TBogg - "...a somewhat popular blogger"





Faithful husband, soccer dad, basset owner, and former cowboy
Return to TboggHomePage




FELLOW TRAITORS

*The Nether-Count*
100 Monkeys Typing
Ain't No Bad Dude
Alicublog
Americablog
American Leftist
Attytood (Will Bunch)
Bad Attitudes
Balloon Juice
Better Inhale Deeply
Bitch Ph.D
Bloggy
Bob Harris
Brilliant At Breakfast
BusyBusyBusy
Byzantium's Shores
Creek Running North
Crooked Timber
Crooks and Liars
Cursor
Daily Kos
Dependable Renegade
David Ehrenstein
Democratic Veteran
Dohiyi Mir
Down With Tyranny
Echidne of the Snakes
Edicts of Nancy
Elayne Riggs
Eschaton (Atrios)
Ezra Klein
Failure Is Impossible
Feministe
Feministing
Firedoglake
First Draft
Freewayblogger
The Garance
The Group News Blog
Guano Island
Hairy Fish Nuts
Hammer of the Blogs
Hullabaloo(Digby)
I Am TRex
If I Ran the Zoo
I'm Not One To Blog
Interesting Times
James Wolcott
Jesus' General
Jon Swift
Juan Cole
King of Zembla
Kung Fu Monkey
Lance Mannion
Lawyers Guns and Money
Lean Left
Liberal Oasis
Main & Central
Majikthise
Making Light (Nielsen Hayden)
Mark Kleiman
Martini Revolution
MaxSpeak
MF Blog
MyDD
Needlenose
The Next Hurrah
Nitpicker
No More Mr. Nice Blog
Norbizness
Norwegianity
Oliver Willis
One Good Move
Orcinus
Pacific Views
Pam's House Blend
Pandagon
Pharyngula
Political Animal(K.Drum)
The Poorman
Progressive Gold
Right Hand Thief
Rising Hegemon
Roger Ailes
Rude Pundit
Rumproast
Sadly, No
Seeing The Forest
Shakesville
Sisyphus Shrugged
Skippy the Bush Kangaroo
Slacktivist
SteveAudio
Suburban Guerilla
TalkLeft
The American Street
The Left Coaster
The Road To Surfdom
The Sideshow
The Talking Dog
The Talent Show
Tom Tomorrow
Tom Watson
Whiskeyfire
UggaBugga
Wampum
Wonkette
World O'Crap




TOSS ME
A BONE
Amazon Wish List







SOURCES
MSNBC
CNN
The Washington Post
Media Matters
The New York Times
The Guardian
Yahoo News
Salon
The Raw Story
Common Dreams
Media Transparency
The Nation
Alternet
Joe Conason

Talking Points Memo




THE VAST WASTELAND

Captain Corndog & Friends
Cheerleaders Gone Spazzy
80% True
Corner of Mediocrity and Banality
Village Idiots Central
Darwin's Waiting Room
News for Mouthbreathers






Mailbox
Your e-mail may be reprinted sans name and e-mail address. Think about how stupid you want to appear.




Blogroll Me!




Add to My Yahoo!



Site Feed

Archives:

Slightly Used Snark

  • 09/01/2002 - 10/01/2002
  • 10/01/2002 - 11/01/2002
  • 11/01/2002 - 12/01/2002
  • 12/01/2002 - 01/01/2003
  • 01/01/2003 - 02/01/2003
  • 02/01/2003 - 03/01/2003
  • 03/01/2003 - 04/01/2003
  • 04/01/2003 - 05/01/2003
  • 05/01/2003 - 06/01/2003
  • 06/01/2003 - 07/01/2003
  • 07/01/2003 - 08/01/2003
  • 08/01/2003 - 09/01/2003
  • 09/01/2003 - 10/01/2003
  • 10/01/2003 - 11/01/2003
  • 11/01/2003 - 12/01/2003
  • 12/01/2003 - 01/01/2004
  • 01/01/2004 - 02/01/2004
  • 02/01/2004 - 03/01/2004
  • 03/01/2004 - 04/01/2004
  • 04/01/2004 - 05/01/2004
  • 05/01/2004 - 06/01/2004
  • 06/01/2004 - 07/01/2004
  • 07/01/2004 - 08/01/2004
  • 08/01/2004 - 09/01/2004
  • 09/01/2004 - 10/01/2004
  • 10/01/2004 - 11/01/2004
  • 11/01/2004 - 12/01/2004
  • 12/01/2004 - 01/01/2005
  • 01/01/2005 - 02/01/2005
  • 02/01/2005 - 03/01/2005
  • 03/01/2005 - 04/01/2005
  • 04/01/2005 - 05/01/2005
  • 05/01/2005 - 06/01/2005
  • 06/01/2005 - 07/01/2005
  • 07/01/2005 - 08/01/2005
  • 08/01/2005 - 09/01/2005
  • 09/01/2005 - 10/01/2005
  • 10/01/2005 - 11/01/2005
  • 11/01/2005 - 12/01/2005
  • 12/01/2005 - 01/01/2006
  • 01/01/2006 - 02/01/2006
  • 02/01/2006 - 03/01/2006
  • 03/01/2006 - 04/01/2006
  • 04/01/2006 - 05/01/2006
  • 05/01/2006 - 06/01/2006
  • 06/01/2006 - 07/01/2006
  • 07/01/2006 - 08/01/2006
  • 08/01/2006 - 09/01/2006
  • 09/01/2006 - 10/01/2006
  • 10/01/2006 - 11/01/2006
  • 11/01/2006 - 12/01/2006
  • 12/01/2006 - 01/01/2007
  • 01/01/2007 - 02/01/2007
  • 02/01/2007 - 03/01/2007
  • 03/01/2007 - 04/01/2007
  • 04/01/2007 - 05/01/2007
  • 05/01/2007 - 06/01/2007
  • 06/01/2007 - 07/01/2007
  • 07/01/2007 - 08/01/2007
  • 08/01/2007 - 09/01/2007
  • 09/01/2007 - 10/01/2007
  • 10/01/2007 - 11/01/2007
  • 11/01/2007 - 12/01/2007
  • 12/01/2007 - 01/01/2008
  • 06/01/2008 - 07/01/2008

  • Saturday, March 15, 2003

     

    Well...... that's different.....

    I realize that George Will is a columnist and therefore he can be as partisan as he wants, but there is no excuse for rank hypocrisy. From Will's latest:

    Recall efforts flourish like avocados in California. There have been 32 recall drives against California governors, including every governor since Edmund Brown in 1960. But no effort has made it to a vote. This one may, because even Davis's supporters dislike him, and because of the state's budget crisis. Its size astonishes the nation, and Californians are especially astonished because Davis said during last fall's campaign that all was well.

    The deficit is at least $35 billion. So it may be about a third of the 50 states' estimated cumulative deficit, currently $90 billion or more.

    The woes of the dot-com and high-tech sectors have disproportionately hurt California, and capital gains tax revenue is way down. Nevertheless, state revenue has risen 28 percent since 1998 -- which is not as fast as Davis has spent. To close the budget gap, which the state constitution requires, he will have to raise many taxes and fees and cut many programs, and every act will create potential recruits for the recall movement.

    Now let's talk about Will's current favorite President:

    When President Bush was sworn in on Jan. 20, 2001, U.S. stocks were valued at $14.7 trillion, according to Wilshire Associates. Last week’s value: $9.9 trillion. Total decline: $4.8 trillion. The only fair way to compare the Bush Market with other presidents’ markets is to use percentages rather than dollars. Here, too, he leads the pack. According to a study conducted for NEWSWEEK by Aronson+Johnson+Ortiz, a Philadelphia money-management firm, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index has fallen more in Bush’s first two years than under any president since the modern stock market emerged. (AJO’s data go back only as far as Hoover, enough for our purposes.) During Hoover’s first two years, which included the Black Thursday crash in October 1929, the S&P fell 29 percent. Not as bad as Bush’s 33 percent. (Through last week, the decline was 36 percent.)

    You can’t blame this all on Bush, of course. The market he inherited in 2001 had been inflated by the tech and telecom bubble that started popping in the spring of 2000. It was bound to fall. But he’s been in office long enough to bear at least some responsibility—you can bet he’d be taking the credit if the market were rising. He can’t blame the problem on 9-11. AJO says the S&P 500 declined at a 28 percent annual rate from Bush’s Inauguration through Sept. 10, 2001, but at less than half that rate since 9-11. However you count, the market isn’t buying his program. And in the long run, the market’s pretty savvy.

    When Bush was sworn in, Uncle Sam seemed to be awash in cash. The federal budget was running big surpluses; the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office projected a $5.6 trillion surplus for the 2002-2011 fiscal years. Bush got his 2001 tax cut through Congress even though the only way to make the numbers work was to use 10 years of projected surpluses to support a tax cut projected to last only nine years. That’s why the cuts are scheduled to end in 2010—which, of course, they won’t. The fact that the president used this kind of “fuzzy math” to get what he wanted doesn’t exactly inspire faith in the reliability of his numbers.

    More on Bush:

    The Congressional Budget Office today forecast a larger-than-expected deficit of $199 billion for this fiscal year, the largest deficit since 1994 and a figure more than a third larger than the shortfall projected only five months ago.

    The influential CBO projections will almost certainly complicate President Bush’s push for a dramatic new round of tax cuts, as lawmakers begin to confront a rising tide of red ink. Just two years after congressional forecasters predicted a $5.6 trillion surplus for this decade, now they do not foresee a return to surpluses until 2007. And the CBO’s latest projections would be substantially worsened by new tax cuts and a war with Iraq, neither of which are included in the new numbers.

    The difference, of course, is that the California state Constitution mandates that the California budget be balanced. The US budget can be maintained in deficit in perpetuity, meaning that Bush can continue spending like a drunken Texan, while saddling our grandkids with the bill. By the time the bill comes due, George W. Bush will be wrangling pretzels down at his Crawford "ranch" while drinking himself into a well-deserved oblivion.

    Meanwhile, Will posits that:

    Republicans, who lost every statewide race last November, might pay a steep price for the fun of dumping Davis. President Bush's chances of carrying California in November 2004, and Republicans' chances of defeating the hyper-liberal Sen. Barbara Boxer, might be better if Californians nurture their anti-Davis grievances for two full years.

    [snip...]

    Winning reelection by just 47 percent to 42 percent over an opponent running his first campaign and running it badly, Davis got 1.4 million fewer votes than in 1998. His job approval rating has plummeted to 27 percent. But although he has governed both unsuccessfully and irresponsibly, the fact that he richly deserves disapproval, and that in some sense he may deserve to be recalled, does not mean that voters deserve to be able to recall him.

    First let's look at how Bush did in California in 2000:

    Al Gore Dem 5,861,203
    George W. Bush Rep 4,567,429

    Of course this was before he plunged the economy into a death spiral, re-started the war on the environment, decreased our freedoms, started us down the slippery slope of denying women the right to control their own bodies, and hid the Cheney documents showing the Administration's hand-in-hand friendship with the same energy companies that screwed California during the "energy crisis".

    Will again:

    California is not a Circuit City store. A democracy with periodic elections should not have, regarding elected officials, a liberal exchange policy -- any time, for any reason -- for voters experiencing "buyer's remorse." Californians deserve to live with the choice they made when they rehired him for four more years just four months ago

    With regard to Bush, well, let's let The Onion describe it:

    "You know, they say people get the government they deserve, but I don't recall knife-raping any retarded nuns."

    ...and we didn't even elect him.

































    posted by tbogg at 11:04 PM

    |

     

    First of all, do harm to others...

    Bill Frist (has he mentioned he's a doctor lately?) says that we should kill to heal.

    Is anyone else sick of his using the fact that he's a doctor to justify war or the destruction of women's rights?

    And why does the press refer to him as Dr. Frist, but Howard Dean is...Howard Dean.

    Last I checked, he was a doctor too.





    posted by tbogg at 9:36 PM

    |

     

    Send Perle and Wolfowitz over...see if they can do better.

    The military's latest brainstorm just became lunch.



    posted by tbogg at 9:19 PM

    |

    Friday, March 14, 2003

     

    For those visiting from Altercation

    Charles Pierce meant to link you to this.


    posted by tbogg at 1:58 PM

    |

     

    Soon to be spammed to you.

    With the advent of email comes the increasing amounts of spam from friends and others containing doctored pictures, phony testimony by Oliver North about Osama Bin laden, and the usual assortment of jokes and cat pictures. Look for this one (which I just received) which is pretty good. I wish I had written it. (I won't italicize it to make it easier to read):

    ~~~~~~~~~

    All right, let me see if I understand the logic of this correctly. We are going to ignore the United Nations in order to make clear to Saddam Hussein that the United Nations cannot be ignored. We're going to wage war to preserve the UN's ability to avert war. The paramount principle is that the UN's word must be taken seriously, and if we have to subvert its word to guarantee that it is, then by gum, we will. Peace is too important not to take up arms to defend. Am I getting this right?

    Further, if the only way to bring democracy to Iraq is to vitiate the democracy of the Security Council, then we are honor-bound to do that too, because democracy, as we define it, is too important to be stopped by a little thing like democracy as they define it.

    Also, in dealing with a man who brooks no dissension at home, we cannot afford dissension among ourselves. We must speak with one voice against Saddam Hussein's failure to allow opposing voices to be heard. We are sending our gathered might to the Persian Gulf to make the point that might does not make right, as Saddam Hussein seems to think it does. And we are twisting the arms of the opposition until it agrees to let us oust a regime that twists the arms of the opposition. We cannot leave in power a dictator who ignores his own people. And if our people, and people elsewhere in the world, fail to understand that, then we have no choice but to ignore them.

    Listen. Don't misunderstand. I think it is a good thing that the members of the Bush administration seem to have been reading Lewis Carroll. I only wish someone had pointed out that "Alice in Wonderland" and "Through the Looking Glass" are meditations on paradox and puzzle and illogic and on the strangeness of things, not templates for foreign policy. It is amusing for the Mad Hatter to say something like, `We must make war on him because he is a threat to peace,' but not amusing for someone who actually commands an army to say that.

    As a collector of laughable arguments, I'd be enjoying all this were it not for the fact that I know--we all know--that lives are going to be lost in what amounts to a freak, circular reasoning accident.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~






    posted by tbogg at 1:51 PM

    |

     

    Blaming all the President's men

    I was just reading Howard Fineman's latest wherein he is critical of Bush's advisors, but let's the Warrior President himself off the hook. Here's Howard:

    ...who’s going to be blamed for the Turkey screwup, or the U.N. screwups? Who’s going to leak the authoritative—and explosive—estimates of the true cost of maintaining 100,000 troops in Iraq for the indefinite future? (One general already has been whacked for piping up, but there will be others.) Who’s going to take the fall for the fact that we’ve lost the international moral high ground? The world is blaming the president, of course, but that’s not the way things work here. Someone else goes down. Who? The “neocons”? Donald Rumsfeld? The State Department? Dick Cheney? Condi Rice?

    Maybe everything will go so swimmingly in Iraq that it’ll be one big happy family here at home. Maybe the war will last only a few days and Iraqis will be in the streets, joyfully greeting GIs as liberators. Maybe a world that now sees us as an imperial pariah will suddenly acknowledge the wisdom of our ways. But never has so much blood, treasure and destiny been gambled on the hope that folks will smile at us. It’s the War of the Happy Iraqis.

    But few think it’s going to be that easy. And my guess is that team discipline inside the Bush administration is about to be fractured by the collateral damage that already is being caused by a war we have yet to fight. We are embarrassingly alone diplomatically, and State Department underlings (privately) blame Rumsfeld & Co. Inside the Pentagon—but outside of Rumsfeld’s offfice—I’m told that E-Ring brass have adopted what one source calls a “Vietnam mentality,” a sense of resignation about a policy (military occupation of Iraq) they seriously doubt will work. For their part, the neocons view Pentagon and State as hives of careerists wimps. No one dares take on Cheney; no one is sure Rice has the clout to keep it all together.

    I'll leave to others to ponder the Machiavellian workings of the West Wing. I was more intrigued by Fineman's next comment:

    Blame games aren’t supposed to happen in and around George W. Bush. I’ve covered him since his days as a gubernatorial candidate in Texas a decade ago. I know that he and his team are extraordinarily focused, disciplined and tight-lipped. I know that he is stubborn and that once he decides on a course he generally sticks to it

    I had forgotten that Howard Fineman has covered George W. Bush since the early days of his political career. Fineman has seen it all, although he may have been remiss in reporting it all in order to maintain access. The fact that he has followed this monumentally insincere, corrupt, and manipulative man throughout his career with few, if any, critical comments reminded me of someone that I couldn't put my finger on until today.

    Jack Burden

    Robert Penn Warren's All The Kings Men, winner of the 1947 Pulitzer Prize for fiction, tells the tale of the rise and fall of southern Governor Willie Stark, a character loosely based upon the life of Louisiana Governor Huey Long. The story is told from the point of view of Jack Burden, a reporter who has covered Stark's career from the beginning, only to become Stark's right-hand man as Stark becomes more and more corrupted by power, eventually losing sight of his ideals. Inevitably Burden, who is a bit of a soft-headed idealist, aids Stark in the destruction of his enemies in a manner that comes back to haunt both Stark and Burden in tragic ways.

    After reading most every fawning article Howard Fineman has written about George W Bush since the 2000 election, one has to wonder: Does Howard have his eyes on Karl Rove's job?




    posted by tbogg at 1:14 PM

    |

     

    Get me one of those fruity drinks with an umbrella...oh, yeah, and a bowl of water for my poodles...

    Bush and Blair to meet in the Azores to plan out Operation Inigo Montoya.

    “In an effort to pursue every last bit of diplomacy, the president will depart Sunday morning for the Azores to meet Prime Minister Blair and with Prime Minister Aznar to discuss prospects for resolving the situation peacefully with diplomacy in final pursuit of a United Nations resolution,” White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said.

    Why do they keep saying that? They aren't negotiating with Iraq to avoid war, they're negotiating (working out bribes in aid or trade credits) with wavering UN Security Council countries for their war vote, in an effort to give the inevitable invasion a patina of legitimacy that is thinner than Bush's foreign policy resume.

    When it comes to Iraq, President Cartman has never negotiated with Iraq. It's just been a constant refrain of "Mommmmmm...I wanna go to warrrrrrrr!".

    White House homunculus, Ari Fleischer, should just cut to the chase. He's not fooling anyone.




    posted by tbogg at 10:52 AM

    |

     

    They seem like reasonable men...

    I'm sure these are just the kind of guys who will welcome the American Christians invading their neighbors and bringing Western Democracy to them via the barrel of a gun.

    Let's roll™

    (Note to self: remember to send royalty check to Lisa Beamer...)






    posted by tbogg at 9:53 AM

    |

    Thursday, March 13, 2003

     

    So much evil located on one place....

    I must not think bad thoughts.

    Join the Media Research Center and the conservative movement's finest as we roast the year's most blatantly liberal members of the national "news" media.

    [snip...]

    Master of Ceremonies: Cal Thomas

    Presenters:
    Sean Hannity
    Laura Ingraham
    Ann Coulter



    Judges, who picked the winners, include:

    Rush Limbaugh
    Steve Forbes
    William F. Buckley, Jr.
    Lawrence Kudlow
    Micheal Reagan
    Kate O'Beirne Walter Williams
    Lucianne Goldberg
    R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr.
    William Rusher
    John Fund


    Plus, come see which conservative stars will accept the awards in jest. Past stand-ins include Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and now Congresswoman Katherine Harris.

    Oooooo. And pictures from last year's hijinks!

    "Fredo" Limbaugh

    Half woman/half swine

    Mental Health Posterboy 1985-96

    Comb-over Cal

    Woman beater

    Cadaver and grandfather of bastard

    Whore








    posted by tbogg at 9:05 PM

    |

     

    Where should I send the thank you card?

    If I can get the address of her coven, I intend on sending Ann Coulter a thank you card. Why? Because she makes it soooooooo easy. How easy?

    This easy:

    Since new competitive media have forced liberals to confront opposing points of view, they seem to have abandoned emotionalism as their main argument. Their new posture is mock hardheaded realism. Liberals flex their spindly little muscles and announce that everything that used to make them cry – guns, racial profiling, torturing suspects – simply doesn't work: The fact is, it doesn't work, this is according to several studies, and no, you can't see them, why would you ask?

    Quick recap: liberals attempt to defend their side of issues with non-existent studies. (You can see where this going, can't you?). Then Little Annie Footnote writes (with my emphasis):

    Thus, for example, after decades of womanly hysteria about guns, we started getting statements like this from Fox News Channel's Alan Colmes to Larry Pratt of Gun Owners of America: "Let's talk about some hard and cold facts, Larry. The fact of the matter is, Larry, that the odds that a home will be the scene of a homicide are much greater if there's a gun in the home." Soccer moms across America shot up straight at that one and said: I did not know that!

    As the inestimable economist John Lott has shown, the study behind this flagrantly dishonest "cold hard fact" assumed that anyone killed by a gun in or near a home where anyone owned a gun was, therefore, killed by "a gun in the home." The study merely attests to the fact that people who live in high-crime neighborhoods tend to own guns. This is like the joke about diets causing people to be fat because most people on diets are fat. Or, as Lott says, on that theory of causation, hospitals must cause people to die because lots of people who die have been hospitalized recently. (Lott exposes dozens of such phony "studies" and shibboleths about guns in his splendid new book, "The Bias Against Guns.")

    John Lott. This John Lott:

    What is it about statistics and guns? Last year, Michael Bellesiles, a historian at Emory College, came under criticism for his Bancroft Prize-winning book, Arming America: The Origins of a National Gun Culture, which argued that gun ownership was far less common during the 18th and 19th century than is generally supposed. His analysis, which was obviously pleasing to proponents of gun control, was drawn from probate records. But Bellesiles was unable to produce all of his data, owing, he said, to a flood in his office. After a committee of three scholars examined Bellesiles' research, they concluded that "his scholarly integrity is seriously in question." Bellesiles resigned from Emory in disgrace.

    Now one of Bellesiles' principal critics, a Northwestern law professor named James Lindgren, has turned his skeptical attention to a scholar who is Bellesiles' ideological opposite: John R. Lott, author of More Guns, Less Crime. Once again, the issue is the disappearance of supporting data.

    Lott's More Guns, Less Crime is the bible of the national movement to persuade state legislatures to pass so-called "concealed carry" laws, which permit citizens to carry concealed firearms. The book's thesis is that populations with greater access to firearms are better able to deter crime. Some scholars have quarreled with Lott's interpretation, but this controversy is about underlying data. Lindgren and others want to know where Lott got the evidence to support the following sentence, which appears on Page 3 of Lott's book: "98 percent of the time that people use guns defensively, they merely have to brandish a weapon to break off an attack."

    Initially, Lott sourced the 98 percent figure to "national surveys." That's how the first edition of More Guns, Less Crime put it. In an August 1998 op-ed for the Chicago Tribune, Lott appeared to cite three specific surveys:

    Polls by the Los Angeles Times, Gallup and Peter Hart Research Associates show that there are at least 760,000, and possibly as many as 3.6 million, defensive uses of guns per year. In 98 percent of the cases, such polls show, people simply brandish the weapon to stop an attack.

    But polls by the Los Angeles Times, Gallup, and Peter Hart show no such thing.

    Alternatively, Lott would sometimes attribute the 98 percent figure to Gary Kleck, a criminologist at Florida State University. In a February 2000 op-ed for Colorado's Independence Institute, Lott wrote: "Kleck's study of defensive gun uses found that ninety-eight percent of the time simply brandishing the weapon is sufficient to stop an attack." But Kleck's research shows no such thing.

    Eventually, Lott settled on yet another source for the 98 percent figure: "a national survey that I conducted," as Lott put it in a second edition of More Guns, Less Crime. When asked about the survey, Lott now says it was done by telephone in 1997 and that the data was lost a few months later in a computer crash.

    Lott's conflicting explanations naturally attracted suspicion, first from Otis Dudley Duncan, a retired sociologist at the University of California, San Diego, who wrote an article on the matter for the Criminologist, and eventually from Lindgren, the Bellesiles gumshoe, who has been posting his findings online. (Chatterbox is indebted to Tim Lambert, a computer scientist and gun-control advocate at the University of New South Wales, for compiling various documents relating to the Lott case.) When Chatterbox asked Lott about the serial attributions to "national surveys," to three specific polls, and to Kleck, Lott conceded, "A lot of those discussions could have been written more clearly." He said that in the computer crash, he lost all his data for the book and had to reconstruct it, but that he couldn't reconstruct the survey. Lott has been able to produce witnesses who remember him talking about this obviously traumatic event soon after it occurred. But none of these people specifically remember him talking about losing data for a survey he'd conducted. Nor has Lott been able to produce the names of the college students he says conducted the phone surveys in Chicago, where Lott was teaching at the time. (Lott is now at Washington's American Enterprise Institute.)

    The only compelling evidence that the 1997 survey ever took place is the testimony of David M. Gross, a Minnesotan who contacted Lott after the controversy spread to various Weblogs. (To date, the only mainstream news organization that's covered the data dispute is the Washington Times, whose Robert Stacy McCain had a piece about the Lott affair on Jan. 23. The Feb. 1 Washington Post examined a bizarre side issue, but we're getting ahead of ourselves.) Gross told Chatterbox, "I have come to the conclusion that I in fact did" participate in the study, "based on some of the details of my recollection." What Gross recalls is that in January 1999—a year before questions were first raised about Lott's data—he attended a talk Lott gave at the Minneapolis Athletic Club. (Gross can pinpoint the date, he says, because he bought a tape.) After Lott's remarks, Gross walked up to Lott and told him he'd figured out, while listening to Lott discuss the 1997 survey, that he, Gross, had participated in that survey. Both the timing and the content, as described by Lott, match what Gross remembers about the survey, which is the only gun poll he recalls ever participating in.

    That John Lott.

    Nice going Ann. You managed to discredit your own column in a mere 168 words. I don't think even George Will can beat that record.
















    posted by tbogg at 8:36 PM

    |

     

    Stolen from Sullivan

    But it's pretty damn funny.



    posted by tbogg at 7:55 PM

    |

     

    Riffin' with Rick.

    Here's Rick Santorum (R-Hypocrite) going off on a tangent about abortion:

    Those who proclaim the virtue of abortion as a right said this would be a blessing to our society. They said: This would be a great blessing. So many positive things will happen. Divorces will come down. Spouse abuse will come down. Infant abuse will come down. Child abuse will come down. Abortions, of course, will go up, but the benefit is domestic violence will go down, teen pregnancy will go down, infanticide will go down, abandoned children will go down. And of course, none of them did. None of them did. Quite the contrary. All of them have at least doubled since 1973 as a percentage.

    So this nirvana that getting rid of these--because, see, they argue that since we are going to get rid of 1.3 million children--25 percent of all pregnancies end in abortion--since we are going to get rid of all these unwanted stresses in people's lives, problems in people's lives, then people will be better off, people will be happier, people will be more free; people won't do bad things because they won't have this stress that complicates their life.

    But is that the lesson that people learn? No. Sadly, people are much smarter than that. They learned from the leaders of our great country that the value of life was diminished. And they learned from our great country that their personal liberty was more important than your life. Their liberty, their rights, trump you. That is what they learned.

    As I mentioned earlier, that is why the two guys ran into Columbine, toting their guns and shooting people, screaming, ``I am the law,'' because that is what Roe v. Wade taught us. They taught us we can put down our neighbor, just like in the early years of this country we could put down the black man and woman.

    There you have it...abortion wasn't a "blessing" but instead is responsible for increased child abuse, divorce, infanticide, domestic abuse, and teen pregnancy. Oh, yeah.... and Columbine.

    (Link expired to Congressional record...I will find it again later. Sorry).







    posted by tbogg at 3:48 PM

    |

     

    Men, women, and abortion.

    Lisa over at Ruminate This talks about a woman's worth to the putative men in the Senate.

    We're not talking about the wholesale slaughter of near-term babies. We're talking about a rare situation...where two doctors, unrelated to abortion, come together and agree that the pregnancy should end for medical reason. The extremists, who have no problem executing children and men on death row, have problems terminating pregnancies where the mother's health is in trouble. It's murder, they say. God told them so.

    The Daily Kos discusses a resolution voted upon by the Senate regarding the upholding of Roe V Wade. The fascinating part:

    And just for fun, let's see how the Senate's women voted on the Roe resolution:

    Boxer (D-CA), Yea
    Cantwell (D-WA), Yea
    Clinton (D-NY), Yea
    Collins (R-ME), Yea
    Dole (R-NC), Nay
    Feinstein (D-CA), Yea
    Hutchison (R-TX), Yea
    Landrieu (D-LA), Yea
    Lincoln (D-AR), Yea
    Mikulski (D-MD), Yea
    Murkowski (R-AK), Yea
    Murray (D-WA), Yea
    Snowe (R-ME), Yea
    Stabenow (D-MI), Yea


    Sort of speaks for itself, doesn't it? Even Hutchinson voted "yea". While women only make up 14 percent of the Senate, they provided 25 percent of the "yea" votes.

    The Doles. Liddy's never had a baby...Bob can't get it up.







    posted by tbogg at 1:16 PM

    |

     

    Celebrities afraid of Bush...MRC afraid of boobs.

    It's not really the Media Research Center's finest moment, but it does say a lot about the way they think. Priggish, moralistic, anal...well, you be the judge

    In a Cyberalert about a CBS segment on celebrities and their views on the upcoming Sweeps Week of Death in Iraq:

    Raymond's dad “afraid” of President Bush. In the midst of an Access Hollywood story Wednesday night by Pat O'Brien on fears of a “return of Hollywood's darkest hour, blacklisting,” a harkening back to when in the 1950s “actors and writers suspected of communist ties were subjected to a witch hunt,” actor Peter Boyle, who plays “Frank Barone” on the CBS sit-com Everybody Loves Raymond, told O'Brien that “I’ve made a commitment not to make any anti-war statements” because “I'm afraid...of Bush.”

    In the same story, actor Richard Gere revealed he has no clue about true public opinion, as he demanded: “Why is it when we have tens of millions of people in this country who say no, we still have a President who says yes in a democracy? This is, something’s wrong here.”

    [snip...]

    Peter Boyle, on “red carpet” outside the March 9 SAG Awards in Los Angeles: “I’ve made a commitment not to make any anti-war statements.”
    O’Brien to Boyle: “Why?”
    Boyle: “Because I’m afraid.”
    O’Brien: “Of?”
    Boyle: “Of Bush.”
    O’Brien: “The Screen Actors Guild has issued a statement warning against the threat. Melissa Gilbert is SAG’s President.”


    Melissa Gilbert: “There is a sense out there, people who’ve got these Web sites going where they’re asking folks to sign petitions to insist that actors are fired off the shows they’re on. And it’s, they’re getting like 30,000 signatures.”
    O’Brien prompted her: “It’s scary?”
    Gilbert: “That’s scary.”


    [snip...] Here comes the kicker (emphasis is mine):

    And for a look at what Melissa Gilbert, “half pint” from Little House on the Prairie, wore, or shall I say didn't wear, to the SAG Awards carried by TNT, and her acting credits: IMDB

    This is the picture that MRC is alluding ("or shall I say didn't wear") to.

    I'm suprised Bozell didn't refer to Gilbert as the Little Ho on the Prairie....





    posted by tbogg at 12:54 PM

    |

     

    Amazon's Jeff Bezos in helicopter crash

    Amazon.com's Chief Executive Jeff Bezos was involved in a helicopter crash last week in southwest Texas and was slightly injured in the incident, a police spokesman said Wednesday

    Customers who bought it in (or near) helicopters :

    Stevie Ray Vaughan
    Bill Graham
    Vic Morrow
    Francis Gary Powers


    Amazon recommends (next time):

    The Segway Human Transporter.



    posted by tbogg at 11:57 AM

    |

     

    Bring out your dead....bring out your dead....

    Lawmaker Wants Troops' Remains Back From France

    BROOKSVILLE - Forget dumping champagne, boycotting brie or sailing the Statue of Liberty back to Paris.
    Frustrated by France's refusal to support a war with Iraq, U.S. Rep. Ginny Brown- Waite proposes bringing the remains of American veterans buried in France back to the United States.


    If the country that U.S. troops helped liberate during World War II won't support American military plans, then Brown-Waite proposes bringing the remains of those troops home for the families that request it.

    ``France has consistently turned its back on the United States,'' said Brown-Waite, R- Brooksville. ``They forget if it weren't for America, they would be speaking German today.''

    More than 74,000 U.S. servicemen and women from World War I and World War II are buried in American cemeteries in France and Belgium, according to the American Battle Monuments Commission.

    Brown-Waite's proposed legislation makes all of those servicemen and women buried in France and Belgium eligible for ``repatriation'' at their families' requests.

    Brown-Waite, elected in November, said she doesn't have cost estimates for returning remains to the United States, but she proposes the government pay for it.

    Ginny Brown-Waite makes Congressman Bob Ney, who renamed the french fries at the House Restaurant, look like friggin' Steven Hawking.....

    (thanks to Robman)


    posted by tbogg at 10:58 AM

    |

     

    Sign O' the Times

    I bought gas this morning at the local Shell Station.

    Regular $2.42 9/10
    Super $2.52 9/10
    Premium $2.62 9/10

    But the good news is that no one is getting blowjobs in the White House.


    posted by tbogg at 10:46 AM

    |

     

    Down the rabbit hole

    Doonesbury.


    posted by tbogg at 8:05 AM

    |

    Wednesday, March 12, 2003

     

    Holy crap!

    No. Really. This is holy crap.

    "Golf and Prayer Walk"?

    Jesus is my caddy.I shall fear no doglegs, and I shall dwell in the fairways forever. Amen, and pass me the putter...

    ...and don't forget to go to the kids page for helpful prayer requests for your little nipper:

    Your prayers will help keep President Bush strong and effective as he leads our nation.


    1. Do you remember last summer when everybody was talking about the Pledge of Allegiance? There is a man who thinks we should take the words, "under God" out of the Pledge. He has asked the courts of our country to do this, and now his request may go to the Supreme Court, the highest court in America. Pray with people all over America that the words "under God" will stay in the Pledge of Allegiance. Pray that all the people who need to speak up about this concern will do so, and that our Supreme Court Justices will decide to settle the matter once and for all time by ruling to "keep God in our Pledge."

    It's things like this that makes God drink until He blacks out.....








    posted by tbogg at 11:20 PM

    |

     

    Sparkle and fade

    Spent the evening with this.

    Blackjack is...really...really...good. And I Want to Die a Beautiful Death is the companion song to Santa Monica (for you Everclear afficianados)

    Santa Monica

    I am still livin' with your ghost
    Lonely and dreamin' of the west coast
    I don't wanna be your downtime
    I don't wanna be your stupid game
    With my big black boots and an old suitcase
    I do believe I'll find myself a new place
    I don't wanna be the bad guy
    I don't wanna do your sleepwalk dance anymore
    I just wanna see some palm trees
    I will try and shake away this disease
    We can live beside the ocean
    Leave the fire behind
    Swim out past the breakers
    Watch the world die
    We can live beside the ocean
    Leave the fire behind
    Swim out past the breakers
    Watch the world die
    I am still dreamin' of your face
    Hungry and hollow for all the things you took away
    I don't wanna be your good time
    I don't wanna be your fallback crutch anymore
    Walk right out into a brand new day
    Insane and risin' in my own weird way
    I don't wanna be the bad guy
    I don't wanna do your sleepwalk dance anymore
    I just wanna feel some sunshine
    I just wanna find some place to be alone
    Yeah watch the world die
    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    I have already asked my wife to have this played at my funeral.

    Really.

    Too bad I won't be there to hear it.






    posted by tbogg at 10:54 PM

    |

     

    Another mystery of the universe solved...

    Reader Ben comes through on the great Mona Lisa Eyebrow Mystery. From Wikipedia:

    Mona Lisa (also Monna Lisa; Italian, La Gioconda, French, La Joconde), by Leonardo da Vinci, is perhaps the most famous painting in the world, going so far as to be iconic of painting, art, and even visual images in general. No other work of art is so romanticized, celebrated, or reproduced.

    The work, which was accomplished between 1503 and 1506, measures 77 x 53 cm and is an oil painting on wood. It was brought to France by Leonardo when King Francois I invited the great painter to work at the Clos Lucé near the king's chateau in Amboise. As a result, the Mona Lisa today hangs in the Louvre in Paris, and is the museum's star attraction.

    The identity of the lady in the painting is not known for certain, except that she was a wealthy Florentine. The most probable suspect is Madonna Lisa del Giocondo.

    [snip...]

    The painting has been restored numerous times: unfortunately, several details have been lost in the process, including Lisa's eyebrows and (possibly) a pearl necklace she was wearing

    Now the only thing keeping me awake is trying to figure out what talent Arsenio Hall ever exibited that made him a celebrity.






    posted by tbogg at 10:45 PM

    |

     

    Saying no to Joe.

    As if there weren't enough reasons to make sure that Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-Quisling) doesn't get the Democratic presidential nomination:

    Democratic leaders are stiffening their opposition to war with Iraq at a time when U.S. troops are preparing to crush Saddam Hussein's terrorist regime to prevent another September 11.

    In a strategic decision that could turn into a political disaster for their party in 2004, House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democratic Leader Tom Daschle are playing to the liberal, anti-war base of their party. That move has upset some of their party's presidential hopefuls who fear it could fuel deeper doubts about the Democrats' falling credibility on defense and national security matters.

    [snip...]

    That is forcing even a front-runner like Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, who also voted for the war resolution, to toughen his criticism of Mr. Bush on the diplomatic front, while still supporting military action.

    However, Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut has been consistently raising the level of his attacks on Saddam and defending the need to "get rid of this tyrant." A Lieberman adviser told me, "You won't find anyone among our party's presidential candidates who supports Bush more on this issue, than Joe does."

    Say goodbye, Joe. No nomination for you....







    posted by tbogg at 10:35 PM

    |

     

    Profiteer Perle reporting for duty, sir.

    Looks like war counselor and chickenhawk Richard Perle is going to be a rich, rich man after he convinces President Hypnotized By Shiny Objects to get his war on. That is unless Sy Hersh's story has legs.

    Perle trying to break Hersh's legs.

    Richard Perle, the influential foreign policy hawk, is suing journalist Seymour Hersh over an article he wrote implying that Mr. Perle is using his position as a Pentagon adviser to benefit financially from a war to liberate Iraq.

    "I intend to launch legal action in the United Kingdom. I’m talking to Queen’s Counsel right now," Mr. Perle, who chairs the Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board, a non-paying position, told The New York Sun last night.

    He said he is suing in Britain because it is easier to win such cases there, where the burden on plaintiffs is much less.

    Mr. Hersh’s article, which appears in the March 17 issue of the The New Yorker magazine, said Mr. Perle met for lunch with two Saudi businessman in France in January in an attempt to seek Saudi investment for a company Mr. Perle is associated with, Trireme Partners L.P.

    Trireme was created to "invest in companies dealing in technology, goods, and services that are of value to homeland security and defense," according to Mr. Hersh’s article.

    What does it avail a man, to gain his fortune and lose his----oh wait, we're talking Perle here.

    Never mind.




    posted by tbogg at 2:50 PM

    |

     

    Speak for yourself.

    The Daily Kos points out that Treasury Secretary John Snow is lying already.

    Wasn't Snow supposed to be an improvement over O'Neil as treasury secretary? Well, he seems to be having another "O'Neil moment" as he claims, against all evidence, that Greenspan backs Bush's tax cut plan.



    posted by tbogg at 1:29 PM

    |

     

    Karen's Choice

    Today Rick Santorum (R-PA) is leading the fight to ban so-called "partial birth abortions". Santorum believes he has a point based on this column he wrote back in May of 1997.

    Some excerpts:

    We had been through the sonogram routine before -- the technician would turn out the lights, spread gel on my wife Karen's growing abdomen, and right there on the screen we would get the first glimpse of our baby. This time was different. Sitting in the darkened room, explaining what we were seeing to our three children, ages 5, 3 and 1, everything seemed fine. But the technician was strangely quiet, reexamining a dark circle on the screen. The doctor entered and repeated the routine. Finally, we were coldly given the verdict: "Your child has a fatal defect and is going to die."

    Through our tears erupted the most basic of all parental emotions: We were going to save our child, whom we already loved.

    [snip...]

    We adjourned to a nearby room where Donnenfeld gave us three options: "Your first option is to terminate the pregnancy." We knew abortion was a legal option, but it was inconceivable to us to end the life of our baby because he wasn't perfect or because he might not live a long life. While we couldn't look into his eyes or hold him, he was no less our child than our other children. And we loved him every bit as much. The second option was to do nothing -- and our son would live only as long as he was in the womb. The third option would entail several tests and possibly intrauterine surgery.

    Karen's response was to do whatever it took to save our son.

    Our son went through two days of tests to determine kidney function. If there wasn't any, there would be no point in proceeding -- he would not develop enough in the womb to survive outside. The first day the test results were so bad that we discussed whether it was worth going through a second painful day for Karen. Adzick said we needed a miracle overnight.

    We prayed more than I can remember for our son, named that day Gabriel Michael, after the great archangels. The next day our prayers were answered with a miraculous improvement; the kidneys were not just OK, but functioning normally! We could do the surgery that would save his life.

    [snip...]

    Unfortunately there were complications:

    Karen was seized with horrible chills and her temperature soared to over 105 degrees. There was little that could be done. Intrauterine infections are untreatable as long as the source of the infection -- the amniotic sac -- is in place. We knew that at 20 weeks Gabriel could not survive outside the womb. But, unless the amniotic sac -- including our son -- was delivered, Karen would soon die, and Gabriel with her.

    While Karen was given an antibiotic to reduce the fever, she clung to the baby with all her strength. But the labor intensified -- the body had identified the problem and taken measures to eliminate the infection. She did everything she could to delay the inevitable, but every doctor gave the same verdict: Gabriel would have to be delivered. Again, the doctors told us that abortion was a legal option to protect Karen's health and possibly save her life.

    But with the support of Dr. Cynthia Simms and Adzick, who had become a supportive force for us throughout, we arrived at another way that gave our son the love and respect he deserved and gave Karen and me a gift we will forever cherish.

    Within hours, at 12:45 a.m., our son was born. He was a beautiful, fully formed creation -- a small, pink package of joy, sorrow, hope and questions. We bundled him up, put a little hat on his head to keep him warm. We held him, sang to him and cried for him. We knew the end was near, so we tried to pack a lifetime of love into those few hours. He was too small to make a sound, but he spoke so powerfully to our hearts. His eyes never opened to see us, but he allowed us to see in him the face of God. Two hours later, he died in my arms.

    Okay, I don't want to give short shrift to the rest of Santorum's story, but, suffice to say, his wife was lucky. And she was more than lucky...she had the right to make her own choice. Gabriel Michael Santorum died at the age of two hours and Karen Santorum survived. But Karen Santorum was allowed by the government of the United States to take that risk and to make that choice with the help of her husband and her doctors.

    Today Santorum argues to deny women the same rights that his wife enjoyed. Being a grieving father doesn't make him any less of a hypocrite.




    posted by tbogg at 1:23 PM

    |

     

    The blind leading the lame...

    Glenn Reynolds finds this:

    The problem arose when Karzai visited the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for what the committee had billed as a "meeting." Generally, heads of state meet with the committee in private, but Chairman Richard G. Lugar (R-Ind.) instead invited Karzai to a hearing room with reporters present.

    Karzai was placed at a witness table looking up at the senators, the usual layout for people summoned to testify at a hearing. There were several skeptical and hostile questions that Karzai did not expect and had not prepared for, according to the Afghan officials. . . .

    In addition to being seated at a table below the committee members, Karzai was scolded by some of them.

    Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.) warned that if Karzai told the committee everything was going well, "the next time you come back, then your credibility will be in question." Hagel said later that he felt the administration had "coached" Karzai.

    Holding a recent report released by the advocacy group Human Rights Watch, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) told Karzai that "police in Herat are detaining women and girls caught alone with unrelated men, are being forced to submit to medical exams to see if they have recently had sexual relations."

    The Karzai government is trying to expand its authority across the country, but it still has only limited control in many areas, including the western city of Herat. . . .

    "We thought these people were our friends, but now we really don't know," a senior Afghan government official said. "This was a protocol blunder, and there was real insensitivity on the part of some senators. They were talking about nitty-gritty problems in Afghanistan and missing the big picture that there is a war on terrorism going on while we try to make a country again from scratch."

    "lame".

    Instead of worrying about Karzai not getting the red carpet treatment, maybe Glenn should ask why the US isn't helping him "get control" of his country instead of acting like a child bored with the Afghani sandbox who runs over to the Iraqi sandbox. There are 250,000 soldiers in the area cooling their heels while President Cartman spends his days futilely trying to get the UN to respect his "autoritah". Before they start "liberating" the good people of Iraq, they might want to finish the job of liberating the people of Afghanistan.

    Maybe it's just me, but Reynolds, who I used to enjoy reading, has become all surface and little thought. I know he has his various columns elsewhere where he goes somewhat more in depth, but the bulk of people go to InstaPundit and where they get "soundbite" posts like the above. They might just as well be Drudge Headlines (Senators Act Lame...Breaking!) To some degree I do this myself, but then I don't advertise myself as an expert/lawyer/MSNBC columnist.

    A little more thought...a little less glibness.



    posted by tbogg at 12:10 PM

    |

     

    If wishes were horses, Bush still couldn't ride...

    Fom The Sideshow:

    If George Bush were the kind of man who could fix this mess, we wouldn't be in this mess, because that kind of man would not have made this kind of mess.

    Go read the whole thing.


    posted by tbogg at 11:14 AM

    |

     

    Line of the day

    From Body & Soul:

    A panel of national security experts, including James Schlesinger and Jeanne Kirkpatrick criticized Bush for not being up-front about the costs and risks of war with Iraq, and for scrimping and poor planning for humanitarian needs. How bad do you have to be if Jeanne Kirkpatrick is criticizing you for not caring enough about humanitarian needs?





    posted by tbogg at 11:04 AM

    |

     

    But what does it mean?

    Yesterday I passed on the fact that according to the good folks at Snapple (who should know), Mona Lisa has no eyebrows. Several readers have written in pointing out that, yes, she does.

    Here. You decide.

    More importantly, it was noted that...Whoopi Goldberg doesn't have eyebrows either.

    I'm sure this means something, but I haven't been able to find the relevant passages in The Bible Code. I'll keep looking....



    posted by tbogg at 9:04 AM

    |

     

    A shorter shelf life than the lambada.

    So. Whatever happened to Andy Sullivan's Eagles? You remember:

    There's a new group of people out there who are socially liberal but also foreign policy realists, especially among those who have been awakened to political engagement by September 11. Some of these used to be Scoop Jackson Democrats, but today's breed doesn't buy into the big government liberalism of the 1960s and 1970s either. Some are neocons who don't love the social right. Others are just Generation X and Y, who simply accept the social diversity of modern culture and want to see it defended against theocratic barbarians. These people are not comfortable with the Republicans' flirtation with the religious right, or their prosecution of the drug war or mixing of church and state; and they're not impressed by the Democrats' lack of seriousness in foreign policy or enmeshment with public sector interest groups. They're politically homeless, these people - but were probably key swing voters in the last election. Instead of hawks and doves, call these people "eagles." I think they'll play a key part in shaping the politics and culture of the next few years.

    Are these guys holding rallies like the Promisekeepers (aka "Stadium Full O' Losers")? Having they started "shaping the politics and culture" yet? And how do they feel about the Jesus-Loves-Me-This-I-Know, Cause-Tony-Scalia-Tells-Me-So bunch of Bible junkies in the White House?

    Andy seems to have obliterated the term from his vocabulary. Hiding it like a bad prom picture, hoping no one will ask to see it....







    posted by tbogg at 8:56 AM

    |

     

    Maybe the tide is turning.....

    Editorial cartoon from the quite conservative San Diego Union.





    posted by tbogg at 7:51 AM

    |

    Tuesday, March 11, 2003

     

    Shorter Andrew Sullivan

    To save you the pain and suffering of going through Sully's long post on why he is afraid of the future, and why that means we should kill a lot of people who are not reasonable like him, I have broken it down to its more "direct points".

    Ahem....Andy has learned that bad guys who aren't really governments with countries and capital cities and soccer teams and stuff, might get bad weapons and do us harm. Sullivan has apparently never seen a James Bond movie (like someone else we know), and so he finds this suprising and unreasonable. Since the world, which doesn't agree with George Bush (who may be our Churchill...no, really!) about attacking Iraq, what is the use in even discussing North Korea? Everyone except for Bush is soooo unreasonable. So someone has to blow up a Western city for us to realize that Bush and Blair are both Churchillian and ahead of their times. North Korea is probably worse, but lets invade Iraq anyway. Opposition is unreasonable and cynical. 9/11 and Iraq are somehow linked, but only at a level or frequency that only Andy can see and dogs can hear. Oh. And he is praying about our "leadership".

    Hey. Who isn't?

    Oh yeah. Andy also said that Rumsfeld is a loose cannon and Bush should tell him to "Mellow out, dude"...or at least snort some of the same pig tranquilizer that Bush mainlined prior to his press conference. But you know Rummy. When he's been tweaked on crystal for four days running he just, you know, says shit...





    posted by tbogg at 11:45 PM

    |

     

    Triumphalism at the Marriott crepe bar.

    Michael Kelly, all decked out in his bush jacket and elastic-waist Dockers, reports from Kuwait City where he is making short work on the mini-bar in his room:

    KUWAIT CITY -- Monday morning, at breakfast in the Marriott hotel here, a man at the table next to mine was talking on his cell phone in one of those brisk executive cell-phone voices. He was not in uniform, but from his neat, straight, clipped look he was military of some sort. He was saying that he was calling on behalf of Capt. So-and-So, following up on a call from yesterday, trying to make clear exactly what the captain needed.

    What does this all mean? Why war is just around the corner and Uncle Sam is spreading Social Security dollars to a favored few as part of Operation Bush’s Manhood.

    But America’s manhood, as exemplified by the sweaty, conference room-bound Kelly is at stake too:

    The historian Paul Kennedy wrote awhile back that the immense disparity of power between the United States and the rest of the world, unique in degree in history, was remarkable enough, but that what was really extraordinary was that the United States was able to achieve this by spending less than 3 percent of gross domestic product annually. A similar sense strikes an observer here.

    It is remarkable enough that the United States is setting out to undertake the invasion of a nation, the destruction of a regime and the liberation of a people. But to do this with only one real military ally, with much of the world against it, with a war plan that is still, by necessity, in flux days before the advent, with an invasion force that contains only one fully deployed heavy armored division -- and to have, under these circumstances, the division's commander sleeping pretty good at night: Well, that is extraordinary.

    A victory on these terms will change the power dynamics of the world. And there will be a victory on these terms.

    USA! USA! USA!

    .........until a suicide bomber blows up a Starbucks in Georgetown and then even smug curbside flag-wavers like Kelly might realize that the war has come home because a group of neo-con chickenhawks handed a baseball bat to a simpleton and told him that the hornets nest in the backyard was a piñata.

    Where's the victory in that?


    posted by tbogg at 10:42 PM

    |

     

    Blocking Democratic judicial nominations officially declared:
    "Youthful Indiscretions".


    Today President Dim Son declared that blocking Presidential Judicial nominees just isn't fair. At least not now. Oh hell, let him explain, as best he can:

    President Bush, his appeals court nomination of Miguel Estrada mired in party politics, called Tuesday for a ban on judicial filibusters and a mandatory vote on all court nominations he and future presidents send to the Senate.

    In a letter read on the Senate floor by Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tennessee, Bush called for a permanent rule "to ensure timely up or down votes on judicial nominations both now and in the future, no matter who is president or which party controls the Senate. This is the only way to ensure our judiciary works and that good people remain willing to be nominated to the federal bench."

    [snip...]

    But Democrats said GOP senators have blocked Democratic judicial nominees from getting confirmation votes in the Senate as well.

    "Because that precedent stands in the way of their political ends, Republicans now seek to deny their own words and their own actions," said Senate Democratic Leader Tom Daschle of South Dakota. "They're here today to claim that the Constitution is threatened by the very same procedures that they themselves have employed. They're here today to claim the Constitution is going to be threatened by the very same powers that it grants."

    But Bush called on the Senate to get beyond the past. "I ask senators of both parties to come together and end the escalating cycle of blame and bitterness and to restore fairness, predictability and dignity to the process," Bush said in the letter.

    Of course, Bush could always nominate some of Clinton's appointees again, to make up for what happened between 1992-2000. He'll probably get to that right after his swearing in at Mensa. So in the meantime, just file Republican judicial obstructionism in the "Youthful Indiscretions" folder along with cocaine usage, infidelity, DUI's, selling technology and weapons to the enemy, and insider trading. It's that folder right there...the big thick one.....











    posted by tbogg at 2:21 PM

    |

     

    Why I love the Freepers...part XXIII

    Attack of the "Euphasims"

    It's funny...because they're stupid.



    posted by tbogg at 1:59 PM

    |

     

    Florida woman unimpressed by Rumsfeld's "big one". She was unmoved and unfulfilled...just like Mrs. Rumsfeld.

    The Air Force tested for the first time the biggest conventional bomb in the U.S. arsenal Tuesday, a 21,000-pound munition that could play a dramatic role in an attack on Iraq.

    Cheryl Irwin, a Pentagon spokeswoman, said the test at Eglin Air Force Base, Fla., was considered a success.

    "It did what they expected it to do. Nothing malfunctioned," she said.

    The bomb, officially called the Massive Ordnance Air Blast, or MOAB, and unofficially dubbed the Mother of All Bombs, is guided to its target by satellite signals. It was dropped out the rear of a C-130 transport plane, officials said.

    The bomb is so powerful that its detonation was expected to create a mushroom cloud visible for miles.

    Some area residents felt the bomb's detonation but said the explosion was not as big as they had expected.

    "It was kind of weak," said Patricia Sariego, a receptionist at the Best Western hotel in Navarre, on the southern edge of Eglin. She said the blast shook doors.

    Don Rumsfeld was unavailable for comment. He was on the porch having a cigarette....



    posted by tbogg at 1:53 PM

    |

     

    Non-carbonated beverage fact of the day

    According to the inside of my Snapple Peach Ice Tea cap:

    The Mona Lisa has no eyebrows.

    No go forth...you have learned something today, Grasshopper.....


    posted by tbogg at 1:05 PM

    |

     

    Bow down before the one you serve...you're going to get what you deserve.

    Speaking of being on the prowl (see below)....John Ashcroft is hunting evil down everywhere, so beware terrorists, fellow travelers, women with brain tumors or paralysis....Yeah, that's right, you sickos. Hands on the car and spread 'em. Big Bad John is back in town and he don't cotton to no debilitated, states-rights spouting dopers:

    A federal judge has refused to prohibit the U.S. government from potentially prosecuting two women with painful ailments whose doctors say marijuana is their only medical solace. In the first case of its kind, the two California medical marijuana users sued Attorney General John Ashcroft, seeking a court order allowing them to smoke, grow or obtain marijuana without threat or fear of federal prosecution.

    U.S. District Judge Martin Jenkins expressed sympathy for the women but said federal law required him to rule against them.

    "Despite the gravity of plaintiffs' need for medical cannabis, and despite the concrete interest of California to provide it for individuals like them, the court is constrained from granting their request," Jenkins wrote in a ruling last week that became public Monday.

    The Justice Department would not comment on whether it would seek to prosecute plaintiffs Angel Raich, 37, or Diane Monson, 44.

    The case underscores the conflict between California's medical marijuana law, which allows people to grow, smoke or obtain marijuana for medical needs, and the federal government's refusal to acknowledge the state's 1996 voter-approved initiative allowing such acts.

    Monson grows and smokes her own marijuana for chronic back problems and has already been raided once by the Drug Enforcement Administration.

    Raich suffers from a variety of ailments, including scoliosis, a brain tumor, chronic nausea, fatigue and pain. Raich and her doctor say marijuana is the only drug that helps her pain and keeps her eating. She says she was partially paralyzed on the right side of her body until she started smoking marijuana.

    Both women say they will continue smoking marijuana. Raich vowed to take her case to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and possibly to the Supreme Court.

    "I am not a criminal. I am just somebody who is really, really ill and sick," she said. "I'm not going to stop. I'm not willing to die."

    How dare she refuse God when he is obviously calling her home?

    First US Attorney to find a 12 year old girl going blind from glaucoma with a joint in her pocket gets a big fat bonus from Ashcroft for giving him his first erection since 1993.

    Suffer the children....





    posted by tbogg at 12:39 PM

    |

     

    Stuck inside the bathroom with those Ashcroft Blues again.

    Man trapped in bathroom by cat

    A Canadian man had to be rescued by police after his cat went berserk and trapped him in a bathroom.

    It took two police officers and animal control officer Ron Sabean, to subdue the seven-year-old cat.

    The pet was snarling and hissing at the bathroom door in the house near Greenwood, Nova Scotia, when Mr Sabean arrived.

    He said: "I've been in this business going on 24 years and I've never seen a cat focus on a person like that one did."



    posted by tbogg at 12:17 PM

    |

     

    It's a joke, you twit.

    I thought Andy Sullivan had a sense of humor (or, in his case, is it humour?). Today Andy writes:

    Then here's the economic expert, Krugman, on the looming deficit:

    [R]ight now the deficit, while huge in absolute terms, is only 2 — make that 3, O.K., maybe 4 — percent of G.D.P.

    I take Krugman's broader point about the deficit, and agree with it. But why such contemptuous sloppiness? There's a critical difference between 2 and 4 percent of GNP. Isn't there?

    Yes, Andy, there is a difference. But it was a joke. You know? How the deficit keeps growing? How they haven't accounted for your war? How the GNP may be slipping?

    Oh. Never mind.

    (Link fixed...sorry.)







    posted by tbogg at 10:21 AM

    |

     

    This...is...so...lame

    From the Liquid List:

    WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The restaurant menus in the three House office buildings will change the name of "french fries" to "freedom fries," a culinary rebuke of France, stemming from anger over the country's refusal to support the U.S. position on Iraq.

    Ditto for "french toast," which will be known as "freedom toast."

    The name changes were spearheaded by two Republican lawmakers who plan to hold a news conference later Tuesday to make the name change official on the menus.

    "This action today is a small, but symbolic effort to show the strong displeasure of many on Capitol Hill with the actions of our so-called ally, France," said Rep. Bob Ney, R-Ohio, the chairman of the Committee on House Administration.

    Normally I would make some snarky little quip about Mr Ney, but this is just so retarded, he doesn't deserve the time and effort.

    (Update) Rittenhouse has more. Ney actually issued a press release. Good thing that Congress got all their work done early today.






    posted by tbogg at 9:53 AM

    |

     

    The enemy of my enemy is, well, I don't really want him as a friend

    Pat Buchanan, who won the West Palm Beach Jewish vote in 2000, takes on the neo-cons. Yeah, I know it's Drudge, but it's a slow news day.

    Anyway:

    In this week's AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE, editor Pat Buchanan issues a controversial, 5000-word indictment of the 'War Party' of Bennett, Kristol, Podhoretz and Richard Perle.

    MORE

    The magazine will hit newsstands and bookstores tomorrow. With quotes and citations, Buchanan alleges:

    'War Party' ideas and plans for an attack on Iraq had been 'in preparation far in advance of 9/11, and when President Bush was looking for a new front,' the neocons 'put their precooked meal in front of him. And Bush dug into it.'

    Richard Perle wrote a paper urging Israeli PM Netanyahu to dump the Oslo Peace Accords and target Iraq -- five years before 9/11.

    Undersecretary of Defense Douglas Feith urged Israel to ditch the Oslo and take back the West Bank though 'the price in blood would be high,' three years before the Camp David talks.

    Pentagon official David Wurmser urged the U.S. to act in concert with Israel to 'strike fatally...the regimes of Damascus, Baghdad, Tripoli, Tehran and Gaza' -- nine months before 9/11.

    Cool. I love the smell of Republican internecine warfare in the morning.....


    posted by tbogg at 9:14 AM

    |

     

    Omigod..this is, like, such a cool book, and I am, like, so loving it....

    Mona Charen has a new book out, Useful Idiots (Regnery Press....duh) and townhall.com (portal to all that is obtuse and rightwing, and yes I know that's redundant) needed someone to review it. Someone who could get the masses to rise up and purchase this landmark, groundbreaking, couldn't-put-it-down, page-turner. A big name. A glittering star in the conservative firmament.

    So they let an intern do it:

    Anna Marie Gould, a student at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, served as a 2002 summer intern for The Heritage Foundation and Townhall.com.

    But Anna Marie had the one thing that gave her the edge over the likes of such Conservative glitterati such as David Limbaugh or Ben Shapiro. She has a thesaurus. Hence, supple prose such as this:

    If we accepted liberals' tendentious arguments on communism and its worldwide consequences, we would have to conclude that the United States played a pivotal role in making other countries miserable. Fortunately, liberal propaganda, which often provides fictitious accounts of American history, is proven wrong time and again by historical reality. Syndicated columnist Mona Charen assiduously attacks those who have deliberately maligned our country in her latest tome, Useful Idiots: How Liberals got it Wrong in the Cold War and Still Blame America First.

    She had me from the first use of "tendentious".

    I think I'm in love.










    posted by tbogg at 8:21 AM

    |

     

    I'm not listening , I'm not listening...lalalalalalalalalala...

    Merrill Lynch & Co., one of Wall Street’s biggest firms, will from next week prevent its brokerage employees from watching financial cable news channel CNBC, the New York Times reported on Tuesday.

    THE NEWSPAPER SAID the move, which would see CNBC ditched in favor of rival Bloomberg Television, stems in part from what some CNBC commentators have said about Merrill on air.

    Lawrence Kudlow and James Cramer, the co-hosts of an evening talk show, have been among Merrill’s harshest critics, the New York Times said.

    I guess it's their own fault for caring what Cokie McKudlow says....


    posted by tbogg at 7:58 AM

    |

     

    Just get it over so I can get on with my so-called life...

    One of the curb-sitting flag-wavers is getting impatient.

    I've been advocating war, but I doubt that this web site had any significant influence on decision making in the Whitehouse. While I do know that some government workers read it, I seriously doubt anyone in a position of authority even knows I exist. Nonetheless, I do feel a degree of responsibility; since we're going to embark on a war I've been advocating, I can't disclaim any negative results from the war once it starts. There's never any way of knowing before you begin how it will go; you do the best you can in terms of preparing, but then you roll the dice. And sometimes the result is not what you expected.

    I want it to be over. I want it in the past, a fait accompli. As I sit, waiting, I feel dread and foreboding. My imagination is working overtime, summoning scenarios which could lead to disaster for us, either before combat begins, or during the period when our troops are in action.

    Just another slow day at The Androids Dungeon....


    posted by tbogg at 7:55 AM

    |

    Monday, March 10, 2003

     

    The first time ever I....

    We all have pivotal moments in our lives when things change and many times we don’t recognize what is going on or how it will impact us; it’s just life moving inexorably forward. Later it will occur to us that something happened. To the best of my knowledge, nothing is happening to me right now, but I do know that things are changing for my daughter. Two things to be exact.

    First, and this is the lesser of the two, she has just been selected to join a soccer team that is competing at a national level. She is going to find out how good she is, how dedicated she is, and what she has inside of her. She is going to find out that talent isn’t always enough. She is going to learn something about herself.

    Secondly, and this is the one that I’m really excited about, she has to read To Kill A Mockingbird for school.

    That’s it. She gets to read a book, and I’m excited for her. Because to me, To Kill a Mockingbird isn’t just any book. It is the book that can start a teenager on the road to adulthood. Told in the voice of a wise child, it is the tale of being an adult. How we lose things as we grow older and have to find lesser things to fill up the space. I can distinctly remember the first time I read this book and I wondered how all the thousands of authors who came before Harper Lee could have missed out on telling this story. It just seemed so…perfect. Just sitting there waiting to be told. I envy my daughter for getting to read it for the first time. Haven’t you ever read a book and wished you could read it again as if it were the first time? I do all the time.

    I remember when I was a kid lying in bed listening to the radio late at night with the lights out and the disc jockey saying that they were going to premiere a new song by Simon and Garfunkel, and then I heard Bridge Over Troubled Water for the first time. After it was over I felt like I hadn’t taken a breath in five minutes. Imagine that. Hearing something like that for the… very… first… time. Something amazing. Something immaculate. Something never heard before.

    Years later I read another book that ended this way:

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Of course, now I am too old to be much of a fisherman, and now of course I usually fish the big waters alone, although some friends think I shouldn't. Like many fly fishermen in western Montana where the summer days are almost Arctic in length, I often do not start fishing until the cool of the evening. Then in the Arctic half-light of the canyon, all existence fades to a being with my soul and memories and the sounds of the Big Blackfoot River and a four-count rhythm and the hope that a fish will rise.

    Eventually, all things merge into one, and a river runs through it. The river was cut by the world's great flood and runs over rocks from the basement of time. On some of the rocks are timeless raindrops. Under the rocks are the words, and some of the words are theirs.

    I am haunted by waters.

    ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

    Perfect. It still takes my breath away. Thank you, Norman MacLean. I still remember closing the book, then reopening it to read those last words again. I remember that exact moment.

    I guess what I’m trying to say is that I hope that my daughter reads To Kill A Mockingbird and sees in it what I saw. And I will do my best not to influence her. Good books like good music have to be discovered on their own. And if it's not Harper Lee who speaks to her, maybe it will be Joseph Conrad or Doris Lessing or Flannery O'Connor.

    I just hope that she finds what is good in this life and makes it a part of her life. And then I hope she remembers….


    posted by tbogg at 9:53 PM

    |

     

    200,000

    You'll probably be reading this on Tuesday. Sometime today this blog will go over the 200,000 hit barrier. When I started it back in September, I expected to get about 35 hits a day...and I would have been happy with that (actually I still would...I'm really only here to amuse myself). 200,000 sounds like a lot, but then Insta-Pundit (Glenn Reynolds) gets that in about two days, which adds a little context.

    I'm thinking that, to get the really big numbers I should just introduce a link, quote a line from it, then follow up with a resonant and thoughtful....

    Indeed.


    posted by tbogg at 9:02 PM

    |

     

    Head down...bulling forward.

    I used to have a basset named Cooder. He was fairly smart by basset standards, but also incredibly stubborn, even using those same standards. We had a dog door built into our door so he could go in and out during the few moments he wasn't sleeping on the bed, couch. chair, anything but the floor. Unfortunately we also had a opossum problem, and so, at night, we had to slip a provided metal sheet into the brackets that framed the dog door to keep the opossums outside where they would spend their time staring at us through the sliding glass doors while we watched TV at night. I guess we were like opossum TV.

    Anyway, sometimes I would forget that the sheet metal blockade was in and Cooder couldn't get out to the yard. One morning he decided to pay the yard a visit and went to go out the door but his little dome-y head bonked up against metal and wouldn't budge. Instead of backing up and trying again, or barking at me, or even giving up temporarily, he just stood there with his head down trying to bull his way through. I guess he expected that if he stood there long enough it would give way. I watched him for several minutes waiting for him to back up...but h