulgarism during a television interview and one of his opponents quickly aired a commercial criticizing him for it.

    Largent called a question about his whereabouts during the Sept. 11 attacks "bull...." during a taped interview broadcast Sunday night at KOKH, the local Fox affiliate. The word was bleeped. He later issued an apology.

    Largent, a football star turned politician who resigned from Congress to run for governor this year, was hunting in Idaho on Sept. 11, 2001. He didn't learn of the attacks until he emerged from the woods Sept. 13, but in his absence, his staff issued a statement indicating his reaction even though staffers were not in contact with him.

    Largent did not like a question about that and other inquiries from KOKH anchor Andrew Speno, and said the discussion should center on the issues.

    "That's not policy, that's bull..., all this stuff about where were you on 9-11," he said.

    Now, far be it for me to go all Michael-Medved on him about using bad language ("You talk to God with that mouth, boy?"), but I was intrigued by another part from above:

    ...but in his absence, his staff issued a statement indicating his reaction even though staffers were not in contact with him

    "Congressman Largent is deeply saddened by this horrific event"

    "If Congressman Largent were here, we bet he would be horrified and saddened by this event"

    "We can't reach Congressman Largent but we have put in a call to God who speaks to him daily, so we should hear from him soon"

    "Congressman Largent checked in with us and we tried to tell him about this heinous attack on America, but he was so excited about an eight-point buck that he dropped with a lung shot, that he didn't hear a word we said. But we're sure he was saddened by it. The attack. Not the deer. He was pretty excited about that."


    posted by tbogg at 9:31 PM

    |

     

    Just call him Dick Ch-ch-ch-cheneybomb

    It takes a Runaways reference to get to this story.



    posted by tbogg at 8:37 PM

    |

     

    Can I leave a deposit and give you the balance later?

    Call me an old fashioned romantic, but you count me among about 15 million men in America who would like to date this woman in San Francisco.


    posted by tbogg at 8:30 PM

    |

     

    Is anyone suprised this happened in Texas?

    Man hit while chasing half-full beer can across freeway

    Tomorrow at the White House, George Bush will see this and be relieved that it was a man and not a certain coed.


    posted by tbogg at 8:26 PM

    |

     

    Spinsanity takes us for a spin

    As pointed out over at Ruminate This:

    I'm very often on the Spinsanity "side" when they argue against the regular flow of media distortion and lie, but not today. In his piece entitled Congressman says opponents want to protect murderers, Ben Fritz takes issue with Rep. Jim Moran (D-VA) who recently suggested on CNN's Inside Politics, that those who oppose ballistic fingerprinting seek to protect murderers. Sure, Moran's comment is inflammatory to anyone who labors, Come Hell or High Water to protect the interests of the gun lobby. This doesn't surprise me - it's an expected reaction. But, the end result of their irrational insistence on gun anonymity, is a police force unable to effectively investigate crime. What we end up with is a simple truth: criminals are shielded by irresponsible NRA policies.

    I found this very intriguing so I popped on over to Spinsanity to find this:

    In his statement above, Moran is clearly suggesting that opponents of ballistic fingerprinting, which can match a bullet to the gun that fired it, want to protect the sniper or other murderers. This is, of course, absurd and untrue. As White House spokesman Ari Fleischer pointed out today during a press briefing, a variety of concerns have been raised about the accuracy and reliability of such a system, as well as concerns for gun owners’ privacy.

    Which is, of course, a load of crap straight from the NRA's fax machine (still no mention of that sniper, though). The White House's concern about "accuracy and reliability" is in the same vein of their "concern" about global warming, which is, "it's not our agenda or the agenda of those who put us in office, but we're really really really concerned and we'll look into it...never".

    While Spinsanity continues to niggle the fine points of debate, the fact remains that people are dying.

    Spin that.



    posted by tbogg at 12:47 PM

    |

     

    A humble "thank you" for speaking with one voice

    Breaking White House tradition, President George W. Bush presented all 373 lawmakers, who approved his War Resolution, with commemorative t-shirts this morning to mark the historic occasion of their abdication of Congressional responsibility.





    posted by tbogg at 11:12 AM

    |

     

    Who's telling the truth, Bush or the CIA, and can I have a third choice?

    David Corn over at the Nation has some interesting things to say:

    Can George W. Bush be trusted as he further heats up the rhetoric on Iraq?

    Two days after a horrific bomb blast in Bali, Indonesia, killed over 180 people--including at least two Americans--Bush, appearing at a Republican campaign rally in Michigan, cited the assault as yet another reason for vigorous prosecution of the war on terrorism. But as he rallied the GOP loyalists, he focused less on al Qaeda (which, naturally, is suspected of being associated with the Bali attack) and more on Saddam Hussein. Bush maintained that the Iraqi dictator hopes to deploy al Qaeda as his own "forward army" against the West, that "we need to think about Saddam Hussein using al Qaeda to do his dirty work, to not leave fingerprints behind," and that "this is a man who we know has had connections with al Qaeda."

    Bush and his administration have offered no proof of any of this. In fact, less than a week before the Michigan event, the CIA had released a letter noting that it had no evidence that Saddam intends to commit terrorism against the United States, absent a US strike against him. (Did the President miss the newspapers that day?) The Agency's conclusion is hardly consistent with Bush's claim that Saddam is actively engaged in turning Osama bin Laden's terrorist network into his own private force. And while the CIA, in that same letter, noted--vaguely--that it possesses "solid reporting of senior level contacts between Iraq and al Qaeda going back a decade," that, too, is a far cry from Bush's assertion that Saddam has had direct ties with al Qaeda. [For more on the CIA letter, click on the link for the previous column at the end of this posting.]

    Why doesn't Bush make it easy for himself?

    snip

    So why doesn't Bush? The obvious answer is, he can't. And the public should not fall for any attempt on the administration's part to play the if-you-only-knew-what-we-know card. The CIA has already presented the best case it can make (or manufacture) out of the classified evidence available to it. Moreover, as The Los Angeles Times, reported a few days ago, those CIA conclusions where produced in an environment in which "senior Bush administration officials are pressuring CIA analysts to tailor their assessments of the Iraqi threat to help build a case against Saddam Hussein.

    snip

    It's like Scrabble. If no one challenges Bush's words--false they may be--they still count as if they were real

    Read the article...then email it to your friends.




    posted by tbogg at 10:56 AM

    |

     

    Bush to cut ribbon on Operation Inigo Montoya, Lieberman hands him the scissors

    WASHINGTON –– President Bush is looking to prod the United Nations to declare resolve on Iraq as he formally accepts Congress' go-ahead for military action against Saddam Hussein.

    Bush summoned about 100 supportive lawmakers to the White House to join him Wednesday as he signed into law the newly passed resolution authorizing the use of force. A senior administration official said Bush would use a speech at the East Room ceremony to press the U.N. to adopt a new resolution compelling Iraq to submit to unconditional weapons inspections.

    The president's message came on a day when the U.N. Security Council is holding its first day of open debate on Iraq at the behest of the dozens of non-Security Council nations who oppose an attack on Baghdad. The debate is mostly designed to take the administration to task on its Iraq policies, and White House officials expected sharp criticism throughout the day.

    That resolution is like a dollar in Bush's pocket that he can't wait to spend. Not that President Bunnypants is anxious to go to war or anything. He's still mulling it over, because he doesn't want to do anything rash. So we'll just have to wait and see what he decides.



    posted by tbogg at 8:42 AM

    |

     

    Okay. Next Wednesday looks good. Now excuse me while I claw my eyes out...

    Charities find nude calenders help pay the bills.

    The groups range from female wool spinners who seek to confront "the ageism and size ism in our culture" to the Rotary Club in Brattleboro, Vt.

    The Rotarians persuaded 53 men -- bankers, lawyers, real estate agents and physicians -- to appear mostly nude in its 2003 "Men of Brattleboro" calendar

    Ew.


    posted by tbogg at 7:56 AM

    |

     

    I see Andy has been shopping at Duh? Depot

    A blinding glimpse of the obvious:

    I've been reluctant to say this till now, but it's my belief that what the D.C. sniper is now doing is terrorism. I don't mean he's a member of any specific group necessarily or even a person who might call himself a terrorist. I mean someone - a criminal - whose goal, whose purpose, is purely terror.





    posted by tbogg at 7:50 AM

    |

     

    Maybe it's because Bush can't pronounce "ballistic"

    Before the selection, the NRA said they would have an office in the White House. Self Made Pundit shows us they weren't kidding.


    posted by tbogg at 7:43 AM

    |

    Tuesday, October 15, 2002

     

    Like Dahmer giving tips on vegetarianism

    War lover Michael Kelly thinks George and George W. both should get the Nobel Peace Prize. No. Really.

    Of course, it's impossible to lift up the Bush boys without knocking someone else down.

    And in these terms, what, exactly, has Carter done? His great achievement as president, in this regard, was to broker a peace agreement in 1979 between Egypt and Israel. This was a good thing, but it did not -- 617 Israelis dead these past two years, 1,909 Palestinians -- actually result in peace.

    As an ex-president perpetually and self-proclaimedly in the pursuit of peace, Carter has put in more amiable sofa time with more despots than anyone except perhaps Kofi Annan (who, come to think of it, was last year's peace prize winner). But what has he actually achieved -- as measured in concrete terms, such as the downfall of tyrannies, the liberation of peoples, actual victories over war and war's fruit, subjugation? Very little. (See wretched, oppressed, dictator-ruled Haiti before Carter's 1994 peace mission; see wretched, oppressed, dictator-ruled Haiti today.)

    The fact that Carter got Egypt and Israel together was unheard of at the time, an enormous step. And that Habitat for Humanity thing? Not "Pax-Americana-big-picture" enough for Mikey. You see, Kelly prefers his peace to come from war:

    The first President Bush marshaled an army that reversed the gains of an illegal war and liberated 2 million people from a spectacularly vicious foreign occupation. This was not a small or ambivalent or symbolic accomplishment. One day, occupied Kuwait was a place of grand-scale, state-sanctioned murder, rape, torture and theft. The next day it was not; it was, again, a country at peace. The sole reason for this peace was the war brought by the American president.

    The fact that we are about to go to war with Iraq again, seems lost on Kelly. Turmoil in the Middle East for Carter (thirty years later) = failure. Turmoil in Iraq for both Bush (eleven years later) = success! Where's my trophy?

    Kelly then finishes by throwing in a healthy dollop of hairy-chest-beating, ugly-americanism about all of the wars that American has won to free people the world over.

    Wars, by the way, that Kelly had no part in.

    Go team.



    posted by tbogg at 10:37 PM

    |

     

    All the news that doesn't embarass us

    Thought I would check in with my good buddies over at the NRA to see what they make of this guy exercising his second amendment rights in their neck of the woods.

    As a public service the NRA has a Top Headlines section that currently lists:

    • Attacks prove urgency of war

    • Al Qaeda active in Indonesia

    • U.S. 'in the dark' on bin Laden note

    • Pakistan coalition wants U.S. out

    • 'Alive' Crash Survivors Win Reunion Rugby Match


    Hmmm. Iraq, Indonesia, Afghanistan, Pakistan, and cannibalism. Nope. Nothing about the sniper. You would think they would be, at least, mildly interested, but I guess not. Maybe someone should call Wayne LaPierre...








    posted by tbogg at 9:35 PM

    |

     

    Dude. I wish we still had some of those berries...I've got, like, the major munchies...

    Alaskan youth trade berries for pot.

    It was unlike anything the village of Emmonak had ever experienced: All over town salmon berries, blackberries and blueberries were disappearing from freezers.

    "We knew something fishy was happening," said resident Darlene Andrews.

    It's good to know that you can't slip anything by the very alert Darlene Andrews.



    posted by tbogg at 8:10 PM

    |

     

    More news from Pravda, comrade

    This is what happens when you don't have the right to arm bears.

    Bears push rocks down from mountains to kill people

    The road between the two Russian resort cities Adler and Krasnaya Polyana is becoming more and more dangerous for drivers and passengers. Piles of rocks tumble down upon people’s heads. Dozens of people have already suffered, and several of them died. Law-enforcement bodies blame road services for this.



    posted by tbogg at 8:01 PM

    |

     

    Who I did on my summer vacation...

    Apparently there are some really old laws still on the books in Georgia:

    The Georgia Supreme Court this afternoon hears a challenge to the state fornication law, which makes it a crime for a person to have sexual intercourse outside of wedlock.

    The appeal is being filed by lawyers of a 16-year-old boy who was found having sex with his girlfriend. The girl's mother found the two in her Fayette County home. The boy, identified in court papers as J.M., was sentenced in Juvenile Court to pay a fine and write an essay.

    Essay begins:

    I am a junior at a small high school in Fayette County and I never thought this would happen to me.....





    posted by tbogg at 7:57 PM

    |

     

    Dennis Miller joins Chachi in the unemployment line

    Remember Dennis Miller? The frighteningly awkward Monday Night Football commentator whose best days were back when SNL was still vaguely funny? With a routine that has gotten as stale as last year's watermelon-sledging stand-up, he's still getting a bit of work.

    Mr. Rant is really on the warpath this time.

    No warm-up, no coaxing, no setups. And no whining about losing both of his TV jobs — with HBO and "Monday Night Football" — in the same year. Dennis Miller comes out swinging.

    He's coming to Seattle to rip U.S. Rep. Jim McDermott a new one, he promises on the phone from his Los Angeles home one recent morning.

    "What do you think? Do you think going to the capital city of your enemy and calling your president a liar is a good move? Is that how liberal it's gotten up there?"


    snip

    None of that means that his viewpoints are mellowing. Ask him about Iraq. He's got this one in the chamber:

    "I think we should invade tomorrow. I think we should put it on Pay Per View and sell bobble-head dolls. And you know something? I would make our demands on Hussein really incredibly specific. I'd say, 'Listen, pal, I want you to shave the left side of your mustache and I want you to go on Al Jazeera TV next week and dance like Kevin Bacon at the end of 'Footloose,' or we're coming in."

    Not that the situation would be any better if Al Gore were president. Although he's no conservative, Miller detests Gore.

    "If he was in there right now, this would be more hysterical than a drag queen returning a pair of shoes without a receipt."

    Um. yeah.

    If you can't make it as a ranter doing schtick with Bush, Ashcroft, and Rummy in office, it's retirement time, Chachi. Make room on Hollywood Squares 2003. Bottom corner. On the right.

    (thanks to Steve for this catch)




    posted by tbogg at 1:42 PM

    |

     

    One more link worth reading

    Rittenhouse Review does a terrific job on a recent David Brooks article in The Weekly Standard. Can just one neo-con get through just one article on the coming war and it's detractors without mentioning Noam Chomsky?

    I didn't think so.


    posted by tbogg at 10:39 AM

    |

     

    Ruminate This

    ...has a nice take on Instapundit's intsa-jumping to to insta-conclusions. Well written, as usual.


    posted by tbogg at 10:05 AM

    |

     

    Visit No More Mr Nice Blog

    Take the David Duke/Ann Coulter challenge.


    posted by tbogg at 9:44 AM

    |

     

    Another reason why it's worth it to suscribe to to Top Five

    If you don't already have a subscription to Top Five...well, you should. It is consistently funny and a showcase for some of the really bright minds floating around out there.

    Yesterday's list is a keeper:

    The Top 12 Least Convincing Reasons to Start a War

    12> We've got a buttload o' missiles about to go past their "use by" date.

    11> Iraqis getting just a little too smug about having uninterrupted electricity for three months straight now.

    10> There's nothing *else* worth watching on TV this season.

    9> Their leader employed a weapon of mass destruction last time he visited, completely laying waste to a Camp David bathroom.

    8> They're a bunch of dangerous, narrow-minded religious fanatics who totally refuse to embrace Jesus as their personal savior.

    7> Peanut butter in our chocolate, chocolate in their peanut butter.

    6> Our boys are gonna get blue balls if they don't set off some ordnance soon!

    5> Midterm elections are approaching and I desperately need to distract the traumatized populace from a collapsing economy ravaged by my gross incompetence. Er, I mean, wooooooooo1! Look at the bogeyman!

    4> Jenna's new boyfriend? Private First Class.

    3> My god put too little oil under my country, and your god put too much under yours.

    2> They're just not sophisticated enough to entrust with nucular weapons.


    and Topfive.com's Number 1 Least Convincing Reason to Start a War...


    1> Just noticed: Them guys is Araby-lookin'!

    Some extra's:

    According to our intelligence offices in Guam, American Samoa and the US Virgin Islands, this aggressor plans to take over several small neighboring countries.

    "Hello! My name is Inigo Montoya! You tried to kill my father. Prepare to die!"

    Stabilizing the economy doesn't seem to be working out so well.

    "He was all, 'Oh, yeah?' and I was all, 'Shut up!' and he was all, 'Make me.'"

    Amway is in desperate need of new territories.

    Dad had one.

    Forgot to get secretary of defense anything for Columbus Day.

    Rumsfeld keeps double-dog daring you to do it.



    posted by tbogg at 9:37 AM

    |

     

    Showing up for Dick

    Energy Secretary Spencer Abraham made a rare public appearance in Michigan yesterday with President Bush at political fundraiser for Republican candidate Dick Posthumous, whose name is oh-so-ironic and almost as funny as Dick Armey.


    posted by tbogg at 8:11 AM

    |

     

    Laura Bush's "Engorged on Reading" program a big hit in Maryland

    To most, McKeldin Library is an attractive place for learning, free of the clamor of dormitory living and filled with an endless collection of books and periodicals.



    posted by tbogg at 7:59 AM

    |

     

    We saw the blue screen of death and panicked

    Authorities evacuated a United Airlines plane at Sea-Tac Airport Monday night as a precaution after a laptop computer was found on board that didn't belong to any of the current passengers.



    posted by tbogg at 7:50 AM

    |

     

    I was a boy-toy for the marginally talented

    Neat-o. Justin Timberlake, who was a singer in one of those interchangeable boy bands that I can't tell apart, is recording a duet with with noted batshit-crazy-woman, Mariah Carey. Oh, and they've been "romatically linked", too. But, according to the story, he has also been "romantically linked" to stunningly untalented Britney Spears, Janet Jackson whose career is a death spiral, and over-emoting, won't-she-shut-the-hell-up Christina Aguilera who appears to be so moronic that McDonalds could probably get some of that government hire-the-handicap money if they took her in.

    Quite frankly, all this Timberlake "romantic linking" has a Tom Cruise-vibe to it, if you know what I mean....

    Anyway, the thin- voiced Timberlake has been paired with the agressively manic-depressive Carey for a single on her next album, which nobody will buy because they are both soooo two years ago. By the end of next year, Timberlake will be asking the public if that was a venti or grande mochachino. Carey, on the other hand, will be doing modeling work for a company that manufactures really slutty-looking straitjackets.



    posted by tbogg at 7:34 AM

    |

    Monday, October 14, 2002

     

    Jeb! In! Trouble!

    Oh, sure , it's from Drudge, but we can dream can't we? I mean, it's not like they're going to let everyone vote, or even count the votes for that matter.

    I don't think that the voters of Florida should throw out Jeb! just because his brother is an inside-trading, election-stealing, half-witted, drunken, lying, inarticulate, war-time deserter with an oedipal complex, who is willing to let 50,000 servicemen die in Iraq to secure the oilfields for his buddies in the energy bidness. That would be wrong. They should throw Jeb! out because he sucks as a governer, a father, and a man.



    posted by tbogg at 9:29 PM

    |

     

    Sorry. The RNC fax machine was broken.

    According to the Washington Post:

    President Bush acknowledged at a campaign rally today that he is worried about the stagnant job market, as the Republican Party prepared to warn candidates that most voters think the economy is going the wrong way.

    snip

    The heightened focus by Bush on the economy -- and the effort to shift culpability to Democrats -- came as the Republican National Committee was ready to send a memo to its campaigns on Tuesday reporting that internal GOP polling shows that the economy is the most important issue to voters, followed by terrorism and education.

    "The public continues to be very concerned about the economy and is somewhat less optimistic than they were a few months ago," wrote Matthew Dowd, who was Bush's campaign pollster and is now the party's polling consultant. "Further, a majority of the public thinks the economy is going in the wrong direction."

    Which would mean that the much-maligned NY Times poll last week was correct.

    But..but, you say, Andy Sullivan and David Tell and Dick Morris (who is never wrong) all said that the poll was wrong, that it was biased, that is was...oh never mind. Consider the source.

    We will expect a Krugman-like apology from Andy somtime time on Tuesday..or Wednesday..or never.





    posted by tbogg at 9:19 PM

    |

     

    If you got in here...congratulations.

    blogger has been experiencing some difficulties today. But we can't complain...it's free.


    posted by tbogg at 6:14 PM

    |

     

    Been a long time since I moved my bowels, yeah yeah

    Geezer rockers Led Zeppelin are hitting the road again. Look for the Rocking Across America with Our Left Blinker Blinking Tour to hit your town.



    posted by tbogg at 3:02 PM

    |

     

    Overheard at the Christian Coalition Conference this past weekend

    "If we want God to grant us victory ... we should arm ourselves with several tools, including a return to God through repentance, honest work and true intentions, [and] to unite under God. If it is true that conflict and differences are the main reasons for failure ... it is true that unity, consensus and faith are the key to victory and the gate to domination."

    Not-invited speaker.


    posted by tbogg at 2:14 PM

    |

     

    Sevice packs soon to follow

    Nina over at Table Talk shares this link:

    "I've started referring to the proposed action against Iraq as Desert Storm 1.1, since it reminds me of a Microsoft upgrade: it's expensive, most people aren't sure they want it, and it probably won't work."--Kevin G. Barkes


    posted by tbogg at 1:25 PM

    |

     

    Okay. The guy who wins the Risk tournament this weekend, gets to push the button.

    Unfortunately it looks like the war will be conducted by people at the Pentagon who aren't actual military, but play like they are in the administration. Bob Novak seems worried:

    If there is a precise plan for action to remove Saddam Hussein from power, general officers at the Pentagon tell members of Congress that they are in the dark. This may be another example of Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld working with a small circle of both official and unofficial advisers, fostering concern among career officers that plans are not being sufficiently reviewed by military experts.

    Hawkish civilians, in and out of the government, have been suggesting that Saddam's elite Republican Guard will throw up its arms in surrender. No serious person believes that. The question is whether an uprising of the persecuted Shia majority will be enough to overthrow the Baghdad regime without heavy application of U.S. force. If there is no effective revolt, the generals and their friends on Capitol Hill worry that the unknown plans may not call for sufficient U.S. forces.

    Like everything else since President Fool Me Once was appointed, it gets worse:

    What most bothers the generals, however, is Rumsfeld's preference for outside advice. For example, sources say a frequent consultant with the secretary is former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, an amateur military expert and member of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board. There is no distribution through the Pentagon of such advice.

    Good lord. If he starts talking to Tom Clancy, I'm moving to Canada.








    posted by tbogg at 11:45 AM

    |

     

    1, 2, 3, 4..We don't want your oil war

    Thanks to Chris over at TT, here is a way to get involved against the coming war:

    No war with Iraq



    posted by tbogg at 9:59 AM

    |

     

    Cheney sits in his mountain-top lair, rubbing his hands together and sneering, "Yessss...excellent"

    Some of the good folks over at Table Talk suggest that the Tarot Card Killer may be part of a government plot.

    In the early 1960s, America's top military leaders reportedly drafted plans to kill innocent people and commit acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war against Cuba.

    Code named Operation Northwoods, the plans reportedly included the possible assassination of Cuban émigrés, sinking boats of Cuban refugees on the high seas, hijacking planes, blowing up a U.S. ship, and even orchestrating violent terrorism in U.S. cities.
    The plans were developed as ways to trick the American public and the international community into supporting a war to oust Cuba's then new leader, communist Fidel Castro.


    America's top military brass even contemplated causing U.S. military casualties, writing: "We could blow up a U.S. ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba," and, "casualty lists in U.S. newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national indignation."

    How sad that this administration makes this sound all too plausible....



    posted by tbogg at 9:32 AM

    |

     

    Would she listen if we sent her a Candygram?

    Apparently Diane Feinstein doesn't hear so well these days.

    In San Francisco, groups are planning sit-ins at Sen. Dianne Feinstein’s office to protest her vote for the resolution after the California Democrat expressed opposition to it a few weeks ago. Efforts to persuade her to oppose the resolution failed despite 11,000 calls that her office logged in the week before the vote, with only 150 of those calls supporting the resolution.

    Even House Minority Whip Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who opposed the resolution (after receiving 12,000 calls from constituents in three weeks, with only 20 of those supporting the resolution), is getting calls complaining about Feinstein’s vote. Brendan Daley, Pelosi’s press secretary, said her office had received a few hundred angry calls regarding Feinstein’s vote Friday morning.

    This makes me soooooo glad I contributed to her campaign.

    Never again.


    posted by tbogg at 9:15 AM

    |

     

    Iran makes peace offering to the US

    Responding to a recent Congressional authorization allowing President Cartman to wage war whenever and wherever he pleases, Iraq has offered to assasinate a hate-mongering religious zealot who hates America and the freedom for which it stands.

    Since it is bad form and an insult to their culture to refuse such a gift, I think it is only right that we humbly accept this offer.



    posted by tbogg at 8:53 AM

    |

     

    O send thy light forth and thy truth; let them be guides to me. And bring me to thine holy---excuse me? You gonna eat those fries?

    White House staffers get together at lunch to study the Bible.

    Too bad they didn't spend more time reading inteligence reports before September 11.


    posted by tbogg at 8:40 AM

    |

     

    War name extra's

    Some war name submission came with explanantions. Here are a few:

    T-ball's daddy named the invasion of Panama "Operation
    Just Cause". In keeping with this spirit, and
    admitting the administration's shifting rationale for
    attacking Iraq, how about "Operation Just 'cause"?

    The answer is in the name of the Contest: Bush's War. He missed/avoided his chance to serve during the Vietnam War, and like most of those dodgers, he is now suffering recriminations. In his infantile mind, he will make up for his failings 30 years ago, but this time he actually gets to "preside" over a war rather than actually suffer through one

    Because (a) W. is such a panty-waist momma’s boy;
    and because (b) his war is merely an echo of
    daddy’s Desert Shield; and because (c) the war is
    designed to ‘protect Bush’ from being stained by
    the fallout of the hemorrhaging economy; I
    propose to call the war OPERATION PANTY SHIELD.






    posted by tbogg at 8:33 AM

    |

     

    It's name that war day

    In no particular order, here are the submissions for Name That War

    Pissing into the Whirlwind

    Operation Bushwacked

    Operation: You Tried to Kill My Dad

    Operation: Because I Can (and I have a small penis)

    Operation Enduring Pretext

    Bush Saddam II: This Time It's Personal

    Operation OhMyPapa

    Operation Protecting America's Natural Resources Overseas

    The War of the Posers

    Operation My Name is Inigo Montoya

    War of the Fraternities: Towel Fight!

    Dubya Dubya III

    The Empire Strikes First

    Operation Emasculation

    Operation War Ain't Really That Bad, Is It? I mean, I really don't know, I'm askin', ya know?

    Operation by Milton Bradley

    Operation Congressional Abdication

    Operation Vietnam Redux

    OPERATION BAG FOR DAD

    Operation "So Damn Insane

    World War W

    OPERATION 'AVENGE POPPY

    Operation Poppy's Revenge

    “Fool my Dad once...shame on...um...Fool me the second time...uh...Hell, I'm goin' to Texas."

    Operation Ooching Toward Oil

    Operation Encourage Consumption

    Operation Working Class Warrior

    Operation Rich Man Deferment


    Although my personal favorite was: Operation My Name is Inigo Montoya.
    The name with the most submissions was the most obvious one:

    World War III

    Thanks to everyone who submitted…


    posted by tbogg at 8:27 AM

    |

    Sunday, October 13, 2002

     

    ....and the war names are!:

    ...coming tomorrow morning.

    I'm tired....wanna go to bed...sleepy...very sleepy........


    posted by tbogg at 9:50 PM

    |

     

    The horror...the horror...

    Atrios over at Eschaton has a picture up of Ari Fleischer when he was still in his pupa stage before he emerged from his cocoon as a full fledged weasel.

    At least he isn't wearing a spread collar and gold chains that, I hear, makes people look gay.

    Because that would be bad.

    Especially in Montana.


    posted by tbogg at 9:37 PM

    |

     

    Saddam on the beach

    Andy Sullivan (again) making a connection that isn"t there:

    THE BELL TOLLS AGAIN: I've been to Bali, with my old friend Max Kennedy, almost fifteen years ago. It's a blessed little place - about as quiet and secluded and out of it as any place on earth. A mixture of Hindu culture, ancient animism, stoners from Australia, and skinny, pale Euro-hikers, it was a little bohemia all its own. Now these monsters have struck again, incinerating innocents in their murderous religious rage. There is no good here. And although Mike Kinsley will scoff at me for saying it, there is much evil. The target is not accidental. Having fun, mixing cultures, partying till dawn are all wonderful human activities that these dour murderers loathe. They hope that by targeting the "sinful," they might even be excused by less extreme Muslims. The only good news is that Indonesia may now better understand what it's up against; and the full inclusion of a moderate Muslim country against these Islamofascists will help greatly. The Brits and Australians, who were again among the dead, have already been spectacular in the war on terror. But perhaps now that more Germans have been murdered, Chancellor Schroder will rethink his hostility to confronting Saddam and his terrorist allies[my emphasis]

    Would someone please explain to Andy for the umpteenth time that Saddam runs a secular state, that Osama hates him, and that we recognize that he is trying to link the two together just so he can use his neologism that he is soooo proud of: Islamofascists. Writing about the Bali tragedy just so you can use your new catch phrase is a sign of.... Sulli-vanity.

    See. You can play at home.

    One more Andy note: Sully thinks that the Taylor ads in Montana were gay-themed because...well...he should know. But I have to wonder if Andy's sudden fascination with the Taylor campaign stems from the fact that big contributors to Mike the Hairdresser go by the name of Taylor Rough Riders.

    I bet that puckered Andy's nipples....



    posted by tbogg at 9:26 PM

    |

     

    Following the Mass and the rugby match, we'll be having a barbeque over by the bleachers

    1972 Andes crash survivors reunite




    posted by tbogg at 12:16 PM

    |

     

    Filling in for Lynne...Glenn Kessler and Peter Slevin

    Glenn Kessler & Peter Slevin of the Washington Post do a wonderful job servicing the hard-to-find and even harder-to-subpoena Dick Cheney. I know that if I want to get to know the real Dick Cheney, the behind-the-scenes, no-holds-barred Dick Cheney, I will immediately run to completely neutral Paul Wolfowitz who is, like, totally unbiased:

    “He is as concerned as any human being I know about the danger of a much more serious terrorist attack on the United States, that Sept. 11 was only the beginning,” said Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz, who said Cheney “was influenced significantly by the developing intelligence on Iraq in general and al Qaeda in particular.”

    To see how Cheney developed his world view, Kessler & Slevin point out that:

    While a student at Yale University in the early 1960s, Cheney took a course with H. Bradford Westerfield, then a conservative foreign policy specialist in the tradition of Sen. Henry “Scoop” Jackson (D-Wash.). Westerfield, who also taught George W. Bush a few years later, said he stressed the long-term global contest for freedom, promoting the idea that it was permissible to overthrow regimes if it would bring the new government within the Western alliance.

    Cheney remembers little of the specifics of the course, but it hooked him on political science.

    That Cheney is hazy on the specifics of the course is unsuprising as he was busy at the time flunking out of Yale and avoiding the draft. But he, liked, aced, that class...

    To show how farsighted this great man is, we learn:

    Cheney was defense secretary when in 1991 Bush’s father chose to halt the Persian Gulf War with Hussein still in power. Cheney has never publicly second-guessed his support of that decision. But, even then, he was keenly interested in Iraq’s possible use of chemical and biological weapons. He ordered a secret study when he felt that Powell, then chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was not taking the problem seriously enough.

    It was also one of the first thoughts that jumped to his mind as he watched the World Trade Center towers collapse while he was sitting in the White House’s underground bunker. “As unfathomable as this was,” Cheney said to an aide as they stared at the television, “it could have been so much worse if they had weapons of mass destruction.”

    Like Nostradamus with a bad ticker, he had a premonition of things to come.......(cue ominous music)

    They then conclude:

    The situation was “worse than a vacuum,” a senior official said. “The wrong arguments were out there. It was a period when, in the absence of making a case, there was a lot of air time being filled by other people.”

    Cheney concluded that the administration couldn’t wait. He mentioned to Bush that he planned to give a speech on Iraq, and the president contributed a few suggestions, officials recounted. Then, the day before the speech, Cheney laconically mentioned that the speech would be “pretty tough.”

    “Tough?” Bush asked.

    “Yep,” Cheney said.

    “Okay,” Bush replied

    Tom Clancy couldn't have written it any better. No, really. Clancy couldn't.




    posted by tbogg at 11:56 AM

    |

     

    The Bush family...American Royalty

    A couple of readers delicately pointed out that I may have gone over the line by infering that Jenna Bush might be giving oral pleasure to drunken frat boys down at U of T. I will reluctantly agree. As a member of the distinguished Bush family made up of Presidents, former Presidents, Senators, Governors, smugglers, corrupt Savings and Loan executives, inside traders, stalkers, and the '"chemically inhanced", Ms. Bush deserves better than this. In the future I will accord her all of the respect that the lovely Jenna deserves, subject, of course, to any future run-ins she may have with the law.

    Oh. And Jenna dear, you may want to try sampling some of those lite beers. They're less filling, and I hear they taste great.


    posted by tbogg at 11:28 AM

    |

    Friday, October 11, 2002

     

    Weekend update

    Since readership goes down on the weekend faster then Jenna at a frat party, I'm going to take a little time off until Sunday night. I just started Comic Book Nation, and I promised myself I would make a dent in it this weekend. That, and reacquaint myself with my family ("Didn't you use to be blonde?"…”When did we buy a pony?”). Remember to keep sending those War Names in. I've already received some good ones. See everyone Monday morning when we’re all pretending to work.




    posted by tbogg at 8:53 PM

    |

     

    The Blog where irony goes to die

    Andy Sullivan shows us that his fans are as clueless as he is.

    SONTAG AWARD NOMINEE: "It is not enough for Bush to be President of the United States, he must become the Emperor of the World. This unclothed emperor is, as they say in Texas, all hat and no brains. In the years before us, I fear there will be causes worth dying for. There will be tyrants so unstoppable that we will have to fight them to preserve our own freedom. But that is not the case now. Instead of standing up against tyranny, we are bringing it to our own doorstep. We have met the enemy, and it is us." - Glenda Gilmore, professor of history, Yale University.

    UPDATE: From a Texas reader: "'This unclothed emperor is, as they say in Texas, all hat and no brains.' We don't say that. We say: all hat and no cattle. She can't even quote the average Texan right."
    From another Texas reader: "In Texas, we say, 'All hat and no ranch.' Never heard it put that other way. Ever."


    As we say in California, "Duh". Thank you sharing the ignorance, Andy. You really have to get down to Texas someday, you're their kind of folk.





    posted by tbogg at 6:04 PM

    |

     

    Just put those cases of Astroglide over there by the Bibles

    Well, the Christian Coalition's Road To Victory 2002 is happening this week in DC. Beltway hookers are expecting a record breaking weekend with the following special guests attending:

    President George W. Bush, Speaker Dennis Hastert, Majority Leader Dick Armey, Congressman Robert Aderholt, David Barton, Congressman Roy Blunt, Pat Boone, Congressman Henry Brown, Senator Sam Brownback, Congresswoman Jo Ann Davis, Rabbi Yechiel Eckstein, Don Feder, Keith Fournier, Jess Gibson, Congressman Bob Goodlatte, Congressman Lindsey Graham, Congressman Ralph Hall, Congresswoman Melissa Hart, Senator Jesse Helms, Dr. E.V. Hill, Donna Rice Hughes, Congressman Henry Hyde, Senator James Inhofe, Roy Innis, Congressman Ernest Istook, Sujo John, Congressman Walter Jones, Governor Frank Keating, Ambassador Alan Keyes, Rabbi Daniel Lapin, Senator Trent Lott, Senator Mitch McConnell, Judge Roy Moore, Benjamin Netanyahu, Senator Don Nickles, Oliver North, Mayor Ehud Olmert, Father Frank Pavone, Star Parker, Congressman Chip Pickering, Slavik Radchuk, Karl Rove, Phyllis Schlafly, Jay Sekulow, Senator Bob Smith, Congressman Chris Smith, Ken Starr, Secretary Tommy Thompson, Congressman Dave Weldon, Armstrong Williams, Zig Ziglar.

    This doesn't count all of the CC activists that will be in town, away from their loved ones, bringing their hopes and dreams of a Christian America as well as a Bible, a sack lunch, and that jelly dong collection they've been hiding in the back of the sock drawer.

    Praise Jebus and pass the lube.






    posted by tbogg at 5:50 PM

    |

     

    Yeah. I got'cher Nobel Prize right here...More from the Dian Fossey Chronicles

    Feeling kind of Dian Fossey-esque, I decided to venture over to freerepublic and see what the droolers "think" about Jimmy Carter receiving the Nobel Peace Prize.

    During Carter presidency, Iran was converted to a radical Islamic fanatic state; he did not care! They invaded AMERICA, by invading our embasy; he did not care! They captured, tortured our people; he did not care! They would not listen to mediation, or international amissaries; he did not care!
    So when is it appropriate to use force against these worthless ragheads?

    -philosofy123

    ******************

    The history of this award speaks for itself. Mr. Carter can consider himself privileged to be in company of such power hungry, self serving, pusillanimous servants of Lucifer.

    -MoGalahad

    *******************

    The swiss are a bunch of effete pussies, they can take their prize and shove it, the next American nominated should refuse it

    -Rome2000


    ********************

    Carter will probably have it bronzed.

    -Jimer


    *****************

    Excuse me while I go have a full body chemical peel.


    posted by tbogg at 1:22 PM

    |

     

    Dick Cheney? Fat, pasty guy? Does the spasm dance every once in awhile? Nope. Haven't seen him.

    Dick Cheney has been kind of scarce lately. Since we can assume that he isn't all greased up and hiding in a love-nest somewhere with Lynne doing the two-backed beast, we figure that Nicholas Kristof has a good idea why Dick should stay at that undisclosed location for just a few more days.

    President Bush and Vice President Cheney portray Saddam Hussein as so menacing and terrifying that one might think they've lain awake at night for years worrying about him.

    But when Mr. Cheney was running Halliburton, the oil services firm, it sold more equipment to Iraq than any other company did. As first reported by The Financial Times on Nov. 3, 2000, Halliburton subsidiaries submitted $23.8 million worth of contracts with Iraq to the United Nations in 1998 and 1999 for approval by its sanctions committee.

    snip

    Old monsters like Libya, North Korea and Iran have proved — well, not ephemeral, but at least changeable, less terrifying today than they used to be. And the Iraqi threat, for which we're now prepared to sacrifice hundreds or thousands of American casualties, just a few years ago was simply another tinhorn dictatorship where C.E.O. Cheney was earning his bonus.


    posted by tbogg at 12:26 PM

    |

     

    What's Norwegian for "bitch-slapped"?

    Jimmy Carter gets the Nobel Peace Prize...and Bush gets a rock.

    OSLO, Norway - Former U.S. President Jimmy Carter won the Nobel Peace Prize on Friday for his peace mediation efforts and promotion of human rights in what the awards committee said was a criticism of current U.S. policy and "a kick in the leg" to those following the same line.


    The secretive, five-member committee made its decision last week after months of deliberations as it sought the right message for a world still dazed by the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks, the war on terrorism that followed and concern about a possible U.S. military strike against Iraq.

    "It should be interpreted as a criticism of the line that the current administration has taken," Gunnar Berge, chairman of the Nobel committee, said in Norwegian. "It's a kick in the leg to all that follow the same line as the United States."

    Bush was said to take consolation for his Man of the Year Award from the American Enuresis Society for his actions on September 11, 2001.




    posted by tbogg at 8:56 AM

    |

     

    More Friday fun

    More fun than playing "got'cher nose" with President T Ball.

    Ooooo. Aaaaaahhh. Fireworks!


    posted by tbogg at 8:43 AM

    |

     

    Name that conflict!

    Now that Congress has given the car keys to a drunk, it's time to name the new inproved 21st century war.

    Will it be Operation Deserter Storm or Bunnypants Revenge? Apparently Condi Rice has suggested; All Up In Saddam's Face, Uh Huh.. Bush, on the other hand wants to call it: Operation The Economy? Hey, Look! It's Saddam!! Get'em!

    What do you want to call it? The royal "we" presents our first ( because there will be others) Name Bush's War contest. Send your suggestions to tblogg@hotmail.com. I'll post the best on Sunday night. Purchase not required . Void where prohibited by law. Sanitized for your protection.



    posted by tbogg at 8:37 AM

    |

    Thursday, October 10, 2002

     

    I'm sorry. We're out of paradigms today. Can I get you a zeitgeist?

    Peggy Noonan didn't have much to write about this week...but that didn't stop her from writing about it. It's her old standby: everything has changed.

    The bookends of her column:

    Even though everyone says Sept. 11 changed everything in America, I'm not sure we've fully noticed how much it's changed everything. And here's a paradox: All that change may well yield a kind of stasis, at least immediately, at least in the midterm elections.

    snip

    At any rate, the great 2002 paradox: Everything is changing, and not much in this election seems poised to change.

    We are suspended.

    We are waiting to see if there is a war, waiting to see how the world reacts, waiting to see if the war is simple and clean or long and brutal, waiting to see if the war makes us safer or less safe in the long run or short.

    Until then, until the war, one can't help but expect a continuance of suspension. That's how it looks to me today at any rate. Movement that brings stasis, action that maintains the status quo. It seems freaky. But it's a freaky time.

    What lies between these passages is a rather thin gruel of loosely connected anecdotes that would qualify as a post-modern novel if there was anything novel about them and the whole piece wasn't shorter than George Bush's attention span when Ed, Edd and Eddy is coming on. Many of the subjects she mentions might be worthy of a column of their own, but Peggy is loath to pass on this "America has changed" theme that she so loves to fall back upon.

    Part of me wants to agree with the Pegster that America has changed, but that part has to disagree with her on the date. I'm an "America changed on December 9, 2000" kind a guy. That was the day that the Supreme Court decided to stop the vote counting in Florida, casting a permanent shadow on the last branch of government that we thought we could count on. In theory, untainted: in reality, corrupt to the bone. We ceased knowing how our government would work from that point forward because each branch of government went to war with the other, and it seems like we've been off-balance ever since. From secret trials to secret meetings, from month-long Presidential vacations to indeterminate sentences, from government by lack of mandate to government by quiet executive orders. Everything is done on the sly now: a subtle rule change here, lobbyists assuming positions without congressional review there, judicial appointees with no paper trail, and if you do want those papers, or any others, be prepared to file a suit for them. It's all very good-old-boy muddled, done with a wink and a thin-lipped, humorless grin and no need-to-worry-your-pretty-little-head, we know what we are doing. Call it the evil of banality.

    If we can't get passionate, like Peggy says, maybe its because the government won't tell us what they are doing, and the media is too busy admiring the scenery out the side window of the car, when they should be facing forward and telling us where these people are taking us. They both feed us gloss and sound bites, press releases and dog and pony shows, but nothing we can sink our teeth into. It's a symbiotic dance we aren't invited to.

    In this way we have changed because our government and the press has taken an odd turn for the worse. Oddly enough, it is George W Bush himself who provides the words that best describe our ambivalence about his own administration:

    "When I was coming up, it was a dangerous world, and you knew exactly who they were. It was us vs. them, and it was clear who them was. Today, we are not so sure who the they are, but we know they're there.”










    posted by tbogg at 10:46 PM

    |

     

    Looking to party, sailor?

    Micky Kaus finally came out of the closet by offering to service anyone who will run against Max Baucus:

    In an earlier item, I suggested that Sen. Max Baucus of Montana was vulnerable to attack as weak on welfare reform. Apparently, Baucus' GOP opponent, Mike Taylor, attempted to raise the issue earlier this year, and it didn't take. But now Taylor has pulled a Torch and quit the race (after the Democrats ran an ad with archival footage of "Taylor applying lotions to the face of a man siting in the barber chair ....wearing a tight-fitting, three piece suit, with a big-collared open shirt"). ... Perhaps former governer Marc Racicot or Lt. Gov. Karl Ohs -- the rumored Lautenbergs in this potential switcheroo -- will be able to more effectively use the historically potent welfare issue. ... Should Racicot or Ohs (or anyone of either party) want details on Baucus' welfare backsliding, kausfiles stands ready to provide guidance.

    He's to the left of Hillary Clinton on this issue. (Hillary signed on to the more centrist New Democrat Bayh-Carper bill) ... I would guess that

    "BAUCUS -- GUTS WORK REQUIREMENTS FOR WELFARE RECIPIENTS"

    over a nice grainy photo would work well. ...

    Dick Morris is a political hack who pretends he's a journalist. Micky Kaus is a pretend journalist who goes out at night dressed as a political hack. Maybe they should team up. One of them seeks the company of whores, and the other one is available all night if the price is right.








    posted by tbogg at 9:00 PM

    |

     

    Disco Stu drops out part II

    Just because I'm enjoying this Mike Taylor story out of Montana so much, I thought I would share a picture of Disco Mike the Ambiguously Gay Hairdresser.

    Now, I don't see gay when I look at this picture. I see swarthy, which means Disco Mike may want to keep a low profile if Ann Coulter decides she wants to do a little bowhunting in Montana next spring. Of course, compare this picture of Mike then , with Mike now, and we can say that time has not been good to either Mike or disco.

    On the other hand, Ted Olson thinks Mike looks kinda groovy.


    posted by tbogg at 3:26 PM

    |

     

    Businessman Bill Simon likes the look of this baby

    I got this email today:

    Dear ,

    With profound interest and in utmost confidence, I am
    soliciting your immediate assistance or co-operation
    as to enable us round up an opportunity within my
    capability as a result of the death of one of our
    contractor (Beneficiary). You should not be surprised
    as to how I got your contact, you were highly
    recommended to me with the believe that you are
    competent, reliable, Trustworthy and confident.


    I am Dr Emi Frank Chief Auditor, Special Project
    and Foreign Contract Regularization and Disbursement,
    in the Office of the Auditor General of the Federation
    of Federal Republic of Nigeria. We work in hand with
    the Senate Committee on Foreign Contract Payment. Our
    duty is to ensure that all contractors are paid their
    contract sum in due time.


    This last payment quarter, a total of 30 contractors
    were short listed for payment and about 25 of them
    have been paid remaining about 5 (Five), information
    reaching this office indicates that one among the
    remaining has been reported dead. His name is Mr.
    Gerrand Schwartz from Sweden, he died in the last Air
    France Concorde plane crash. Meanwhile he finished the
    execution of his contract December 19th 1999. But
    since his death, nobody has come forward to put a
    claim to his contract fund which is about
    US$15,500,000.00 Million (fifteen Million Five
    Hundred Thousand U.S Dollars) that is why I need your
    immediate assistance to expedite the transfer of the
    contract amount.


    With my position as a Director in the Department of
    Contract Regularisation and Disbursement, I will
    regularize all the necessary documents and present
    your company as the bona-fide beneficiary of this fund
    in as much as you respond within 48 hours for
    respect of this important message. Your unreserved
    cooperation in this business is just what we require
    for a successful and hitch - free transaction.
    Necessary measures to ensure a risk - free and fool
    proof transaction and confidentiality has been taken.


    Kindly signify your interest by replying via my
    personal e -mail address above. Upon receipt of your
    positive reply we shall discuss on (1) Basic Program
    for Operation (2) Financial Status as to ascertain
    your capability. Upon completion of this transaction
    I have decided to give you 30% of the total sum, 60%
    of the fund which is our share will be used for
    investment in your company or in any other company of
    our choice. While10% has been mapped out to take care
    of any minor expenses incurred. Take note that this
    project will last for only 21 working days.


    I expect your response in time (within 48 hours) as
    time is of great essence in this transaction.



    God Bless and Kind Regards,

    Dr Emi Frank

    I'm gonna be rich! So long suckers!!! BWAHAHAHA


    posted by tbogg at 1:32 PM

    |

     

    Dian Fossey moment

    If you can stand the bellowing, hooting, and general feces flinging, freerepublic is fairly entertaining in that soon-to-be-appearing-on-COPS-wearing-a wifebeater-T-and-screaming-at-the-police kind of way. Freerepublic owner, RimJob, provides a public service by providing this forum to people who might otherwise spend their time driving around Maryland thinning out the herd, if you know what I mean.

    Now I won't vouch for the veracity of this, but I find it amusing as all get out:

    Appearing on Mark Larson's Larson Live! radio show (KRLA 870AM Los Angeles, KCBQ 1170AM San Diego and KRLH 590AM in Riverside and San Bernardino) this morning, political strategist Dick Morris was asked about the California governor's race. Noting that the current polls give Davis 45% to Simon's 35%, Morris said that with numbers like that, if the election were held today then Simon would likely win by a small margin. Morris said that an incumbent (Davis) must get credibly close to 50% to have a reasonable chance of victory. The reason is that the challenger has less name recognition among undecided voters, who are likely to break to the challenger as they become more familiar with him. Morris says that, as an experienced campaigner, Davis is well aware of this. Davis is presently calling on Simon to step down after the latest gaffe regarding the illegal fundraising accusations by Simon. Morris said that Davis "being all over Simon" should be regarded as more of a measure of Simon's strength than his weakness.

    And to think that there are actually people who give money to Dick Morris to say and write stuff.

    It's a strange world.





    posted by tbogg at 12:43 PM

    |

     

    Not that there's anything wrong with that

    Senatorial candidate Mike Taylor ...storms off in a huff:

    HELENA, Mont. -- Republican Mike Taylor dropped out of the Senate race against Democratic Sen. Max Baucus on Thursday, with his campaign complaining a Democratic ad portrayed him as a crook and a gay hairdresser.

    Taylor, who was trailing Baucus badly in the polls, said the ad amounted to assassination of character.

    The announcement comes less than a week after Democrats began airing the TV ad accusing Taylor of a scam involving student loan money when he ran a beauty school in Colorado. The ad includes videotape of Taylor from the 1980s in which he is wearing an open-front shirt and gold chains while massaging a man's face.

    Campaign spokesman Bowen Greenwood said Taylor, a married father of two, believes the ad is an attempt by Democrats to portray him as a homosexual.

    I thought they were just trying to portray him as having really really bad taste, even by Montana standards.


    posted by tbogg at 11:40 AM

    |

     

    Elsewhere in the blogosphere

    Lisa at Ruminate This has a wonderful piece about Bush where she makes the all too natural link between alcoholism/intervention and Bush's war.

    David Ehrenstein does a number on Rosenbaum that is well worth the time.

    Preternaturally smart Matthew Yglesias is becoming resigned to war. Too bad, but I know how he feels.







    posted by tbogg at 11:02 AM

    |

     

    Since Nancy Reagan has her hands full these days...

    Future obscure cultural footnote, Erika Harold, who is Miss America 2003 in case you weren't one of the nine people who watched this year's pageant, has been given the go-ahead to preach abstinence to teenagers, who still don't know who she is and will probably never care unless some naked pictures of her pop up like they did with Vanessa Williams which is why she is the only Miss America anybody remembers anymore, plus she's, like, really really hot even in those Radio Shack commercials with Ving Rhames who would probably like to get medieval on her ass if he got the chance. Where was I? Oh, yeah....

    Those who remember Nancy Reagan's "Just Say No" to drugs campaign which ended teenage drug use in America forever and ever, may feel a sense of deja vu as teenagers across the land hear Harold's message and respond by rolling their eyes and pumping their fists in an up and down motion meant to represent, as Mrs Reagan might put it "flogging Ronnie", or masturbation as Ms Harold might call it, if she could just get the word out from between her tightly-clenched, Vaselined- smeared teeth.

    "I don't think the pageant organizers really understood how much I am identified with the abstinence message," Miss Harold told reporters at a ceremony in Oak Brook Terrace to crown her successor as Miss Illinois.

    "If I don't speak about it now as Miss America, I will be disappointing the thousands of young people throughout Illinois who need assurance that waiting until marriage for sex is the right thing to do," she said.

    ...at which point half the reporters were giggling like 10 year-old schoolgirls while the other half were wondering how Miss Harold would look with her ankles behind her ears. Miss Harold then said:

    ...she was subjected to "pervasive racial and sexual harassment" by other students in high school because of her black and American Indian ancestry and her refusal to succumb to sexual advances.

    Students threatened to kill her, and the principal told her, "If you'd only be more submissive like the other girls, this wouldn't happen to you," she said.

    At which point the assembled reporters rolled their eyes and did that "flogging Ronnie" motion with their non-note-taking fists.


    posted by tbogg at 9:33 AM

    |

    Wednesday, October 09, 2002

     

    Um. Okay, Ron. Look, I gotta go, so can you get to the point?

    Sullivan calls this essay by Ron Rosenbaum "wonderfully purgative". Yeah, that's a pretty good word for it, since " wonderfully self-indulgent rhetorical flotsam and jetsam" doesn't have quite the same zing to it.

    If you manage to get through all of Rosenbaum's turgid navel-gazing (order a venti triple shot and mainline it...no, order two), keep in mind my personal favorite quote from it:

    Goodbye to the deluded and pathetic sophistry of postmodernists of the Left, who believe their unreadable, jargon-clotted theory-sophistry somehow helps liberate the wretched of the earth.

    Rosenbaum: heal thyself.


    posted by tbogg at 10:47 PM

    |

     

    "...so then, the policeman said "Leave the money on the bedstand..."

    Okay. It isn't enough that Bill Simon's campaign flamed out again this week with his baseless charge against Gray Davis. But if you read deeper into the story we see this:

    Monty Holden, the current executive director of COPS, which is backing Simon, told reporters that Angele and Davis were in the lieutenant governor's office. Simon acknowledged his campaign, which has donated over $200,000 to COPS, had not sought to verify the authenticity of the photos.

    Simon bought his endorsement from COPS. I'm sorry, he "donated" $200,000 to them for their "consideration" of his "candidacy" which led them, coincidentally, to list him on their mailer of voting recommendations.

    Summation: he gave them $200,000...they gave him crap information and discredited all involved parties.

    Bill Simon. Businessman.





    posted by tbogg at 10:19 PM

    |

     

    I'm not going to be IGNORED!

    Poor Andy.

    Jim Romenesko's MediaNews blog is probably the most-read journalism blog on the web. He covers every minor story out there on the media and most major ones. So why won't he link to stories criticizing the new slant of the New York Times? This week, for example, major pieces in the Weekly Standard and the New York Post, not to mention Kausfiles and this site, all alerted readers to what seems like extraordinary bias in the presentation (yet again) of a New York Times poll. [my emphasis] Romenesko won't touch the story. Previous mentions of criticism of the Times get filed in small print as a the whinings of a bunch of right-wing loonies. Romenesko is free to link to whatever he wants. But he has an agenda for the left and pretends he doesn't. Of course, that's precisely what endears him to the New York Times.

    Romenesko spurns stories by Sullivan, Krugman-stalker Micky Kaus, Dick Morris (smirk), and David Tell. Kind of makes you wonder why Romenesko would take a pass on those titans of journalism. Actually, no it doesn't.

    Andy's constant snivelling comments about being passed over for notice (NY Times recently did a story on blogs and didn't mention him....) are starting to worry me. He's looking like he may take the Sylvia Plath solution any day now.


    posted by tbogg at 9:22 PM

    |

     

    Things that make you say...kill me now

    Remember Pat Boone? The guy who makes Lee Greenwood look like Henry Rollins? Well, he's back and if this doesn't make you shake your head and wonder if god had an aneurysm, I don't know what will:

    Pat Boone to Unveil New Song 'Under God' Oct. 10

    Veteran entertainer, Pat Boone ...


    Will unveil his new song, "Under God," in support of the pledge of allegiance, for members of the U.S. Congress at a press
    conference, hosted by the Natl. Foundation of Women Legislators


    No. Really. Then this:

    When, for years, it was uncool to be publicly patriotic, entertainer Pat Boone was one of the few Hollywood figures to do so anyway. Now he's stepping back up to the patriotic plate with a newly penned anthem supporting the pledge of allegiance, titled "Under God." It's a catchy tune that Boone, 67, just recorded in Los Angeles and plans to release via his own record company, The Gold Label, Oct. 15. Long a favorite of the military and hard core patriots, Boone, who's starred in numerous films, on TV and records, recently starred in an album, DVD and PBS Special, all titled "American Glory." On Thurs., Oct. 10, Boone unveils the song
    in Washington before a group of women legislators.


    According to a Newsweek magazine poll, 84 percent of Americans think references to God are acceptable in school and other public settings. Not surprisingly, Boone, who also wrote the unofficial national anthem of Israel, The Exodus Song," wants the words,
    "under God," to remain a part of the pledge, a precedent now being challenged in a San Francisco court. First penned in 1892, the
    pledge has undergone various revisions over the years, most recently in 1954 when the Knights of Columbus lobbied Congress to
    add the words, "Under God," which it did.


    Patriots on both sides of the aisle are already calling Boone to up to get advance copies of the song.

    You know...I thought I was embarassed to be an American with President "Keep good relations with the Grecians" at the helm, but Christ in a tubetop, this is friggin' appalling...

    Thanks to Maia for bringing this to my attention...I think.





    posted by tbogg at 7:32 PM

    |

     

    ...and they say that all politicians are liars...

    Congressman Pete Stark lays it on the line:

    “Let us not forget that our President -- our Commander in Chief – has no experience with, or knowledge of, war. In fact, he admits that he was at best ambivalent about the Vietnam War. He skirted his own military service and then failed to serve out his time in the National Guard. And, he reported years later that at the height of that conflict in 1968 he didn’t notice ‘any heavy stuff going on.’”

    “So we have a President who thinks foreign territory is the opponent’s dugout and Kashmir is a sweater.

    “What is most unconscionable is that there is not a shred of evidence to justify the certain loss of life. Do the generalized threats and half-truths of this Administration give any one of us in Congress the confidence to tell a mother or father or family that the loss of their child or loved one was in the name of a just cause?

    “Is the President’s need for revenge for the threat once posed to his father enough to justify the death of any American?

    “I submit the answer to these questions is no.







    posted by tbogg at 7:06 PM

    |

     

    It's a fine whine, with a sly drool undertone and just a hint of old man smell

    Strom Thurmond, (R-pooped his pants again) took time out from dying today to complain that Patrick Leahy, (D-Vermont) lied to him by not holding a hearing for yet another of Bush's whackaloon court nominees.

    You would think that Strom would be using his last minutes on earth to ponder why God would let a disgusting sack of grease like himself live to be a 100 when a great guy like Darryl Kile, who had a really good cut fastball, had to die at age 34. Even the Pope can't explain that one, and he's knock knock knockin' on heaven's door his own bad self.

    Meanwhile President Thank God for Childproof Caps is getting really steamed because the Democrats won't rubberstamp his collection of fundamentalist crackers and corporate suck-asses to lifetime Judicial appointments:

    Besides Shedd, one of those stranded would be Miguel Estrada, Bush's choice for the U.S. Appeals Court in the District of Columbia and a rumored choice for a Supreme Court seat if a vacancy should open.

    Bush also blasted the Senate over Estrada.

    "There are senators who are playing politics with this good man's nomination," Bush said, receiving a standing ovation at a White House celebration of Hispanic Heritage Month. "There are senators who would rather not give him the benefit of the doubt, [my emphasis] senators looking for a reason to defeat him as opposed to looking for a reason to herald his intelligence, his capabilities his talent. I strongly object to the way this man is going to be treated in the United States Senate."

    "Benefit of the doubt"? Excuse me, but a bunch of people did that for Bush in the election of 2000, when we had peace and prosperity, and look how that turned out.

    As Bush might say "Fool me once...uh...fool me twice...won't get fooled again...Karen! This is tooooo hard!!!"


    posted by tbogg at 2:05 PM

    |

     

    Dig your own hole

    Just when Doug Forrester was about to run off with the title of America's Biggest Ass Clown, Bill Simon snatches it from his grasp:

    Republican candidate Bill Simon on Wednesday conceded that his allegation that Gov. Gray Davis illegally accepted a campaign check inside the state Capitol "is now in question," and Davis called on him to drop out of the governor's race.

    Simon still defended himself for making the claim, which was based on now-discredited photographs released by a law enforcement group that is a key Simon ally and a complaint the group made to a state watchdog agency.

    Well, sure, you get one debate and the bombshell you drop turns out to be a lie. Good job! Prior to this, Simon had to weather the storm over a jury decision concerning a multi-million dollar deal Simon did with a convicted drug dealer. Simon, known to be a big Urkel fan, must have stayed home to watch Family Matters the day they covered "due dilligence" in law school.

    Meanwhile, somewhere in Pasadena, Dan Lundgren is smirking, knowing he will no longer be known for running the worst campaign in California's history.








    posted by tbogg at 1:28 PM

    |

     

    With the way the economy is going, well, I'm sorry to say we're going to have to downsize you

    Judith Gorman gives Bush a performance review. It hope he didn't just buy a new car.

    We hired Mr. Bush nearly two years ago, although most of us believed he was the wrong man for the job, and many of us knew that he was unqualified for the position. Mr. Bush had never successfully managed a large corporation, or for that matter, successfully run a corporation of any size, and his experience in public office was scant to say the least. It turned out that we really had no choice. After all, he was the boss' son.

    Thanks to Kim to sending this one to me.



    posted by tbogg at 10:33 AM

    |

     

    We'd love to look into this...but we've got a war to fight...

    The Boston Globe reports:

    WASHINGTON - Harvard University's financial relationship with President Bush's former oil company was deeper than previously understood, with the university's management fund creating a separate ''off the books'' partnership with Harken Energy Corp. that helped keep afloat the financially troubled company, according to a report to be released today.

    HarvardWatch, a student-alumni group that monitors the school's investments, plans to issue the report and say that it has analyzed documents showing that the Harvard fund, an independent entity that manages the university's endowment, formed a partnership in 1990 with Bush's oil firm called the Harken Anadarko Partnership. The partnership effectively removed $20 million of debt from Harken's books, relieving the Texas company's short-term financial problems.

    About the same time, the Harvard fund invested about $30 million in Harken, which also helped keep the firm afloat. The partnership has not been mentioned in recent accounts of Bush's financial dealings in the oil business.

    IRAQIRAQIRAQIRAQIRAQIRAQIRAQIRAQIRAQIRAQIRAQIRAQIRAQIRAQ

    I'm sorry, what were they saying?





    posted by tbogg at 8:54 AM

    |

     

    ...and I want to be a veterinarian because I just love children

    Erika Harold, current Miss America 2003 as well as future infomercial spokeperson for Diamondnique Fashion Accessories, is, like, way upset that she can't promote teen abstinence to teens who don't even know who the hell she is, and could care less because she's like, this super braniac, who hasn't dated anyone really hot like Usher and she doesn't dress like, way slutty like Lil' Kim, so like, oh my gah!, who is she again?

    Ms Harrold was last seen stamping her dainty feet in a fit of soon-to-be-repressed pique, causing her tiara to go, like, all a kilter and stuff. Know what I'm sayin'?





    posted by tbogg at 8:27 AM

    |

     

    Well, they haven't blamed Gary Condit for it...yet

    Beltway police are still searching for the Washington sniper after he left a tarot card with the message, "Dear policeman, I am God" .

    Police are interviewing known associates of God, including John Ashcroft, Franklin Graham, Jerry Falwell, and those two guys who write those crappy Left Behind books who are already under investigation for dumbing down America even more, if that's possible.


    posted by tbogg at 8:10 AM

    |

     

    But would they have bumped Malcolm In The Middle for it?

    Fox is pretty proud of the fact that they had the highest rating for President Hooked On Phonic's speech on his upcoming war with Iraq to prove his manhood.

    I have to give them credit for clever marketing of the time slot as When Morons Attack. 4.6 million viewers is pretty good numbers for a Bush on Fox, passed only by the Noelle Bush crack-bust episode on COPS just four weeks ago, which grabbed a 4.2 Nielsen Media Research rating.


    posted by tbogg at 8:01 AM

    |

    Tuesday, October 08, 2002

     

    I'm sorry, that previous statement is no longer operative...for the moment.

    NOW:

    People say, well, why -- and I know a lot of kids are probably asking, well, why America? And you've just got to understand that the enemy hates us because of what we love. We love freedom. We love the idea of people -- (applause). We love the fact that, in this great country, people can worship an almighty God any way they see fit. That's what we love. (Applause.) We love free political -- we love the debates, we love free -- we love the discourse of free people. We love a free press. We love everything about our freedom, and we're not going to change. We're going to stand tall and stand strong. (Applause.)
    George W Bush
    October 8, 2002 Alcoa, Tennessee

    ...AND THEN:

    "There ought to be limits to freedom"
    George W Bush
    May 22, 1999 Austin, Texas

    Did he change his mind, or is he lying...again?


    posted by tbogg at 9:13 PM

    |

     

    Supreme Court Groans And Holds Head In Hands

    Mark Morford is a god. From his Morning Fix.


    A father of nine ordered to have no more children unless he could support those already born lost a Supreme Court appeal. The justices did not comment in turning away an appeal from some sniveling overspermed dinkwad named David Oakley, impregnator of really not very bright women and total loser dad who should be not only banned from procreating, but from touching another female of any intelligence level for roughly the next, say, 75 years, who argued that it is unconstitutional for the government to limit his right to have children, as the court just sort of a sat there and stared at him, eyes tired and lids narrowed, sighing heavily, silently wishing painful genital warts upon him for many years henceforth, and feeling really, really sorry for this jerk's brood of miserable kids. The court also turned back a transsexual's claim for half of her late husband's estate, sidestepping a debate over the legality of marriages of people who've had sex changes, mostly because the co! urt just doesn't really like to handle the complicated sexual cultural crap anymore and would rather just kick back and rig elections and party and try not to drink too much Crystal and puke on Rehnquist's yacht again, yo.

    Go here to subscribe.. You won't be sorry.


    posted by tbogg at 8:53 PM

    |

     

    More NHL scores from hell

    I wish this wasn't coming from Pat Buchanan since it will be written off as anti-semitic nonsense, but Pat sees the writing on the wall:

    When Richard Gephardt left the White House with the president's blessing on a Gephardt-Bush resolution empowering the commander in chief to attack Iraq at a time of his own choosing, congressional resistance instantly crumbled.

    The debate is over, the issue settled. If Saddam does not open up his "palaces" to U.N. inspectors, his successor will open them up to U.S. troops.

    The president still demands a U.N. resolution authorizing force. But a Security Council refusal to vote for it will not deter him.

    Thus, with millions of Americans skeptical, most of Europe opposed and the Islamic world either bitterly against this war or terrified of its consequences, the president will likely give the order to U.S. forces this winter to smash Iraq.

    Congress' abdication is astonishing. For no one knows what America's plans are, once U.S. troops reach the gates of Baghdad.

    Some, however, have made plans. Read antiwar.com. The War Party sees the attack and invasion of Iraq as but the first battle in an imperial war of conquest against the entire Arab-Islamic world

    This caused this reaction over at freerepublic:

    Pat Buchanan is not a conservative

    I don't know about you, but I love it when the rightwing eats it's own.


    posted by tbogg at 6:49 PM

    |

     

    Crimestoppers Tip O' the Day

    Somebody is traveling around the DC/Maryland area shooting innocent people with a high-powered rifle. Profilers indicate that the person is probably a loner with a pathological hatred of people, and who seems to have the ability to roam at will unnoticed through the human landscape.

    As Peggy Noonan once said, "Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to." So, with that in mind...has anyone seen this person lately?

    Where do I go for my reward? I've got my eye on that foosball table I had to take back when my McArthur Genius Grant fell through....


    posted by tbogg at 3:39 PM

    |

     

    One of these things is not like the others

    Sully writes:

    SULLIVAN, HITCHENS AND ORWELL

    Well, in the end we couldn't resist. I've just finished reading Christopher Hitchens' lively, witty and oddly moving defense of the life and work of George Orwell: "Why Orwell Matters." If you've read all of Orwell (and I'm getting close) or have barely read him at all, the book is both a wonderful introduction to the man's work and a stimulating overview of all the issues he raises. Orwell's ability to confound both right and left, his tenacious honesty, his pellucid prose, his power of moral reasoning, his ability to distinguish between an argument and a feeling - all these come through loud and clear in this little book. Buy it and read it and then join Hitch and me for a weeklong conversation at the end of the month [my emphasis] about what Orwell means, and why his example still shines, perhaps more brightly than ever, in an era of war and ideological conflict. Buying the book through this site also helps support us financially, so enrich your mind and support this blog by getting the book today. Click here to purchase.

    It's not enough that Andy equates Bush with Churchill, FDR, Ming the Merciless, and Freddie Patek, former shortstop for the Kansas City Royals (okay, I made that last one up), he now has the hubris to list his name as well as that of besotted, hygienically-challenged Christopher Hitchens alongside the legendary George Orwell. Today he is inviting everyone to join him late in the month to this Algonquin kiddies-table, meeting of the minds where they're going to go all "big brains" for us.

    I am of two minds about this end-of-the-month meeting between England's worst exports since Gene Loves Jezebel. On the one hand their "discussion' is bound to devolve from Orwell, to Democrats, to Clinton's penis, to Howell Raines, to the inability to find a really good fitting pair of leather pants, then proceed on to all the places that they have been fired from because they are such iconoclasts, yadda yadda yadda. Then Sully will get all pissy when Hitch throws up on Sully's new reptile leather Madiso Gold Tipped Lace-up's. Afterwards, hilarious hijinks will ensue.

    Then again this discussion should provide hours of stuff to comment on, so I guess I should count my blessings.



    posted by tbogg at 2:02 PM

    |

     

    Notes from The Note

    The royal "we" liked this in The Note, regarding last night's debate in California between Davis & Simon.:

    One of the most fun political junkies have is learning who is playing the role of the "opponent" in debate prep.

    From sources familiar with the Davis campaign: The Note has learned that former Gore press secretary and Democratic consultant Chris Lehane played the Bill Simon role in the Gray Davis debate preparation that took place over the weekend.

    According to insiders, during several lengthy preparation sessions, Lehane adopted a "pit-bull approach" in the mock debates.

    When asked to comment, Lehane only would say for attribution, "I did my best to get into the Simon character by visiting a gun show, seeking an accountants advice on off-shore tax havens and limiting my speech to monosyllabic words. I wasn't perfect, but …


    posted by tbogg at 12:02 PM

    |

     

    Hello, Dahlia

    There are many reasons to stay away from Slate (Krugman -stalker Micky Kaus comes to mind as well as Timothy Noah), but there are also a couple of good reasons to visit.

    Jacob Weisberg's Bushism's is a must. Here's today's:

    "Let me tell you my thoughts about tax relief. When your economy is kind of ooching along, it's important to let people have more of their own money."—Boston, Oct. 4, 2002

    But the best reason is for Dahlia Lithwick's coverage of the Supreme Court. Lithwick cuts to the chase and provides a brilliant synopsis of their daily-doings (and not-doings) without the pomposity of a James Kirkpatrick. That, and her subversive snarks about the Justices make it time well spent. It's just nice to read a knowledgable writer who has respect for the law, but less for the Justices who interpret it.


    posted by tbogg at 10:33 AM

    |

     

    Yeah. I've got an MBA, but it's a home-schooled MBA

    Glad to see those private Christian colleges are stll teaching our kids about traditional values. Gardner-Webb University in a grade scandal.

    A university cheating scandal that triggered noisy protests and angry resignations has erupted on a campus few might expect: a small Baptist school that prides itself on its Christian roots.

    Gardner-Webb University has been embroiled in controversy ever since the school's president admitted he wrote a memo two years ago ordering a star basketball player's GPA to be calculated without an F he received for cheating -- in, of all things, a religion class.

    Without the change, Carlos Webb would have been ineligible in 2000-01, the season Gardner-Webb won the National Christian College Athletic Association championship.

    I love this next part:

    The school's trustees affirmed Christopher White's presidency after a 10-hour meeting September 27, though they demoted a pair of administrators who had criticized White's actions.

    Gardner-Webb is still pretty small-time compared to Hillsdale though.


    posted by tbogg at 10:00 AM

    |

     

    What show was Andy watching?

    Andy Sullivan seem to think there was someything new in the Bush speech last night:

    The last phony anti-war argument was that President Bush had yet to "make the case" for war against Iraq, as if grown-ups didn't have the capacity to make their own minds up on the issue without constant guidance from the commander-in-chief. But that surely must now be in tatters as a point, since the president has made speech after speech in the last year clearly laying out the rationale for the war on terror, a rationale that has always included defanging Saddam. And now he's gone and laid it out in full, at length and in detail in prime time. And what did the networks do, the same networks that routinely feature talking heads bravely pronouncing that the president hasn't made his case? They ignored him. Of course they did. What losers and sophists.

    ". And now he's gone and laid it out in full, at length and in detail in prime time. "

    What details? Bush delivered the same stump speech he's been giving all around the country in his same halting three-words-at-a-time cadence. Then he lied and said he doesn't want to go to war... again. Nobody believes that.

    Maybe somebody should tell Andy to turn off the Tom Robinson CD's and un-mute the TV.


    posted by tbogg at 9:34 AM

    |

     

    Smacked upside the head by a two by 401(k)

    Paul Krugman...the last truthteller.

    But this summer, when plunging stocks and corporate scandals dominated the news, all sorts of unlikely people declared themselves ardent defenders of the small investor against corporate insiders. Mr. Oxley, the chairman of the House Financial Services Committee — and big accounting firms' best friend on Capitol Hill — suddenly emerged as the co-sponsor of that reform bill. Harvey Pitt, chosen to head the Securities and Exchange Commission precisely because the accounting industry regarded him as a softer touch than Arthur Levitt, tried to portray himself as tougher than his predecessor. George W. Bush, whose business career consisted of a series of murky insider dealings, declared himself outraged at corporate evildoers. Fortunately, Dick Cheney didn't make any speeches about business honesty; that would really have made our heads explode.


    posted by tbogg at 9:04 AM

    |

     

    No Dick. When they say "foot in mouth" it usually means putting their own foot in their mouth

    Notorious toe tonguer Dick Morris say that the NY Times poll that showed the economy was a bigger issue than war was a "push poll".

    Slant No. 1: The Times poll asks voters if they would "be more likely to vote for a congressional candidate because of their positions on the economy or foreign policy."

    The use of "foreign policy" throws the results way off and allows the Times to report that voters want more focus on the economy by 57 percent to 25 percent. But on Sept. 8-9 Fox News asked 900 voters a similar question - comparing not economy vs. foreign policy, but economy vs. national security. The results: an even split, with the economy pulling 32 percent and national security 31 percent. What a difference a word makes

    In Dick's (and Fox's world) "foreign policy" and "national security" are one and the same. Well, no they're not. "Foreign policy" dictates our response to the rest of the world. "National security" tends to be more inward looking. They can be linked, but they are definitely not the same, like, for example, "hooker" and "paid escort who has sex with you while you talk to the President".




    posted by tbogg at 8:57 AM

    |

     

    " How about if he says, "We may be bombing, but that new Monday Night CBS lineup is laugh-arific!"....?

    The major networks passed on the President Hooked on Phonics speech, and the White House wasn't happy.

    If the president of the United States gives a speech but the broadcast networks do not carry it live for their tens of millions of viewers to see, did the president actually give the speech?

    ABC, CBS and NBC all decided not to carry President Bush's speech live at 8 last night. They said yesterday that they made this call because the White House never asked them to carry the speech live.

    But the White House said it did not put in the usual formal request because it wanted to keep the American public from thinking we were going to war.

    Yesterday around 4 p.m., the White House was rethinking that strategy. Aides called the networks' Washington bureau chiefs to get them to reconsider and offered to beef up the speech, but still they made no formal request for coverage.

    "On this call they were saying things like 'what if we do this, what if we do that,' " one network insider said.

    snip

    A senior administration official said the White House did not ask for time because it wanted to avoid alarming the public.

    A request to the broadcast networks "would have started a frenzy of people thinking we were about to go to war," the official told The Washington Post's Mike Allen. "It wouldn't have served the country."

    It's nice to know that his own aides realize that everytime Bush goes on the air, the country becomes alarmed.

    Bad News Bush.


    posted by tbogg at 8:41 AM

    |

    Monday, October 07, 2002

     

    (repeated by popular request)

    Leave no child unrepressed


    Lynne Cheney, wife of Vice President Dick Halliburton, has announced that she will no longer be writing western-lesbian-bodice-rippers, in order to focus on her books for children. From her official biography:


    Mrs. Cheney's most recent book is America: A Patriotic Primer, an alphabet book for children of all ages and their families. The book, released May 21, 2002, celebrates the ideas and ideals that are the foundations of our country. On September 23, 2002, Mrs. Cheney announced her work on a second children's book on American history, A Is for Abigail Adams, to be published next fall. Mrs. Cheney's net proceeds from both children's books are being donated to charity.


    We here at tbogg (that would be the royal 'we') decided in the spirit of bi-partisanship, and since it is for charity (The Lynne Cheney Knees-Pressed-Together Foundation) that we would pitch in (because that's the kind of guy 'we' are) to help Ms. Cheney complete this monumental task so that she can get back to her duties representing the Administration in the World Wrestling Federation reprising her role as Lynne The Erection Shriveller. So here is our contribution to Lynne's future amazon.com bestseller:


    A is for Ashcroft, the Crisco-anointed


    B is for Bush, not elected. Appointed


    C is for Condi, she missed all the clues


    D is for daughters who sure like their booze


    E is for Enron and Kenny Boy Lay


    F is for faith based who don’t like the gays


    G is for Gore whose loss really stings


    H is for Hillary who waits in the wings


    I’s for Intelligence that can’t connect dots


    J is for Jenna who likes to drink , lots


    K is for Karen who pulls Bush’s strings


    L is for Laura who likes to read things


    M is for Martha whose fortune did slide


    N’s for Nebraska where Bush likes to hide


    O is for Olson who died in the crash


    P is for Pioneers who give lots of cash


    Q’s for al-Qaida, Osama’s bad guys


    R is for Rove who feeds Bush his lies


    S is for Scalia who stopped the vote dead


    T is for Trent and his helmet head


    U’s for United, we’ve been told to stand


    V’s for Vermont where Jefford’s the man


    W’s for war, it’s the Bush family way


    X for Camp X-Ray in Guantanamo Bay


    Y is for Yemen where terrorist's hide


    Z is for Zell who’s on the wrong side



    You may now applaud..golf style. Thank yew..thank yew...godblessmurica.



    posted by tbogg at 6:09 PM

    |

     

    Wow.

    Atrios over at Eschaton has an extraordinary transcript from Wolf Blitzer tonight between Mike Gallagher (who makes Ann Coulter look like Mother Teresa) and Joe Madison who should have physically kicked Gallagher's fat ass.


    posted by tbogg at 4:10 PM

    |

     

    Well, if we're lucky, they take a bullet just before they retire

    It's a cliche as old as the Maltese Falcon. The young police detective has a crusty, but wise, sidekick who is just days away from retirement when ...bang! Cut to funeral.

    Looks like the Administration has seen too many of these movies and has decided to apply it to those wonderful fighting men and women whose votes they're always protecting in close elections.

    According the Washington Post:

    Alarmed by the cost of expanding military entitlement programs, President Bush has threatened to veto the $355 billion defense authorization bill for the new fiscal year if House and Senate conferees do not eliminate new pension benefits for disabled military retirees that could cost from $18.5 billion to $58 billion over the next decade.

    "We simply cannot continue to add ever-expansive obligations to the defense budget," Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld said in a letter to the conferees, who could decide the issue this week. "This would divert critical resources away from the war on terrorism, the transformation of our military capabilities and important personnel programs such as pay raises and facilities improvements."

    Okay. Lets take the worse case scenario. Suppose it is $58 billion over ten years. For the Paul Krugman impaired, that's $5.8 billion per year in funding to disabled vets going towards rent, food, health care, etc. for which the White House is willing to veto the defense bill. Yet they have indicated that they have no problem with the prospect of paying $9.5 billion a month for an indefinite period to rebuild the economy and infrastructure of Iraq, after we destoy it, of course.

    The difference is where the money would go. Whereas military vets would just waste their money on their daily needs, the money to rebuild Iraq would go to "outside contractors" brought in to do the "nation building". Companies like Halliburton (including) Brown & Root, Wackenhut, the Carlyle Group, and all the other usual supects.

    Looks like that $36 million that Cheney got as a parting gift from Halliburton was a good investment. A better investment than the one he made in puchasing Dresser when he was CEO.


    posted by tbogg at 3:44 PM

    |

     

    Supreme Court rejects GOP challenge to U.S. Senate race in New Jersey.

    Wow. Looks like Forrester is going to have to actually run a campaign now.


    posted by tbogg at 11:10 AM

    |

     

    More news from New Jersey

    The Daily Kos has a great piece on the Republicans trying to block Torricelli from giving his war-chest to Lautenberg.

    It seems like everything interesting is happening in New Jersey right now. Oh, wait. Bon Jovi has a new CD due out this week. That's not interesting.


    posted by tbogg at 10:30 AM

    |

     

    To know, know, know him, is to hate, hate, hate him...

    You've really got to hand it to Doug Forrester. He is running the campaign of the century.

    The Democrats' new Senate candidate, Frank Lautenberg, had a slight lead over Republican Douglas Forrester, according to a poll released Monday, but a majority said the bid to substitute candidates in the race was unfair.

    Lautenberg received 49 percent to Forrester's 45 percent in the latest Quinnipiac University poll of likely voters, with 4 percent undecided. The margin of error was plus or minus 4 percentage points.

    snip

    When asked whether it was fair for Lautenberg to replace Torricelli on the ballot, 54 percent in the Quinnipiac poll said no, but only 30 percent said they would not vote for Lautenberg because of the switch

    But here is where it gets good:

    "New Jersey voters don't like the way Lautenberg got on the ballot, but they are glad to see tarnished Sen. Robert Torricelli gone," Richards said. "And one in five of those voters who say a last minute candidate switch is unfair say they will vote for Lautenberg anyway."

    Lautenberg's favorability rating was 46 percent, while Forrester's was 27 percent.

    "The whole Torricelli mess had made Forrester better known, But his negatives have gone up," Richards said

    27%? Twenty seven percent? In poltical consulting circles they have a grid based on favorability levels:

    80% and above Slam dunk

    60-79% Prohibitive favorite

    49-59% Solid favorite

    39-48% Tight Race

    29-38% Loser

    20-28% Ass Clown

    Below 19% Bob Barr





    posted by tbogg at 9:14 AM

    |

     

    No coverage for you! Next!

    If a Bush gives a major address and no network carries it, does anybody care?

    ABC might have carried it if the Administration had called it 8 Simple Rules About Dating My Drunken Daughters...and Invading Iraq




    posted by tbogg at 8:55 AM

    |

     

    We know you're a whore for war...now we're just haggling over price

    Charles Krauthammer has softened his approach to the coming war with Iraq (Operation Avenge Poppy), but he still in favor of it.

    Preemption is the position of the Bush administration hawks. Deterrence is advanced by a small number of congressional Democratic doves. But, ah, there is a third way. It is the position of Democratic Party elders Al Gore, Ted Kennedy (both of whom delivered impassioned speeches attacking the president's policy) and, as far as can be determined, Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle. This third way accepts all the premises of the antiwar camp. It gives us all the reasons why war could be catastrophic: chemical or bio-weapon attacks, door-to-door fighting in Baghdad, alienating allies, destroying the worldwide coalition of the war on terror, encouraging the recruitment of new terrorists, etc.

    Moreover, they argue, deterrence works. "I have seen no persuasive evidence," said Kennedy, "that Saddam would not be deterred from attacking U.S. interests by America's overwhelming military superiority." So far, so good. But then these senior Democratic critics, having eviscerated the president's premises, proceed to enthusiastically endorse his conclusion -- that Saddam Hussein's weapons facilities must be subjected to the most intrusive and far-reaching inspection, and that if he cheats and refuses to cooperate, we must go to war against him.

    snip

    More important, why are these critics insisting on inspection and disarmament anyway? They have elucidated all the various costs of attempting to disarm Iraq forcibly, and told us that deterrence has worked just fine to keep Saddam Hussein from doing us any harm. If deterrence works, by what logic does Kennedy insist that Saddam Hussein "must be disarmed"?

    The enthusiasm of these senior Democrats for inspections is really nothing more than an argument for delay. Yet what advantage is there to delay? The war will be just as costly tomorrow as today [my emphasis]. Even assuming that delay gets us a few extra allies, how does that prevent Saddam Hussein from launching his awful weapons or resorting to urban warfare?

    The virtue of delay is that it gives Democrats political cover

    Well yes. that's one reason, but one of the major reasons is that the Democrats who are part of this "third way" want the rest of the world involved, something that Krauthammer can't seem to contenance, possibly due to his contempt for any goverment other than ours.

    Count me among the "third way" folks. Besides the fact that I don't want to see the US bombing the shit out of a city of 4 million people, I don't want to have to pay the 9.5 billion a month to run the country and rebuild it. Like the Gulf War, I would rather have a international community involved and sharing in the costs if they agree Saddam is really a threat to them.

    Krauthammer does eventually write:

    Nonetheless, I can both understand and respect those few Democrats who make the principled argument against war with Iraq on the grounds of deterrence, believing that safety lies in reliance on a proven (if perilous) balance of terror rather than the risky innovation of forcible disarmament by preemption.

    But this doesn't keep him from going back to his same old argument.

    Since day one, Krauthammer has taken the Administration at it's word about Saddam, without questioning their motives (oil, '02 elections, Poppy's revenge, oil, keep attention off the economy, oil, Halliburton, Harken, oil, Enron, failure to capture bin Laden, oil, Noelle Bush crack whore, oil...). Yet he only ascribes political motivations to those who oppose war. Why is that?

    Like Michael Kelly and Andrew Sullivan, Krauthammer is still suffering from 9/11 hysteria, and, goddamit, somebody has to pay in blood, just so long as it isn't theirs...


    posted by tbogg at 1:04 AM

    |

     

    Don't know much about nothin' at all

    Jonah Golberg shows he "don't know much about history" (Norah Vincent ...take note...this is how you "crib" from popular songs) or even current history, and he admits in the first line of his most recent column:

    To be honest, I haven't followed the New Jersey folderol too closely.

    Which, of course, doesn't keep him from weighing in for about 1200 words. Jonah likes to foster the image as a glib wiseguy with serious underpinings of deep political knowledge, sort of like PJ O'Rourke but even less funny. To be fair, he's funnier than, say, Mallard Fillmore, but then again Family Circus is funnier than Mallard Fillmore, which is really sad when you think about it. Anyway, getting back to Jonah, he makes this interesting observation:

    This is what's wrong with the Torricelli maneuver. Forrester chose a strategy to run against Torricelli. He made a long series of careful decisions about the kind of campaign he was going to run. Obviously, if he had been running against Frank Lautenberg he would have made different decisions, and the campaign would have looked very different. In short, Forrester played by the rules of the game. The voters were told what was going to be on the test and that is what they prepared for. If that educational process is less important than the merely mechanical process we call voting, then why have campaigns at all?

    Now Jonah strikes me as a kind of Gentlemen's C's kind of guy which may explain his problem with the whole Forrester/Lautenberg problem. We''ll use his test analogy to explain it to him:

    2 +2 =

    a) 4

    b) 3.17

    c) Ireland

    d) 27

    Now, when I used to take a test I went into it with the ability to solve, in this case, by having a knowledge of addition. It would appear that Jonah would go into his tests, throw out the obvious wrong answers, guess and hope for the best. Using the above test, we could say that (c) Ireland is Torricelli (the obvious wrong choice), which would leave a, b, and d as possible answers . Forrester would have us remove (c) in the hopes that the voter might actually vote for him given less choices (but which one is he?). Is that cynical of Forrester, given that he has made no effort to inform the voter of what the correct answer should be? You bet. In education it's called teaching to the test, and Forrester has done a poor job of it in his campaign so far. If Forrester can't make a case for why he is the correct answer, he has no business running for office. His campaign has now become his problem, and I have faith that the voters of New Jersey will now teach him a lesson.

    Oh yeah. And, Jonah? Next time, show work....slacker.






    posted by tbogg at 12:26 AM

    |

    Sunday, October 06, 2002

     

    Hey there Georgie Girl. Making fun of Perle so fancy free

    Nobody else ever seems to link to her, but Georgie Ann Geyer's latest is a keeper. Georgie doesn't seem to care for Perle and Wofowitz; the Mary Kate and Ashley of the chickenhawks.

    WASHINGTON -- Some readers may have gotten the impression that I am unequivocally against a war with Iraq. As a matter of fact, that is not true. But one reason that I am against an attack upon Baghdad is because I do not think our military leaders are the best ones to lead it.

    To the contrary, I think that our many superzealous civilian officials who are impassionedly leading the fight should be right up there in the front lines. Wars always need the most aggressive and "warlike" at the front. Instead, we find ourselves today in a virtually unheard-of situation where most of the men planning this abstruse war are hawkish and agenda-prone intellectuals who seem to think that war is the ultimate metaphysical experience -- for someone else, of course.

    snip

    I'm sure our servicemen and their families would love to hear this quote from Perle:

    Richard Perle revealed his own deep concern for American soldiers when he was asked on a recent "Wide Angle" TV show about the threat of chemical and biological weapons to troops landing in Iraq. All he could do was announce, without any emotion, "These are not effective weapons in terms of the outcome of the engagement."

    No wonder the people at the Pentagon who have actually served in war hate these guys.




    posted by tbogg at 11:42 PM

    |

     

    Drinkin' with Jenna

    A little pre-blog entertainment.

    Believe it or not, dittoheads actually read something other than The Turner Diaries. For example, Bob Cobb's Dittohead Bartender's Guide.

    Please note the review listed below:

    I couldn't live without this..., October 29, 2001

    Reviewer: A reader from Austin, Tx by way of San Diego
    As a college coed whose father happens to be the appointed President of the United States, life can be just one big pressure cooker. That's why I love this book. I try and use at least one recipe every night, and at least a dozen on Saturday night. The best part is, I can make these in my dorm without having to show any ID. I just give a list of ingredients to one of my Secret Service dudes, and they do the rest. Is that cool, or what? When I'm at my parent's summer house in Crawford I like to make up a pitcher of Red Zombie Paralyzing Potion and head off to my special Black Light Freakout Room that my dad had built for me. Talk about a lost weekend!
    My sister, Barbara (she's the one whose not as pretty as me), and I are having a race to see who can get to the very last drink first. She's a little ahead of me now, but that's only because I'm more prone to blackouts than her.


    Party on, America...!

    --This text refers to the Paperback edition




    posted by tbogg at 1:19 PM

    |

     

    Gorillas in our midst

    My Dian Fossey moment of the day.

    We startled this elderly female silverback gorilla as she gently coaxed one of her brood into a secluded clearing. Notice the reaction of the female to the sudden intrusion while the younger male stands in sullen silence. Later, they began hooting and flinging feces at our photographer.


    posted by tbogg at 1:03 PM

    |

     

    Remember these guys?

    Promise Keepers. Next stop on the "Stadium Full O' Losers" tour is in Stockton, Ca. Remember..... beer cutoff is right before Book 3, Psalms 73-89, and don't forget your big Jesus is #1 foam fingers. Tailgate party starts at 11am, loaves and fish.........again.


    posted by tbogg at 10:31 AM

    |

     

    Say two "Hail Mary's" and call me in the morning

    More proof that the Bush administration loves Jesus...and hates women:

    A quiet battle is raging over the Bush Administration's plan to appoint a scantily credentialed doctor, whose writings include a book titled As Jesus Cared for Women: Restoring Women Then and Now, to head an influential Food and Drug Administration (FDA) panel on women's health policy. Sources tell Time that the agency's choice for the advisory panel is Dr. W. David Hager, an obstetrician-gynecologist who also wrote, with his wife Linda, Stress and the Woman's Body, which puts "an emphasis on the restorative power of Jesus Christ in one's life" and recommends specific Scripture readings and prayers for such ailments as headaches and premenstrual syndrome. Though his resume describes Hager as a University of Kentucky professor, a university official says Hager's appointment is part time and voluntary and involves working with interns at Lexington's Central Baptist Hospital, not the university itself. In his private practice, two sources familiar with it say, Hager refuses to prescribe contraceptives to unmarried women. Hager did not return several calls for comment

    FDA advisory panels often have near-final say over crucial health questions. If Hager becomes chairman of the 11-member Reproductive Health Drugs Advisory Committee, he will lead its study of hormone-replacement therapy for menopausal women, one of the biggest controversies in health care. Some conservatives are trying to use doubts about such therapy to discredit the use of birth-control pills, which contain similar compounds. The panel also made the key recommendation in 1996 that led to approval of the "abortion pill," RU-486—a decision that abortion foes are still fighting. Hager assisted the Christian Medical Association last August in a "citizens' petition" calling upon the FDA to reverse itself on RU-486, saying it has endangered the lives and health of women

    Hager was chosen for the post by FDA senior associate commissioner Linda Arey Skladany, a former drug-industry lobbyist with longstanding ties to the Bush family. Skladany rejected at least two nominees proposed by FDA staff members: Donald R. Mattison, former dean of the University of Pittsburgh School of Public Health, and Michael F. Greene, director of maternal- fetal medicine at Massachusetts General Hospital. Despite pressure from inside the FDA to make the appointment temporary, sources say, Skladany has insisted that Hager get a full four-year term. FDA spokesman Bill Pierce called Hager "well qualified."

    So the FDA panel on women's health will be run by a "christian" lunatic who hates women and was chosen by a drug-industry lobbyist. Looks like Bush hit the trifeceta again. But how come every time Bush hits the trifecta, America loses?


    posted by tbogg at 9:31 AM

    |

    Saturday, October 05, 2002

     

    More from the Way Back Machine

    Roger Rosenblatt wrote this back on Oct. 29, 2000:

    I mean no disrespect to the Undecideds or the occasionally Decideds, or to the non-Republican faithful who have come to the conclusion that George W. Bush should be president of the United States. But, are you kidding?

    Here is a choice between an apparently amiable fellow who talks about bringing people together, and a man with 24 years' experience in national government and international affairs, who is extraordinarily competent, clear-headed, fair-minded, egalitarian to the bones; who will enact policies that retain and make the best use of our astonishing prosperity; and who is — as I know personally — big-hearted, honest, loyal, devoted to his wife, children and friends and (does one really need to say this?) likable.

    Why is this election so close? Because too many people see money up, crime down and their own gardens in bloom, and thus conclude that matters of public policy have no connection to their lives. So they focus on nonsense. They tilt toward Bush in the debates out of some adolescent response to powerlessness and ineptitude. They tilt away from Gore because he appears to know that he's intellectually superior to and more civic-minded than his opponent. He is.

    My fellow Americans: It's not about likability. It's about who keeps the checklist, who flies the plane. [my emphasis]

    Then there is this:

    On this wonk business: I spoke with Gore in his hotel room the week before last. Having completed a day of Regis, Oprah, "Saturday Night Live," the Al Smith dinner, and set to wake up at 5 a.m. to do the "Today" show, he stretched out and had a beer. It was close to midnight. He should have been exhausted. Instead, in answer to my questions, he sailed into exquisitely detailed, many-referenced and well-over-my-head explanations of the economy, the arms race and anything else his mind embraced.

    Why? Not to impress me, I assure you. It's simply that he loves traveling in academic territory. If his tendency to sometimes talk like a monograph comes off as bullying, it's a flaw of style. Live with it. When he is president, we will all smile it off as a treasurable quirk.

    Or do you prefer George W.'s response to the 34-year-old single woman in the third debate who asked how his tax plan would affect her: "You get a plan that will include prescription drugs... You're going to live in a peaceful world... It's less likely that you'll be harmed in your neighborhood"? Is it for thinking like this that Bush has received a press pass to the election?[my emphasis again]


    Thanks to Will for this catch.








    posted by tbogg at 9:19 AM

    |

    Friday, October 04, 2002

     

    Leave no child unrepressed

    Lynne Cheney, wife of Vice President Dick Halliburton, has announced that she will no longer be writing western-lesbian-bodice-rippers, in order to focus on her books for children. From her official biography:

    Mrs. Cheney's most recent book is America: A Patriotic Primer, an alphabet book for children of all ages and their families. The book, released May 21, 2002, celebrates the ideas and ideals that are the foundations of our country. On September 23, 2002, Mrs. Cheney announced her work on a second children's book on American history, A Is for Abigail Adams, to be published next fall. Mrs. Cheney's net proceeds from both children's books are being donated to charity.

    We here at tbogg (that would be the royal 'we') decided in the spirit of bi-partisanship, and since it is for charity (The Lynne Cheney Knees-Pressed-Together Foundation) that we would pitch in (because that's the kind of guy 'we' are) to help Ms. Cheney complete this monumental task so that she can get back to her duties representing the Administration in the World Wrestling Federation reprising her role as Lynne The Erection Shriveller. So here is our contribution to Lynne's future amazon.com bestseller:

    A is for Ashcroft, the Crisco-anointed

    B is for Bush, not elected. Appointed

    C is for Condi, she missed all the clues

    D is for daughters who sure like their booze

    E is for Enron and Kenny Boy Lay

    F is for faith based who don’t like the gays

    G is for Gore whose loss really stings

    H is for Hillary who waits in the wings

    I’s for Intelligence that can’t connect dots

    J is for Jenna who likes to drink , lots

    K is for Karen who pulls Bush’s strings

    L is for Laura who likes to read things

    M is for Martha whose fortune did slide

    N’s for Nebraska where Bush likes to hide

    O is for Olson who died in the crash

    P is for Pioneers who give lots of cash

    Q’s for al-Qaida, Osama’s bad guys

    R is for Rove who feeds Bush his lies

    S is for Scalia who stopped the vote dead

    T is for Trent and his helmet head

    U’s for United, we’ve been told to stand

    V’s for Vermont where Jefford’s the man

    W’s for war, it’s the Bush family way

    X for Camp X-Ray in Guantanamo Bay

    Y is for Yemen where terrorist's hide

    Z is for Zell who’s on the wrong side


    You may now applaud..golf style. Thank yew..thank yew...godblessmurica.







    posted by tbogg at 11:39 PM

    |

     

    Score one point for the gene pool

    This is too weird:

    A father who was grieving over his girlfriend’s abortion of their baby boy, stood in front of the Planned Parenthood clinic in Overland Park, Kansas and killed himself on September 10.

    Brad Draper, 44, shot himself in the head in front of the Overland Park, Kansas Planned Parenthood clinic on September 10. He died later in the hospital. Draper was grieving the killing of his unborn baby son by his girlfriend at the clinic.

    Draper published an obituary for his boy in the local newspaper in June, 2002. In his obituary, he said: “Zachary Duncan Draper was beautiful as his mother, loved by God and others. My little baby boy didn’t make it to his Daddy’s arms. I never got to hold and kiss him, tell him stories or read him rhymes. I love you Zachary and look forward to seeing you in heaven.”

    According to the family, Draper had seen ultrasounds of his son and was very excited to be a father until his girlfriend had the abortion without telling him. Family members say he killed himself on what would have been his son’s due date.

    Sounds just like the stable kind of guy who should be raising a child.

    Okay, maybe I'm being kind of cruel, but you've got Christian Theology-Boy who:

    A. Slept with a woman before he married her

    B. "Spent his seed" (as the Bible like to say) within her, getting her pregnant.

    C. Then he commited suicide

    He attended Olivet Nazarene University, JOCO Community College and Mid America Nazarene University where he graduated with a Business Degree

    Did he skip all the classes about heaven having a three strikes rule?



    posted by tbogg at 3:46 PM

    |

     

    See what happens if you let one moron steal an election. Now ALL the morons want to steal one

    TPM gets it right again:

    Republicans have developed a lot of know-how in the last couple years at stealing elections. But I must confess to a certain confusion about how one steals an election by fielding a candidate. The idea seems to be that for Doug Forrester, Frank Lautenberg is an unfairly strong candidate. And that Forrester is somehow damaged by Lautenberg's electability.

    Giving it some thought, and considering the Supreme Court's decisions in Bush v. Gore, it even seems possible that this might be the basis of an equal protection claim for Forrester. Forrester entered the race with the reasonable expectation that he would only face a candidate either equally lame or more lame than him, but not less lame. It's almost an implied contract he has with the state's electorate, right? Putting a new candidate on the ballot now violates this insufferable chump's right to coast into office without facing an actual opponent. But I digress ...




    posted by tbogg at 1:48 PM

    |

     

    Condi hasn't gotten him up to ten. Can we just do seven paces?

    Hussein vs. Bush, Iraqi VP proposes

    BAGHDAD, Iraq -- An Iraqi vice president offered an unusual suggestion Thursday for solving the U.S.-Iraq standoff: Presidents Saddam Hussein and George W. Bush should fight a duel to settle their differences and spare their people the ravages of war.

    I'm sure I'm not the only person in America to say that I could live with the outcome of this, however it were to come out. The Pay Per View could wipe out the deficit.

    Can we add it to the November ballot?



    posted by tbogg at 10:50 AM

    |

     

    Friday fun time

    This is, like, the coolest website I have ever visited. Thanks to Dale!


    posted by tbogg at 9:37 AM

    |

     

    Looks like a double-dip to me

    The man who would be Senator.


    posted by tbogg at 8:46 AM

    |

     

    No McArthur Genius Grant for you!

    Could New Jersey Republicans have picked a stupider man? The Self Man Pundit answers: probably not.


    posted by tbogg at 8:36 AM

    |

     

    Chicago leaves their left blinker on

    Today is Paul Harvey day in Chicago. Out-of-towners: please excuse that old-man smell. Thank you.


    posted by tbogg at 7:52 AM

    |

     

    Excellent commentary

    ...over at Ruminate This about the Gephardt Democrats rolling over on their backs and peeing on their bellies like a puppy.


    posted by tbogg at 7:50 AM

    |

    Thursday, October 03, 2002

     

    Flickering signs of sanity

    Peggy Noonan's doctors must be quite pleased. For the last two weeks now she has been reasonably coherent, even indulging in a bit of logical thought processes. Her meds are working; a round of soft golf applause, please.

    Ever since the Great Eunice Stone setback, she has been on her best behavior and soon may join the other recovering pundits (Broder, Cohen, Friedman) in the crafts room.

    Today’s column about Bob Torricelli makes some very good points. His speech was good to a point...then like a house guest, it stayed too long. Ms Noonan was quite correct about this. Unfortunately there were a few, let's call them "Peggy-isms" that I can't let pass. Such as:

    Forty years ago, in "The Making of the President, 1960," the big book that transformed modern political reporting, Theodore White called New Jersey the most corrupt big state in the union and said the reason was that it was the least covered by the media of the day.

    So far so good. But then Pegs had a relapse:

    I first read White's observation when I was in high school. I thought to myself: By the time I'm grown up it will have changed [emphasis mine].

    Peggy remembers this thought? She actually had thoughts like this when she was in high school? It is a grand Noonan tradition for her to make a point by relating an incident in years past that leads to: I remember thinking to myself..., followed by some pithy prediction that will just happen to bear out her point in the column in which it appears. Such as: When George Bush first announced he would run for President, I thought to myself: this election will come down to a Supreme Court ruling 5-4 in favor of this big, stupid man.. (Okay, I made that one up). Peggy always provides her own foreshadowing. I think this is the result of too many lonely nights spent reading romance novels with chapters ending in: Little did she know how swiftly her dreams would come true.

    The other quibble I have isn't really a Noonan-ism so much as a memory she jogged with a comment she made. She wrote:

    I created, I funded, I saved, I did. I, I, I. And they don't even know my name.

    This is--well, where to start? It is poor political etiquette, and it is more than that.

    Imagine a JFK or a Ronald Reagan talking like that. "I brought the Berlin Wall down--I did it," "I put Castro in his place." "I cut taxes and you didn't even say thanks." And now you won't have Torricelli to kick around anymore.

    Ronald Reagan and JFK would not speak that way, and not only because each had grace. They also had more understanding of the facts. Mr. Reagan knew it was the patriots and bravehearts of the world who brought the wall down.

    But what is sad is that what Mr. Torricelli had to say is more and more how modern politicians talk. And because he seemed to believe what he said.

    He did it, he is great, we owe him.

    The kind of politicians who do this are the kind who never say they're in politics. They always say they're in public service.

    Let's take a trip in Mr. Peabody's Wayback Machine.

    Salt Lake City. Winter Olympics. Opening ceremony. In a purely fortuitous moment (orchestrated by Karen Hughes), NBC was given a completely unplanned, my-god-get-a-camera-on-this, we're-seeing-history, and-its-not-staged, really-its-not, honest, moment when little skating sprite Sasha Cohen handed her cel phone to a totally unscripted GW Bush, so he could say "hi" to her mother showing what a real regular guy he was.

    His priceless closing words to her, broadcast to millions around the world:

    "I've gotta go now. I have a war to fight"

    I remember thinking to myself: this is how modern politicians talk. And this guy is idiot.

    Little did I know…..



















    posted by tbogg at 11:02 PM

    |

     

    I've got spurs that jingo, jingo, jingo

    Overly belligerent and bitter Washington Post columnist Charles Krauthammer exhibits his jingoistic tendencies in his latest:

    Ted Kennedy is not alone. Much of the leadership of the Democratic Party is in the thrall of the United Nations. War and peace hang in the balance. The world waits to see what the American people, in Congress assembled, will say. These Democrats say: Wait, we must find out what the United Nations says first.

    The chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, Carl Levin, would enshrine such lunacy in legislation, no less. He would not even authorize the use of force without prior U.N. approval. Why? What exactly does U.N. approval mean?

    Much of what Krauthammer says is debatable, some of it laughable. We'll save the laughable for later.

    Chuck starts off comparing the Cuban Missle Crisis with the current Bush manhood crisis. I'm sure he remembers President John Kennedy presenting to the people of the United States, satellite photos of Russian-built missle sites in Cuba (it was in all the papers). With these dramatic pictures, Kennedy proved to the country that there was an actual physical threat. Today we get bluster that changes on a daily basis from Rummy, Condi, and Cheney, and our weekly dose of tortured babbling from President Hooked on Phonics...but no proof, only "trust us". I would feel better about that if they hadn't already been caught lying, and if they hadn't done such a bang-up job with the information they ignored in August 2001 when they were too busy with the Great Crawford Golfcart Roundup.

    Krauthammer intones:

    Certainly Kennedy and Levin cannot be saying that we must not decide whether to go to war until we have heard the considered opinion of countries that none of their colleagues can find on a map.

    Okay. So we are not talking about these dots on the map. We must be talking about the five permanent members. The United States is one. Another is Britain, which supports us. That leaves three. So when you hear senators grandly demand the support of the "international community," this is what they mean: France, Russia and China.

    Recent polls indicate that 57% of Americans are willing to go to war against Iraq if the UN is involved. That number drops to 37% if we go it alone. Rule #1 from Viet Nam: Don't go to war without the will of the people. Of course the Bushies will say that they don't look at polls...unless of course it's that poll that shows that 65% of the public approves of the job President Can't Fool Me is doing, which is the only thing that keeps Ari Fleischer from immolating himself in the National Press Gallery. For the US, war is easy, but we suffer from morning after hangovers (the one thing Bush does have experience in). We need the support of the world, both morally and financially, to clean up the mess we are bound to make. Last I looked, I didn't see an extra nine billion dollars a month it will take to maintain Iraq, sitting in the US checkbook. Hell, we're stealing money from old people just to give tax breaks to rich people, as it is.

    Krauthammer concludes:

    So insist leading Democrats. Why? It has no moral logic. It has no strategic logic. Forty years ago, we had a Democratic president who declared that he would not allow the United Nations or any others to tell the United States how it would defend itself. Would that JFK's party had an ounce of his confidence in the wisdom and judgment of America, deciding its own fate by its own lights, regardless of the wishes of France

    Here is a lesson for Krauthammer. Bush is not America. Al Gore may not have won his own state, but Bush didn't even win his own country. To criticize Bush or his mal-administration is not un-American, it is anti-belligerence, it is anti-arrogance, it is anti-stupidity. Given my choice, I'm going to have to go with France and Germany on this one. Their goverments aren't chosen by the courts but by the people, and I have a lot of faith in the people.

    Oh yes...the laughable:

    France and Russia will decide the Iraq question based on the coldest calculation of their own national interest, meaning money and oil.

    Krauthammer actually wrote that. Really. And probably with a straight face. Too bad this humorless man couldn't laugh at the unintended irony of his own statement. I know I did.













    posted by tbogg at 9:54 PM

    |

     

    My eyes! My eyes! For the love of god, someone take the controls!!!

    Apparently Poppy Bush, also known as the Preppy Cadaver, is having problems with people flying around the old compound.

    The Walker's Point compound, home of President Bush's parents, is seen Thursday, Oct. 3, 2002, in Kennebunkport, Maine. The Federal Aviation Administration announced Thursday that it is imposing tighter restrictions on flights in a 30-nautical mile radius of Walker's Point when the president visits this weekend. The restrictions drew protest from an organization representing pilots and plane owners.

    Originally the plan was for Barbara Bush to spend more time sunbathing in her thong, but the telcoms started complaining about their satellites spontaneously combusting...so the FAA had to step in.


    posted by tbogg at 2:19 PM

    |

     

    Tbogg correction

    On the 10/2 I criticized John Ashcroft for not catching "Kevin Rudolph" when I meant Eric Rudolph the Health Clinic & Atlanta Olympic's bomber. Thanks to Will for pointing it out. Kevin Rudolph is a guy I used to go to high school with who owes me twenty bucks, so if Ashcroft nails Kevin by mistake, that'll teach the little welshing bastard.

    Now back to your regular snark.


    posted by tbogg at 2:05 PM

    |

     

    Stop payment on the check

    David Corn at the Nation weighs in on Richard Gephardt, the man who will never be President.

    On September 29, at the fancy Kodak Theatre in Los Angeles, she headlined a $6 million fundraiser for the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. With her on the stage was House minority leader Richard Gephardt.

    Three days after the concert, he brokered a deal with the White House that guaranteed passage of a resolution authorizing Bush to launch war on Iraq as "he determines to be necessary and appropriate" in order to "defend the national security of the United States against the continuing threat posed by Iraq" and to enforce United Nations resolutions. The Gephardt-backed measure was less of a blank check than the one Bush had sent to Congress. The differences, though, meant little.

    Streisand should start being more selective and only raise money for Democrats who show medical proof of a spine...(not so fast, Lieberman...back in line, Edwards).


    posted by tbogg at 11:40 AM

    |

     

    Talking Points Memo nails it...again.

    I wish I could be as subtle as Josh Marshall.

    The money quote from the New Jersey Supreme Court ballot case came from Justice Peter G. Verniero, a former Chief Counsel, Chief of Staff and later Supreme Court appointee of former Governor Christie Whitman. "Didn't Mr. Forrester call for Mr. Torricelli to withdraw?" he said in response to a protesting Republican attorney during oral arguments. "Was he expecting to run unopposed?"

    That about sums it up.

    The Forrester campaign is now headed to the United States Supreme Court, the normal recourse of Republicans who can't win elections with majorities but aren't inclined to see that as the end of the story.

    The "money quote" slap at Sullivan was priceless.




    posted by tbogg at 10:52 AM

    |

     

    "Hi honey. I'll be home late. I'm busy at the office fellating the President. Love you too."

    You know, for a guy with five kids and a wife at home, Bill Sammons sure spends a lot of time on his knees in front of Commander Bunnypants (for which Laura is eternally grateful, I might add). Noted closet-case Matt Drudge has another hot exclusive from Regnery Press, home of such noted authors as Tinfoil Bill Gertz, Gun Psycho Wayne LaPierre, and former Hillary stalker and current briquette Barbara Olson.

    Here's a typical Drudge snip:

    President Bush watched in disbelief when New York Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton went to the Senate floor and brandished the infamous NEW YORK POST 9/11 headline: "BUSH KNEW".

    “What bothered me was the fact that somebody would be so irresponsible and kind of stirring up a bunch of wonderful Americans that somehow I wouldn’t have done what was necessary," Bush reveals in a new book set for release. "Yes, it bothered me.”

    "What bothered me was the fact that somebody would be so irresponsible and kind of stirring up a bunch of wonderful Americans that somehow I wouldn’t have done what was necessary"....Sigh. I haven't made up my mind. Is that statement Churchill-ian or reminiscent of the musings of Pliny the Elder?

    In FIGHTING BACK: THE WAR ON TERRORISM FROM INSIDE THE BUSH WHITE HOUSE, the president -- for the first time -- sounds off on critics who were “somehow questioning my courage in the face of danger” because he did not immediately return to the White House after the attacks.

    Bush calls his detractors “elites, these kind of professor types that love to read their names in the newspaper,” author Bill Sammon reports.

    What could be more "elitist" than using your goverment-paid-for private jet to run as far away from the action as possible, leaving your wife behind? Nobody questions Bush's courage; based upon his desertion during the Viet Nam war, we already know he's a chickenshit. For those who weren't aware of his ingrained cowardice, just go back to the tape of his first speech after the attack when Karen had to pull him kicking and screaming from his hidey-hole. That was a real face of "courage".

    “Had he done so, we would have thrown the ultimate book at him. But our people, our prosecutors don’t feel that’s the case.”

    I absolutely marvel at how he can change tenses so effortlessly.

    During a weekend with lawmakers at Camp David in the midst of the war, Bush was disgusted by a scene in the movie “Black Hawk Down” in which the Clinton administration refuses to give American soldiers heavy armor to defend themselves in Somalia.

    The difference here is that Les Aspin took the blame for the failure to approve Bradley Fighting Vehicles and AC-130 gunships for Somalia. Too bad that Bush can't show the same amount of disgust for Condoleeza Rice, the FBI, and the CIA for their failure to see 9/11. See, it's easy to play Monday Morning Quarterback.

    The book also examines the question of whether Bush was transformed by Sept. 11 or whether he is the same man he always was.

    I believe that he is still the same callow, brainless tool of big oil and Dick Cheney that he always was. So, it seems that somethings didn't change on 9/11.

    So look for Sammon's new book at neighborhood bookstore...or just wait a few months and pick it up on the $1 remainder tables with the rest of the fiction.




    posted by tbogg at 9:50 AM

    |

    Wednesday, October 02, 2002

     

    You know....OJ has a thing for lanky blondes....hmmmmmm

    Hate-filled scary bitch-thing, Ann Coulter is popping a hemorrhoid over Torricelli (Don't give her the clicks, I'll give you the good stuff...meaning the more ridiculous stuff):

    Democratic Sen. Robert Torricelli's announcement that he was pulling out of the New Jersey Senate race this week looked like a confession of guilt in a Soviet show trial. In the reflection of his dewy eyes, you could almost see Terry McAuliffe mouthing the words to him from the audience. Especially the part where he paid tribute to the great Bill Clinton [my emphasis], to whom Torricelli evidently owes his deeply ingrained sense of ethics.

    Ann's weekly admission of penis envy.

    But the Democrats had no qualms with the gifted senator (get it?) until he fell behind in the polls.

    If you have to say "get it?"...it blows...like Ann at a Federalist Society smoker.

    A vacancy on the Supreme Court could materialize and, against overwhelming historical odds, Bush's appointee might be one of five votes to strike down Roe v. Wade. Then – God forbid – the public would be allowed to vote on an important issue! In some of the less-enlightened states, the public might not recognize the fundamental human right to suck the brains out of little babies.

    Not that having their brains "sucked out" would stop them from becoming "constitutional lawyers" and writing badly footnoted books for morons.

    The Democrats' 11th-hour switch is in violation of state election law, which puts a 51-day limit on withdrawing from an election. This is not a random filing requirement. Torricelli's Republican opponent, Douglas R. Forrester, has designed an entire campaign – polls, advertisements, issues – on the assumption that he was running against a specific candidate.

    Finally! An admission that Forrester is an empty, very cheap suit with nothing to offer other than he is not Torricelli. As far as his "entire campaign – polls, advertisements, issues", I believe if he goes down to the New Jersey Secretary of State's office they can provide him a TFB form.

    One may assume that violating the law did not even break the Democrats' stride. The nettlesome part must have been explaining to Torricelli that he was to be replaced by former Sen. Frank Lautenberg – whom Torricelli famously, and not without justice, despises.

    Which would put the lie to Forrester's press release today decrying the "Torricelli-Lautenberg machine". Can't you guys (that means you "Ann") get on the same page?

    Democrats wail about every vote counting when they need to steal votes after an election. But in New Jersey they won't even tell the voters who the candidate is. If Democrats could get away with it, they'd claim to be running "Ronald Reagan" in all elections and then fill the seats with the equivalent of James Carville.

    The logic in that is about as thin as Noelle Bush after a two week crack binge.

    Republicans couldn't even get all Republican senators on board to remove a Democratic president who was a known felon and probable rapist.

    Penis envy, redux.

    When Democratic Senate candidate Mel Carnahan died in a plane crash just three weeks before the 2000 election, his wife, Jean, volunteered to be appointed to the seat if he won. Carnahan was behind in the polls before the plane went down, but in an outpouring of sympathy for the grieving widow, the dead man won an upset victory.

    Well, that's a lie. Carnahan was ahead against an incumbent. Maybe Ann has a footnote on this one. Then again...

    The only items remaining on the Democrats' death list are honest elections and a million unborn babies.

    Uh oh...At 40+ sounds like someone's biological clock is ticking. Then again, with Ann, maybe it's just her fifteen minutes running out.

    The important thing to remember about Coulter (other than her obvious lack of class, sanity, taste, or style) is that she makes no effort to tell us what a great candidate Forrester is (for obvious reasons). She has nothing good to say about her own party (for obvious reasons, redux). She just an attack dog, without reason or rhyme: mindless, frothing, and nightmarishly pathological.








    posted by tbogg at 11:10 PM

    |

     

    The NJ Supremes say yes to Lautenberg

    CNN says:

    The state Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that Democrats can replace outgoing Sen. Robert Torricelli on the November 5 election ballot, while Republicans, who have promised an appeal, opened a second front in federal court.


    But...oh oh..there's dark clouds on the horizon:

    The attorney for Forrester has said the GOP intends to take the case to the U.S. Supreme Court to keep Torricelli's name on the ballot.

    As the parties awaited the ruling, lawyers for Forrester said they would go to Attorney General John Ashcroft and file a federal voting rights lawsuit to force election officials to mail out absentee ballots with Torricelli's name on them.

    If ballots aren't mailed soon, voters overseas -- particularly U.S. military personnel -- could be denied their right to vote, said Forrester attorney Bill Baroni.

    "There are absentee ballots that are destined for overseas, to ships and bases, that are in vaults in New Jersey. Every day, every minute those ballots are in vaults is disenfranchising these military voters," he said.

    Yes. They're playing the "fighting men and women of Murica" card again. The question is: will John Ashcroft (R-religious nutbar) go that far out on a limb even though it will appear partisan?

    Yeah. Probably. He's a loon. The man who couldn't beat a dead man, thinks he has a chance to be president. That's a special kind of stupid.






    posted by tbogg at 3:50 PM

    |

     

    Posterboy for Ferret Monthly

    From Salon:

    Sen. Joe Lieberman, D-Conn., a potential rival of Bush in the 2004 presidential election, said the administration had explored all options, other than military, to disarm Saddam. "They've not worked. The moment of truth has arrived for Saddam Hussein. This is his last chance."

    Biden said he expected Lieberman and Warner to join forces later Wednesday in backing the compromise between the White House and the House of Representatives and pushing it in the Senate

    Biden already disqualified himself from running for President by absolutely botching the Clarence Thomas hearings. But Lieberman shouldn't be allowed within 100 miles of a Democratic National ticket. He's a manipulative, mush-mouthed little weasel, and he was the biggest mistake that Al Gore ever made. I'm to the point where I wouldn't support Gore now because of the damage he inflicted on the country by bringing Lieberman into the limelight.


    posted by tbogg at 2:37 PM

    |

     

    But if it started, like, you know, a big friggin' Middle East war, then that would, like, really suck

    The Bush administration points out that killing women and children in Iraq can save you $2.83 next time you fill up your Lincoln Navigator.

    WARSAW (Reuters) - A senior U.S. Commerce Department official said on Wednesday that a possible war on Iraq could boost the global economy by eliminating a terrorist threat and releasing fresh oil supplies onto world markets.

    The comments in Poland by Under Secretary Grant Aldonas came amid diplomatic wrangling over sending weapons inspectors to Iraq, which President Bush says is threatening the world with weapons of mass destruction.

    snip

    "The combined effect may actually be positive economically because it would eliminate one of the real sources of terror and one of the real clouds hanging over the world's economy," he said.

    "At the same time it will open up the spigot on Iraqi oil, which would certainly have a profound effect in terms of the performance of the world economy for those countries that are manufacturers and oil consumers.

    "That obviously isn't the point of any action taken against (Iraqi leader) Saddam Hussein and Iraq but certainly it would be one of the results economically," he added.

    Thereby showing us that he's really just a sunny optimist who sees the gas tank half-full and not half-empty. Later he went back to his sun-dappled bedroom filled with unicorn posters and snowglobes, and flopped on his canopied bed to dream of big fluffy mushroom clouds that looked just like cotton candy.




    posted by tbogg at 1:23 PM

    |

     

    A Sophie's Choice for Kelly

    Although not as spittle-flecked as his last rant, the war-drunk Michael Kelly still wants the goddam war to start, godammit. And the only thing that is stopping the goddam war from starting is those goddam Democrats:

    Next week, most likely, Congress will pass some sort of resolution authorizing the current President Bush's war with Iraq. This time, a majority of Democrats will support the war. But the party, at its leadership level, has already gone and done the same old hurt to itself.

    There was Al Gore, telling the world that the killers of Sept. 11 had "gotten away with it" and broadly (if, in his trademark weaselly fashion, coyly) suggesting that the president of the United States was pursuing war for the selfish purpose of winning votes in November. Two days later, there was Senate Majority Leader Thomas A. Daschle picking up on Gore's repulsive slander and vastly amplifying it on the floor of the Senate. A few days later, there was House Democratic leader Richard A. Gephardt, in a mostly reasonable op-ed column, echoing the calumny: "President Bush himself has decided to play politics with the safety and security of the American people."

    And, last Sunday, there were -- most memorably, most indefensibly, most obscenely -- two Democratic congressmen, former whip David E. Bonior of Michigan and Jim McDermott of Washington, beamed live from Baghdad, to literally parrot Hussein's line -- to tell Americans that, as McDermott said, "the president would mislead the American people" in order to get his war, but that, by contrast, "you have to take the Iraqis on their value, at their face value."

    This is not a little cabal of contributors to the Nation telling the world that the American president is not to be believed and that he wishes to send Americans off to fight and possibly die in Iraq because war is good for his party. These are men in the leadership ranks of the Democratic Party. This is the party's mainstream. This is what it, again, has revealed itself to be. Parties do the darnedest things. To themselves.

    Kelly still has not managed to get off his dead ass and explain why we must go to war with Saddam. Proof of weapons of destruction..Bush says so... good enough for Mike. Saddam threatening America...nope. Iraq had something to do with 9/11..evidence says absolutely not. So where is your case, Kelly? Most journalists (and Kelly still pretends to be one) have acknowledged, and Karl Rove and Andy Card have stated, that the war on Iraq is an election marketing gimmick; the "product' to be sold after all the back-to-school sales are over. But for Kelly, it's "don't bother me with facts or evidence, just start the friggin war".

    We may very well go to war. The Democrats are close to giving President Dry Drunk the right to bomb the shit out of Iraq, and then come back 48 hours later scratching his head and giving excuses just like the old days when he had to be bailed out of the drunk tank.

    Michael Kelly has two boys: Jack and Tom. Although I would never wish them harm, if one of them has to go war for Bush, and one of them doesn't come back, I want to be there when Kelly writes his next column on what is "most memorable, most indefensible, and most obscene".






    posted by tbogg at 11:24 AM

    |

     

    "We hate the American serviceman"

    Not one of these people have a child that will fight the war in Iraq.

    But they all have little flag pins in their lapels.


    posted by tbogg at 10:56 AM

    |

     

    Sorry. Our religion says "sit your fat ass on the couch, eat Lil Debbie Cakes, watch Nickelodeon, and get juvenile diabetes"

    Fox News (they distort, you deride) reports that some parents, suffering from profound retardation, are being denied their rights to raise equally developmentally-stunted children because their local school district is teaching Yoga, which is clearly a religion.

    "It's a church and state issue," Steve Woodrow, the father of a first grader, said.

    Woodrow, pastor of the First Baptist Church of Aspen, Colo., became upset when his daughter's public school announced that yoga classes would begin this fall. He and other parents complained to the school board, claiming it was a clear violation of the separation of church and state.

    "If you study yoga its roots clearly are within Hinduism," Woodrow said.

    Woodrow then sat on the porch of his tarpaper shack plucking tunelessly on his banjo while grinning a toothless grin, and waving at tourists as they took his picture thereby stealing what was left of his shrivelled and seldom-used soul.

    He later announced plans to grow an opposable digit on at at least one hand, probably the one he scratches with.


    posted by tbogg at 9:37 AM

    |

     

    ...and Jerry Mathers as the Beaver

    Sorry. I couldn't help myself. Val Kilmer is going to play porn legend John Holmes.


    posted by tbogg at 9:08 AM

    |

     

    That's weird. Bobby wasn't covered in cooking oil when he disappeared.

    The National Amber Alert is going to be administered by John Ashcroft's Justice Department.

    Hey Attorney General Can't-Beat-A-Dead-Man? Do you think you could find the Anthrax Killer or Kevin Rudolph first? (Oh wait, the Anthrax guy tried to kill members of the media and Democrats, and Rudolph attacked women's Health Clinic's, which would make both of them...Ashcroft's key supporters in the much coveted 18-55 year-old angry white male demographic.)

    Never mind. Our children are doomed.





    posted by tbogg at 8:57 AM

    |

     

    How about death by choking on oily non-answers?

    Looks like Ari Fleischer needs a press secretary.

    "Regime change is the policy in whatever form it takes," Fleischer said when asked if the White House wanted to see Saddam dead.

    When a reporter pressed one final time if Fleischer intended to advocate from the White House podium that an Iraqi should put a bullet in Saddam's head, the Bush spokesman said, "Regime change is welcome in whatever form it takes." And he repeated, "Regime change is welcome in whatever form it takes."

    I'm sure the stress of having to explain the ramblings of President Irwin Corey has taken it's toll on Ari. Why just 18 months ago, he had a full, lustrous head of hair. Now look at him...on the other hand, don't bother.


    posted by tbogg at 8:40 AM

    |

     

    Does this mean we get to bomb Michelle Malkin?

    ZAMBOANGA, Philippines, Oct. 2 — Two people were killed, including an American serviceman, in a powerful blast outside a bar frequented by soldiers from an adjacent military base in the southern Philippines, according to a radio report and U.S. military sources.

    Must be those terra-ists in the Philippines. Blame Saddam.


    posted by tbogg at 8:18 AM

    |

     

    Ashcroft couldn't beat a dead man. Forrester is worse...

    Republicans are all but admitting that the only way Forrester can win if he has no one opposing him. The Self Made Pundit makes some excellent points.


    posted by tbogg at 8:14 AM

    |

     

    Notes from the short bus

    According to reports, President Cartman ("respect mah athoritah!") has reached agreement with the House on an Iraq resolution.

    Now, I've said this before (just ask my wife) I have always considered the House to be the Special Olympics branch of our goverment (anyone can play), which explains why Bush gets his way there so often. I've met both Senators and House members in my life, and I know that Senators, for the most part, have a sense of gravitas or propriety; they have weight. With Congressmen you get some insurance man in a cheap suit who made the rounds of the Rotary breakfasts and got in with the local Democratic or Republican commitee. Soaked in a fear-induced sweat, these climbers have one eye continually on the two year clock, worried that they may have to go back into the private sector and actually work, after one term, with a big "L" stamped on their foreheads. Their other eye is focused on the Big Enchilada...Senator.

    But does anyone really believe that blowhards like JD Hayworth (R-potential heartattack) or Duncan Hunter (R-bloated windbag) will ever get called up to the show? Do you really think that Tom DeLay (R-Snopes family retainer) could get elected to the Senate? These overstuffed fulminators avoid deep thought like it's kryptonite and latch onto any hot button wedge issue like it was the last doughnut in the box.

    So, when Bush reaches a deal with the House, take it with a grain of salt. He still has to deal with the Senate where there is actual consideration of consequences in play (Patriot Act excluded).


    posted by tbogg at 8:03 AM

    |

    Tuesday, October 01, 2002

     

    Bob? Where's your review of last night's Matlock?

    Bob Bartley, who was put out to pasture not a moment too soon over at the Wall Street Journal, wrote an....."interesting" column this week about the Viet Nam war and Democrats. Outside of a selective overview of the war, he makes this interesting observation:

    These sentiments led the Democratic Party to electoral debacle in 1968 and 1972. With 45 of 55 Democratic Senators voting against the Gulf War resolution in 1991, they've been able to win the presidency only with Southern governors who had no foreign policy record to connect them to the anti-war movement.

    Huh? Okay Bob, stay with me here:

    1992 Bill Clinton, noted "draft dodger and protestor of the war while in England"

    1996 Bill Clinton, see above

    2000 Presumptive winner George W. Bush (with an assist from SCOTUS), noted Texas Air National Guard deserter during the Viet Nam War.

    2000 Actual winner Albert Gore, Viet Nam war vet and son of a southern Senator who lost his seat over opposition to the Viet Nam War.

    For those keeping score, that's three Presidential elections since 1991 and the Dems won all three, with one thrown out due to Supreme interference. At worst, the Dems are batting .666, which is only slightly higher than Jenna's last Breathalyzer test...

    Looks like Bob hasn't been taking his historical Metameucil lately. Somebody tuck his blanket in a little tighter while I go mash up some bananas.





    posted by tbogg at 1:22 PM

    |

     

    Bloviating Sophistry Alert

    Yeah. It's George Will again:

    McDermott's and Bonior's espousal of Saddam Hussein's line, and of Gore's subtext (and Barbra Streisand's libretto), signals the recrudescence of the dogmatic distrust of U.S. power that virtually disqualified the Democratic Party from presidential politics for a generation. It gives the benefits of all doubts to America's enemies and reduces policy debates to accusations about the motives of Americans who would project U.S. power in the world.

    "recrudescence of the dogmatic distrust "

    How that just trips off the tongue. Someone over on Table Talk once said that George Will writes like a "smart-ass seventh grader who just found a thesaurus". It makes you wonder who reads Will's columns to President Cartman in the morning while he's having his Cocoa Pebbles. Probably the same person who explains Marmaduke to him.

    Anyway, Will brings out all the usual suspects: Jane Fonda ( who protested the Viet Nam war while Will was hiding out in divinity school praying to god he didn't get drafted), William Joyce, Neville Chamberlain, Al Gore, Barbra Streisand (although Will's fact checker forgot Alec Baldwin which should result in a serious dressing down as well as a reduction in his meager stipend)... Using a Will-like baseball analogy, it looks like Will's relationship with the Pulitzers is remarkably similar to the Cubs and the World Series: won one a long time ago, but none are forecast in the foreseeable future.


    posted by tbogg at 10:58 AM

    |

     

    I'll take "Crack-ho Daughters" for $300, Alex

    Looks like Jeb thought he was going to be on Quiz Show...and needed a little help.

    Can't those Bush boys do anything without cheating?


    posted by tbogg at 8:48 AM

    |

     

    They wuz talkin' funny.... so I shot 'em

    Read this. Then think about Eunice Stone with a gun.


    posted by tbogg at 8:43 AM

    |

     

    Vote for me because I'm not Robert Torricelli. What? Okay. Vote for me because I'm not ...the other guy who's going to run against me. Whoever he is. Because I'm not him.

    "In 36 days, decency, fairness and the rule of the law will trump this desperate attempt to retain power," said Douglas Forrester, Torricelli's GOP opponent. "The people of New Jersey have had enough of playing politics with the fundamental tenets of democracy."

    Doug Forrester sure is a chickenshit. If he's such a great candidate, why is he worried?


    posted by tbogg at 8:35 AM

    |

     

    You don't send me faxes...

    I'm not a big fan of Barbra Streisand, but the enemy of my enemy is my friend.



    posted by tbogg at 8:24 AM

    |

     

    The cafeteria wants to know if they can have the goat after the ritual sacrifice

    If you happen to be in the neighborhood of San Mateo High School, stop by the Satanic Thought Society bake sale. The pentagram cookies are divine...



    posted by tbogg at 8:20 AM

    |

    Monday, September 30, 2002

     

    Back in the saddle with Andy

    Just when I thought I was done with Sully tonight he comes up with this:

    Above all, Torricelli's exit unfairly denies the voters a chance to punish him. Such votes are a critical part of the political system. They help cleanse the electoral palette, they allow the body politic to make a formal statement about what matters, and they drive the point home by humiliating the ethically challenged. Torricelli's final, cynical move is of a piece with his entire career. It's a scam and a duck. This time, surely New Jersey's courts shouldn't let him get away with it.

    Earlier today, Joe Conason had this to say:

    Just four days ago, Republican senatorial candidate Douglas Forrester demanded that Bob Torricelli step down. "Mr. Torricelli has disgraced himself and New Jersey," he said. "The people of New Jersey deserve better. I reiterate my call for Mr. Torricelli to resign his office and apologize to the people of New Jersey." But before Torricelli decided to follow his rival's advice, Forrester's friends began whining.

    "This is a cynical attempt by party bosses to manipulate democracy," cried the executive director of the Republican Senatorial Campaign Committee." In other words, they've suddenly realized that the Torch's resignation would allow Gov. Jim McGreevey to name a new Democratic senator -- who would probably beat Forrester in a special election. Some people are just never satisfied.

    If Andy had bothered to just read Conason's comments written for Salon (which also, for some unknown reason gives Sully a check) earlier in the day, he probably wouldn't have made such a fool of himself. Then again, he probably would...he is Andy Sullivan afterall.





    posted by tbogg at 9:50 PM

    |

     

    There's idiots, useful idiots, and then there is Sullivan

    Looks like Andy Sullivan has his knickers in a twist...again. Now it's those pesky Congressmen who were actually elected instead of selected. Let's listen in:

    WHOSE SIDE ARE THEY ON?: Congressman Jim McDermott has just accused president (sic) Bush of wilfully (sic) lying to the American people about national security threats from Saddam or Al Qaeda. He said this not on the floor of the House or in his district - but in Baghdad, the capital city of a despot who is on the brink of war with the United States. At a time when the U.S. government is attempting some high-level diplomatic maneuvers in the U.N., when Saddam is desperate for any propaganda ploy he can muster, these useful idiots play his game. I think what we're seeing now is the hard-core base of the Democratic Party showing its true colors, and those colors, having flirted with irrelevance and then insouciance are now perilously close to treason.

    This is the story that harshed Andy's mellow:

    WASHINGTON, Sept. 29 — Democratic congressmen who are visiting Iraq this week stirred up anger among some Republicans when they questioned the reasons President Bush has used to justify possible military action against Iraq.

    One of the congressmen, Representative Jim McDermott of Washington State, said today that he thought President Bush was willing "to mislead the American people" about whether the war was needed and that the administration had gone back and forth between citing supposed links between Iraq and the terrorist network Al Qaeda and Iraq's supposed attempts to obtain weapons of mass destruction.

    Andy then continues in high dudgeon:

    So at a crucial juncture in American diplomacy, this Democrat is saying that Bush is a liar and a cheat - and in Baghdad! The only word for this is vile. Then there's David Bonior, formerly second-ranking Democrat in the House, who said the following: "We've got to move forward in a way that's fair and impartial. That means not having the United States or the Iraqis dictate the rules to these inspections." Let's be clear here. This guy is saying that we should be neutral between the demands of the United States and Iraq over weapons inspections. Neutral. Between his own country and a vicious military despot with weapons of mass destruction, Bonior cautions neutrality. It seems to me that in the coming elections, this has to be a key issue. Do you want to elect Congressmen who are neutral between Iraq and the U.S. or those who would always put the interests of the U.S. first? Now that the Democrats have upped the ante in this way, I see no reason why the Republicans cannot call them on it.

    Shall we deconstruct Andy's little screed? Oh, lets!:

    Andy:Congressman Jim McDermott has just accused president Bush of wilfully lying to the American people about national security threats from Saddam or Al Qaeda.

    Looks like the International Atomic Energy Agency begs to differ. Guess it was just a mistake in the Cliff Notes that Condi prepared for him...or Bush lied.

    Andy:He said this not on the floor of the House or in his district - but in Baghdad, the capital city of a despot who is on the brink of war with the United States.

    Actually, it looks like the Bush is on the brink of war with Iraq, not the other way around. I haven't heard Saddam threatening "regime change" in the US. If he did, I'm sure the papers would have mentioned it.

    Andy:At a time when the U.S. government is attempting some high-level diplomatic maneuvers in the U.N.

    Bush: Either you go with us or we are gonna go anyway. Yup, sounds "high level diplomatic" to me.

    Andy:I think what we're seeing now is the hard-core base of the Democratic Party showing its true colors, and those colors, having flirted with irrelevance and then insouciance are now perilously close to treason.

    Now as I understand the word "insouciance", it means a lack of concern or being nonchalant. I wouldn't think that three American Congressmen would travel to the country of "a vicious military despot with weapons of mass destruction" if they weren't concerned that the a lying President was willing to start World War III just because some guy "tried to kill my dad". So we will have to deny Andy this point also. Sorry.

    Andy:"We've got to move forward in a way that's fair and impartial. That means not having the United States or the Iraqis dictate the rules to these inspections." Let's be clear here. This guy is saying that we should be neutral between the demands of the United States and Iraq over weapons inspections. Neutral. Between his own country and a vicious military despot with weapons of mass destruction, Bonior cautions neutrality.

    No. Bonior is making the point that the UN and not the US should dictate the rules of engagement. If it were up to this administration, Iraq would already be a US colony called either East Texas or Exxonistan. Oh yes, and we still have no proof of weapons of mass destruction except for what President Cowardly Lyin' is telling us.

    Andy: It seems to me that in the coming elections, this has to be a key issue. Do you want to elect Congressmen who are neutral between Iraq and the U.S. or those who would always put the interests of the U.S. first?

    BZZZT. Strawman! Shouldn't the choice be between those who want to send somebody else's kids off to die for oil and "daddy vengeance" or for someone who wants to be a partner in the world community and not just run around blowing shit up because they can?


    So I would say that Andy didn't do so well today. He did manage an approximation of the shrill level of shrieking hysteria that was set by Chickenhawk Michael Kelly, but that is a benchmark that is almost, shall we say, Coulterian. Let's give him a D+ with markdowns for misspellings and for misapplying "insouciance".

    For Andy's next assignment::

    Jim McDermott (D- Former Lt. Commander, US Navy Medical Corp),

    Mike Thompson (D- Viet Nam Vet from 173rd Airborne, awarded the Purple Heart)

    David Bonior (D- US Air Force)

    George W Bush (R- Deserted from the Texas Air National Guard)

    Dick Cheney (R-Had other priorities)

    Compare and contrast.

    ...and remember...show work.








    posted by tbogg at 7:20 PM

    |

     

    I'm not stupid...but I play a stupid person on the web

    Micky Kaus, who apparently can't imagine anything that might happen beyond, oh say, lunch today, thinks that Matthew Miller is being overly "cynical". I think that Kaus is being overly obtuse. Kaus, quoting Miller:

    Many Republicans think these trends favor Democrats, too. That's why George W. Bush, learning the lesson of Newt Gingrich, has always pretended to have a "compassionate" agenda. But Republican political consultants privately know the surest way to stem the Democratic drift is for the war on terror to become the master narrative of American politics. [Emphasis added.]

    Kaus then says:

    What's interesting are the implications of this super-cynical view (which I do not necessarily share!) for the Iraq question.. Specifically, if Bush wants to use the terrorism issue to help his own reelection in 2004 (and not just to win the mid-term elections this November) will he invade Iraq in January, as many conservative commentators hope and expect? The answer is no. If a January Iraq invasion were successful, it would probably be over too soon to help Bush in 2004 -- and Saddam Hussein's fall would open up the dangerous possibility that the nation's attention would quickly shift back to domestic issues on which Democrats have the edge. .... No, unless Bush is planning to invade Korea and Iran after Iraq, the optimal cynical strategy for maintaining anti-terrorism as the "master narrative of American politics" would seem to require Bush, once the midterms were safely over, to keep delaying the Iraq invasion for a year or two, so that the real military crisis comes closer to the next presidential election..... In other words, to the extent that Bush is the purely cynical, self-interested dog-wagger that some Democrats (not me!) charge, he can't also be the irresponsible cowboy who is going to rush into war in January. It's not in his political interest.

    Kaus seems a little slow on the uptake, in that he disregards General Karl's Power Point presentation (Election by War for Dummies) as well as the latest Bush doctrine which, in it's short form, says: "we can blow up anyone who might somehow, someday be able to blow us up". Using this as a starting point allows Bush, like a distracted child, to move from one conflict (Afghanistan) to another (Iraq) because it's newer and shinier. At one point the goal was getting Osama (remember him?), then it was getting the Taliban which we did, more or less (although tracking down Mullah Omar has become a bit of a problem too). Now, like a child discarding a broken toy, the adminstration thinks that they have done enough in Afghanistan and wants something newer and still in the shrinkwrap. This is called lowering the bar, or in Bush's case, "the soft bigotry of lowered expectations". Bush gives himself a "gentleman's C" and is ready to move on. In Bush's world there are many "terrarists" which means that we may have actions against Iran, Libya, Sudan, oh hell pick a country. I'm sure with recent developments Bush may want to put Germany or California in play.


    So President Cartman can start on Iraq sometime next year. Then at the beginning of 2004 (because an evildoer-destroyers work is never done... just ask Batman) he can pick on some other little country that Condi chooses for him (which will never, ever, ever be Saudi Arabia) and he can come up with some more "intelligence" about the evil that men do in that Country of the Month Club.


    Kaus forgets that a Bush only does well politically when he is at war fighting evil. Everything else requires complex thinking and planning which just isn't a strength of a Bush... or Kaus for that matter.


    posted by tbogg at 12:39 PM

    |

     

    A lesson in ad hominems

    I guess San Diego Union Insight Editor Robert Caldwell missed that day at journalism school when they covered hypocrisy. From his Sunday column:


    Gore's case, in striking contrast, is sloppily assembled and patently political, complete with applause lines and leaden sarcasm. Indeed, it is much more an ad hominem, mean-spirited political assault on Bush than a detailed deconstruction of the president's Iraq policy

    Let's see what Caldwell had to say about Gore:

    Then came Al Gore, lurching left in a soft-on-Saddam speech

    Gore's case, in striking contrast, is sloppily assembled and patently political, complete with applause lines and leaden sarcasm

    mean-spirited

    Next, Gore cheap shots Bush

    Gore ridicules Bush for disparaging "nation building," then tosses off an applause line

    Who's politicizing the Iraq debate now? A performance this cheap should be beneath the dignity of a former vice president. It's a gross disservice to America for Gore to stride onto a public stage and then savage the president amid a mounting international crisis.

    No doubt about who is the stateman here and who the shabby politician.

    What Caldwell passes on is making the distinction between Gore giving a speech to a group while Blair had to go before Parliament and lay out the case for war to get their support (the fact that Blair pretty much flopped seems to have eluded Caldwell). It's also instructive that Caldwell does not compare Gore's speech with President Cartman's speech before the UN that was so taxing he slumped into a chair like he had just fought ten rounds and couldn't find his cornerman.

    If Caldwell wants a real debate on Iraq, why not call for one between Gore and Bush. Hell, they could put it on Pay Per View. I'd watch that.

    Email Caldwell to let him know what you think.



    posted by tbogg at 9:13 AM

    |

     

    Gimmee an S-H-U-T Gimmee a U-P What's that spell? Not you George...

    Trent Lott, ever the cheerleader steps up and defends President Cartman from those mean old Democrats:

    -- A congressman who questioned U.S. efforts to link Iraq to the al Qaeda terrorist network should "come home and keep his mouth shut," Senate Minority Leader Trent Lott said Sunday.

    Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Washington, who is one of three House members visiting Iraq to urge Iraqi officials to avert war by allowing U.N. weapons inspectors back in, has acted irresponsibly, Lott said.

    "For him to be in Baghdad, the center of one of the most dangerous dictators in the world, with all kinds of weapons of mass destruction, to be questioning the veracity of our own American president, is the height of irresponsible," said Lott, R-Mississippi. "He needs to come home and keep his mouth shut."

    snip

    "Why do they keep coming back to this issue and keep trying to hook the Iraqis into that?" McDermott asked on CNN's "Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer." "My question really is, why do they want the regime change? I would much rather have disarmament here. And what they're doing is really setting up to throw out Saddam Hussein."

    McDermott went further in an interview with ABC's "This Week." "I think the president would mislead the American people," he said.


    That would be Jim McDermott (D- Former Lt. Commander, US Navy Medical Corp), who was joined by Mike Thompson (D- Viet Nam Vet from 173rd Airborne, awarded the Purple Heart) that Trent wants to deny First Amendment rights to. They served their country and fought for freedom while Trent was turning cartwheels in Oxford, Mississippi.











    posted by tbogg at 8:44 AM

    |

    Sunday, September 29, 2002

     

    ...and this is your new roommate, Grandpa Simpson

    Independent UK reports:

    The United States and a number of Arab countries have drawn up plans for the exile of Saddam Hussein to a neutral country to avoid an invasion that could lead to massive number of civilian deaths.

    Planners in the Near East division of the US State Department have looked at various scenarios under which the Iraqi president would cede power to a democratic government and then leave the country. President Saddam has angrily dismissed such suggestions – made to him by third parties.

    Apparently Saddam was amenable to this prior to the Bush administration, but then his 401(k) went to shit.


    posted by tbogg at 12:27 PM

    |

     

    Well, Operation Afghan Hearts and Minds is going well...so, can we attack Iraq now?

    Time reports:

    One afternoon in August, a U.S. Special Forces A team knocked at the door of a half-ruined mud compound in the Shahikot Valley. The servicemen were taking part in Operation Mountain Sweep, a weeklong hunt for Qaeda and Taliban fugitives in eastern Afghanistan.

    THE MAN OF THE HOUSE, an elderly farmer, let the Americans in as soon as his female relatives had gone to a back room, out of the gaze of strange men. Asked if there were any weapons in the house, the farmer proudly showed them his only firearm, a hunting rifle nearly a century old. When the team had finished searching, carefully letting the women stay out of sight, the farmer served tea. The Americans thanked him and walked toward the next house.

    They didn’t get far before the team’s captain looked back. Six paratroopers from the 82d Airborne, also part of Mountain Sweep, were lined up outside the farmer’s house, preparing to force their way in. “I yelled at them to stop,” says the captain, “but they went ahead and kicked in the door.” The farmer panicked and tried to run, and one of the paratroopers slammed him to the ground. The captain raced back to the house. Inside, he says, other helmeted soldiers from the 82d were attempting to frisk the women. By the time the captain could order the soldiers to leave, the family was in a state of shock. “The women were screaming bloody murder,” recalled the captain, asking to be identified simply as Mike. “The guy was in tears. He had been completely dishonored.”

    Okay, so we didn't learn anything from Viet Nam...


    posted by tbogg at 12:02 PM

    |

    Saturday, September 28, 2002

     

    Newsflash!!! Hitchens to leave The Nation...real nation replies, "Who is Hitchens and why should we care?"

    So, drunken has-been "journalist" Chris Hitchens is leaving The Nation. BFD...stop the presses...zzzzzzzzzzzzz.

    When you consider that the late Barbara Olson's last book was the prophetic The Final Days, would it be fair to assume that Hitch is leaving because there's No One Left To Lie To?


    posted by tbogg at 11:11 PM

    |

     

    The Goddess, Ann Telnaes....

    No editorial cartoonist in the country quite captures George W Harkenbush and Dick Cheneyburton like she does.

    and Jeff Danziger provides Ann Coulter with some national exposure.


    posted by tbogg at 10:56 PM

    |

     

    C'mon...do it. You know you want to....

    Punch the Doughboy

    Who says the Internet is a vast wasteland?


    posted by tbogg at 9:00 PM

    |

     

    Novocaine for the soul

    Lite-Brite


    posted by tbogg at 8:58 PM

    |

     

    Getting off the political beat....

    I can't say enough good things about a Songs About Jane by neo-soul band Maroon 5. (Careful ...if you're at work...the link has sound). Great musicianship as well as vocals that fall somewhere between Stevie Wonder (when he was good) and Mick Hucknall. In fact this is the band that we hoped Simply Red would become, before they went smarmy. Harder To Breathe is one of the the "hookiest" songs I've heard in years.

    ...and let's not forget Aimee Mann's Lost in Space. As Elvis Costello has gotten older and mushier, Mann has stepped up as one of the smartest songwriters working.

    Hey. I gotta listen to something while I'm sitting here getting snarky...



    posted by tbogg at 8:42 PM

    |

     

    Dead man's revenge

    Maybe it wasn't such a good thing for John Ashcroft to lose to a dead man in 2000. Oh sure, I know that this would mean that the Republicans would probably still have control of the Senate (although Lincoln Chaffee is looking mighty skittish). But then you read this by Dahlia Lithwick, and you wonder just how much damage that crazy Crisco-annointing, hymn-singing, repressed Jesus huckster can do as Attorney General.

    As Frank Rich points out in this excellent column:

    While the administration says yes, the factual backup is again fuzzy. Certainly it's hard to be reassured by anything said or done by John Ashcroft, who in May 2001 testified to the Senate that "our No. 1 goal is the prevention of terrorist acts." We now know that he was just putting us on. On Sept. 10, 2001, he refused a F.B.I. budget request to add 149 field agents, 200 analysts and 54 translators to its counterterrorism effort. He did so despite the fact, unearthed by Congressional investigators, that the F.B.I. then had only one analyst monitoring Al Qaeda.

    The attorney general drives liberals crazy with his assaults on civil liberties, but we do have courts to sort that out (as they are already doing). What's truly frightening about Mr. Ashcroft is his incompetence. Even as we learned this week that the Justice Department's prosecutors are so sloppy that they mistakenly turned over 48 classified F.B.I. reports to Zacarias Moussaoui, Seymour Hersh reported in The New Yorker that the attorney general may have blown our chance to get useful Qaeda information out of Mr. Moussaoui by mismanaging his prosecution.

    Add that to Lithwick's column, and what we already know about the Padilla case, the New Orleans hookers, offensive statuary, his assault to Right to Die in Oregon, and you have to ask yourself, what can be done to stop this crazy bastard?

    I wonder how Russ Feingold sleeps these days?

    Dumbass.


    posted by tbogg at 6:01 PM

    |

    Friday, September 27, 2002

     

    Trent's got a Lotta 'splainin' to do

    Senator Mark Dayton weighs in:

    After Saddam Hussein bounced U.N. inspectors in January 1998, then-Senate Majority Leader Trent Lott said on Feb. 12: "I had hoped that we could get to the point where we could pass a resolution this week on Iraq. But we really developed some physical problems, if nothing else. . . . So we have decided that the most important thing is not to move so quickly but to make sure that we have had all the right questions asked and answered and that we have available to us the latest information about what is . . . happening with our allies in the world.

    "The Senate is known for its deliberate actions. And the longer I stay in the Senate, the more I have learned to appreciate it. It does help to give us time to think about the potential problems and the risks and the ramifications and to, frankly, press the administration."

    The Republican-controlled Senate took five more months to pass a resolution that year, and it did not authorize President Clinton to use military force. After Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait in 1990, the Senate also deliberated five months before authorizing what became the Persian Gulf War.

    Hey. I like this Dayton guy...




    posted by tbogg at 10:41 PM

    |

     

    Virtual Karen Hughes speech writing site..sans her sumptuously androgynous ass

    Now you too can write Presidentin' speechifying....

    A big thanks to Cliff for this one. You da man...



    posted by tbogg at 10:03 PM

    |

     

    I don't remember signing up for the cult of personality

    Arundhati Roy points out that opposing Bush isn't necessarily being un-American.



    posted by tbogg at 9:53 PM

    |

     

    Chuck and duck

    Charles Krauthammer, not to be out-blustered my Michael "Goddamit! Kill someone" Kelly, comes in late, but no less rabid, on President in Exile Al Gore's speech:

    A pudding with no theme but much poison. Such was the foreign policy speech Al Gore delivered in San Francisco on Monday. It was a disgrace -- a series of cheap shots strung together without logic or coherence. Most of all, it was brazen. It was delivered as if there had been no Clinton-Gore administration, no 1990s.

    and

    Gore should be careful about leveling charges about presidents getting combat-happy to distract attention from other problems. Yet what is most remarkable about Gore's speech is that for all its poison, it is profoundly unserious. Take Gore's repeated characterization of the Bush policy on postwar Afghanistan as "this doctrine of wash your hands and walk away."

    then he finishes with this

    One can argue either way, but the burden of proof is on those urging the more onerous and risky MacArthur regency. If Gore were a serious man he would make the case. But he doesn't. He doesn't even try to. He is too thin. And too cynical.

    The New York Times reports that Gore wrote the speech "after consulting a fairly far-flung group of advisers that included Rob Reiner." Current U.S. foreign policy is the combined product of Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleezza Rice, Dick Cheney, Colin Powell, Paul Wolfowitz and the president. Meanwhile, the pretender is huddling with Meathead.

    Had it not been for a few little old ladies baffled by the butterfly ballot in Palm Beach, Fla., American foreign policy today would be made by Gore-Reiner instead of the Bush brain trust. Who says God doesn't smile upon the United States of America?


    I'll pass on the way too easy characterization of Rummy, Condoleeza "liberating the Germans from Hitler" Rice, Dick Cheneyburton, Colin Powell, Paul "Chickenhawk" Wolfowitz, and President Cartman as a Bush brain trust, and instead move on to a point that Krauthammer makes...and then runs away from like Bush from a drug test. To wit:

    Considering the glass house he inhabits, Gore's attack on Bush is remarkably ad hominem. He implies, first, that the president is going after Iraq to distract attention from not finding Osama bin Laden. And second, that Bush is doing this for electoral purposes.

    Well...what about those implications? His answer:

    Clinton's dick, Clinton wagging the dog, Clinton checking polls, Monica, Monica, Monica...

    Is Bush wagging the dog?

    Clinton's dick, impeachment, Monica, Monica, Monica...

    Have we found Osama?

    Well, Gore specifically says we need to finish the job in Afghanistan, and Krauthammer agrees with him:

    Walk away? Our current policy is to secure Kabul, retrain the army, protect the new president and establish a small central government that can, over time, expand its political and geographic reach. This is a serious commitment. Our soldiers trying to fulfill it are being shot at regularly. Tell them they're walking away.

    There is a serious question about how deeply involved in Afghanistan we ought to be. Are we more likely to bring stability by continuing Afghanistan's long history of decentralization and allowing warlords to act in their traditional areas of influence, or by sending an imperial army to go around imposing order in places where outsiders -- the British and the Soviets most notably -- have not had much luck imposing their own order?

    Notice he avoids bin Laden, completely. (bin who?) But then he says:

    One can argue either way, but the burden of proof is on those urging the more onerous and risky MacArthur regency. If Gore were a serious man he would make the case. But he doesn't. He doesn't even try to. He is too thin. And too cynical.

    I think what is cynical is agreeing with someone...and then disagreeing with them in the next breath because it hinders your point of view, and then hoping no one notices. Like most of the critics of the Gore speech (the Humes, Kellys, Sullivans...you know , the second tier pundits) he chooses to select a few fragments of the speech and egregiously misinterpret them. Then again, maybe he's just obtuse. Who knows? But like Kelly's foam-flecked commentary on the same subject, it betrays a man obsessed with transfering his hatred from Clinton to Gore in a most bilious manner.

    Either way, you got to love this line (again):

    Meanwhile, the pretender is huddling with Meathead.

    Insert your own Bush/mirror joke here...








    posted by tbogg at 9:30 PM

    |

     

    Relax, Miguel, it's in the bag....whoops

    In Monty Python and the Holy Grail you had to "answer me these questions three". Looks like Miguel Estrada ain't crossing that Bridge of Death.

    Chuck Schumer handed him his tope.


    posted by tbogg at 4:00 PM

    |

     

    Friday fun time

    Last week it was Wu names...today, contributor Travis from KY. provides us with Mullet haiku. Take it away, Travis:

    Drunk at 3 p.m.

    Requested AC/DC

    Hootin', hollerin'

    *****************

    'No smoking inside'

    Save the butt behind my ear

    Can't kill the rooster

    ***********************

    Take her to Wendy's

    No shoes, no shirt, no service

    Wait in the car, smoke.

    **************************

    Top short for the boss

    Long in back for the ladies

    Underage girlfriend.

    *************************

    Nothing but curse words

    The kid still ain't potty-trained

    Tank top every day.



    posted by tbogg at 12:35 PM

    |

     

    Consensus is a beautiful thing, especially when it's ramrodded down the nation's throat

    Mark Morford.


    posted by tbogg at 12:28 PM

    |

     

    Words from the wise

    Jimmy Breslin nails it.


    posted by tbogg at 11:05 AM

    |

     

    Fly the friendly skies of....not so fast there, Liberal-boy

    More tales of how life has gotten better under Bush...

    Critics question whether Sister Virgine Lawinger, a 74-year-old Catholic nun, is the kind of "air pirate" lawmakers had in mind when they passed the law. Lawinger, one of the Wisconsin activists stopped at the Milwaukee airport on April 19, said she didn't get upset when two sheriff's deputies escorted her for questioning.

    "We didn't initially say too much about the detainment, because we do respect the need to be careful (about airline security)," the nun recounted. "They just said your name is flagged and we have to clear it. And from that moment on no one ever gave me any clarification of what that meant and why. I guess that was our frustration."




    posted by tbogg at 10:41 AM

    |

     

    All the news that fits...or at least gets the wingnuts to click on it

    MSNBC Headline:

    USOC investigating Sen. Clinton

    First line in the story:

    NEW YORK, Sept. 27 — The U.S. Olympic Committee is reviewing possible 2012 Summer Games bidding rules violations involving Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Mayor Michael Bloomberg. [emphasis added]

    Oh yeah. That guy too.....



    posted by tbogg at 10:12 AM

    |

     

    Sullivan's travails

    Andy Sullivan is going to great lengths, not to mention playing rhetorical Twister, in an effort to deconstruct President in Exile Al Gore's speech. Here's his latest:

    As usual, a really sharp comment from Virginia Postrel on Gore's speech. She cites the passage where Gore says


    "that we ought to be focusing our efforts first and foremost against those who attacked us on September 11th and who have thus far gotten away with it ...I don't think we should allow anything to diminish our focus on the necessity for avenging the 3,000 Americans who were murdered and dismantling the network of terrorists that we know were responsible for it." [Emphasis added.]



    Virginia comments:

    This is a very interesting way of framing the task at hand: not to prevent future attacks on Americans but to avenge the deaths on September 11. Now there's no question that many Americans, myself included, have entertained the desire for vengeance. But the only reason to act on that impulse is to make it clear that future attacks will be costly for the attackers. Vengeance for vengeance's sake is just blood lust. It might feel good, but (leaving aside any humanitarian considerations) it doesn't solve the fundamental problem. Vengeance may even make matters worse, by escalating blood feuds without eliminating threats. Gore's pooh-poohing of the administration's Iraq policy depends in large measure on his definition of the problem. If you want to prevent further attacks, you have to worry about state-sponsored weapons programs. If you just want to get revenge, you don't.



    Andy then says:


    I think that's a brilliant insight. In his pathetic attempt to find a way to attack his nemesis, Gore has actually reverted to the kind of bellicose hysteria we usually associate with the far right. In fact, I think Gore's speech is essentially what happens when a man takes his emotion and tries to find reasons - any reasons - for it. If the Democrats follow him, it will be into a political wilderness.


    First off, if Andy is looking for "bellicose hysteria" he need look no further than any recent Michael Kelly column. Secondly Postrel doesn't seem to see the linkage in two of her own statements :

    But the only reason to act on that impulse is to make it clear that future attacks will be costly for the attackers.

    and

    If you want to prevent further attacks, you have to worry about state-sponsored weapons programs.

    Maybe if Postrel put those two thoughts together she can come up with one worthy one. People like Postrel and Sullivan want to muddy the water so that 9/11 and Bush's Saddam obsession become one. They're not...and that is what Al Gore said quite clearly.





    posted by tbogg at 9:24 AM

    |

     

    The perpetual military campaign

    I'm sure this has been spammed around, but it's worth repeating. This is a letter published in the Hartford Courant less tha a week ago:

    September 22, 2002

    When George W. Bush was governor of Texas, his basic strategy was to stake out a position and refuse to budge, hoping to bully others into acquiescing. Only when met with strong opposition did he back down and compromise. We are seeing the same strategy in his policy over Iraq. In the past weeks, the president has attempted to bully the United Nations and now Congress into allowing him to attack Iraq and depose its leader. He is likely to get his wish. But the larger problem is not what will happen if no one stands up to Saddam Hussein. It is what will happen if no one stands up to the president and his vision of moral clarity.

    Our Constitution left the power to declare war to Congress because of the fear that if the president could act unilaterally, he might seek to aggrandize himself by taking the country into one war after another. Although the president could always defend the nation if attacked, he could not initiate hostilities without Congress' approval. In the 20th century, Congress' role has receded of necessity, so the president's power to make war has been hemmed in largely by domestic politics, the threat of nuclear reprisal and international law.

    The Bush administration's new policy of pre-emptive attacks is a dangerous addition to this mixture, creating a host of bad incentives. Simply by announcing future threats that deserve pre-emptive action, presidents can seize control of the political stage. A president who takes the country to war pushes aside all other concerns. By shifting the nation's forces from one military offensive to another, he can divert attention from domestic failures and foreign policy blunders. The more often the president attacks other countries pre-emptively, the more likely it becomes that our country will be attacked in turn. The president can then justify additional military action in response, and no patriotic American will oppose it.

    In this way, the president can effectively govern through war, with disastrous consequences for the nation and for the world. Armed with the doctrine of military pre-emption, the perpetual political campaign perfected by our last president might well become the perpetual military campaign of future presidents.

    President Bush had good reason to take us to war after Sept. 11. Still, he has not accomplished his stated goal of eliminating al Qaeda or capturing Osama bin Laden. With victory not achieved and Afghanistan still unstable, he has now attempted to shift our attention to a new war with Iraq. Again, he may well have excellent reasons for doing so. But we must pay attention to the larger picture. Members of Congress debating authorization for an attack on Iraq should ask the president tough questions about what future military actions he is considering. The way the president's foreign policy is proceeding, Iraq may not be the last war he asks us to fight.

    The president is right about one thing, however. Today the world faces a single man armed with weapons of mass destruction, manifesting an aggressive, bullying attitude, who may well plunge the world into chaos and bloodshed if he miscalculates. This person, belligerent, arrogant and sure of himself, truly is the most dangerous person on Earth. The problem is that his name is George W. Bush, and he is our president. "

    Jack M. Balkin is Knight Professor of Constitutional Law and the First Amendment at Yale Law School. His latest book is "The Laws of Change" (Schocken Books, 2002).

    Copyright 2002, Hartford Courant


    posted by tbogg at 8:24 AM

    |

     

    Noonan lets me down...but in a good way

    Last night I could barely sleep knowing that I would wake to yet another episode of the Loony Noonan Chronicles. Well, you could just imagine my disappointment when I read it this morning and she almost appeared lucid. I guess last weeks defense of Eunice Stone, the Georgia Snoop, just took a lot out of her.

    I will give her this: for all her misplaced admiration for the Midland Moron, and as much as she fears swarthy people of all shades of swarth, she doesn't seem to want to see America attack Iraq. You've got to give her credit for that. Now if she can just convince Michael Kelly to get out of that tree with his gun and put his clothes back on....


    posted by tbogg at 8:09 AM

    |

     

    I'd be lying if I said I told the truth

    Tom Tancredo (R-Hates Mexicans) is now admitting that he was just kidding when he took the term limit pledge.

    Tancredo said he backed out of the term limits pledge, in part, because he was not sure he could abandon his growing role as an immigration reform leader in Congress. He has not made a decision whether to run for a fourth term in 2004, but said the pledge is no longer a factor.

    "Once I did make up my mind, I'm not going to lie to you and say I'm still wondering," said Tancredo, who is seeking a third term this year. "Once you do it, you might as well send it out and get this thing through the snake."


    "get this thing through the snake"?

    Sounds to me like he's crawdaddin' on his pledge and stiffing his constituents (which isn't as dirty as it sounds).


    posted by tbogg at 7:54 AM

    |

    Thursday, September 26, 2002

     

    ....and I got this necklace, a Sponge Bob piñata, and a bottle of tequila for each one of girls."

    First Lady Laura Bush was spreading a little Librarian Love in Mexico City this week.

    In statements to the Mexican press made in Washington and published Wednesday in Reforma daily, Laura Bush explained she and her husband had lived in Texas for many years and have a special sensitivity for the problems of the U.S. Hispanic community.

    "There are so many stories about immigrants and the children of immigrants in the United States. Our whole country is made up of immigrants who were able to overcome poverty and obtain good jobs. There are many examples in my husband's administration," the first lady noted.


    The First Lady, identified in Mexican papers as Senora Alineada de Pinata, also pointed out that she and President Bush (Sr. Borracho y Estupido) had spent their honeymoon in Mexico City and Cozumel where they engaged in heavy drinking, shouting out commands in English to contemptuous service employees, as well as other acts of rampant Ugly Americanism.





    posted by tbogg at 1:34 PM

    |

     

    Misty water-colored memo's

    How is it, that we are allowed to see a personal fax between Barbra Streisand and Dick Gephardt, but we can't see the supposedly public records of meetings between oil companies and Dick Cheney (R-Halliburton)? Oh wait...it's Drudge, and he needs that mystical convergence between show business and politics to make him put down his copy of Poultry Today


    posted by tbogg at 12:53 PM

    |

     

    Like Clarence Thomas, but without the porn fixation

    Alberto Gonzales (the Chico to Bush's Man) took time out from his busy schedule helping Bush shred the Constitution to pen a plea for the Senate Judiciary Committe to please, please, please approve Miguel Estrada , who has been compared to Clarence Thomas by Rick Santorum (R-Unintentially ironic), to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit. Mr Estrada says:

    His extraordinary intellect, experience, integrity and support normally would mean a swift Senate confirmation -- particularly given the historic nature of the nomination. But some Senate Democrats have deemed Estrada controversial and are apparently threatening to block his confirmation. Sen. Charles E. Schumer (D-N.Y.) stated last April: "From my perusal of the record, [Estrada] is way out of the mainstream."

    But then he says:

    I do not know what record Schumer could have been referring to. Estrada has not been the author of controversial opinions or articles, nor has he spoken out on divisive issues. He is not a politician or an interest-group leader who has sought to make policy. What he has done is serve, in a variety of public and private capacities, as a brilliant and careful lawyer devoted to the courts and the law.

    Hmmmmmm. That's odd. Why would Schumer say that? Could he be out of line? Oh wait. From an article by Neil Lewis in the New York Times:

    Still, Senate Democrats have requested copies of Mr. Estrada's internal memorandums when he was an assistant solicitor general, from 1992 to 1997.

    The White House has refused to supply them and has pointed to a letter from several former solicitors general, Democrats and Republicans, saying that complying with the request would inhibit lawyers from giving candid advice.


    This, of course, was brought to you by....Alberto Gonzales.








    posted by tbogg at 10:32 AM

    |

     

    I click on it, so that you don't have to

    Sigh. Ann Coulter. What are we going to do with that high-spirited litle filly? As usual, she doesn't have anything to say this week, but that doesn't keep her from saying it anyway. Some choice morsels:

    Gore also complained that Bush has made the "rest of the world" angry at us. Boo hoo hoo. He said foreigners are not worried about "what the terrorist networks are going to do, but about what we're going to do."

    Good. They should be worried. They hate us? We hate them. Americans don't want to make Islamic fanatics love us. We want to make them die. There's nothing like horrendous physical pain to quell angry fanatics. So sorry they're angry – wait until they see American anger. Japanese kamikaze pilots hated us once too. A couple of well-aimed nuclear weapons, and now they are gentle little lambs. That got their attention.


    Apparently in her white-hot hatred of everything that is not a reflection of her feral visage, she has decided that having everyone hate you is a good thing. I'm sure this is based on personal experience. Anyway, she continues:

    Minority Whip Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., the ranking Democrat on the House intelligence committee, said the Democrats would not have enough information to make an informed decision on Iraq – until January. The war will have to take a back seat to urgent issues like prescription drugs and classroom size until then. The Democratic Party simply cannot rouse itself to battle.

    Instead of obsessing over why angry primitives hate Americans, a more fruitful area for Democrats to examine might be why Americans are beginning to hate Democrats.


    Well. That makes sense in some kind of apoplectic climb-on-the-roof-with-a-highpowered-rifle-and-thin-out-the-neighborhood kind of way.

    So. This weeks summary of Coulter:

    My Fedexed order from Good Vibrations hasn't shown up yet, so won't someone please kill some swarthy people so I can get off without having to invite Spencer Abraham over to give me oral pleasure?


    posted by tbogg at 9:55 AM

    |

     

    I'll gladly seal your driveway, for a hamburger today

    In light of the great Toogood parking lot assault, Slate has an interesting article on what the heck an Irish Traveler is. What is known about them is that they appear to be just normal folks who move from job to job, either doing shoddy work or, in many cases, no work at all. Also, they are terrific liars and scam artists, continually duping the unsuspecting people that come in contact with them.

    I found it interesting that, in Ireland, they're refered to as "Michael Kellys". Imagine that.


    posted by tbogg at 9:19 AM

    |

    Wednesday, September 25, 2002

     

    Sullivan's scourge starts a blog

    A big welcome to the fabulous David Ehrenstein. Sullivan should be quivering in his tighty-whiteys...


    posted by tbogg at 10:03 PM

    |

     

    And thusly did Al Gore harshly criticize President Bush's push for war against Iraq

    If you aren't already reading Mark Morford ... you're just wasting your time on the internet. How you can pass up writing like this?:

    He went on to blame the oily junior Texan grammar-mangler for plunging us "like some sort of squinty cowboy-wannabe on Ritalin" (quote spurious) toward a world that would allow any ol' second-rate piss-ant nation to launch an expensive macho whiny military strike against whomever it likes and call itself a superpower, even if it doesn't have all the kickass sorority parties and the 50-percent obesity rate and the gold-trimmed 8 mpg Escalades with the cute little antenna flags.

    and this:

    Polishing off his fifth scotch in about two gulps and slamming the glass down on the podium and muttering that Bush is a "likable niddering sycophantic imbecile who couldn't screw in a lightbulb without Cheney, much less spell 'niddering' or 'sycophantic,'" Gore, possibly dressed in faded Sean John khakis and black Ugg boots and an "Evildoer" T-shirt, did not go on to say how he truly believes Dick's defibrillator is powered by tiny frantic radioactive demon-monkeys running on little alien treadmills from Hell. But he should have.

    Stuff like this makes me feel like I'm just scratching petroglyphs on a wall in some cave.


    posted by tbogg at 9:41 PM

    |

     

    Stop the (upcoming) war...from the comfort of your own home

    Thanks to Kim B for passing this along:

    Dear MoveOn Member,

    As you know, Congress will likely vote whether or not to support a military
    attack on Iraq in the next week. Whether that vote passes, and whether we
    go to war, critically depend upon how much our Representatives and Senators
    hear from us now.

    MoveOn is recruiting a team of volunteer lobbyists who will contact
    Representatives' key foreign policy staff members to ensure they are well
    informed about the depth and breadth of opposition to a war. It's important
    that they understand precisely why we believe a campaign against Iraq would
    be a terrible move for our country.

    The lobbying effort will be the final push before the vote in MoveOn's
    extensive Iraq campaign. Over the last four months, MoveOn members have
    made over 10,000 phone calls to Congress, written thousands of letters to
    the editor, and participated in meetings with Senators' offices in every
    state.

    Being a volunteer lobbyist would take about four hours a week for the next
    two weeks. You don't need to be in Washington, D.C. -- you'll most likely do
    your work over the phone. We'll provide a detailed guide and script, but you
    should be comfortable engaging in a discussion in your own words about the
    war in Iraq.

    Since time is so short, if you're interested we need you to apply by 5pm
    TODAY. We're looking for volunteers in every congressional district in the
    country, which is going to be tough. We know we're pretty thin in some
    districts, so please let us know immediately if you can help. If we have
    more folks than we can handle in some districts, we'll let you know right
    away.

    With a strong grassroots lobbying team, we can turn the tide.

    --Eli Pariser

    International Campaigns Director

    MoveOn.org




    posted by tbogg at 7:42 PM

    |

     

    Bush II presents: Depression II...The Return of Tom Joad

    Great commentary over at selfmadepundit.


    posted by tbogg at 7:08 PM

    |

     

    Fan mail (yeah..I get some) from overseas...

    Andrew F. writes

    Excellent concept. Just what I need these days.

    I'm currently living in Switzerland. My friends and colleagues -- an
    eclectic mix of nationalities -- are truly unnerved and perplexed by Dubya
    and the mighty American machine. As am I.

    Brief summary of the rhythms of living abroad over the past two years:

    Pre-9/11 -- just another American expat, remember not to talk so loud and
    try not to let the cigarette smoking bother you (Switzerland has the
    highest incidence of smoking in Europe after like the Czech Republic or
    some place like that).

    Right after 9/11 -- lots of sympathy and heartfelt concern, people are
    truly shocked by the events, but as an expat, you're a bit on edge, some
    background concerns about "them," so, try to keep a low profile.

    Present -- keep a really low profile, not because of "them" -- Switzerland
    once again feels very safe and secure -- but to avoid making the locals
    uncomfortable, cuz when people realize you're from the US, they assume
    you're on side with the Bushies, and they tend to project that on to you.

    Anyway, great blog. Hope you can keep it up.


    I thought the last comment was rather personal...but thanks anyway, Andrew.


    posted by tbogg at 6:57 PM

    |

     

    Tapdancing with Ari

    If you have never read a White House briefing transcript, today is the day. I don't know how much they pay Ari, but he certainly earns it. He must be the first Presidential Press Secretary to have a corner man and a choreographer. Today he sustained several deep wounds...while antagonizing the whole White House Press room.


    posted by tbogg at 6:46 PM

    |

     

    Funny, you don't look poll-ish

    According to a recent CBS News Poll, when asked :


    Who is a greater threat?


    Survey says!:


    46% Saddam Hussein

    33% Osama bin Laden


    Now. What does this mean? First of all, we can assume that GW Bush (known in the blue states as Commander Bunnypants) was not given as an option. Secondly, it appears that some of these people think that Hussein was involved with 9/11. From the article:


    A majority of Americans, 51%, also believe that Saddam Hussein was personally involved in the Sept. 11 attacks


    Although there is a complete absence of information linking Saddam, and believe me, if there was information linking Saddam to 9/11, Bush would be all over it like Spencer Abraham on a hoagie. But there isn’t, and the fact remains that Osama bin Laden is the one behind 9/11. Lastly, it means that CBS will poll anyone, even if they are wearing their pants on their heads and standing in line to buy tickets to Let’s Roll! The Musical starring Sandy Duncan as brave, plucky Lisa Beamer.


    Taken in conjunction with the other polls showing the TANG Deserter at 60% approval levels, I would have to conclude that there are a lot of stupid people in this country, so making a career in Amway products is plausible, if still not socially acceptable.


    posted by tbogg at 2:49 PM

    |

     

    NHL schedules games in Hell

    Even Pat Buchanan can see the light at the end of the Bush apocalypse.


    posted by tbogg at 1:39 PM

    |

     

    Some rational discourse about irrational people

    Bob Somerby says it better than I ever could.


    posted by tbogg at 1:09 PM

    |

     

    Why does George Bush hate average working Americans?

    This puzzles me. What does George Bush have against the average working guy? I mean, Laura is tired of Tom Ridge hanging around the White House all day, sleeping on their sofa every night, and then he never, ever, rinses out his cereal bowl, and would it kill him to replace the toilet paper roll when it runs out? So every morning when Bush get ready to leave for work, right after he watches Blue's Clues, Laura says, "Bushie...see if you can get Tom a job today, okay? You're the Warrior President...pull some strings. Oh, and you forgot to put on your pants again".


    But yet, as much as they would like Tom out of the house, he still won't sign the Homeland Security bill.

    He hates working people so much that he would rather not have a Homeland Security Department, which means that we are at the mercy of evildoers from all the swarthy people countries. Which leads me to ask:


    Why does George Bush hate America?


    posted by tbogg at 12:53 PM

    |

     

    Bloated windbag now up to gale force strength

    Michael Kelly, who loves war more than his own children's lives, didn't care for Al Gore's speech. How's this for temperate argument:

    Gore's speech was one no decent politician could have delivered. It was dishonest, cheap, low. It was hollow. It was bereft of policy, of solutions, of constructive ideas, very nearly of facts -- bereft of anything other than taunts and jibes and embarrassingly obvious lies. It was breathtakingly hypocritical, a naked political assault delivered in tones of moral condescension from a man pretending to be superior to mere politics. It was wretched. It was vile. It was contemptible. But I understate.

    Later he says:


    Although Gore knows that Bush has been publicly trying to move the nation toward war with Iraq since at least January, he pretended to believe the president was only now -- "in this high political season" -- pushing for war in order to gain electoral ground for his party and to divert attention from his administration's failure against al Qaeda by attacking "some other enemy whose location might be easier to identify." I see -- Bush is risking his presidency on a war with Iraq because it is the easy thing to do.


    Maybe Kelly didn't hear Andy Card talking about introducing "product" after August from a "marketing" standpoint. And, as far as Bush "risking his presidency" on an Iraq war; what risk is that? Bush gives red meat to the rightwing by going after swarthy foreigners and stealing their oil, and re-drums up all the support that was inexplicably given to him back on 9/12, the day after America was attacked and Bush had climbed out of his hidey hole in Nebraska. With an Iraqi war he can become the Warrior President again, instead of the Crawford Imbecile.


    It's no suprise to anyone that Kelly doesn't like Gore, but for him to dismiss Gore's speech because of personal pique is sloppy journalism. Ever since 9/11 Kelly has been running around like a high school girl who discovers a big zit on picture day. His columns have become hysterical in a way that makes him sound like the freakish spawn of some bizzare mating ritual between Ann Coulter and Peggy Noonan. Now that's a scary thought.


    posted by tbogg at 11:01 AM

    |

     

    So..... what sorority did Bush belong to?

    Mo Dowd hits this one out of the park.

    Looks like Dowd woke up and smelled the coming carnage. Since President in Exile Gore spoke the other day, I really expected she would take some cheap shots at him. Anyway, I loved this part:


    I used to think the Bush hawks suffered from testosterone poisoning, always throwing sharp elbows and cartoonishly chesty my-way-or-the-highway talk around the world, when a less belligerent tone would be classier and more effective.

    But now we have the spectacle of the 70-year-old Rummy acting like a 16-year-old Heather, vixen-slapping those lower in the global hierarchy, trying to dominate and silence the beta countries with less money and fewer designer weapons.




    posted by tbogg at 8:09 AM

    |

     

    But I am too, a genius


    MacArthur "genius grants" were announced today, and I got passed over again, so my wife says I've got to take the foosball table back.


    posted by tbogg at 7:43 AM

    |

    Tuesday, September 24, 2002

     

    Bring me the head of Lawrence Lindsey


    Senior White House officials tell TIME there will be a "major shake-up in the economic team" after the election. Lindsey is the most likely to go. He contributed to the criticism that he has made too many on-the-record gaffes by speculating last week in the Wall Street Journal that a war with Iraq might cost from $100 billion to $200 billion on the very day the President was preaching fiscal discipline.




    posted by tbogg at 6:53 PM

    |

     

    Don't fear the weeper

    ''Key economic indicators such as inflation, real wages, productivity, interest rates, business profits and the housing sector are all strong,'' Treasury Secretary Paul O'Neill said yesterday in Lexington, Ky., a stop on a national tour to promote the economy. ''The latest indicators look good.''


    Told that the Dow had dropped 302 points so far this week, the crybaby Secretary burst into tears like a 7 year old girl and had to be comforted by Commerce Secretary Donald Evans who patted his back and murmured "There...there...".


    posted by tbogg at 6:31 PM

    |

     

    Nuh-uh. Don't go there, girlfriend...


    Former Congressman and erstwhile spunky, Bob Dole sidekick, Jack Kemp (R-NFL) isn't quite so sure he agrees with this invasion thing. You know, maybe if Kemp had played baseball, George W. Bush (R-Arizona Instructional League) might listen to him. Anyone got Jim Bunning's (R- 224 wins 184 losses) phone number?


    posted by tbogg at 9:38 AM

    |

     

    In the land of the spineless, Bush is the King


    Ben Sargent


    posted by tbogg at 9:10 AM

    |

     

    I caught the car...now what do I do with it?


    Nicholas Kristof has a terrific column out today posing the question of what happens after we invade Iraq. Excerpt:


    NAJAF, Iraq — As soon as American troops are rolling through Saddam Hussein's palaces, the odds are that this holy Shiite city 100 miles south of Baghdad will erupt in a fury of killing, torture, rape and chaos.


    The Shiite Muslims who make up 60 percent of Iraq — but who have never held power — will rampage through the narrow streets here. Remembering the whispers from the bazaar about how Saddam's minions burned the beard off the face of a great Shiite leader named Muhammad Bakr al-Sadr, then raped and killed his sister in front of him, and finally executed him by driving nails through his head, the rebels will tear apart anyone associated with the ruling Baath Party.


    In one Shiite city after another, expect battles between rebels and army units, periodic calls for an Iranian-style theocracy, and perhaps a drift toward civil war. For the last few days, I've been traveling in these Shiite cities — Karbala, Najaf and Basra — and the tension in the bazaars is thicker than the dust behind the donkey carts.


    So before we rush into Iraq, we need to think through what we will do the morning after Saddam is toppled. Do we send in troops to try to seize the mortars and machine guns from the warring factions? Or do we run from civil war, and risk letting Iran cultivate its own puppet regime? In the north, do we suppress the Kurds if they take advantage of the chaos to seek independence? Do we fight off the Turkish Army if it intervenes in Kurdistan?



    The question is: how many American lives and how many billions of dollars are we willing to spend in order to avenge Bush's father? You might make the case that the oil will make up for the dollars, but how many servicemen have to die so that you can buy Premium at $1.09 per gallon? The more Americans look into the cost of war with Iraq, in dollars and lives, the less appealing it seems.


    posted by tbogg at 8:18 AM

    |

    Monday, September 23, 2002

     

    Fool me once...then it's probably a Sullivan column


    Maybe someone should explain to Andy Sullivan that, when you write a blog and provide links, that sometimes...just sometimes, people are actually going to go to those links. A case in point:


    In the last week or so, a new slurry of phony arguments has emerged against the war with Iraq. The increasingly unhinged MoDo just asserted that a war against Iraq is actually a function of a "culture war" that Rumsfeld and Cheney are engineering to get back at their Vietnam era peacenik peers. Paul Krugman today takes up what's left of his column (once he's addressed the errors he's made in other recent columns) to another argument.


    So, what was Paul Kugman's "error"?:


    Halliburton has objected to my use of the word "confiscate" in summarizing changes in pension benefits to employees whose divisions were sold, changes described in a Sept. 10 New York Times article. Although Halliburton's actions were legal — I did not suggest otherwise — they had the effect of depriving workers of benefits they had been led to expect. In particular, workers who planned to take early retirement were informed that they had "severed" their employment relationship — even though they had no choice in the matter — and that as a result, if they retired early they would not receive the level of benefits suggested by their retirement plan statements. However much Halliburton may try to put a spin on its actions, its behavior remains, as one pension expert quoted in the original article put it, "scandalous."

    I don't know. That doesn't sound like a correction, so much as a response to a Halliburton snit about his choice of words. It's not uncommon for people to have differences over a choice of terms, without either one being wrong. For example, the administration prefers "regime change" whereas I prefer "steal the oil and distract people from an economy in a death spiral ". See? You can do this at home. We're both right.

    So Andy, if you can put down that article on chest hair making a comeback, maybe you will can go back and see that a difference in terms is not necessarily a "correction".


    Oh, and Andy, you really have to get over being fired by Howell Raines. He's getting tired of those late night weepy phone calls. Move on, man. Move on.



    posted by tbogg at 11:17 PM

    |

     

    Irrelevant watch


    As we all know, ever since President Bush (known in Mexico as estupido y borracho) spoke to the UN, the administration word of the day has been "irrelevant". Bush (known in China as Dim Son) has used it repeatedly as has Cheney, Rice, Ari, Powell and a whole bunch of other administration officials who are hard to tell apart because they're all white and wear suits with little flag pins on the lapel.

    Well, today , President in Exile Al Gore spoke out against the upcoming US-Iraq Steel Cage Deathmatch that Bush (known in France as le lâche) wants to spend your Medicare money on. Now the linked msnbc story pretty much covers the same story you can find in Reuters, CNN.com, yahoo, etc. except for this little journalistc scoop:


    A senior White House official called the former vice president “irrelevant,” saying that “no one around here is remotely concerned about what he has to say” on the subject of war with Iraq, NBC’s Campbell Brown reported. “He is out of the mainstream with his own party,” the official said.

    There's that word again.


    Now, Campbell Brown who, I'm sure you are aware, plays a journalist on NBC (only not on The West Wing) decided to share that little gratuitous smear from a "a senior White House official (known everywhere as anonymous cowardly nematode) in an effort to remind us that the guy who ran against Bush (known in Germany as Hitler) in 2000 isn't important even though he got, oh, about 50,996,116 votes in the last election, which was more than...well...you know.


    So thank you Campbell Brown for that journalistic coup. I'm sure that when the Pulitzers are handed out next year, and your name gets mentioned, we can expect irrelevant to brought back out of retirement just for you.


    posted by tbogg at 6:48 PM

    |

     

    Look! Some fish in a barrel!

    Actual review from amazon.com regarding David Kaplan's book on Election 2000:


    The book is easy to read. But it really is just an long winded argument that has already been beaten to death. It assumes that the people of the United States are stupid, ill informed and can form no opinions on their own. Because someone doesn't vote Libral, doesn't mean that are morons. The book is just plain sour grapes. In view of recent events, it is rediculous.




    posted by tbogg at 3:43 PM

    |

     

    Is our children....oh...never mind...

    Thanks to Eschaton for this.

    No comment necessary...


    posted by tbogg at 2:25 PM

    |

     

    It's enough to make Ben Nighthorse Campbell switch sides ...again


    Senator Wayne Allard (R-You know, CO) got to go on Meet the Press this weekend and show everybody what a big brain he has. It wasn't pretty:


    MR. RUSSERT: Let me show you the first 21 months of the Bush administration, in terms of economic factors, and I’ll put them on the screen. On Inauguration Day, the Dow Jones was at 10,587; it’s down 32.5 percent. The unemployment rate, as you see, is up 36 percent. The budget has gone from a $281 billion surplus to $157 billion deficit. Jobs, a loss of two million. Senator Allard, are you comfortable running on that kind of record?


    SEN. ALLARD: No, I’m not comfortable with any time we have a deficit. I’m one who believes that we needed to pay down the debt when we were in a surplus, and also believe that we needed to eliminate the deficit. We’re back, like you said in your figures, into deficit spending again. I think the things that we can do to help the economy is that, number one, we need to do something to bring about corporate responsibility so people feel good about the figures that they’re seeing on our companies. We need to make permanent those temporary tax cuts that we passed a year and a half ago.


    MR. RUSSERT: That would increase the deficit.


    SEN. ALLARD: Well, we argued about that in the past, but you know, I happen to think that when have you the economy doing better, that means more revenue to the federal government, and I don’t think that it necessarily increases the deficit. The other thing that I think that we need to have, we need to have a plan to pay down the deficit. I looked at those figures, and if we don’t institute any more new programs, we stay just at current levels, we’ll be actually out of the deficit in about six years. I just think that we need to have some kind of a deficit reduction plan within the next 10 years.


    MR. RUSSERT: But what would be cut? If, in fact, you freeze all programs, people will say you’re cutting farm programs...


    SEN. ALLARD: Yes.


    MR. RUSSERT: ...you’re cutting environmental programs, and you don’t have a prescription drug program.


    SEN. ALLARD: You know...


    MR. RUSSERT: You can’t have it all, have tax cuts, a war in Iraq and still balance the budget.


    SEN. ALLARD: Well, you know, only in Washington is the argument made that, you know, if have a less of an increase than what somebody asked for, it’s called a cut. I think we can let the economy go— I’m willing to give a little flexibility for the growth in our budget. But look, you know, I think that we can, as members of the Senate, put in a budget that will balance it within 10 years. I don’t think that’s unreasonable. And we can do it to hold spending down within reasonable levels.


    MR. RUSSERT: If you postpone the Bush tax cut, would that be a tax increase?


    SEN. ALLARD: Yeah, I think it would be a tax increase, if you postponed the tax cut, yeah.


    MR. RUSSERT: Then if you froze spending, why wouldn’t it be a cut?


    At this point Senator Allard starting yelling "Iraq! Iraq!" and making bomb noises.


    Should Brainiac Wayne not win re-election this November, I believe that he could a have shot as a professional athlete, y'know?


    (Thanks to mbroglio on TT for supplying this little tidbit)




    posted by tbogg at 1:12 PM

    |

     

    Love the idea...hate the reality


    We love the idea that people can debate and speak their mind, and holler and whoop about politics. They hate it. They hate free thought and free speech. We love a free press, they hate it. See, they hate freedom and we love freedom.--George W. Bush, Trenton, NJ. 9/23/02


    There ought to be limits to freedom,"--Gov. George W. Bush , Austin, TX. 5/22/99



    posted by tbogg at 11:46 AM

    |

     

    Less than Zero


    Morton Kondracke writes in his latest that House Minority Leader Richard Gephardt (D-No eyebrows.) fully supports George Bush (R-No brain) in his drive for "regime change" in Iraq. According to Kondracke:


    According to an attendee at the Sept. 10 meeting - held two days before Bush's speech to the United Nations - Gephardt declared full support for Bush's policy of regime change in Iraq.


    "He was very strong, he was pointed. There were no weasel words, no 'give us more evidence,' no circumlocutions."


    This witness quoted Gephardt as saying, "Regime change in Iraq has been the declared policy of the United States and it should be our policy. Saddam Hussein is a bad guy. We've got to get him out of there. You have my full support."


    snip...



    Countering anti-war forces in the Democratic Caucus led by Rep. Dennis Kucinich (Ohio) and Minority Whip Nancy Pelosi (Calif.), he's arguing that the Sept. 11 attacks should "lower the level of proof" required before taking action against Hussein.


    At the Sept. 10 meeting, a witness said, Pelosi told the president, "You haven't convinced me" of the need for action and urged that he make nuclear nonproliferation a higher priority of his administration.


    On the basis of what I've heard from and about Gephardt, I clearly was wrong to write last week that he's among the Democratic presidential aspirants who's showing less than presidential-level leadership in the Iraq crisis. He's leading in his trademark fashion - by tireless listening and consensus-building.



    So at the same time that Gephardt is desperately trying to take back the House to make himself Speaker, with his eyebrowless eyes gazing longingly on the White House, he wants to join in on Bush's reindeer games. Now maybe it's just me, or where I live, but does anyone, anywhere really get excited at the prospect of a Dick Gephardt presidency? Did anyone even care before this latest?




    posted by tbogg at 10:33 AM

    |

     

    Update

    Apparently the link below about the Public Market is only working intermittenly. Here are the main points:

    Dale Steele envisioned what nobody else could see.

    The former teen fashion model wants to turn the abandoned Old Police Station downtown into a public marketplace and memorial to officers killed in the line of duty.

    It would be similar to markets in cities such as Seattle, Boston and Columbus, Ohio, with produce, meats and fish, breads and a variety of locally made foods. Steele spent the last two years and $30,000 of her own money consulting with national public market experts and garnering local support to get the project moving.

    Now, several groups, including the Police Historical Association, as well as public and private officials, share Steele's vision.
    "People who move to the downtown area want an urban experience. They want to walk to a public market, they want to know the guy that grows tomatoes," Steele said. "It's a city that we fall in love with."


    The San Diego Unified Port District owns the station, which was built in 1939, and the buildings around a central, open-air courtyard. The complex is 4.22 acres.

    In 1998, the National Park Service added the Old Police Station to the National Register of Historic Places.
    For the market to come to fruition, Steele and her nonprofit, grassroots Public Market Group need approval from the Port as well as to raise the $8 million to $10 million in startup money.

    And there are several other organizations lobbying for the building and the land, said Ralph Hicks, director of land use for the Port.
    "All along we've been receiving a half a dozen concepts," Hicks said. "A boutique hotel, an aquarium, a restaurant, a Ripley's Believe It or Not, a public market, a range of ideas -- and we've gotten kookier ones."



    The project must improve pedestrian access to the San Diego Bay; preserve the Old Police Station; provide for overall financial feasibility; create an active urban park environment; resolve parking issues and fit in with adjacent Port tenants and land use, Hicks said.
    Also, it must be implemented soon and must enhance the aesthetic environment.

    Steele asserts the public market plan meets all of the Port's criteria.
    "It's a gorgeous building and still has three cellblocks. We would retain the blocks and give (them) to the San Diego Police Historical Association to do a museum," she said.


    The public market would include a restaurant, art school, cooking school, special events hall and outdoor tables.
    "This concept would be a lifestyle community center. Not only the public market in terms of fresh food like produce and bakery items, meats and fish, wine shops, flower shops and cookware and pie places and cookie places, but it would be prepared food. You could come in as a businessperson and get lunch and eat there on the premises, in the park or courtyard," she said.


    posted by tbogg at 9:13 AM

    |

     

    Local news


    This isn't national news, but it's important here in San Diego. Too often the powers that be take a big chunk of our heritage and Disney-fy it, turning classic old buildings into cartoons of themselves in order to sell t-shirts and crappy Wyland coffee mugs and candles to the tourists. We need a Public Market that will serve all the people of San Diego, while maintaining the beauty and dignity of the original structure. Because San Diego is a tourist town, all comments from out-of-towners carry weight with the Port Commision. Please write Ralph Hicks at the Port in support of the Public Market concept. Thanks.


    posted by tbogg at 8:03 AM

    |

    Sunday, September 22, 2002

     

    I'll take "Questions about the Soviet Union for $400, Alex"


    Condoleeza Rice, George Bush's best-est friend in the whole world as well as his National Security Advisor, says that the US will be "completely devoted" to rebuilding Iraq after we bomb the shit out of it.


    Ms Rice, speaking in an interview with the Financial Times, signalled US willingness to spend time and money rebuilding Iraq after the fall of Mr Hussein's regime.


    Ms Rice, who specialty is the Soviet Union (a country that no longer exists) was the one who reviewed the pre-9/11 intelligence information with a vacationing Bush in Crawford last year, where they failed to connect the dots, or at least they connected some of the dots until they spelled out: "tax cut". Then they went outside and cut some brush and did cowboy stuff. This year Ms. Rice is helping to lead the administration's efforts to convince world opinion that an attack on Iraq is warranted under Operation Because I Said So... When You're A Superpower You Can Pick The Country To Blow Up, So There.


    Meanwhile, Americans unable to get Medicare to pay for the cancer-fighting drugs, blood-clotting factors, or breast biopsies they need will instead be given timeshare vouchers for the newly rebuilt Tigris View Condominium Estates in lovely Tikrit, featuring sand volleyball courts and an Olympic sized swimming pool (location subject to suitable bomb craters). Please see our associates for further details.


    posted by tbogg at 9:48 PM

    |

     

    You got this in PowerPoint?

    Bush has been given his options on how to proceed in the war against Iraq, that he hasn't really even decided that he is going to have others fight, even if he is emptying out every military base in America and shipping the soldiers off to Camp Re-Election in Qatar. Anyway, I felt pretty good about this considering our Commander in Chief is the Warrior President, Prince Hal, Winston Churchill, Teddy Roosevelt, or Gunga Din according to our fair and balanced media.

    But when I got to the end of the article and I read this:

    Every scenario has real dangers. In the end, President Bush will have to decide how much risk he—and the American people—can tolerate. With Saddam almost certainly building weapons of mass destruction, the greater risk, say White House hawks, is inaction. The top brass may have to swallow their traditional caution and offer up a plan that accepts the possibility of heavy casualties

    It made me remember this:

    "If there's a 10-page paper,"says chief of staff Clay Johnson, Bush wants to know "what are the two pages that contain all the content?" (Washington Post, 1/19/00...courtesy of Paul Begala)

    Wouldn't we feel a lot better about planning for war if it was okayed by someone who could get through all the options without getting distracted by that shiny tag on Barney's collar? I know I would.




    posted by tbogg at 12:39 PM

    |

     

    Is our children being beaten?

    America's favorite mom, right after Andrea Yates and Kathy Lee Gifford, speaks out:

    "They shouldn't have taken my child away," she said. "There's permanent residence right here in Indiana that would have took my child that CPS [Child Protective Services] could have looked at ... they shouldn't have did this. They wasn't supposed to do this, and it shouldn't have been done."

    Speaking from Camp David (or as Laura calls it: "Xanax Central") President Bush commented that we should feel compassion for Ms. Toogood, and that he thought she was someone he could "really talk" to.


    posted by tbogg at 12:16 PM

    |

     

    Dude! I am so ripped!

    Is anyone else playing that college game where you do a shot everytime someone from the Bush administration uses the words "UN" and "irrelevant" in the same sentence? I hear it's sweeping the campuses. At least that's what college cultural arbiter John Leo told me when he got back from partying with Ja Rule.


    posted by tbogg at 1:43 AM

    |

     

    Bring out your dead...clank...But I'm not dead yet...


    The New York Times reports:

    The Bush administration is proposing deep reductions in Medicare payments for a wide range of drugs and medical devices used to treat people who are elderly or disabled.

    But I like this part:

    The cuts would affect many drugs, devices and high-technology procedures, including cancer drugs and cardiac defibrillators like the one implanted in the chest of Vice President Dick Cheney to prevent an irregular heartbeat.

    ...and it gets worse. Read the article...





    posted by tbogg at 1:25 AM

    |

     

    Won't somebody buy Andy Sullivan an abacus?



    According to Andy :

    I'm struck by the generational dynamics in the latest Ipsos-Reid poll. The GOP has a huge lead among the young, especially men under 44. I wonder why. Could it be that September 11 was a more potent event for those with less life experience under their belts? Or is it that the young recognize that the Democrats are essentially a political operation designed to take money from the young and productive and give it to the old and rich and retired? Both possibilities are encouraging.


    While I will allow that Andy is correct about the men's numbers (although his reasons are specious at best), his main point:

    The GOP has a huge lead among the young

    is, how should I put this... lacking in those qualities that make it the truth. A quick check over at Ipsos-Reid shows this:


    And if the election for Congress were held today, would you want to see the Republicans or Democrats win control of Congress?

    Men 18-44 prefer Republicans to Democrats 53% to 35%


    All well and good...but wait a minute...we all know that women are not Andy's "preference", but shouldn't we at least take a look at how they would vote? Oh, let's!

    And if the election for Congress were held today, would you want to see the Republicans or Democrats win control of Congress?

    Women 18-44 prefer Democrats to Republicans 53% to 36%.


    Let's check back with Andy again:

    The GOP has a huge lead among the young

    Now, I'm no Paul Krugman, but I see a 1% variance here.

    So. What have we learned today? First, Andy Sullivan is not very good at math. Secondly, he "shades" the truth, and not very well. And lastly, if you come across one of Andy's personal ads looking for you know what and he promises a huge package...expect a one percent increase above the norm. That's hardly worth getting off the couch for.












    posted by tbogg at 12:40 AM

    |

     

    Powered By Blogger TM
    Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com