|
 Faithful husband, soccer dad,
basset owner, and former cowboy
Return to TboggHomePage
FELLOW TRAITORS
*The Nether-Count*
100 Monkeys Typing
Ain't No Bad Dude
Alicublog
Americablog
American Leftist
Attytood (Will Bunch)
Bad Attitudes
Balloon Juice
Better Inhale Deeply
Bitch Ph.D
Bloggy
Bob Harris
Brilliant At Breakfast
BusyBusyBusy
Byzantium's Shores
Creek Running North
Crooked Timber
Crooks and Liars
Cursor
Daily Kos
Dependable Renegade
David Ehrenstein
Democratic Veteran
Dohiyi Mir
Down With Tyranny
Echidne of the Snakes
Edicts of Nancy
Elayne Riggs
Eschaton (Atrios)
Ezra Klein
Failure Is Impossible
Feministe
Feministing
Firedoglake
First Draft
Freewayblogger
The Garance
The Group News Blog
Guano Island
Hairy Fish Nuts
Hammer of the Blogs
Hullabaloo(Digby)
I Am TRex
If I Ran the Zoo
I'm Not One To Blog
Interesting Times
James Wolcott
Jesus' General
Jon Swift
Juan Cole
King of Zembla
Kung Fu Monkey
Lance Mannion
Lawyers Guns and Money
Lean Left
Liberal Oasis
Main & Central
Majikthise
Making Light (Nielsen Hayden)
Mark Kleiman
Martini Revolution
MaxSpeak
MF Blog
MyDD
Needlenose
The Next Hurrah
Nitpicker
No More Mr. Nice Blog
Norbizness
Norwegianity
Oliver Willis
One Good Move
Orcinus
Pacific Views
Pam's House Blend
Pandagon
Pharyngula
Political Animal(K.Drum)
The Poorman
Progressive Gold
Right Hand Thief
Rising Hegemon
Roger Ailes
Rude Pundit
Rumproast
Sadly, No
Seeing The Forest
Shakesville
Sisyphus Shrugged
Skippy the Bush Kangaroo
Slacktivist
SteveAudio
Suburban Guerilla
TalkLeft
The American Street
The Left Coaster
The Road To Surfdom
The Sideshow
The Talking Dog
The Talent Show
Tom Tomorrow
Tom Watson
Whiskeyfire
UggaBugga
Wampum
Wonkette
World O'Crap
TOSS ME A BONE
Amazon Wish List

SOURCES
MSNBC CNN
The Washington Post Media Matters The New York Times The Guardian
Yahoo News Salon The Raw Story
Common Dreams Media Transparency
The Nation Alternet Joe Conason
Talking Points Memo
THE VAST WASTELAND
Captain Corndog & Friends
Cheerleaders Gone Spazzy
80% True
Corner of Mediocrity and Banality
Village Idiots Central
Darwin's Waiting Room
News for Mouthbreathers
Mailbox Your e-mail may be reprinted sans name and e-mail address. Think about how stupid you want to appear.
Blogroll Me!

Site Feed
|
Saturday, March 15, 2003
Well...... that's different.....
I realize that George Will is a columnist and therefore he can be as partisan as he wants, but there is no excuse for rank hypocrisy. From Will's latest:
Recall efforts flourish like avocados in California. There have been 32 recall drives against California governors, including every governor since Edmund Brown in 1960. But no effort has made it to a vote. This one may, because even Davis's supporters dislike him, and because of the state's budget crisis. Its size astonishes the nation, and Californians are especially astonished because Davis said during last fall's campaign that all was well.
The deficit is at least $35 billion. So it may be about a third of the 50 states' estimated cumulative deficit, currently $90 billion or more.
The woes of the dot-com and high-tech sectors have disproportionately hurt California, and capital gains tax revenue is way down. Nevertheless, state revenue has risen 28 percent since 1998 -- which is not as fast as Davis has spent. To close the budget gap, which the state constitution requires, he will have to raise many taxes and fees and cut many programs, and every act will create potential recruits for the recall movement.
Now let's talk about Will's current favorite President:
When President Bush was sworn in on Jan. 20, 2001, U.S. stocks were valued at $14.7 trillion, according to Wilshire Associates. Last week’s value: $9.9 trillion. Total decline: $4.8 trillion. The only fair way to compare the Bush Market with other presidents’ markets is to use percentages rather than dollars. Here, too, he leads the pack. According to a study conducted for NEWSWEEK by Aronson+Johnson+Ortiz, a Philadelphia money-management firm, the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index has fallen more in Bush’s first two years than under any president since the modern stock market emerged. (AJO’s data go back only as far as Hoover, enough for our purposes.) During Hoover’s first two years, which included the Black Thursday crash in October 1929, the S&P fell 29 percent. Not as bad as Bush’s 33 percent. (Through last week, the decline was 36 percent.)
You can’t blame this all on Bush, of course. The market he inherited in 2001 had been inflated by the tech and telecom bubble that started popping in the spring of 2000. It was bound to fall. But he’s been in office long enough to bear at least some responsibility—you can bet he’d be taking the credit if the market were rising. He can’t blame the problem on 9-11. AJO says the S&P 500 declined at a 28 percent annual rate from Bush’s Inauguration through Sept. 10, 2001, but at less than half that rate since 9-11. However you count, the market isn’t buying his program. And in the long run, the market’s pretty savvy.
When Bush was sworn in, Uncle Sam seemed to be awash in cash. The federal budget was running big surpluses; the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office projected a $5.6 trillion surplus for the 2002-2011 fiscal years. Bush got his 2001 tax cut through Congress even though the only way to make the numbers work was to use 10 years of projected surpluses to support a tax cut projected to last only nine years. That’s why the cuts are scheduled to end in 2010—which, of course, they won’t. The fact that the president used this kind of “fuzzy math” to get what he wanted doesn’t exactly inspire faith in the reliability of his numbers.
More on Bush:
The Congressional Budget Office today forecast a larger-than-expected deficit of $199 billion for this fiscal year, the largest deficit since 1994 and a figure more than a third larger than the shortfall projected only five months ago.
The influential CBO projections will almost certainly complicate President Bush’s push for a dramatic new round of tax cuts, as lawmakers begin to confront a rising tide of red ink. Just two years after congressional forecasters predicted a $5.6 trillion surplus for this decade, now they do not foresee a return to surpluses until 2007. And the CBO’s latest projections would be substantially worsened by new tax cuts and a war with Iraq, neither of which are included in the new numbers.
The difference, of course, is that the California state Constitution mandates that the California budget be balanced. The US budget can be maintained in deficit in perpetuity, meaning that Bush can continue spending like a drunken Texan, while saddling our grandkids with the bill. By the time the bill comes due, George W. Bush will be wrangling pretzels down at his Crawford "ranch" while drinking himself into a well-deserved oblivion.
Meanwhile, Will posits that:
Republicans, who lost every statewide race last November, might pay a steep price for the fun of dumping Davis. President Bush's chances of carrying California in November 2004, and Republicans' chances of defeating the hyper-liberal Sen. Barbara Boxer, might be better if Californians nurture their anti-Davis grievances for two full years.
[snip...]
Winning reelection by just 47 percent to 42 percent over an opponent running his first campaign and running it badly, Davis got 1.4 million fewer votes than in 1998. His job approval rating has plummeted to 27 percent. But although he has governed both unsuccessfully and irresponsibly, the fact that he richly deserves disapproval, and that in some sense he may deserve to be recalled, does not mean that voters deserve to be able to recall him.
First let's look at how Bush did in California in 2000:
Al Gore Dem 5,861,203
George W. Bush Rep 4,567,429
Of course this was before he plunged the economy into a death spiral, re-started the war on the environment, decreased our freedoms, started us down the slippery slope of denying women the right to control their own bodies, and hid the Cheney documents showing the Administration's hand-in-hand friendship with the same energy companies that screwed California during the "energy crisis".
Will again:
California is not a Circuit City store. A democracy with periodic elections should not have, regarding elected officials, a liberal exchange policy -- any time, for any reason -- for voters experiencing "buyer's remorse." Californians deserve to live with the choice they made when they rehired him for four more years just four months ago
With regard to Bush, well, let's let The Onion describe it:
"You know, they say people get the government they deserve, but I don't recall knife-raping any retarded nuns."
...and we didn't even elect him.
posted by tbogg at 11:04 PM
|
First of all, do harm to others...
Bill Frist (has he mentioned he's a doctor lately?) says that we should kill to heal.
Is anyone else sick of his using the fact that he's a doctor to justify war or the destruction of women's rights?
And why does the press refer to him as Dr. Frist, but Howard Dean is...Howard Dean.
Last I checked, he was a doctor too.
posted by tbogg at 9:36 PM
|
Send Perle and Wolfowitz over...see if they can do better.
The military's latest brainstorm just became lunch.
posted by tbogg at 9:19 PM
|
Friday, March 14, 2003
For those visiting from Altercation
Charles Pierce meant to link you to this.
posted by tbogg at 1:58 PM
|
Soon to be spammed to you.
With the advent of email comes the increasing amounts of spam from friends and others containing doctored pictures, phony testimony by Oliver North about Osama Bin laden, and the usual assortment of jokes and cat pictures. Look for this one ( which I just received) which is pretty good. I wish I had written it. (I won't italicize it to make it easier to read):
~~~~~~~~~
All right, let me see if I understand the logic of this correctly. We are going to ignore the United Nations in order to make clear to Saddam Hussein that the United Nations cannot be ignored. We're going to wage war to preserve the UN's ability to avert war. The paramount principle is that the UN's word must be taken seriously, and if we have to subvert its word to guarantee that it is, then by gum, we will. Peace is too important not to take up arms to defend. Am I getting this right?
Further, if the only way to bring democracy to Iraq is to vitiate the democracy of the Security Council, then we are honor-bound to do that too, because democracy, as we define it, is too important to be stopped by a little thing like democracy as they define it.
Also, in dealing with a man who brooks no dissension at home, we cannot afford dissension among ourselves. We must speak with one voice against Saddam Hussein's failure to allow opposing voices to be heard. We are sending our gathered might to the Persian Gulf to make the point that might does not make right, as Saddam Hussein seems to think it does. And we are twisting the arms of the opposition until it agrees to let us oust a regime that twists the arms of the opposition. We cannot leave in power a dictator who ignores his own people. And if our people, and people elsewhere in the world, fail to understand that, then we have no choice but to ignore them.
Listen. Don't misunderstand. I think it is a good thing that the members of the Bush administration seem to have been reading Lewis Carroll. I only wish someone had pointed out that "Alice in Wonderland" and "Through the Looking Glass" are meditations on paradox and puzzle and illogic and on the strangeness of things, not templates for foreign policy. It is amusing for the Mad Hatter to say something like, `We must make war on him because he is a threat to peace,' but not amusing for someone who actually commands an army to say that.
As a collector of laughable arguments, I'd be enjoying all this were it not for the fact that I know--we all know--that lives are going to be lost in what amounts to a freak, circular reasoning accident.
~~~~~~~~~~~~
posted by tbogg at 1:51 PM
|
Blaming all the President's men
I was just reading Howard Fineman's latest wherein he is critical of Bush's advisors, but let's the Warrior President himself off the hook. Here's Howard:
...who’s going to be blamed for the Turkey screwup, or the U.N. screwups? Who’s going to leak the authoritative—and explosive—estimates of the true cost of maintaining 100,000 troops in Iraq for the indefinite future? (One general already has been whacked for piping up, but there will be others.) Who’s going to take the fall for the fact that we’ve lost the international moral high ground? The world is blaming the president, of course, but that’s not the way things work here. Someone else goes down. Who? The “neocons”? Donald Rumsfeld? The State Department? Dick Cheney? Condi Rice?
Maybe everything will go so swimmingly in Iraq that it’ll be one big happy family here at home. Maybe the war will last only a few days and Iraqis will be in the streets, joyfully greeting GIs as liberators. Maybe a world that now sees us as an imperial pariah will suddenly acknowledge the wisdom of our ways. But never has so much blood, treasure and destiny been gambled on the hope that folks will smile at us. It’s the War of the Happy Iraqis.
But few think it’s going to be that easy. And my guess is that team discipline inside the Bush administration is about to be fractured by the collateral damage that already is being caused by a war we have yet to fight. We are embarrassingly alone diplomatically, and State Department underlings (privately) blame Rumsfeld & Co. Inside the Pentagon—but outside of Rumsfeld’s offfice—I’m told that E-Ring brass have adopted what one source calls a “Vietnam mentality,” a sense of resignation about a policy (military occupation of Iraq) they seriously doubt will work. For their part, the neocons view Pentagon and State as hives of careerists wimps. No one dares take on Cheney; no one is sure Rice has the clout to keep it all together.
I'll leave to others to ponder the Machiavellian workings of the West Wing. I was more intrigued by Fineman's next comment:
Blame games aren’t supposed to happen in and around George W. Bush. I’ve covered him since his days as a gubernatorial candidate in Texas a decade ago. I know that he and his team are extraordinarily focused, disciplined and tight-lipped. I know that he is stubborn and that once he decides on a course he generally sticks to it
I had forgotten that Howard Fineman has covered George W. Bush since the early days of his political career. Fineman has seen it all, although he may have been remiss in reporting it all in order to maintain access. The fact that he has followed this monumentally insincere, corrupt, and manipulative man throughout his career with few, if any, critical comments reminded me of someone that I couldn't put my finger on until today.
Jack Burden
Robert Penn Warren's All The Kings Men, winner of the 1947 Pulitzer Prize for fiction, tells the tale of the rise and fall of southern Governor Willie Stark, a character loosely based upon the life of Louisiana Governor Huey Long. The story is told from the point of view of Jack Burden, a reporter who has covered Stark's career from the beginning, only to become Stark's right-hand man as Stark becomes more and more corrupted by power, eventually losing sight of his ideals. Inevitably Burden, who is a bit of a soft-headed idealist, aids Stark in the destruction of his enemies in a manner that comes back to haunt both Stark and Burden in tragic ways.
After reading most every fawning article Howard Fineman has written about George W Bush since the 2000 election, one has to wonder: Does Howard have his eyes on Karl Rove's job?
posted by tbogg at 1:14 PM
|
Get me one of those fruity drinks with an umbrella...oh, yeah, and a bowl of water for my poodles...
Bush and Blair to meet in the Azores to plan out Operation Inigo Montoya.
“In an effort to pursue every last bit of diplomacy, the president will depart Sunday morning for the Azores to meet Prime Minister Blair and with Prime Minister Aznar to discuss prospects for resolving the situation peacefully with diplomacy in final pursuit of a United Nations resolution,” White House spokesman Ari Fleischer said.
Why do they keep saying that? They aren't negotiating with Iraq to avoid war, they're negotiating (working out bribes in aid or trade credits) with wavering UN Security Council countries for their war vote, in an effort to give the inevitable invasion a patina of legitimacy that is thinner than Bush's foreign policy resume.
When it comes to Iraq, President Cartman has never negotiated with Iraq. It's just been a constant refrain of "Mommmmmm...I wanna go to warrrrrrrr!".
White House homunculus, Ari Fleischer, should just cut to the chase. He's not fooling anyone.
posted by tbogg at 10:52 AM
|
They seem like reasonable men...
I'm sure these are just the kind of guys who will welcome the American Christians invading their neighbors and bringing Western Democracy to them via the barrel of a gun.
Let's roll™
(Note to self: remember to send royalty check to Lisa Beamer...)
posted by tbogg at 9:53 AM
|
Thursday, March 13, 2003
So much evil located on one place....
I must not think bad thoughts.
Join the Media Research Center and the conservative movement's finest as we roast the year's most blatantly liberal members of the national "news" media.
[snip...]
Master of Ceremonies: Cal Thomas
Presenters:
Sean Hannity
Laura Ingraham
Ann Coulter
Judges, who picked the winners, include:
Rush Limbaugh
Steve Forbes
William F. Buckley, Jr.
Lawrence Kudlow
Micheal Reagan
Kate O'Beirne Walter Williams
Lucianne Goldberg
R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr.
William Rusher
John Fund
Plus, come see which conservative stars will accept the awards in jest. Past stand-ins include Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas and now Congresswoman Katherine Harris.
Oooooo. And pictures from last year's hijinks!
"Fredo" Limbaugh
Half woman/half swine
Mental Health Posterboy 1985-96
Comb-over Cal
Woman beater
Cadaver and grandfather of bastard
Whore
posted by tbogg at 9:05 PM
|
Where should I send the thank you card?
If I can get the address of her coven, I intend on sending Ann Coulter a thank you card. Why? Because she makes it soooooooo easy. How easy?
This easy:
Since new competitive media have forced liberals to confront opposing points of view, they seem to have abandoned emotionalism as their main argument. Their new posture is mock hardheaded realism. Liberals flex their spindly little muscles and announce that everything that used to make them cry – guns, racial profiling, torturing suspects – simply doesn't work: The fact is, it doesn't work, this is according to several studies, and no, you can't see them, why would you ask?
Quick recap: liberals attempt to defend their side of issues with non-existent studies. (You can see where this going, can't you?). Then Little Annie Footnote writes (with my emphasis):
Thus, for example, after decades of womanly hysteria about guns, we started getting statements like this from Fox News Channel's Alan Colmes to Larry Pratt of Gun Owners of America: "Let's talk about some hard and cold facts, Larry. The fact of the matter is, Larry, that the odds that a home will be the scene of a homicide are much greater if there's a gun in the home." Soccer moms across America shot up straight at that one and said: I did not know that!
As the inestimable economist John Lott has shown, the study behind this flagrantly dishonest "cold hard fact" assumed that anyone killed by a gun in or near a home where anyone owned a gun was, therefore, killed by "a gun in the home." The study merely attests to the fact that people who live in high-crime neighborhoods tend to own guns. This is like the joke about diets causing people to be fat because most people on diets are fat. Or, as Lott says, on that theory of causation, hospitals must cause people to die because lots of people who die have been hospitalized recently. (Lott exposes dozens of such phony "studies" and shibboleths about guns in his splendid new book, "The Bias Against Guns.")
John Lott. This John Lott:
What is it about statistics and guns? Last year, Michael Bellesiles, a historian at Emory College, came under criticism for his Bancroft Prize-winning book, Arming America: The Origins of a National Gun Culture, which argued that gun ownership was far less common during the 18th and 19th century than is generally supposed. His analysis, which was obviously pleasing to proponents of gun control, was drawn from probate records. But Bellesiles was unable to produce all of his data, owing, he said, to a flood in his office. After a committee of three scholars examined Bellesiles' research, they concluded that "his scholarly integrity is seriously in question." Bellesiles resigned from Emory in disgrace.
Now one of Bellesiles' principal critics, a Northwestern law professor named James Lindgren, has turned his skeptical attention to a scholar who is Bellesiles' ideological opposite: John R. Lott, author of More Guns, Less Crime. Once again, the issue is the disappearance of supporting data.
Lott's More Guns, Less Crime is the bible of the national movement to persuade state legislatures to pass so-called "concealed carry" laws, which permit citizens to carry concealed firearms. The book's thesis is that populations with greater access to firearms are better able to deter crime. Some scholars have quarreled with Lott's interpretation, but this controversy is about underlying data. Lindgren and others want to know where Lott got the evidence to support the following sentence, which appears on Page 3 of Lott's book: "98 percent of the time that people use guns defensively, they merely have to brandish a weapon to break off an attack."
Initially, Lott sourced the 98 percent figure to "national surveys." That's how the first edition of More Guns, Less Crime put it. In an August 1998 op-ed for the Chicago Tribune, Lott appeared to cite three specific surveys:
Polls by the Los Angeles Times, Gallup and Peter Hart Research Associates show that there are at least 760,000, and possibly as many as 3.6 million, defensive uses of guns per year. In 98 percent of the cases, such polls show, people simply brandish the weapon to stop an attack.
But polls by the Los Angeles Times, Gallup, and Peter Hart show no such thing.
Alternatively, Lott would sometimes attribute the 98 percent figure to Gary Kleck, a criminologist at Florida State University. In a February 2000 op-ed for Colorado's Independence Institute, Lott wrote: "Kleck's study of defensive gun uses found that ninety-eight percent of the time simply brandishing the weapon is sufficient to stop an attack." But Kleck's research shows no such thing.
Eventually, Lott settled on yet another source for the 98 percent figure: "a national survey that I conducted," as Lott put it in a second edition of More Guns, Less Crime. When asked about the survey, Lott now says it was done by telephone in 1997 and that the data was lost a few months later in a computer crash.
Lott's conflicting explanations naturally attracted suspicion, first from Otis Dudley Duncan, a retired sociologist at the University of California, San Diego, who wrote an article on the matter for the Criminologist, and eventually from Lindgren, the Bellesiles gumshoe, who has been posting his findings online. (Chatterbox is indebted to Tim Lambert, a computer scientist and gun-control advocate at the University of New South Wales, for compiling various documents relating to the Lott case.) When Chatterbox asked Lott about the serial attributions to "national surveys," to three specific polls, and to Kleck, Lott conceded, "A lot of those discussions could have been written more clearly." He said that in the computer crash, he lost all his data for the book and had to reconstruct it, but that he couldn't reconstruct the survey. Lott has been able to produce witnesses who remember him talking about this obviously traumatic event soon after it occurred. But none of these people specifically remember him talking about losing data for a survey he'd conducted. Nor has Lott been able to produce the names of the college students he says conducted the phone surveys in Chicago, where Lott was teaching at the time. (Lott is now at Washington's American Enterprise Institute.)
The only compelling evidence that the 1997 survey ever took place is the testimony of David M. Gross, a Minnesotan who contacted Lott after the controversy spread to various Weblogs. (To date, the only mainstream news organization that's covered the data dispute is the Washington Times, whose Robert Stacy McCain had a piece about the Lott affair on Jan. 23. The Feb. 1 Washington Post examined a bizarre side issue, but we're getting ahead of ourselves.) Gross told Chatterbox, "I have come to the conclusion that I in fact did" participate in the study, "based on some of the details of my recollection." What Gross recalls is that in January 1999—a year before questions were first raised about Lott's data—he attended a talk Lott gave at the Minneapolis Athletic Club. (Gross can pinpoint the date, he says, because he bought a tape.) After Lott's remarks, Gross walked up to Lott and told him he'd figured out, while listening to Lott discuss the 1997 survey, that he, Gross, had participated in that survey. Both the timing and the content, as described by Lott, match what Gross remembers about the survey, which is the only gun poll he recalls ever participating in.
That John Lott.
Nice going Ann. You managed to discredit your own column in a mere 168 words. I don't think even George Will can beat that record.
posted by tbogg at 8:36 PM
|
Stolen from Sullivan
But it's pretty damn funny.
posted by tbogg at 7:55 PM
|
Riffin' with Rick.
Here's Rick Santorum (R-Hypocrite) going off on a tangent about abortion:
Those who proclaim the virtue of abortion as a right said this would be a blessing to our society. They said: This would be a great blessing. So many positive things will happen. Divorces will come down. Spouse abuse will come down. Infant abuse will come down. Child abuse will come down. Abortions, of course, will go up, but the benefit is domestic violence will go down, teen pregnancy will go down, infanticide will go down, abandoned children will go down. And of course, none of them did. None of them did. Quite the contrary. All of them have at least doubled since 1973 as a percentage.
So this nirvana that getting rid of these--because, see, they argue that since we are going to get rid of 1.3 million children--25 percent of all pregnancies end in abortion--since we are going to get rid of all these unwanted stresses in people's lives, problems in people's lives, then people will be better off, people will be happier, people will be more free; people won't do bad things because they won't have this stress that complicates their life.
But is that the lesson that people learn? No. Sadly, people are much smarter than that. They learned from the leaders of our great country that the value of life was diminished. And they learned from our great country that their personal liberty was more important than your life. Their liberty, their rights, trump you. That is what they learned.
As I mentioned earlier, that is why the two guys ran into Columbine, toting their guns and shooting people, screaming, ``I am the law,'' because that is what Roe v. Wade taught us. They taught us we can put down our neighbor, just like in the early years of this country we could put down the black man and woman.
There you have it...abortion wasn't a "blessing" but instead is responsible for increased child abuse, divorce, infanticide, domestic abuse, and teen pregnancy. Oh, yeah.... and Columbine.
(Link expired to Congressional record...I will find it again later. Sorry).
posted by tbogg at 3:48 PM
|
Men, women, and abortion.
Lisa over at Ruminate This talks about a woman's worth to the putative men in the Senate.
We're not talking about the wholesale slaughter of near-term babies. We're talking about a rare situation...where two doctors, unrelated to abortion, come together and agree that the pregnancy should end for medical reason. The extremists, who have no problem executing children and men on death row, have problems terminating pregnancies where the mother's health is in trouble. It's murder, they say. God told them so.
The Daily Kos discusses a resolution voted upon by the Senate regarding the upholding of Roe V Wade. The fascinating part:
And just for fun, let's see how the Senate's women voted on the Roe resolution:
Boxer (D-CA), Yea
Cantwell (D-WA), Yea
Clinton (D-NY), Yea
Collins (R-ME), Yea
Dole (R-NC), Nay
Feinstein (D-CA), Yea
Hutchison (R-TX), Yea
Landrieu (D-LA), Yea
Lincoln (D-AR), Yea
Mikulski (D-MD), Yea
Murkowski (R-AK), Yea
Murray (D-WA), Yea
Snowe (R-ME), Yea
Stabenow (D-MI), Yea
Sort of speaks for itself, doesn't it? Even Hutchinson voted "yea". While women only make up 14 percent of the Senate, they provided 25 percent of the "yea" votes.
The Doles. Liddy's never had a baby...Bob can't get it up.
posted by tbogg at 1:16 PM
|
Celebrities afraid of Bush...MRC afraid of boobs.
It's not really the Media Research Center's finest moment, but it does say a lot about the way they think. Priggish, moralistic, anal...well, you be the judge
In a Cyberalert about a CBS segment on celebrities and their views on the upcoming Sweeps Week of Death in Iraq:
Raymond's dad “afraid” of President Bush. In the midst of an Access Hollywood story Wednesday night by Pat O'Brien on fears of a “return of Hollywood's darkest hour, blacklisting,” a harkening back to when in the 1950s “actors and writers suspected of communist ties were subjected to a witch hunt,” actor Peter Boyle, who plays “Frank Barone” on the CBS sit-com Everybody Loves Raymond, told O'Brien that “I’ve made a commitment not to make any anti-war statements” because “I'm afraid...of Bush.”
In the same story, actor Richard Gere revealed he has no clue about true public opinion, as he demanded: “Why is it when we have tens of millions of people in this country who say no, we still have a President who says yes in a democracy? This is, something’s wrong here.”
[snip...]
Peter Boyle, on “red carpet” outside the March 9 SAG Awards in Los Angeles: “I’ve made a commitment not to make any anti-war statements.”
O’Brien to Boyle: “Why?”
Boyle: “Because I’m afraid.”
O’Brien: “Of?”
Boyle: “Of Bush.”
O’Brien: “The Screen Actors Guild has issued a statement warning against the threat. Melissa Gilbert is SAG’s President.”
Melissa Gilbert: “There is a sense out there, people who’ve got these Web sites going where they’re asking folks to sign petitions to insist that actors are fired off the shows they’re on. And it’s, they’re getting like 30,000 signatures.”
O’Brien prompted her: “It’s scary?”
Gilbert: “That’s scary.”
[snip...] Here comes the kicker (emphasis is mine):
And for a look at what Melissa Gilbert, “half pint” from Little House on the Prairie, wore, or shall I say didn't wear, to the SAG Awards carried by TNT, and her acting credits: IMDB
This is the picture that MRC is alluding ("or shall I say didn't wear") to.
I'm suprised Bozell didn't refer to Gilbert as the Little Ho on the Prairie....
posted by tbogg at 12:54 PM
|
Amazon's Jeff Bezos in helicopter crash
Amazon.com's Chief Executive Jeff Bezos was involved in a helicopter crash last week in southwest Texas and was slightly injured in the incident, a police spokesman said Wednesday
Customers who bought it in (or near) helicopters :
Stevie Ray Vaughan
Bill Graham
Vic Morrow
Francis Gary Powers
Amazon recommends (next time):
The Segway Human Transporter.
posted by tbogg at 11:57 AM
|
Bring out your dead....bring out your dead....
Lawmaker Wants Troops' Remains Back From France
BROOKSVILLE - Forget dumping champagne, boycotting brie or sailing the Statue of Liberty back to Paris.
Frustrated by France's refusal to support a war with Iraq, U.S. Rep. Ginny Brown- Waite proposes bringing the remains of American veterans buried in France back to the United States.
If the country that U.S. troops helped liberate during World War II won't support American military plans, then Brown-Waite proposes bringing the remains of those troops home for the families that request it.
``France has consistently turned its back on the United States,'' said Brown-Waite, R- Brooksville. ``They forget if it weren't for America, they would be speaking German today.''
More than 74,000 U.S. servicemen and women from World War I and World War II are buried in American cemeteries in France and Belgium, according to the American Battle Monuments Commission.
Brown-Waite's proposed legislation makes all of those servicemen and women buried in France and Belgium eligible for ``repatriation'' at their families' requests.
Brown-Waite, elected in November, said she doesn't have cost estimates for returning remains to the United States, but she proposes the government pay for it.
Ginny Brown-Waite makes Congressman Bob Ney, who renamed the french fries at the House Restaurant, look like friggin' Steven Hawking.....
(thanks to Robman)
posted by tbogg at 10:58 AM
|
Sign O' the Times
I bought gas this morning at the local Shell Station.
Regular $2.42 9/10
Super $2.52 9/10
Premium $2.62 9/10
But the good news is that no one is getting blowjobs in the White House.
posted by tbogg at 10:46 AM
|
Down the rabbit hole
Doonesbury.
posted by tbogg at 8:05 AM
|
Wednesday, March 12, 2003
Holy crap!
No. Really. This is holy crap.
"Golf and Prayer Walk"?
Jesus is my caddy.I shall fear no doglegs, and I shall dwell in the fairways forever. Amen, and pass me the putter...
...and don't forget to go to the kids page for helpful prayer requests for your little nipper:
Your prayers will help keep President Bush strong and effective as he leads our nation.
1. Do you remember last summer when everybody was talking about the Pledge of Allegiance? There is a man who thinks we should take the words, "under God" out of the Pledge. He has asked the courts of our country to do this, and now his request may go to the Supreme Court, the highest court in America. Pray with people all over America that the words "under God" will stay in the Pledge of Allegiance. Pray that all the people who need to speak up about this concern will do so, and that our Supreme Court Justices will decide to settle the matter once and for all time by ruling to "keep God in our Pledge."
It's things like this that makes God drink until He blacks out.....
posted by tbogg at 11:20 PM
|
Sparkle and fade
Spent the evening with this.
Blackjack is...really...really...good. And I Want to Die a Beautiful Death is the companion song to Santa Monica (for you Everclear afficianados)
Santa Monica
I am still livin' with your ghost
Lonely and dreamin' of the west coast
I don't wanna be your downtime
I don't wanna be your stupid game
With my big black boots and an old suitcase
I do believe I'll find myself a new place
I don't wanna be the bad guy
I don't wanna do your sleepwalk dance anymore
I just wanna see some palm trees
I will try and shake away this disease
We can live beside the ocean
Leave the fire behind
Swim out past the breakers
Watch the world die
We can live beside the ocean
Leave the fire behind
Swim out past the breakers
Watch the world die
I am still dreamin' of your face
Hungry and hollow for all the things you took away
I don't wanna be your good time
I don't wanna be your fallback crutch anymore
Walk right out into a brand new day
Insane and risin' in my own weird way
I don't wanna be the bad guy
I don't wanna do your sleepwalk dance anymore
I just wanna feel some sunshine
I just wanna find some place to be alone
Yeah watch the world die
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I have already asked my wife to have this played at my funeral.
Really.
Too bad I won't be there to hear it.
posted by tbogg at 10:54 PM
|
Another mystery of the universe solved...
Reader Ben comes through on the great Mona Lisa Eyebrow Mystery. From Wikipedia:
Mona Lisa (also Monna Lisa; Italian, La Gioconda, French, La Joconde), by Leonardo da Vinci, is perhaps the most famous painting in the world, going so far as to be iconic of painting, art, and even visual images in general. No other work of art is so romanticized, celebrated, or reproduced.
The work, which was accomplished between 1503 and 1506, measures 77 x 53 cm and is an oil painting on wood. It was brought to France by Leonardo when King Francois I invited the great painter to work at the Clos Lucé near the king's chateau in Amboise. As a result, the Mona Lisa today hangs in the Louvre in Paris, and is the museum's star attraction.
The identity of the lady in the painting is not known for certain, except that she was a wealthy Florentine. The most probable suspect is Madonna Lisa del Giocondo.
[snip...]
The painting has been restored numerous times: unfortunately, several details have been lost in the process, including Lisa's eyebrows and (possibly) a pearl necklace she was wearing
Now the only thing keeping me awake is trying to figure out what talent Arsenio Hall ever exibited that made him a celebrity.
posted by tbogg at 10:45 PM
|
Saying no to Joe.
As if there weren't enough reasons to make sure that Sen. Joe Lieberman (D-Quisling) doesn't get the Democratic presidential nomination:
Democratic leaders are stiffening their opposition to war with Iraq at a time when U.S. troops are preparing to crush Saddam Hussein's terrorist regime to prevent another September 11.
In a strategic decision that could turn into a political disaster for their party in 2004, House Democratic Leader Nancy Pelosi and Senate Democratic Leader Tom Daschle are playing to the liberal, anti-war base of their party. That move has upset some of their party's presidential hopefuls who fear it could fuel deeper doubts about the Democrats' falling credibility on defense and national security matters.
[snip...]
That is forcing even a front-runner like Massachusetts Sen. John Kerry, who also voted for the war resolution, to toughen his criticism of Mr. Bush on the diplomatic front, while still supporting military action.
However, Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut has been consistently raising the level of his attacks on Saddam and defending the need to "get rid of this tyrant." A Lieberman adviser told me, "You won't find anyone among our party's presidential candidates who supports Bush more on this issue, than Joe does."
Say goodbye, Joe. No nomination for you....
posted by tbogg at 10:35 PM
|
Profiteer Perle reporting for duty, sir.
Looks like war counselor and chickenhawk Richard Perle is going to be a rich, rich man after he convinces President Hypnotized By Shiny Objects to get his war on. That is unless Sy Hersh's story has legs.
Perle trying to break Hersh's legs.
Richard Perle, the influential foreign policy hawk, is suing journalist Seymour Hersh over an article he wrote implying that Mr. Perle is using his position as a Pentagon adviser to benefit financially from a war to liberate Iraq.
"I intend to launch legal action in the United Kingdom. I’m talking to Queen’s Counsel right now," Mr. Perle, who chairs the Pentagon’s Defense Policy Board, a non-paying position, told The New York Sun last night.
He said he is suing in Britain because it is easier to win such cases there, where the burden on plaintiffs is much less.
Mr. Hersh’s article, which appears in the March 17 issue of the The New Yorker magazine, said Mr. Perle met for lunch with two Saudi businessman in France in January in an attempt to seek Saudi investment for a company Mr. Perle is associated with, Trireme Partners L.P.
Trireme was created to "invest in companies dealing in technology, goods, and services that are of value to homeland security and defense," according to Mr. Hersh’s article.
What does it avail a man, to gain his fortune and lose his----oh wait, we're talking Perle here.
Never mind.
posted by tbogg at 2:50 PM
|
Speak for yourself.
The Daily Kos points out that Treasury Secretary John Snow is lying already.
Wasn't Snow supposed to be an improvement over O'Neil as treasury secretary? Well, he seems to be having another "O'Neil moment" as he claims, against all evidence, that Greenspan backs Bush's tax cut plan.
posted by tbogg at 1:29 PM
|
Karen's Choice
Today Rick Santorum (R-PA) is leading the fight to ban so-called "partial birth abortions". Santorum believes he has a point based on this column he wrote back in May of 1997.
Some excerpts:
We had been through the sonogram routine before -- the technician would turn out the lights, spread gel on my wife Karen's growing abdomen, and right there on the screen we would get the first glimpse of our baby. This time was different. Sitting in the darkened room, explaining what we were seeing to our three children, ages 5, 3 and 1, everything seemed fine. But the technician was strangely quiet, reexamining a dark circle on the screen. The doctor entered and repeated the routine. Finally, we were coldly given the verdict: "Your child has a fatal defect and is going to die."
Through our tears erupted the most basic of all parental emotions: We were going to save our child, whom we already loved.
[snip...]
We adjourned to a nearby room where Donnenfeld gave us three options: "Your first option is to terminate the pregnancy." We knew abortion was a legal option, but it was inconceivable to us to end the life of our baby because he wasn't perfect or because he might not live a long life. While we couldn't look into his eyes or hold him, he was no less our child than our other children. And we loved him every bit as much. The second option was to do nothing -- and our son would live only as long as he was in the womb. The third option would entail several tests and possibly intrauterine surgery.
Karen's response was to do whatever it took to save our son.
Our son went through two days of tests to determine kidney function. If there wasn't any, there would be no point in proceeding -- he would not develop enough in the womb to survive outside. The first day the test results were so bad that we discussed whether it was worth going through a second painful day for Karen. Adzick said we needed a miracle overnight.
We prayed more than I can remember for our son, named that day Gabriel Michael, after the great archangels. The next day our prayers were answered with a miraculous improvement; the kidneys were not just OK, but functioning normally! We could do the surgery that would save his life.
[snip...]
Unfortunately there were complications:
Karen was seized with horrible chills and her temperature soared to over 105 degrees. There was little that could be done. Intrauterine infections are untreatable as long as the source of the infection -- the amniotic sac -- is in place. We knew that at 20 weeks Gabriel could not survive outside the womb. But, unless the amniotic sac -- including our son -- was delivered, Karen would soon die, and Gabriel with her.
While Karen was given an antibiotic to reduce the fever, she clung to the baby with all her strength. But the labor intensified -- the body had identified the problem and taken measures to eliminate the infection. She did everything she could to delay the inevitable, but every doctor gave the same verdict: Gabriel would have to be delivered. Again, the doctors told us that abortion was a legal option to protect Karen's health and possibly save her life.
But with the support of Dr. Cynthia Simms and Adzick, who had become a supportive force for us throughout, we arrived at another way that gave our son the love and respect he deserved and gave Karen and me a gift we will forever cherish.
Within hours, at 12:45 a.m., our son was born. He was a beautiful, fully formed creation -- a small, pink package of joy, sorrow, hope and questions. We bundled him up, put a little hat on his head to keep him warm. We held him, sang to him and cried for him. We knew the end was near, so we tried to pack a lifetime of love into those few hours. He was too small to make a sound, but he spoke so powerfully to our hearts. His eyes never opened to see us, but he allowed us to see in him the face of God. Two hours later, he died in my arms.
Okay, I don't want to give short shrift to the rest of Santorum's story, but, suffice to say, his wife was lucky. And she was more than lucky...she had the right to make her own choice. Gabriel Michael Santorum died at the age of two hours and Karen Santorum survived. But Karen Santorum was allowed by the government of the United States to take that risk and to make that choice with the help of her husband and her doctors.
Today Santorum argues to deny women the same rights that his wife enjoyed. Being a grieving father doesn't make him any less of a hypocrite.
posted by tbogg at 1:23 PM
|
The blind leading the lame...
Glenn Reynolds finds this:
The problem arose when Karzai visited the Senate Foreign Relations Committee for what the committee had billed as a "meeting." Generally, heads of state meet with the committee in private, but Chairman Richard G. Lugar (R-Ind.) instead invited Karzai to a hearing room with reporters present.
Karzai was placed at a witness table looking up at the senators, the usual layout for people summoned to testify at a hearing. There were several skeptical and hostile questions that Karzai did not expect and had not prepared for, according to the Afghan officials. . . .
In addition to being seated at a table below the committee members, Karzai was scolded by some of them.
Sen. Chuck Hagel (R-Neb.) warned that if Karzai told the committee everything was going well, "the next time you come back, then your credibility will be in question." Hagel said later that he felt the administration had "coached" Karzai.
Holding a recent report released by the advocacy group Human Rights Watch, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) told Karzai that "police in Herat are detaining women and girls caught alone with unrelated men, are being forced to submit to medical exams to see if they have recently had sexual relations."
The Karzai government is trying to expand its authority across the country, but it still has only limited control in many areas, including the western city of Herat. . . .
"We thought these people were our friends, but now we really don't know," a senior Afghan government official said. "This was a protocol blunder, and there was real insensitivity on the part of some senators. They were talking about nitty-gritty problems in Afghanistan and missing the big picture that there is a war on terrorism going on while we try to make a country again from scratch."
"lame".
Instead of worrying about Karzai not getting the red carpet treatment, maybe Glenn should ask why the US isn't helping him "get control" of his country instead of acting like a child bored with the Afghani sandbox who runs over to the Iraqi sandbox. There are 250,000 soldiers in the area cooling their heels while President Cartman spends his days futilely trying to get the UN to respect his "autoritah". Before they start "liberating" the good people of Iraq, they might want to finish the job of liberating the people of Afghanistan.
Maybe it's just me, but Reynolds, who I used to enjoy reading, has become all surface and little thought. I know he has his various columns elsewhere where he goes somewhat more in depth, but the bulk of people go to InstaPundit and where they get "soundbite" posts like the above. They might just as well be Drudge Headlines (Senators Act Lame...Breaking!) To some degree I do this myself, but then I don't advertise myself as an expert/lawyer/MSNBC columnist.
A little more thought...a little less glibness.
posted by tbogg at 12:10 PM
|
If wishes were horses, Bush still couldn't ride...
Fom The Sideshow:
If George Bush were the kind of man who could fix this mess, we wouldn't be in this mess, because that kind of man would not have made this kind of mess.
Go read the whole thing.
posted by tbogg at 11:14 AM
|
Line of the day
From Body & Soul:
A panel of national security experts, including James Schlesinger and Jeanne Kirkpatrick criticized Bush for not being up-front about the costs and risks of war with Iraq, and for scrimping and poor planning for humanitarian needs. How bad do you have to be if Jeanne Kirkpatrick is criticizing you for not caring enough about humanitarian needs?
posted by tbogg at 11:04 AM
|
But what does it mean?
Yesterday I passed on the fact that according to the good folks at Snapple (who should know), Mona Lisa has no eyebrows. Several readers have written in pointing out that, yes, she does.
Here. You decide.
More importantly, it was noted that... Whoopi Goldberg doesn't have eyebrows either.
I'm sure this means something, but I haven't been able to find the relevant passages in The Bible Code. I'll keep looking....
posted by tbogg at 9:04 AM
|
A shorter shelf life than the lambada.
So. Whatever happened to Andy Sullivan's Eagles? You remember:
There's a new group of people out there who are socially liberal but also foreign policy realists, especially among those who have been awakened to political engagement by September 11. Some of these used to be Scoop Jackson Democrats, but today's breed doesn't buy into the big government liberalism of the 1960s and 1970s either. Some are neocons who don't love the social right. Others are just Generation X and Y, who simply accept the social diversity of modern culture and want to see it defended against theocratic barbarians. These people are not comfortable with the Republicans' flirtation with the religious right, or their prosecution of the drug war or mixing of church and state; and they're not impressed by the Democrats' lack of seriousness in foreign policy or enmeshment with public sector interest groups. They're politically homeless, these people - but were probably key swing voters in the last election. Instead of hawks and doves, call these people "eagles." I think they'll play a key part in shaping the politics and culture of the next few years.
Are these guys holding rallies like the Promisekeepers (aka "Stadium Full O' Losers")? Having they started "shaping the politics and culture" yet? And how do they feel about the Jesus-Loves-Me-This-I-Know, Cause-Tony-Scalia-Tells-Me-So bunch of Bible junkies in the White House?
Andy seems to have obliterated the term from his vocabulary. Hiding it like a bad prom picture, hoping no one will ask to see it....
posted by tbogg at 8:56 AM
|
Maybe the tide is turning.....
Editorial cartoon from the quite conservative San Diego Union.
posted by tbogg at 7:51 AM
|
Tuesday, March 11, 2003
Shorter Andrew Sullivan
To save you the pain and suffering of going through Sully's long post on why he is afraid of the future, and why that means we should kill a lot of people who are not reasonable like him, I have broken it down to its more "direct points".
Ahem....Andy has learned that bad guys who aren't really governments with countries and capital cities and soccer teams and stuff, might get bad weapons and do us harm. Sullivan has apparently never seen a James Bond movie (like someone else we know), and so he finds this suprising and unreasonable. Since the world, which doesn't agree with George Bush (who may be our Churchill...no, really!) about attacking Iraq, what is the use in even discussing North Korea? Everyone except for Bush is soooo unreasonable. So someone has to blow up a Western city for us to realize that Bush and Blair are both Churchillian and ahead of their times. North Korea is probably worse, but lets invade Iraq anyway. Opposition is unreasonable and cynical. 9/11 and Iraq are somehow linked, but only at a level or frequency that only Andy can see and dogs can hear. Oh. And he is praying about our "leadership".
Hey. Who isn't?
Oh yeah. Andy also said that Rumsfeld is a loose cannon and Bush should tell him to "Mellow out, dude"...or at least snort some of the same pig tranquilizer that Bush mainlined prior to his press conference. But you know Rummy. When he's been tweaked on crystal for four days running he just, you know, says shit...
posted by tbogg at 11:45 PM
|
Triumphalism at the Marriott crepe bar.
Michael Kelly, all decked out in his bush jacket and elastic-waist Dockers, reports from Kuwait City where he is making short work on the mini-bar in his room:
KUWAIT CITY -- Monday morning, at breakfast in the Marriott hotel here, a man at the table next to mine was talking on his cell phone in one of those brisk executive cell-phone voices. He was not in uniform, but from his neat, straight, clipped look he was military of some sort. He was saying that he was calling on behalf of Capt. So-and-So, following up on a call from yesterday, trying to make clear exactly what the captain needed.
What does this all mean? Why war is just around the corner and Uncle Sam is spreading Social Security dollars to a favored few as part of Operation Bush’s Manhood.
But America’s manhood, as exemplified by the sweaty, conference room-bound Kelly is at stake too:
The historian Paul Kennedy wrote awhile back that the immense disparity of power between the United States and the rest of the world, unique in degree in history, was remarkable enough, but that what was really extraordinary was that the United States was able to achieve this by spending less than 3 percent of gross domestic product annually. A similar sense strikes an observer here.
It is remarkable enough that the United States is setting out to undertake the invasion of a nation, the destruction of a regime and the liberation of a people. But to do this with only one real military ally, with much of the world against it, with a war plan that is still, by necessity, in flux days before the advent, with an invasion force that contains only one fully deployed heavy armored division -- and to have, under these circumstances, the division's commander sleeping pretty good at night: Well, that is extraordinary.
A victory on these terms will change the power dynamics of the world. And there will be a victory on these terms.
USA! USA! USA!
.........until a suicide bomber blows up a Starbucks in Georgetown and then even smug curbside flag-wavers like Kelly might realize that the war has come home because a group of neo-con chickenhawks handed a baseball bat to a simpleton and told him that the hornets nest in the backyard was a piñata.
Where's the victory in that?
posted by tbogg at 10:42 PM
|
Blocking Democratic judicial nominations officially declared:
"Youthful Indiscretions".
Today President Dim Son declared that blocking Presidential Judicial nominees just isn't fair. At least not now. Oh hell, let him explain, as best he can:
President Bush, his appeals court nomination of Miguel Estrada mired in party politics, called Tuesday for a ban on judicial filibusters and a mandatory vote on all court nominations he and future presidents send to the Senate.
In a letter read on the Senate floor by Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tennessee, Bush called for a permanent rule "to ensure timely up or down votes on judicial nominations both now and in the future, no matter who is president or which party controls the Senate. This is the only way to ensure our judiciary works and that good people remain willing to be nominated to the federal bench."
[snip...]
But Democrats said GOP senators have blocked Democratic judicial nominees from getting confirmation votes in the Senate as well.
"Because that precedent stands in the way of their political ends, Republicans now seek to deny their own words and their own actions," said Senate Democratic Leader Tom Daschle of South Dakota. "They're here today to claim that the Constitution is threatened by the very same procedures that they themselves have employed. They're here today to claim the Constitution is going to be threatened by the very same powers that it grants."
But Bush called on the Senate to get beyond the past. "I ask senators of both parties to come together and end the escalating cycle of blame and bitterness and to restore fairness, predictability and dignity to the process," Bush said in the letter.
Of course, Bush could always nominate some of Clinton's appointees again, to make up for what happened between 1992-2000. He'll probably get to that right after his swearing in at Mensa. So in the meantime, just file Republican judicial obstructionism in the "Youthful Indiscretions" folder along with cocaine usage, infidelity, DUI's, selling technology and weapons to the enemy, and insider trading. It's that folder right there...the big thick one.....
posted by tbogg at 2:21 PM
|
Why I love the Freepers...part XXIII
Attack of the "Euphasims"
It's funny...because they're stupid.
posted by tbogg at 1:59 PM
|
Florida woman unimpressed by Rumsfeld's "big one". She was unmoved and unfulfilled...just like Mrs. Rumsfeld.
The Air Force tested for the first time the biggest conventional bomb in the U.S. arsenal Tuesday, a 21,000-pound munition that could play a dramatic role in an attack on Iraq.
Cheryl Irwin, a Pentagon spokeswoman, said the test at Eglin Air Force Base, Fla., was considered a success.
"It did what they expected it to do. Nothing malfunctioned," she said.
The bomb, officially called the Massive Ordnance Air Blast, or MOAB, and unofficially dubbed the Mother of All Bombs, is guided to its target by satellite signals. It was dropped out the rear of a C-130 transport plane, officials said.
The bomb is so powerful that its detonation was expected to create a mushroom cloud visible for miles.
Some area residents felt the bomb's detonation but said the explosion was not as big as they had expected.
"It was kind of weak," said Patricia Sariego, a receptionist at the Best Western hotel in Navarre, on the southern edge of Eglin. She said the blast shook doors.
Don Rumsfeld was unavailable for comment. He was on the porch having a cigarette....
posted by tbogg at 1:53 PM
|
Non-carbonated beverage fact of the day
According to the inside of my Snapple Peach Ice Tea cap:
The Mona Lisa has no eyebrows.
No go forth...you have learned something today, Grasshopper.....
posted by tbogg at 1:05 PM
|
Bow down before the one you serve...you're going to get what you deserve.
Speaking of being on the prowl (see below)....John Ashcroft is hunting evil down everywhere, so beware terrorists, fellow travelers, women with brain tumors or paralysis....Yeah, that's right, you sickos. Hands on the car and spread 'em. Big Bad John is back in town and he don't cotton to no debilitated, states-rights spouting dopers:
A federal judge has refused to prohibit the U.S. government from potentially prosecuting two women with painful ailments whose doctors say marijuana is their only medical solace. In the first case of its kind, the two California medical marijuana users sued Attorney General John Ashcroft, seeking a court order allowing them to smoke, grow or obtain marijuana without threat or fear of federal prosecution.
U.S. District Judge Martin Jenkins expressed sympathy for the women but said federal law required him to rule against them.
"Despite the gravity of plaintiffs' need for medical cannabis, and despite the concrete interest of California to provide it for individuals like them, the court is constrained from granting their request," Jenkins wrote in a ruling last week that became public Monday.
The Justice Department would not comment on whether it would seek to prosecute plaintiffs Angel Raich, 37, or Diane Monson, 44.
The case underscores the conflict between California's medical marijuana law, which allows people to grow, smoke or obtain marijuana for medical needs, and the federal government's refusal to acknowledge the state's 1996 voter-approved initiative allowing such acts.
Monson grows and smokes her own marijuana for chronic back problems and has already been raided once by the Drug Enforcement Administration.
Raich suffers from a variety of ailments, including scoliosis, a brain tumor, chronic nausea, fatigue and pain. Raich and her doctor say marijuana is the only drug that helps her pain and keeps her eating. She says she was partially paralyzed on the right side of her body until she started smoking marijuana.
Both women say they will continue smoking marijuana. Raich vowed to take her case to the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals and possibly to the Supreme Court.
"I am not a criminal. I am just somebody who is really, really ill and sick," she said. "I'm not going to stop. I'm not willing to die."
How dare she refuse God when he is obviously calling her home?
First US Attorney to find a 12 year old girl going blind from glaucoma with a joint in her pocket gets a big fat bonus from Ashcroft for giving him his first erection since 1993.
Suffer the children....
posted by tbogg at 12:39 PM
|
Stuck inside the bathroom with those Ashcroft Blues again.
Man trapped in bathroom by cat
A Canadian man had to be rescued by police after his cat went berserk and trapped him in a bathroom.
It took two police officers and animal control officer Ron Sabean, to subdue the seven-year-old cat.
The pet was snarling and hissing at the bathroom door in the house near Greenwood, Nova Scotia, when Mr Sabean arrived.
He said: "I've been in this business going on 24 years and I've never seen a cat focus on a person like that one did."
posted by tbogg at 12:17 PM
|
It's a joke, you twit.
I thought Andy Sullivan had a sense of humor (or, in his case, is it humour?). Today Andy writes:
Then here's the economic expert, Krugman, on the looming deficit:
[R]ight now the deficit, while huge in absolute terms, is only 2 — make that 3, O.K., maybe 4 — percent of G.D.P.
I take Krugman's broader point about the deficit, and agree with it. But why such contemptuous sloppiness? There's a critical difference between 2 and 4 percent of GNP. Isn't there?
Yes, Andy, there is a difference. But it was a joke. You know? How the deficit keeps growing? How they haven't accounted for your war? How the GNP may be slipping?
Oh. Never mind.
(Link fixed...sorry.)
posted by tbogg at 10:21 AM
|
This...is...so...lame
From the Liquid List:
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The restaurant menus in the three House office buildings will change the name of "french fries" to "freedom fries," a culinary rebuke of France, stemming from anger over the country's refusal to support the U.S. position on Iraq.
Ditto for "french toast," which will be known as "freedom toast."
The name changes were spearheaded by two Republican lawmakers who plan to hold a news conference later Tuesday to make the name change official on the menus.
"This action today is a small, but symbolic effort to show the strong displeasure of many on Capitol Hill with the actions of our so-called ally, France," said Rep. Bob Ney, R-Ohio, the chairman of the Committee on House Administration.
Normally I would make some snarky little quip about Mr Ney, but this is just so retarded, he doesn't deserve the time and effort.
(Update) Rittenhouse has more. Ney actually issued a press release. Good thing that Congress got all their work done early today.
posted by tbogg at 9:53 AM
|
The enemy of my enemy is, well, I don't really want him as a friend
Pat Buchanan, who won the West Palm Beach Jewish vote in 2000, takes on the neo-cons. Yeah, I know it's Drudge, but it's a slow news day.
Anyway:
In this week's AMERICAN CONSERVATIVE, editor Pat Buchanan issues a controversial, 5000-word indictment of the 'War Party' of Bennett, Kristol, Podhoretz and Richard Perle.
MORE
The magazine will hit newsstands and bookstores tomorrow. With quotes and citations, Buchanan alleges:
'War Party' ideas and plans for an attack on Iraq had been 'in preparation far in advance of 9/11, and when President Bush was looking for a new front,' the neocons 'put their precooked meal in front of him. And Bush dug into it.'
Richard Perle wrote a paper urging Israeli PM Netanyahu to dump the Oslo Peace Accords and target Iraq -- five years before 9/11.
Undersecretary of Defense Douglas Feith urged Israel to ditch the Oslo and take back the West Bank though 'the price in blood would be high,' three years before the Camp David talks.
Pentagon official David Wurmser urged the U.S. to act in concert with Israel to 'strike fatally...the regimes of Damascus, Baghdad, Tripoli, Tehran and Gaza' -- nine months before 9/11.
Cool. I love the smell of Republican internecine warfare in the morning.....
posted by tbogg at 9:14 AM
|
Omigod..this is, like, such a cool book, and I am, like, so loving it....
Mona Charen has a new book out, Useful Idiots (Regnery Press....duh) and townhall.com (portal to all that is obtuse and rightwing, and yes I know that's redundant) needed someone to review it. Someone who could get the masses to rise up and purchase this landmark, groundbreaking, couldn't-put-it-down, page-turner. A big name. A glittering star in the conservative firmament.
So they let an intern do it:
Anna Marie Gould, a student at the University of Wisconsin-Madison, served as a 2002 summer intern for The Heritage Foundation and Townhall.com.
But Anna Marie had the one thing that gave her the edge over the likes of such Conservative glitterati such as David Limbaugh or Ben Shapiro. She has a thesaurus. Hence, supple prose such as this:
If we accepted liberals' tendentious arguments on communism and its worldwide consequences, we would have to conclude that the United States played a pivotal role in making other countries miserable. Fortunately, liberal propaganda, which often provides fictitious accounts of American history, is proven wrong time and again by historical reality. Syndicated columnist Mona Charen assiduously attacks those who have deliberately maligned our country in her latest tome, Useful Idiots: How Liberals got it Wrong in the Cold War and Still Blame America First.
She had me from the first use of "tendentious".
I think I'm in love.
posted by tbogg at 8:21 AM
|
I'm not listening , I'm not listening...lalalalalalalalalala...
Merrill Lynch & Co., one of Wall Street’s biggest firms, will from next week prevent its brokerage employees from watching financial cable news channel CNBC, the New York Times reported on Tuesday.
THE NEWSPAPER SAID the move, which would see CNBC ditched in favor of rival Bloomberg Television, stems in part from what some CNBC commentators have said about Merrill on air.
Lawrence Kudlow and James Cramer, the co-hosts of an evening talk show, have been among Merrill’s harshest critics, the New York Times said.
I guess it's their own fault for caring what Cokie McKudlow says....
posted by tbogg at 7:58 AM
|
Just get it over so I can get on with my so-called life...
One of the curb-sitting flag-wavers is getting impatient.
I've been advocating war, but I doubt that this web site had any significant influence on decision making in the Whitehouse. While I do know that some government workers read it, I seriously doubt anyone in a position of authority even knows I exist. Nonetheless, I do feel a degree of responsibility; since we're going to embark on a war I've been advocating, I can't disclaim any negative results from the war once it starts. There's never any way of knowing before you begin how it will go; you do the best you can in terms of preparing, but then you roll the dice. And sometimes the result is not what you expected.
I want it to be over. I want it in the past, a fait accompli. As I sit, waiting, I feel dread and foreboding. My imagination is working overtime, summoning scenarios which could lead to disaster for us, either before combat begins, or during the period when our troops are in action.
Just another slow day at The Androids Dungeon....
posted by tbogg at 7:55 AM
|
Monday, March 10, 2003
The first time ever I....
We all have pivotal moments in our lives when things change and many times we don’t recognize what is going on or how it will impact us; it’s just life moving inexorably forward. Later it will occur to us that something happened. To the best of my knowledge, nothing is happening to me right now, but I do know that things are changing for my daughter. Two things to be exact.
First, and this is the lesser of the two, she has just been selected to join a soccer team that is competing at a national level. She is going to find out how good she is, how dedicated she is, and what she has inside of her. She is going to find out that talent isn’t always enough. She is going to learn something about herself.
Secondly, and this is the one that I’m really excited about, she has to read To Kill A Mockingbird for school.
That’s it. She gets to read a book, and I’m excited for her. Because to me, To Kill a Mockingbird isn’t just any book. It is the book that can start a teenager on the road to adulthood. Told in the voice of a wise child, it is the tale of being an adult. How we lose things as we grow older and have to find lesser things to fill up the space. I can distinctly remember the first time I read this book and I wondered how all the thousands of authors who came before Harper Lee could have missed out on telling this story. It just seemed so…perfect. Just sitting there waiting to be told. I envy my daughter for getting to read it for the first time. Haven’t you ever read a book and wished you could read it again as if it were the first time? I do all the time.
I remember when I was a kid lying in bed listening to the radio late at night with the lights out and the disc jockey saying that they were going to premiere a new song by Simon and Garfunkel, and then I heard Bridge Over Troubled Water for the first time. After it was over I felt like I hadn’t taken a breath in five minutes. Imagine that. Hearing something like that for the… very… first… time. Something amazing. Something immaculate. Something never heard before.
Years later I read another book that ended this way:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Of course, now I am too old to be much of a fisherman, and now of course I usually fish the big waters alone, although some friends think I shouldn't. Like many fly fishermen in western Montana where the summer days are almost Arctic in length, I often do not start fishing until the cool of the evening. Then in the Arctic half-light of the canyon, all existence fades to a being with my soul and memories and the sounds of the Big Blackfoot River and a four-count rhythm and the hope that a fish will rise.
Eventually, all things merge into one, and a river runs through it. The river was cut by the world's great flood and runs over rocks from the basement of time. On some of the rocks are timeless raindrops. Under the rocks are the words, and some of the words are theirs.
I am haunted by waters.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Perfect. It still takes my breath away. Thank you, Norman MacLean. I still remember closing the book, then reopening it to read those last words again. I remember that exact moment.
I guess what I’m trying to say is that I hope that my daughter reads To Kill A Mockingbird and sees in it what I saw. And I will do my best not to influence her. Good books like good music have to be discovered on their own. And if it's not Harper Lee who speaks to her, maybe it will be Joseph Conrad or Doris Lessing or Flannery O'Connor.
I just hope that she finds what is good in this life and makes it a part of her life. And then I hope she remembers….
posted by tbogg at 9:53 PM
|
200,000
You'll probably be reading this on Tuesday. Sometime today this blog will go over the 200,000 hit barrier. When I started it back in September, I expected to get about 35 hits a day...and I would have been happy with that (actually I still would...I'm really only here to amuse myself). 200,000 sounds like a lot, but then Insta-Pundit (Glenn Reynolds) gets that in about two days, which adds a little context.
I'm thinking that, to get the really big numbers I should just introduce a link, quote a line from it, then follow up with a resonant and thoughtful....
Indeed.
posted by tbogg at 9:02 PM
|
Head down...bulling forward.
I used to have a basset named Cooder. He was fairly smart by basset standards, but also incredibly stubborn, even using those same standards. We had a dog door built into our door so he could go in and out during the few moments he wasn't sleeping on the bed, couch. chair, anything but the floor. Unfortunately we also had a opossum problem, and so, at night, we had to slip a provided metal sheet into the brackets that framed the dog door to keep the opossums outside where they would spend their time staring at us through the sliding glass doors while we watched TV at night. I guess we were like opossum TV.
Anyway, sometimes I would forget that the sheet metal blockade was in and Cooder couldn't get out to the yard. One morning he decided to pay the yard a visit and went to go out the door but his little dome-y head bonked up against metal and wouldn't budge. Instead of backing up and trying again, or barking at me, or even giving up temporarily, he just stood there with his head down trying to bull his way through. I guess he expected that if he stood there long enough it would give way. I watched him for several minutes waiting for him to back up...but he didn't. Head down...feet dug in...head pressed against the door. Finally I gave in and pulled the sheet out and he walked out without even a look back. To him, it was just going to happen.
All of this brings me to Bob Bartley of the Wall Street Journal. Bartley was supposed to have gone out to pasture sometime ago, but I guess they just can't get rid of the guy. Bartley's column this week is headlined:
On Repairing Economic Damage
America is really going to need a tax cut after the war
Skipping over the fact that he sees the war as a fait accompli, I was impressed with his single-mindedness about the tax cut. Bartley has a reputation for cheerleading every tax cut for the rich that comes down the pike, and by golly, he's not going to let deficits as far as the eye can see, as well as the cost of a war (whose expense the Bush administration won't let us see) stop him from getting his tax cut.
Growth tailed off as war worries rose, however, coming in at 1.4% in the final quarter of 2002. In the current quarter, it will be lucky to hit 2%, and at the moment seems headed downward. Business investment has been notoriously laggard, while consumer spending remained strong. But the commerce department reported that personal spending fell in January, and auto makers are now cutting production runs. Manufacturing is weakening, and the economy lost more than 300,000 jobs in February. Consumer sentiment has also been falling and, the Michigan survey center says, would be lower except that everyone expects current problems to be temporary.
Odds still rest against a double-dip recession, but the latest bad news casts a shadow. We can't be sure that the economy will automatically rebound when Saddam Hussein is gone; perhaps the current sluggishness will turn self-perpetuating.
At the same time, the economy's performance in the face of adversity suggests an underlying potential for strong growth. In my book, we shouldn't be content with growth of 3% in real output over the next few years, but should look toward the 5% range. Productivity is surging; despite the dot-com collapse we are realizing the efficiencies of an information economy. The issue is how to unleash this potential, which brings us to the Bush economic proposals.
Actually, the administration has if anything undersold its tax-cut ideas as an antidote for sluggish growth. Outgoing economic adviser Glenn Hubbard struck a careful note in his Economic Report of the President; the tax plan would "enhance the long-term growth of the economy while supporting the emerging recovery." This reflects the current tastes of the economics fraternity--that fiscal legislation can't be enacted fast enough for counter-cyclical policy, which should be left to monetary policy while tax policy looks to the long-term.
N. Gregory Mankiw, set to replace Mr. Hubbard as Chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers, is cut from the same cloth. Yes, he had a dog named Keynes--rather unimaginative, I thought; should have been Maynard. Yes, he said that deficits drive up interest rates and crowd out private investment, but everyone agrees with this as an accounting identity.
Nowhere do I see Bartley calling for spending cuts. Instead, in the face of massive deficits and the uncertainties of war, in duration and cost, Bartley wants his tax cut. And he wants it now before the public starts to see what the cost of war will be.
And nothing can dissuade him. Tax cuts solve everything. Head down, pushing, pushing, and pushing....
Stubborn...and kinda dumb.
posted by tbogg at 4:07 PM
|
Boycott everything....
Now Pakistan doesn't want to get involved.
Pakistan has decided to abstain in any U.N. Security Council vote that would pave the way for war against Iraq, a senior ruling party official said on Monday.
A mainly Muslim country and key player in the U.S.-led war on terror, Pakistan is a member of the 15-nation council facing a vote on a draft resolution by the United States, Britain and Spain giving Iraq until March 17 to disarm or face war.
"Pakistan has decided to abstain in a vote on Iraq," the Pakistan Muslim League official, who did not want to be identified, told Reuters.
We're losing allies faster than Powell is losing credibility.
Freepers have vowed to boycott:
Pac-Man
Backpacks
Tupac
Packing lunches
and all future Microsoft Service Packs.
posted by tbogg at 1:07 PM
|
Three years ago? Who was the President then?
Stocks painted red on anniversary of Nasdaq high
The Nasdaq Composite (NasdaqSC:^IXIC - News) , which closed above 5,000 for the last time three years earlier, lost 24 points, or 1.9 percent, to 1,281.
Are you better off than you were three years ago?
posted by tbogg at 1:01 PM
|
Stay at home mom takes on celebrities...she's still poor and obscure, they're still rich and famous.
Lori Bardsley, a stay-at-home mother of three, accuses Hollywood celebrity "pundits," as she calls them, of using their celebrity to interfere with the defense of the country.
"Anti-war activism is hip but Sept. 11th was real," said Bardsley. "On Sept. 11th our children were threatened. We expect President Bush to take whatever measures necessary to keep us safe," she added.
Bardsley feels the celebrities don't speak for most Americans. Indeed, one week after she quietly posted her online petition entitled "Citizens Against Celebrity 'Pundits,'" she reports more than a thousand visitors have added their signatures.
"Anti-war activism is hip"? "Hip"?
I know this article is from December, but I think "hip" was already way past it "Use By" date. I think that "stay-at-home" mom needs to get out a little bit more. Of course, we all know that those rich people in Hollywood have an agenda. Here is Hollywood’s agenda in action and how it affected "Mom" Lori:
Bardsley admits having grown up heavily under the influence of Hollywood as a teen-ager and feels that influence taught her to view abortion as an acceptable form of birth control.
"I remember cheering in front of the television as I watched Gloria Steinem and her Hollywood friends march in D.C. for choice. It would be many years later that I would have three abortions in place of birth control and end up with complicated pregnancies as a result of my choice," she said.
What turned Bardsley around was hearing the heartbeat of her fourth baby. Now, she's committed to countering the Hollywood influence for her children.
Let me get this straight. Lori the Braniac, who used abortion as "birth control" three times, wants to provide Americans with advice on who to listen to? Hell, if I were a judgmental, Pro-Life Christian, I'd would point out that this woman is about two kids short of being Andrea Yates.
But then, I'm not a judgmental, Pro-Life Christian.....so I won't.
posted by tbogg at 11:55 AM
|
The nutty aunt in the attic and the dead kid in the box
It's not up yet at the Media Resource Center, but they report (from my email):
8) Picking up on complaints that President Bush did not take a question at Thursday's press conference from Hearst Newspapers
columnist Helen Thomas, on Fox News Sunday Brit Hume suggested that she's "the nutty aunt in the attic of the Washington press corps" since her questions "have not been questions of the kind that any professional journalist would normally ask. Mostly they are argumentative, she makes statements."
Hume also revealed why she does get to pose questions at the daily briefings: "Privately, they will tell you, that her
questions are so outrageous and so over the top, that when the person giving the briefing wants to generate a little sympathy in
the TV audience, all you've got to do is call on Helen."
During the roundtable portion of the March 9 program, Hume explained: "I sat next to Helen Thomas when I was covering the
White House for eight years. She'd been there for a lot longer than that and she still shows up. And she deserves a certain
amount of our admiration for sheer indefatigability and dedication.
"But she is, to some extent, the nutty aunt in the attic of the Washington press corps and has been for years. And all of us
have been kind of overlooking her because we're personally fond of her, as I rather am. But let's face it, the questions that she has
been asking at White House briefings and press conferences, for decades, have not been questions of the kind that any professional
journalist would normally ask. Mostly they are argumentative, she makes statements, she gives speeches. She does things that
journalists trying to behave with some neutrality simply do not do and she's gotten away with it lo these many years principally
because she had been there all this time and she became sort of an institution. She is not now a working daily reporter, she's a
columnist and opinion dispenser and she has been moved out of the front row of the press conferences.
"She retains, however, her front row seat in the White House briefing room. And why is that? Privately, they will tell you,
that her questions are so outrageous and so over the top, that when the person giving the briefing wants to generate a little sympathy in the TV audience, all you've got to do is call on Helen."
"not been questions of the kind that any professional journalist would normally ask" said the anchor from Fox news.....smirk.
But, since you're such an expert on crazy relatives Brit, maybe you can enlighten us on why your son killed himself? Here are some leads. From Datalounge, from WND lunatic Joseph Farah, and even from the Clinton Body Count.
You report...we'll decide.
( Update:) I'm already getting email from people complaining that by bringing up Sandy Hume's suicide I have somehow crossed a "line". After all his smears of the Clintons that continue to this day on Fox, to his latest, "Helen Thomas is crazy...but bless her heart" comments, I would say that Brit has pretty much trampled and stomped on any "line" that used to exist. I'm tired of bringing a knife to a gunfight.
Too bad.
( Update redux:) Here is the Official Media Research link.
posted by tbogg at 11:07 AM
|
Sunday, March 09, 2003
This weeks lyrics...
Don McLean's The Grave:
The grave that they dug him had flowers
Gathered from the hillsides in bright summer colors
And the brown earth bleached white
At the edge of his gravestone
He’s gone
When the wars of our nation did beckon
The man, barely twenty, did answer the calling
Proud of the trust
That he placed in our nation
He’s gone
But eternity knows him
And it knows what we’ve done
And the rain fell like pearls
On the leaves of the flowers
Leaving brown, muddy clay
Where the earth had been dry
And deep in the trench
He waited for hours
As he held to his rifle
And prayed not to die
But the silence of night
Was shattered by fire
As the guns and grenades
Blasted sharp through the air
One after another
His comrades were slaughtered
In the morgue of marines
Alone, standing there
He crouched ever lower
Ever lower, with fear
“They can’t let me die
They can’t let me die here!
I’ll cover myself
With the mud and the earth
I’ll cover myself
I know I’m not brave!
The earth, the earth
The earth is my grave.”
The grave that they dug him had flowers
Gathered from the hillsides in bright summer colors
And the brown earth bleached white
At the edge of his gravestone
He’s gone
posted by tbogg at 11:04 PM
|
Actually I don't think either one of them likes girls...but for different reasons.
Roger Ailes (not the evil one) has a few things to sat about Andy Sullivan, George Bush, and misogyny.
Speaking of Roger Ailes...Everytime I think of the good blogger Ailes sharing a name with the evil Fox News one, I remember these lines from Office Space:
Samir: No one is this country can ever pronounce my name right. It's not that hard: Nayee-Nanajar. Nayeenanajar.
Michael Bolton: Yeah, well, at least you're name isn't Michael Bolton.
Samir: You know, there's nothing wrong with that name.
Michael Bolton: There WAS nothing wrong with it. Until I was about 12 years old, and that no-talent-ass-clown BECAME famous and started winning Grammy's.
Samir: Why don't you just go by Mike, instead of Michael?
Michael Bolton: No way! Why should I change it? He's the one who sucks.
posted by tbogg at 10:52 PM
|
Huked on fonics werked for me...it can werk for yu to.
The stigma of bad spelling...
I was given the word "reversible" in one of the early rounds. With great confidence in my spelling, if not in my ability to speak clearly into a microphone in front of my peers, I quickly recited "r-e-v-e-r-s-a-b-l-e" and awaited the cheers that would send me on to the next round. How shocked I was when I was banished to the bleachers with the rest of the great unwashed.
posted by tbogg at 10:30 PM
|
Science-geek haiku...
Proof that the Internet is not a vast wasteland...except for the fan-fiction sites. The Periodic Table of Haiku
Oxygen
Green plants' waste;
Earth's invisible treasure:
now breathe
posted by tbogg at 10:21 PM
|
"Put a stop payment on that check!!!", WSJ's Paul Gigot screams in his sleep....
It's official.... Peggy Noonan has completely cracked.
It's a beat-up little suburban single-story house in a Third World place far away. Faded blue paint on the outside, broken bicycle on a cracked cement walkway, rusty fence. You wouldn't think twice if you drove by. It wasn't interestingly decrepit or antique, just modern, cheap and fallen down.
It's after midnight. A man--thin, bearded, tall--is sitting up in bed, his back against the wall. He's writing a letter in a lined notebook that rests on a pillow. There's a little kid's sort of lamp, 40 watts, to his right, on a rickety plywood bureau that holds his cell phone, PDA, papers, watch.
A sound. The sharp break of a small stick.
He doesn't move. Stares straight ahead. He isn't even aware of "seeing" or "feeling"; he has only one sense now and it is hearing.
Nothing. Silence. Now he moves, keeping silent. The sheet soundlessly put aside, his feet on the floor. He sits on the side of the bed, listening.
Nothing. A dog barks a block away. He notes the time. Quietly takes the PDA, cell phone and watch, and puts them in a small brown satchel.
Holy Crap. 1500 words like this, written like a precocious 14-year-old...or Steven den Beste.
I can't even make fun of it.
posted by tbogg at 10:02 PM
|
Bomb Iraq....
North Korea Test-Fires Missile
posted by tbogg at 9:47 PM
|
Take the Jerry Bowyer challenge....
A few weeks ago I wrote about radio host Jerry Bowyer and his connection to lunatic right-wing financier Richard Mellon Scaife. MR bowyer took exception to what I wrote as seen by this email:
Subject: how could you possibly get it so wrong?
A simple Google search on the words “Bowyer” and “Scaife” would have led you to plenty of articles that would demonstrate that your ‘facts’ are way out of date. I am not the President of the Allegheny Institute – that info is three years out of date. I do not get any Scaife funding of any kind, and never will. In fact a little checking could have yielded the relevant information that no only am I not Dick Scaife’s “sock puppet” but Dick and I had rather public (therefore easily found by a conscientious fact checker) disagreement. Just for the record (although I doubt you will be interested in correcting the record): I disagree vehemently with what my party did in the 1990’s running over the cliff into crazy conspiracy theories about Clinton the mass-murderer, Clinton the drug runner, Clinton the Foster-cide, etc. I think Clinton’s blow-job in the white house was none of Ken Starr’s business, nor that of the US Congress and I rank Bill Clinton in the top quarter of US Presidents in the 20th Century. I have said these things hundreds of times publicly over the years. Fronting for Scaife? You oughta call that theory into my radio program sometime, you’d be laughed out of town by my liberal callers alone.
Regards,
Jerry
I went ahead and took the Bowyer challenge and here is what I found. First link in Google:
Scaife has been donating to big think thanks for four decades, but he recently launched a new kind of policy group in Pittsburgh, the Allegheny Institute for Public Policy, which describes itself as "devoted exclusively to the study of local issues" in western Pennsylvania. In just five years it has become a forceful advocate for conservative alternatives to traditional city and county policies in areas ranging from education to trash removal and economic development.
The institute earned political influence by leading a campaign against a proposed half-penny increase in the sales tax to finance civic improvements, including new stadiums for the Steelers and Pirates. To the surprise of Pittsburgh's traditional ruling circles, voters defeated the tax in a November 1997 referendum. The losers blamed a public relations campaign orchestrated by Jerry Bowyer, president of the institute, which opposed the referendum as a fat cats' use of tax money for inappropriate purposes.
Bowyer has cast himself as an effective gadfly, appearing regularly on talk shows – including four he hosts himself – to promote his agenda of more privatization, more reliance on "faith-based social service organizations" to deliver help to the needy. He is now accepted as a civic leader in Pittsburgh. Just six years ago he was leading the National Reform Association, a branch of the Calvinist Reformed Presbyterian Church, crusading for creation of a "theocracy" in America – "Christocracy, the rule of Christ over the nation," he called it once.
...and Bowyer is correct. The article is dated May, 1999. So does this mean that Bowyer is no longer in the employ of R.M. Scaife? Could be. We have no proof that he is currently on the payroll....but as Peggy Noonan once, so memorably, said:
Is it irresponsible to speculate? It is irresponsible not to.
posted by tbogg at 9:45 PM
|
Ted Rall
A Democratic pro-Klendathu government.
Ann Telnaes
Praying
posted by tbogg at 8:41 PM
|
Robert Stacy McCain gives it five ^^^^^ hoods up.
Fun for the whole "Southern Heritage" family.
Gods and Generals...the game.
This summer look for expansion packs:
G & G: Plantation Redux
G & G: Emmett Till Had It Coming
and
G & G: Mandingo Moments.
posted by tbogg at 8:36 PM
|
Follow me....over the cliff
Bush leading the "coalition of the willing".
posted by tbogg at 12:26 PM
|
A buzz for me, a buzz for thee....
Setting the record straight on Mormon's and ephedra....from my email:
Dear Tom,
Just a quick point regarding your post regarding the Mormons and Ephedra from a botanist. The genus Ephedra includes several species of plants native to the dryer areas of the Southwest, including one found here in Oklahoma. The common name for these plants is "Mormon Tea" because though the Mormons would not consume coffee or normal tea, but would make a tea-like drink out of these plants. While this is certainly hypocritical, using a stimulating compound found in one group of plants while placing prohibitions on others and certainly follows no obvious logic, Senator Hatch's position is probably consistent with other aspects of Mormon "logic."
Interestingly, other early settlers to the American west used the plant as a cure for syphilis, thus the most common species has the name Ephedra antisyphilitica. Maybe this explains Senator Hatch's fondness for the Ephedra industry?
Cheers,
Jim
P.S. Ephedra, to my knowledge, has never been demonstrated to have any actual effects that cure syphilis infection.
*************
Thanks for clearing that up Jim. This would explain why so many sufferers of syphillis use ephedra under the mistaken notion that it can cure them, leading to unhealthy weight loss and an almost skeletal appearance.
posted by tbogg at 12:25 PM
|
Saturday, March 08, 2003
It's Saturday morning now...
...but here is the weekly Bush Administration Friday afternoon atrocity:
New clean water regulations requiring small construction sites to develop plans for storm water will not apply to the oil and gas industries, officials of the Environmental Protection Agency said today.
The new rules, which take effect on Monday, will require construction sites bigger than one acre to have plans to handle storm water, which can carry chemical and metal runoff from the disturbed soil. Existing rules already require such plans for sites larger than five acres
The agency says it is giving the oil and gas industries a two-year exemption from the requirement at the smaller sites while it conducts further study. Critics in national environmental groups and in Congress say the oil and gas industries are taking advantage of close ties to the administration to lay political groundwork for broader exemptions to the Clean Water Act.
John Millett, an environmental agency spokesman, said the agency had received conflicting information about the environmental impact of oil and gas construction sites.
"It's different because of its short time frame compared to other construction," Mr. Millet said, adding that the agency did not have enough data to properly understand how the rule would affect the oil and gas industries. "All that information right now is residential and commercial construction."
"Oil and gas differs sufficiently enough to warrant further evaluation," he said.
Since 1990, construction sites, including oil and gas facilities, that are larger than five acres or in more densely populated areas have been required to obtain permits. Oil construction sites larger than five acres often dealt with the regulation by building ponds to collect the storm water and soil runoff.
Senator James M. Jeffords, independent of Vermont, the ranking minority member of the Environmental and Public Works Committee, criticized the exemption.
"While small communities and small construction projects in every other sector of the economy must comply with strong storm water standards," Mr. Jeffords said, "the Bush administration is giving a free ride to the oil and gas industry."
These guys don't even bother to pretend anymore....
Thanks Ralph.....
posted by tbogg at 1:10 AM
|
Would you like your Postum with an ephedra back?
Digby points out that the son of Orrin Hatch (R-High-collared Hypocrite) is one of the big lobbyist's helping to keep ephedra untested and on the market. Jeez, Mormon's aren't even supposed to "indulge" in caffeine, but give them a couple of million dollars and suddenly the Book of Moroni becomes Naked Lunch to these people.
posted by tbogg at 12:47 AM
|
Indulge me here...
After writing about the shafting I got from Ticketmaster (see below), I got to thinking about all of the concerts I have been to in my not so short, yet not so long, life. Stuck in traffic I began listing singers, bands, and artists I have seen over the years. With the help of my wife who reminded me of whom we had seen together, and after racking my brains going back to the seventies, I compiled a list of the popular, the obscure, the what exactly was I thinking, and the people I am glad to have seen before they faded from sight or from life. I should point out that the very first concert I saw was in 1969. Kenny Rogers and the First Edition. I believe that tickets were about $6.50 which sounds about right. Here they are in vague and hazy somewhat chronological order. One hit wonders and all timers. See how many you recognize:
Kenny Rogers and the First Edition The Beach Boys Don McLean Crosby Stills and Nash Argent 10CC's The Grassroots Steve Miller Band Seals & Croft Rare Earth The Moody Blues Chicago Chase The James Gang Blood, Sweat, and Tears Jesse Colin Young Yes Jethro Tull Emerson, Lake, and Palmer OC Smith Santana The Byrds Atlanta Rythym Section James Taylor The Who The Rolling Stones J Geils Band Blue Oyster Cult The Outlaws Molly Hatchet Robin Trower Lee Michaels Bachman Turner Overdrive America Loggins & Messina Poco Pure Prarie League The Eagles Linda Ronstadt Jackson Browne Sammy Hagar Quarterflash Karla Bonoff Warren Zevon Roxy Music Elton John Norton Buffalo Sonny Rollins Herbie Mann King Crimson Neil Young Hall & Oates The Doobie Brothers Cheap Trick Fleetwood Mac Graham Parker Randy Newman Paul Simon Orleans Emmylou Harris Tom Petty and the Heartbreakers Nick Lowe Josie Cotton George Thorogood Joe Jackson Elvis Costello Stevie Ray Vaughan Jimmy Buffett Tommy Tutone Split Enz Robert Cray Dire Straits Peter Gabriel The Romantics Rachel Sweet The Go Go's The Rockets Joan Armatrading Husker Du Phranc Genesis The Golden Palominos The Stranglers Ultravox Howard Jones Echo and the BunnyMen Johnny Cougar The Motels Camper Van Beethoven The Lemonheads James REM Ricki Lee Jones Bruce Hornsby Los Lobos Lou Reed Townes Van Zant Maria McKee Ry Cooder Lyle Lovett Toni Childs The Cowboy Junkies Chris Isaak The Indigo Girls Dinosaur Jr Janes Addiction Counting Crows Natalie Merchant X Nanci Griffith Matthew Sweet Paula Cole Joan Osbourne The Bo Deans Son Volt Was Not Was Social Distortion Shawn Colvin Nirvana Pearl Jam Red Hot Chili Peppers Beck Green Day Diana Krall The Roots Sevendust Jimmy Eat World Blink-182 Unwritten Law The Distillers Sum 41 Garbage No Doubt Sugar Cult The Crystal Method Cassandra Wilson and...Tool
I know I'm missing some, but, what the hell. Those that I regret I never saw were the Lowell George-led Little Feat, For Squirrels, the Refreshments, the Posies, Badfinger, Harry Nillson, Steve Goodman, The Jesus and Mary Chain, Helmet, the Stone Roses, and Harry Chapin.
That was my exercise in self indulgence. Thank you for your attention...
posted by tbogg at 12:27 AM
|
Friday, March 07, 2003
Referrals from around the world
As I'm sure most of you know, we bloggers can sometimes look to see how you got to our particular neck of the Internet woods. Lots of time it's thru someone seeking something through Yahoo or Google that causes them to stumble upon us. For example, way back when I started this thing I linked to an article about Disney pushing Disney TV pop tart Hillary Duff as a "singer" on Radio Disney, when all the other stations wouldn't touch her. On the other hand, Disney Radio had her in heavy rotation. Anyway, ever since then I 've somehow become the home of Hillary+Duff+naked in google.
Tonight though, I had a new one:
Peggy+Noonan+is+a+stupid+bitch
Hell, I didn't know Elian had a computer...
posted by tbogg at 6:43 PM
|
A great analysis of President Qualude's press conference.
The Road to Surfdom.
George Bush may not be stupid, as some like to claim, but he sure is unimpressive. His "interview" last night showed a man of pointless arrogance, incapable of making an honest case, and someone who would wilt under the scrutiny of the sort of parliamentary system that operates in, say, Britain and Australia.
posted by tbogg at 2:13 PM
|
I want to see her sing..I don't want to buy her for the night.
This is a rant.
Remember when you used to go line up to buy tickets to concerts? You would stand in some crappy windy parking lot for four hours just hoping to get decent seats to see someone that you really wanted to see. Of course you wouldn't admit to seeing half of those bands today because you are soooo much cooler now. (Mine was Blue Oyster Cult with The Outlaws and Molly Hatchett...what the hell was I was thinking?). Then they started giving out wristbands so you could come back at an appointed hour...but you still had to get in line for the wristbands. And even then, all the good seats were gone because the "ticket agencies" (scalpers) had either made deals with the promoters or they paid homeless guys to camp out overnight to stand in line so you were sitting in nosebleeds making Sammy Hagar (yes...I saw him too, with Quarterflash.....groan) look even dinkier than he already was.
Now, when you go to a concert, you just get screwed financially. Two weeks ago I bought tickets for the Dixie Chicks (no...not for me...for the wife and daughter, and I love them anyway) and paid $62 apiece for them, to which Ticketmaster added a "convenience charge" of close to $10 per ticket, then there was the "Order Processing Charge" of $3.50. Final price: $150 to see a chubby little singer and a couple of pickin' and grinnin' sisters cover a Stevie Nicks song.
Today...Annie Lennox. Okay, Annie is special. Rarely tours...doesn't record much, so I could justify the $52 tickets (top price ticket $102). Covenience charge $9.70 per ticket. Order Processing Charge $3.10. Total price (I bought six tickets for our "group") $373.30.
Now keep in mind that the tickets were purchased online, so that the convenience cost of $58.20 for Lennox was for using my computer and Ticketmaster's site. The order processing charge is to spit out the tickets and mail them to me First Class. The extra charges for six tickets were more than the cost of one ticket. Yeah, yeah, it's what the market demands, but only because of exclusivity agreements between the promoters, venues, and Ticketmaster.
This must be the invisible hand that the Libertarians speak about. I'm just not too wild about where the fingers of that hand are going....
posted by tbogg at 1:28 PM
|
Just a thought...
I was thinking about President Bed Wetter using an Ari-supplied list of "safe" reporters that allowed him to avoid Helen Thomas, and wondered what would have happened if one of the favored few had stood up and said, "Mr. President(sic). I would like to defer to Helen Thomas of the Hearst papers".
I imagine that's why he wore a dark suit as protection. So we wouldn't be able to see the wet spot on the front of his pants.
I guess we know that Terry Moran won't be allowed to speak at the next press conference in May 2004.
posted by tbogg at 12:10 PM
|
It's alive.....
Yea! The Hamster finally appeared over in the Hot Links...twice.
Fine. Go visit him twice.
I give up.
posted by tbogg at 11:53 AM
|
...you are a traitorous baby-killing communist, how dare you, don't you value your freedom?
More Mark Morford.
Let us now speak blasphemy. Let us point up something no one seems to be mentioning, as Shrub sends in 300,000 of our youth to blast a cheap thug who is, by every account, no serious threat to the U.S., and never has been, and who had nothing to do with 9/11, and whose ties to terrorism are tenuous at best, all while rabid North Korea happily buys more nuke technology from desperate Pakistan and sells the finished product to the highest bidder.
Here it is: The military does not protect my freedom. Our soldiers are not out there right now safeguarding me, or you, or us, from some sort of total, '50s-era, Red Scare-esque dictatorial overthrow of our nation; nor is the military guaranteeing I have the right to write this column any more than it is protecting your right to read it, or to protest the war and speak freely and smoke imported French cigarettes and watch porn and drive really fast. Not anymore, they're not. Not this time.
More than ever before in recent history, the otherwise worthy U.S. military is right now in service not of the people, not of the national security, but of the current government regime and its corporate interests. Has it always been this way? Of course. But this time, with our smirky Enron president and cash-hungry CEO administration, it's never been so flagrant, or insulting, or invidious.
posted by tbogg at 10:49 AM
|
Jealous, I am....
Charles Kuffner is coaching Little League, reminding me once again that this is the first year my daughter isn't playing ball after eight years.
I am soooo jealous. Guess I'll live vicariously through his season.
Casey's last game. (She's the lefty)
1 for 3...bases-loaded single to drive in two runs in a 5-3 league championship game.
At least I have that.
posted by tbogg at 10:34 AM
|
He would look kinda hunky in a wifebeater and a mullet....
My Media Research Center CyberAlert just showed up and the MRC makes a devasting accusation against the Warrrior President. This isn't up on their site yet, so here is the cut and paste from my email:
2) President Bush was hit at his Thursday evening press
conference with a bunch of challenges to his Iraq policy, but
ABC's Terry Moran certainly encapsulated the attitude brought to
bear every night by Peter Jennings which presumes Bush's approach
"has drawn millions or ordinary citizens...into the streets in
anti-war protests" and made the U.S. "an arrogant power."
Moran, ABC's White House correspondent, argued in the guise of
a question: "In the past several weeks, your policy on Iraq has
generated opposition from the governments of France, Russia,
China, Germany, Turkey, the Arab League, and many other countries;
opened a rift at NATO and at the UN; and drawn millions of
ordinary citizens around the world into the streets in anti-war
protests. May I ask what went wrong that so many governments and
peoples around the world now not only disagree with you very
strongly but see the U.S. under your leadership as an arrogant
power?"
And when did you stop beating Laura?
posted by tbogg at 9:53 AM
|
Headline trifecta
Boy. You got to love these headlines from Media Whores Online.
GRACELESS, VINDICTIVE FRAUD TREMBLES
IN FEAR OF 82-YEAR-OLD WOMAN
'PUNISHES' WAYWARD JOURNALIST
FOR DARING TO ASK QUESTIONS ON MINDS
OF ALL THINKING AMERICANS
STONED BOY EMPEROR BREAKS HONORED TRADITION
posted by tbogg at 9:37 AM
|
I have my reservations...
Although I would like to throw my full support behind Jim Cappozola's Quixotic run against Arlen Specter, I do have a few questions:
Is his brow furrowed? Furrowed brows connote deep thought that may be incompatible in a Senate chamber filled with smooth brows unruffled by complexities and gray areas.
His hair. Does he have a full thick shock of hair that requires expensive upkeep? Should the good people of Pennsylvania suffer runway shutdowns at Philadelphia International Airport because he needs a crème rinse and possibly some highlights?
Although his name indicates that he is Italian, he has mentioned that he contains some Irish blood. What happens if some of this Irish blood is tainted by Jewish blood? What is he hiding and is this indicative of the way that he changes ethnicity to suit the latest restaurant he visits? Is he Thai today but Cracker Barrel Down Home Cooking tomorrow?
I remember that Jim wears predominately black clothes. Black can be an earth-tone. What does this say about him?
I personally know that Jim has never ever seen a James Bond film. Not one. What happens if he draws duty on the Senate Intelligence Committee? Will America's Silent Warriors be denied exploding watches, pens that shoot nerve gas, and exciting opening chase scenes, simply because he hasn't done his homework? What of femme fatales like Pussy Galore or Lotta Cleavage? Who will keep them in catsuits? I also think the risk of unchecked super villain masterminds in their secret island lairs is just too great a risk to take.
And lastly...Mildred's pet cause is autoerotic poo eating and that one is already taken by Lynne Cheney.
posted by tbogg at 9:17 AM
|
"I just thought he looked wiped."
Usually there is nothing Sullivan likes better than a spent man.
posted by tbogg at 8:47 AM
|
Advertising to ourselves...
NewsMax, which is an online news-service for the profoundly retarded, still has their skid-marked, stretched-out Fruit of the Looms in a twist over France not rolling over like a rolled-up, paper-smacked Tony Blair. Never mind that Germany, China, and Russia also oppose the war, they've got France in their sights and their gonna take her down.
As the war on terrorism heats up, now is the time for all patriotic Americans to show their support for our President and our country.
That is why NewsMax is launching our national "Boycott Cowardly France Campaign". With your help, we can reach millions.
If Paris wants to keep profiting from Saddam Hussein, Americans should just say no to French goods.
Boycott all things French: their gooey cheeses, their overpriced wines, their rip-off Perrier and Evian water, their crummy automobiles...
And most of all we will be boycotting their white flags. As President Bush said, we shall not surrender to evil and terrorists.
Please take a moment now and stand up for our country, our boys in uniform, and all who oppose terrorism by supporting our "Boycott Cowardly France Campaign".
NewsMax plans a nationwide ad campaign to encourage Americans to boycott France. You can help us. Please send what you can afford $50, $20, even $10. It will send France a message they will never forget.
Which you can send to their PO Box, because these guys obviously work out of a trailer. Here's what your money will do:
NewsMax plans to take out newspaper ads, internet ads, and if funds allow, radio and TV commercials to encourage Americans to boycott French goods, products, travel and services.
This will send a wake up call to the Paris elitists – betray America and the Western alliance at your own cost!
NewsMax has an ambitious program to reach millions of Americans – if contributions allow – for ads in the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, and major papers across the country.
This will not only inform millions of Americans, but send a wake up call to France, and make them reluctant to obstruct America, Britain and other allies.
We believe France, by not making a united front against terrorism, has put America at risk to terrorism. They have also weakened Western resolve as American troops are on the line in the sands of the mid East.(sic)
Your contributions can make a difference. NewsMax has done these informational campaign to great effect during the Elian Controversy and Election Crisis of 2000. We reached millions in those campaign with full pages ads in the NY Times and TV commercials on Fox News and elsewhere.
Just so you're clear here...the kind of people who watch Fox News(sic) should send money to NewsMax so that they can advertise on...Fox News(sic) to reach the kind of people who watch Fox News(sic).
But wait...there's more. Check out the great premiums you can receive with your "contribution":
Contribute $50 or more and receive a FREE “Home of the Brave Land of the Free” t-shirt - a value of $25
Contribute $100 or more get a FREE copy of the coffee table book “The Great Greatest Speeches of Ronald Reagan” - a $40 value with shipping
Contribute $250 or more and get a FREE edition of “Resolve” - the official portrait of President George Bush framed with his most resolute quotation.
"His most resolute quotation"?
Was last night's "Show your cards" more resoluter?
Personally I take solace in the fact the every dollar sqaundered over at NewsMax is one less dollar going towards ammunition and Toby Keith CD's.
posted by tbogg at 8:43 AM
|
Stoned and dethroned
Bush was tweaked to the gills. Tom Shales says so.
The contrast between the foggy Bush of last night and the gung-ho Bush who delivered a persuasive State of the Union message to Congress not so long ago was considerable. Maybe Bush thought he was, indeed, coming across as cool and temperate instead of bored and enervated, and this was simply a rhetorical miscalculation. On the other hand, it hardly seems out of order to speculate that, given the particularly heavy burden of being president in this new age of terrorism -- a time in which America has, as Bush said, become a "battlefield" -- the president may have been ever so slightly medicated.
He would hardly be the first president ever to take a pill.
There were brief interludes during the news conference -- especially the long languid pauses -- when some viewers might have flashed back to the presidency of Richard Nixon. That is, the Nixon Years at their most tumultuous and Twilight Zoney, when the old Trickster would come on TV and you'd sit there not just fascinated but a trifle terrified of what he might say, who he'd accuse of persecuting him, and whether he might come completely unglued or just melt into a hideous puddle right before your horrified eyes.
posted by tbogg at 8:17 AM
|
Thursday, March 06, 2003
See? He is a uniter.
Everyone hates us.
Then the Toronto Globe and Mail newspaper conducted a (hopelessly unscientific) poll on its Web site, asking Canadians whether they agreed that "Americans are behaving like 'bastards.' " The returns aren't good: as of yesterday, 51 percent were saying yes.
When even the Canadians, normally drearily polite, get colorfully steamed at us, we know the rest of the world is apopleptic. After all, the latest invective comes on top of the prime minister's spokesman calling Mr. Bush a "moron" last fall.
Canada's incivility is a reminder that the U.S. and its allies are slugging one another to death while Iraq watches from the sidelines. If, as Mr. Bush suggested in a press conference last night, the U.S. may lose a vote in the U.N. and then promptly go to war anyway, the internecine warfare within the West will grow far worse.
The U.S. debate on the antipathy toward us has been misleading, I think, in its focus on France. (There's now an American bumper sticker: "Iraq Now, France Next.") It's not just the prickly Gauls who are taking potshots at us — it's even our buddies, like the Canadians and the Irish.
In a survey, The Sunday Independent newspaper of Ireland polled Dublin residents about whom they feared most, Saddam Hussein or George Bush. The result: 39 percent picked Saddam; 60 percent, Mr. Bush. Even in Britain, a poll by The Sunday Times of London found that equal numbers called Saddam and Mr. Bush the "greatest threat to world peace."
So let's take stock of how our invasion of Iraq is going. The Western alliance is ferociously strained, NATO is paralyzed, America is resented by millions, the United Nations is in crisis, U.S. pals like Tony Blair are being skewered at home, North Korea has exploited our distraction to crank up plutonium production, oil prices have surged, and the world financial markets have sagged.
And the war hasn't even begun yet.
Read the whole column. The end is devastating.
For those contemplating a trip to Europe later this year, may I suggest a t-shirt that says: He's Not My President.
posted by tbogg at 8:40 PM
|
You show me your cards..I won't show you mine
Looks like President Preserve and Protect got into Laura's prozac collection tonight. There's not much I can say about the speech...mainly because he didn't say much of anything that we haven't heard before. He got his soundbite phrase in: "Show your cards", yet when pressed to explain why we are going to war, he failed to show his.
"I believe (Iraqi President) Saddam Hussein is a threat to the American people. I believe he's a threat to the neighborhood in which he lives."
But what is the threat to America?
Bush ain't saying...and he doesn't care what you think.
posted by tbogg at 8:29 PM
|
Tonight's press conference
Digby has a list of questions that will probably be asked of the Putz behind the Podium.
The real problem is not so much that Bush is unable to answer anything directly, truthfully, or in actual english words that 4th graders use on a daily basis. It's the press. Since Bush give press conferences about as often as Spencer Abraham gets laid, each reporter realizes that they may only get, what Eminem would call, "one shot" to get a question in. So they go with their little pads with one question written at the top...and the rest blank to scribble down the inanities.
What happens then is someone asks a good question...Bush dodges it by reciting a canned answer, and then Bush calls on someone else... who doesn't follow up on the previous question, pinning the chimp down. Helen Thomas may ask, " Why war? Why now?" which Bush will mumble his way through before calling on a Fox News correspondent who will ask about God in the Pledge of Allegiance. This allows Bush to call a hostile reporter, then follow with someone sympathetic to the Administration, whose job it will be to change the subject.
Afterwards Peggy Noonan and Howard Fineman will call Bush "masterful", recalling former President and current okra casserole, Ronald Reagan in his prime.
A little teamwork by the reporters would go a long way to exposing this weak little man who has all of the depth of a mirror.
posted by tbogg at 3:04 PM
|
Justice Thomas would like to review the type of porn that will be filtered...Can he have it for the weekend?
The delightful Dahlia Lithwick covers Ted Olson trying to make libraries safe for people with no health problems or bodily parts:
You really have to hand it to U.S. Solicitor General Ted Olson. The man can say absolutely anything and still keep a straight face. Here he is in the Supreme Court today, arguing for a law that conditions federal funding to public libraries on their willingness to install wildly ineffective "smut filters," and he actually manages to argue—three times by my count—that these filters will enhance free speech.
[snip...]
A good question from Kennedy: Wouldn't it be a lot easier just to have two separate computers, a filtered one for children and an unrestricted one for adults—you, know, in the section behind the black curtain, with the bound back editions of Hustler and the very sticky floors? Olson replies that Congress could have done this lots of ways, but it chose a rational mechanism (the financial blackmail method) that is constitutionally sufficient. Olson then offers up the incredibly weird argument that this statute actually saves librarians from being inundated with lawsuits from authors suing because their book wasn't stocked. Because if the blocking software is unconstitutional, then "so are the types of decisions librarians have been making all along." This is part of Olson's whole "librarians love this" defense of a statute librarians seem to pretty universally detest—as evidenced by the fact that the named plaintiff in the case is, in fact, the American Library Association.
Supreme Court FunFact: In Lithwick's article the following Justices make comments:
O'Connor
Stevens
Kennedy
Ginsburg
Souter
Rehnquist
Scalia
Breyer
I count eight. Interesting that the one Justice with first-hand (his right hand) knowledge of porn is strangely silent on the issue...if you don't count the low moans and the occasional "Who's your daddy?".
posted by tbogg at 2:02 PM
|
I'm not mad at you...I'm just terribly disappointed.....
Howard Fineman, who last week was telling us that God speaks to man through President Hooked on Galatians, has gone all Judas and shit (but not Catholic Judas) on Bush's ass.
I’M THINKING of the Grand Bazaar as I look at the hash George W. Bush has made of the diplomatic gamesmanship surrounding the pending war with Iraq. All the world was not going to be with us in a war to take out Saddam Hussein. And if taking him out is the right and necessary thing to do, so be it. But diplomacy has its uses (we’re depending on the United Nations to pick up the pieces in Baghdad), and what’s the use of making things harder than they need to be?
A lot of this has to do with the president’s negotiating style. It’s a mix of Bible Belt certitude and West Texas bluster: You declare that you are in the right, stake the most aggressive land claim in all the oil patch, talk big and strong, and dare them to call your bluff. But it doesn’t work that way in the Grand Bazaar, where you need to hide your intentions and examine the merchandise with care. The president hasn’t always done either. As a result, he’s been outmaneuvered by some of the world’s slickest shopkeepers: the Turks, the French, even Saddam. And now Bush is buying war at what could be a very high price.
[snip...]
Of course the smoothest operators of all are the French. They want into the Iraqi oil fields, but it’s not all about the money — at least not in the minds of the Gauls. They want respect. They want to be known as the paragons of principle. They want to be known as the conscience of Europe. The president’s father is a longtime friend of Jacques Chirac. Perhaps Dad can explain French thinking to his son. Dad might explain that there’s a time for tough talk and a time for a diplomatic peck on the cheek (or even a metaphoric kiss on the butt). Because, for better or worse, we’re not in Midland anymore.
That's quite a tongue-lashing on Bush from Fineman. But then, it's not the first time Fineman has used his tongue on the Warrior President.
posted by tbogg at 12:59 PM
|
She's a real emotional girl
Ann Coulter took a few days off to deal with her genital herpes, but she's back and inflamed as ever:
If impeached former president Bill Clinton had ever caught a fish as big as Mohammed, he would still go down in history as America's worst president, but at least he would have a single foreign policy accomplishment. Last September, Clinton was among those braying that it was insanity to go to war with Iraq rather than concentrating on al-Qaida: "Saddam Hussein didn't kill 3,100 people on Sept. 11; Osama bin Laden did."
Then again, Clinton didn't allow 3100 people to die on his watch while he was taking a month off in Texas.
Ann then shows that, after two years, she still hasn't gotten over Clinton's turgid member, as she writes:
After an arrest like that, Clinton would have held 17 press conferences to praise himself and attack Republicans. Bush has held no press conferences on the capture of this major al-Qaida leader
Whoops.
THE 8 P.M. ET news conference will be televised live nationally. The president will begin with an opening statement about successes in the war against terrorism and the importance of disarming Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, White House spokesman Ari Fleischer told reporters.
This is the kind of thing that happens when you miss your RNC blastfax because you're stumbling around the apartment in a vodka haze and forgot to put paper in the machine. Not that that keeps you from writing:
Human rights groups have responded to the capture of this major al-Qaida figure with the plea: DON'T HURT HIM! They are hysterical at the possibility that the government is torturing Mohammed for information. There are dark rumors that terrorists are being stripped, humiliated, strapped down and subjected to total sleep deprivation with lights and noise. Then it turned out the hapless victims of such brutal tactics weren't terrorists, but airline passengers since Sept. 11.
We now know why she calls her new screed "Treason". It's the closest she will ever get to the word "reason".
posted by tbogg at 12:36 PM
|
Hedging your bet in a game of Texas poker
Robert Novak tells us that President Smirky is playing cards with America's future.
''This is Texas poker, with the president putting everything on Iraq,'' a Republican senator (who thoroughly approves of this policy) told me.
But the impression I get from Novak's column is that he isn't convinced that Bush is playing a strong hand. Some excerpts:
The extraordinary gamble by Bush leads to deepening apprehension by Republican politicians as they wait for the inevitable war. They consider the Democratic Party divided, drifting to the left and devoid of new ideas. Yet, Bush's re-election next year is threatened by two issues: the economy and the war on terrorism. Success on both is tied to war with Iraq.
Few Republicans discuss even in private whether the president had to make this bet. The usually unasked question: Was it really necessary to focus on Saddam's removal from power? With U.S. troops ready to head into harm's way, patriotic politicians do not want to speculate whether this war was avoidable.
[snip...]
The senator who told me the president is playing ''Texas poker'' is delighted to march with Bush in a crusade for democracy in the Arab world, a goal that colleagues well-versed in diplomacy view as unrealistic. That is the heart of George W. Bush's gamble, with his presidency and the course of the nation at stake.
If things go poorly in Iraq or the economy tanks worse than it is now, expect Novak to be the first to say "I told you so". My impression of Novak, when I see him on TV, is that he is not Bush's biggest booster. Novak, who is a very smart man, seems more of an economic conservative than a cultural one, and I think, deep down, that he believes Bush is a simpleton. I would guess that he gets up every morning with his fingers crossed and a tightened sphincter wondering what Bush is going to do that day.
posted by tbogg at 12:10 PM
|
Monosyllabic cretin to make rare public appearance
Bush has held eight news conferences since taking office two years ago.
He is known to think that White House news conferences are too formal, and that they include too much preening by reporters
Watch for the "hearing aid".
(Update): I just realized that the Ex-Gov. Bush will be speaking at the same time The Simpsons are on. I expect that my wife will walk through the room, glance at the TV and comment that "Homer looks like he's lost weight".
posted by tbogg at 11:25 AM
|
Wednesday, March 05, 2003
Take It To The Limit Bank Tour
Over-the-hill country rockers The Eagles, who we thought were Already Gone, are hiting the road...again, letting us see what Life in the Slow Lane With Your Left Blinker Going is like.
Thousands will flock to their concerts reliving the imaginary wild times they think they had when the Eagles were at their peak, ignoring the fact that no matter how long they grow their hair on the sides, they're still bald on top and they can no longer Chug All Night.
Me? I waiting for next year's Droolin' Daltons Tour. I hear they're going to play The Disco Strangler.
That...would...rawk.....
posted by tbogg at 11:00 PM
|
I told you there was something funny going on between Frodo & Sam
Previously I mentioned that I sensed some homoerotic tension between Mr Frodo and Sam in LOTR: The Two Towers. I guess it wasn't just me. Wal-Mart has some very special editions of The Hobbit.
The Hobbit: Or, There and Back Again
Author: Tolkien, J. R. R.
On the Battersea Reach of the Thames, a mixed bag of eccentrics live in houseboats. Belonging to neither land nor sea, they belong to one another. There is Maurice, a homosexual prostitute; Richard, a buttoned-up ex-navy man; but most of all there's Nenna, the struggling mother of two wild little girls. How each of their lives complicates the others is the stuff of this perfect little novel.The adventures of the well-to-do hobbit, Bilbo, Baggins, who lived happily in his comfortable home until a wandering wizard granted his wish.
Boxed hardcover bound in green leatherette with gold and red foil stamping, two-color typography, and five full-page color illustrations by the author
So that is why the Virgin Ben likes these books so much. I think I'm beginning to see why they called it The Two Towers, although The Two Turgid Throbbing Towers has a nice alliterative ring to it....
(Thursday update) Damn. Wal-Mart pulled the page. I'm sure someone cached the screen somewhere....
posted by tbogg at 10:42 PM
|
Is that an Air Stratocaster or are you happy to see me?
If Glenn Reynolds takes a few days off... here is probably the reason why.
He strikes me as a My Woman From Tokyo kinda guy...
posted by tbogg at 10:31 PM
|
These are the final days of peace in America.
Mark Morford...who Andy Sullivan dearly wishes he was....
These are the final days of peace in America. Please remember to turn off the lights and lock up when you leave.
These are the last days of relative calm before we start bombing and massacring hundreds of thousands of people and in so doing enter into what many believe will a very long, drawn-out, insanely expensive, volatile, destabilizing, completely unwinnable war against a cheap thug of an opponent who has negligible military might and zero capacity to actually harm the U.S. in any substantive way. U-S-A! U-S-A!
This will not be Desert Storm. This will not be quick and painless. This will be 3,000 guided missiles launched on the first day of the war, 10 times that of Desert Storm, turning Iraq into an instant wasteland. This is already a minimum of $200 billion, with an additional $50 billion to try and bribe Turkey alone, just to begin with. This is total unabashed war gluttony....
posted by tbogg at 10:22 PM
|
From the wonderful folks over at Whitehouse.org
Last night, the President called an emergency meeting of his top advisers in the Presidential Prayer Squad to discuss the Administration's overarching concern and principal goal for America's future: his reelection in 2004. Working feverishly until dawn with PPS leaders Deacon Fred and Brother Harry Hardwick, the President arrived at a plan of action which will ensure that his political future does not mimic that of his vaguely effeminate father. Let the record state that the Prayer Squad's painstakingly objective analysis involved reviewing opinion polls of NRA members, Heritage Foundation economic forecasts, back episodes of the Greatest American Hero and, most importantly, the Holy Bible.
Meanwhile, Dick Cheney's lawyer doesn't want you to see this.
After earning her Bachelor of Arts degree in English Literature from Colorado College, the not-yet-Mrs. Dick Cheney found herself still without a bread-winning spouse. Wisely hedging her bets, she took refuge in post-graduate education, earning both a Masters Degree and Ph.D. in the profoundly non-practical, yet supremely lady-like academic province of poetry studies. Fortunately for Pre-Mrs. Dick Cheney, a life of scholarly spinsterism was narrowly averted, when one fine July evening in 1964, she would cross paths with Mr. Dick Cheney, an old high school acquaintance. The two would dine together the next evening at a Roy Rogers Family Restaurant, then venture out for a night of dancing and sloe gin fizzes. Two weeks later, they were married in an intimate ceremony at a Las Vegas motor chapel. Mrs. Dick Cheney would go on to sire two daughters, Mary and Elizabeth, the latter of whom would fulfill her Godly obligation to couple with men and produce grandchildren in a naturally biological fashion.
posted by tbogg at 10:13 PM
|
An email form reader Jeff
Just a note:
This quote:
Koppel set the tone for the evening by opening the March 4 live broadcast (EST/CST feed) with this supposed joke which undermined the moral superiority of the U.S. position: “There's a sardonic two-liner making the rounds in Washington these days: 'How do we know that Saddam Hussein has biological and chemical weapons? We have the receipts.' Nasty, but there's an element of truth to it.”
Just wanted to point out the great standup comedian, the late Bill Hicks, used to do this in his routine. Something like (paraphrased of course):
“Iraq has terrible weapons, awful weapons. How do we know? Uh, we looked at the receipt. In fact it’s a check, but as soon as that sucker clears we’re goin in!”
Not suggesting Koppel plagiarizes from stand up comics, but…. When Bill Hicks said it, we were in Bush The Elder’s Reign Of Bombs. This is such a well-worn joke, we laugh about in locker rooms and over holiday dinners when we talk to our weird uncles. It’s been a water-cooler snicker for over a decade, and not just among racial comics. There’s much more than an element of truth to it. Everyone in America, from the stoner in my mailroom to my sister the Soccer Mom has been chuckling over the absurdity of it for years.
But when Koppel says it actually seems cutting edge and controversial.
Do these guys really believe they are offering insights? Do they really think we don’t know? How badly out of touch is our media? How dumb do they think we are? How poorly have they served us? Does our government also think we are chumps, that Bush’s constant reminders to “go tell a neighbor you love em” actually passes for sense and leadership.
There’s a deep sense of the hypocrisy in US policy eating at all of us. And younger people are growing up totally disillusioned. I had to come by my own cynicism as an adult. I believe the media and the establishment have no real idea how widespread is the sense of our government being totally immoral and false. And it may seem like they can lead us into anything with a blank check now, while there are still some people tethered to the ship as it goes down. But there’s also another class of people totally cynical, who never had anything noble to believe in and never will. And with Bush ripping the nest egg out from under them too, you’re going to have a scary kind of political nihilism jumping out at us from a corner not too far in our future
posted by tbogg at 10:01 PM
|
Welcome...
Long before I started blogging I used to read The Hamster, which makes me wonder why I haven't linked to him before. You can now find him under the Hot Links with all the other good folks. Visit often. Send him money. Buy things there. Let him marry your daughter. Stuff like that.
(Well...he should show up soon, once friggin' Blogger gets their template updates fixed. Blogger has had a bunch of problems since Google bought them. Good thing it's free...Hang in there, Eric)
posted by tbogg at 9:46 PM
|
A spoonful of Bosco makes the Karl Marx go down.
Andy Sullivan (balding guy...English...lover, not a fighter) writes this today:
THE NEW YORK TIMES ON STALIN: Yes, this was the 1953 obit. (Thanks to NRO's Corner.) Always useful to see how the Times dealt with murderous dictators then. Some things never change.
Oddly enough, Andy passed on the opportunity to blame the Stalin obituary on then ten-year old Howell Raines who was at the time establishing a 5th grade Communist cell in his native Birmingham, Alabama.
posted by tbogg at 6:51 PM
|
Can we kick out the people who buy Creed CD's too? Because I could get behind that...
In reading about Mall-Gate I found this to be amusing:
On Monday, Stephen Downs, 61, and his son were asked by mall security guards to remove their peace-slogan shirts or leave. Downs' 31-year-old son, Roger, took off his shirt. But Downs refused.
The guards called police, and he was charged with trespassing and pleaded innocent.
Police Chief James Murley said: ``We don't care what they have on their shirts, but they were asked to leave the property, and it's private property.''
The men had had the T-shirts made at a mall store and wore them while they shopped.
Soooooo...you can buy the t-shirt there, but you can't wear the t-shirt there....
I see.
posted by tbogg at 2:59 PM
|
I see Marvin's Word of the Day Calendar is a big hit.
Marvin Olasky, who is rumored to be George W Bush's spiritual gardener (which would explain the weeds, rocks, and dead plants) has a column up pointing out that those who oppose Miguel Estrada (El Topo) are...you guessed it: Marxists. In fact, Marv (can I call you Marv...?) is so sure that they are Marxists that in his 648 word column he uses the term Marxist, Marxists, or Neo-Marxist 11 times. On the other hand, he uses the word "and" 13 times.
posted by tbogg at 2:42 PM
|
Soon to become Pro-I Didn't Think They Would Retaliate Against My Family.
When, exactly, did the pro-war people morph into " pro-liberation" people? Did this happen during the ever-changing rationale for going after Saddam? Looks like they have gone from Pro-1441 to Pro-He Tried To Kill My Dad to Pro-He Has WMD's to Pro-He Double Dates With Osama to Pro-Democracy In Iraq Before America to Pro-Aluminum Tubes! Aluminum Tubes! Aiiiieeeee! to Pro-Well, The Soldiers Are Already There to Pro- Bush's Vestigial Manhood Is At Stake to Pro-Reclaim Our Precious Bodily Oils That Are Under Their Sand to Pro-Liberation in mere months.
Anyway, for those keeping score at home, pro-war = pro-liberation...anti-war = Marxists.
posted by tbogg at 2:21 PM
|
11 out of 13 can't be right
I'm really loving my cyberalerts from the Media Research Center (see below), they make life so much easier. In today's alert, we see that Nightline is "liberal" because, in a Nightline Town Meeting, good common folks, real salt of the earth types, actually had the audacity to question the administration's rush to war. Gasp! Let's let MRC 'splain it to you:
ABC's Nightline Town Meeting on Tuesday night put the burden on those in favor of a war on Iraq, a tilt evident in the title of the 90-minute special, “War in Iraq: Why Now?” While Ted Koppel presented a balanced panel of three experts for and three against a war, an amazing 11 of 13 questions posed from the audience, at St. Johns Episcopal Church within sight of the White House, expressed hostility for President Bush's policy or outright disdain for the U.S.
Remember: asking "War in Iraq: Why Now?” is putting a "burden" on the administration, and we wouldn't want to burden them with explaining why they want to blow $100+ billion, kill ten's of thousands of Iraqi civilians, and put America's fighting forces in harm's way just so we can get at that guy who tried to kill the President's dad. That would require some heavy lifting from a bunch of white collar criminals and these homies don't play that. And speaking of 'burdens" it looks like the MRC doesn't want to have to explain why 11 out of 13 people "expressed hostility for President Bush's policy or outright disdain for the U.S". The MRC says:
But the really biased element to the show was all the hostile questions from the left. The audience for these Nightline Town Meetings is carefully selected by ABC producers who then decide who can pose a question, so the questioners normally are pretty balanced. But not on Tuesday night, a slant which really makes ABC look pretty irresponsible given the very small audience they were able to fit into the church.
Proof of an ABC conspiracy? The fact that 11 out of the 13 questioned the war is all the proof that MRC needs, although I found it interesting that they claim that "the really biased element to the show was all the hostile questions from the left". Does this mean that no one from the right is opposed to the war? Are they really in such tight lockstep over there? Didn't they all get the Rove-a-gram?
But my favorite part was Ted Koppel's little joke that probably really steamed Bozell's clams:
Koppel set the tone for the evening by opening the March 4 live broadcast (EST/CST feed) with this supposed joke which undermined the moral superiority of the U.S. position: “There's a sardonic two-liner making the rounds in Washington these days: 'How do we know that Saddam Hussein has biological and chemical weapons? We have the receipts.' Nasty, but there's an element of truth to it.”
posted by tbogg at 1:34 PM
|
It's only Hardball off-camera
Thanks to the thin-skinned folks over at L. Brent "Where's My Scaife Check" Bozell's Media Research Center for transcribing Chris Matthews latest comments from the Don Imus show. This says a lot about what is said on the air, and what they say during commercial break.
MSNBC's Chris Matthews, whose Hardball show has fewer viewers than the cancelled Donahue had, went on a tear against President Bush, whom he described as “a kid,” and others in the administration over their Iraq policy. Matthews charged on Friday's Imus in the Morning: “It's going to make every Arab kid grow up to hate our guts for the next thousand years.”
Matthews argued that the policy has nothing to do with any danger posed by Iraq's arsenal. Instead, “it's about changing these governments around so that they play ball with us.”
On Bush, Matthews bemoaned: “This kid has got religion, he goes to bed at 9:30, he doesn't drink, he's got God on his side, his family doesn't complain against him -- he's basically got the bit in his teeth and he's going to war, and the people around him aren't questioning it.”
MRC analyst Jessica Anderson took down some of what Matthews spewed on the February 28 Imus in the Morning radio show simulcast on MSNBC:
-- "It looks like Bush 43 is going to go, he doesn't care. There's an interesting little item in the paper today about how Bush 41, the family as it's called, are concerned about going it alone, ripping apart the alliance that Bush Senior had going into Baghdad the first time, or going into Kuwait. I think they're worried about it, I'm worried about, but you know, this kid has got religion, he goes to bed at 9:30, he doesn't drink, he's got God on his side, his family doesn't complain against him -- he's basically got the bit in his teeth and he's going to war, and the people around him aren't questioning it. I think Colin Powell is aboard, Wolfowitz is out there, you know, almost like a fanatic saying, 'I don't even know how much the thing is going to cost, but we're going.' These guys are going to war and there's no way around it. At this point, they probably have to."
-- "Well, you know my gut, I've been against this war. They said it was anthrax, then they said they did '93, then they said they did 2001. They've got every excuse, it's like throw it against the wall and see if it sticks, and it's basically an attitude that the guys around the President are ideologues, they don't like despotisms, they want to go in there and knock off those Arab leaders, they want to change the Middle East around so it's peaceful and the Israelis can cut a better deal, and it's all about ideology and, to some extent Israel, but it's hardly any of it is about guns. I think the gun part of this thing has always been BS.
“It's about changing these governments around so that they play ball with us and I think that's what the game has been from Wolfowitz and Feith and Rumsfeld and Cheney -- they're all hardliners. You know, when they get off the air with me they always giggle, 'You know, I hope they don't disarm.' That's their worst fear, that Saddam Hussein will throw all his guns out in the street in front of 'em, then we can't go to war and these guys will be miserable. It's not about guns. It's about ideology. These guys want to change that part of the world and they're damned, they'll come up with any excuse to do it. And look, that's an idealistic Wilsonian notion. I think it's squirrelly. It's going to make every Arab kid grow up to hate our guts for the next thousand years, but that's they're(sic) point of view and I've got mine."
So why doesn't Matthews confront them about their off-screen comments the next time they come on? Is it Hardball or T-Ball?
posted by tbogg at 9:18 AM
|
...and starring Khalid Sheikh Mohammed as the Hedgehog.
It takes a special kind of person to notice this.
posted by tbogg at 8:32 AM
|
Tuesday, March 04, 2003
Yadda yadda yadda...to spend more time with my family...yadda yadda yadda
Janet Rehnquist leaving under a cloud.
Grassley and Montana Democratic Sen. Max Baucus asked the GAO to perform a management review of the inspector general's office in October after whistleblowers complained that Rehnquist had forced out a number of senior staff members.
One former staff member told CNN that Rehnquist "moved people and destroyed careers because she thought they were disloyal."
In a television interview in January, Rehnquist said she made the staff changes "for the good of the organization."
The GAO has also been investigating whether Rehnquist delayed an audit of Florida's pension fund at the request of Gov. Jeb Bush's office.
HHS documents show that the audit had been scheduled to begin in April 2002, but Rehnquist, after speaking with the governor's chief of staff, ordered it postponed. The audit did not begin until September 2002, which meant the results would not come out before Bush's re-election in November.
posted by tbogg at 9:35 PM
|
Turkey is, like, totally ruining the Pentagon's war feng shui
The Daily Kos explains the implications of Turkey's decision.
posted by tbogg at 9:26 PM
|
Looks like Mystery Science Theater 3000 has a new silhouette
But still the same bad movies.
posted by tbogg at 9:03 PM
|
The first humanitarian disaster
Martin Amis.
There are two rules of war that have not yet been invalidated by the new world order. The first rule is that the belligerent nation must be fairly sure that its actions will make things better; the second rule is that the belligerent nation must be more or less certain that its actions won't make things worse. America could perhaps claim to be satisfying the first rule (while admitting that the improvement may be only local and short term). It cannot begin to satisfy the second.
We contemplate a kaleidoscope of terrible eventualities: a WMD attack on Israel, and a WMD response (conceivably nuclear); civil war in Iraq. and elsewhere, together with all manner of humanitarian disasters; fundamentalist revolutions in Egypt and Jordan; and, ineluctably, an additional generation of terror from militant Islam. Meanwhile, common sense calmly states that an expanded version of the present arrangement (inspectors, monitors, full exposure to world opinion) is sufficient to contain and emasculate Saddam until pressure builds for a coup; and that the "war on terror" can start only with the dismantling of the settlements in the territories occupied by Israel
posted by tbogg at 8:38 PM
|
Bush Offers Taxpayers $300 If We Go To War
The Onion, what else...
WASHINGTON, DC—Amid growing anti-war protests and polls indicating eroding public support for an invasion of Iraq, President Bush is offering U.S. taxpayers a rebate in the amount of $300 if we go to war.
[snip...]
"The plan is almost identical to the tax rebate offered in 2001," Bush said. "With the minor exception, of course, of the provision that Americans react favorably to the deployment of 210,000 troops to the Persian Gulf."
"Which reminds me, have you seen these new iPods?" added Bush, pulling an Apple-brand MP3 player from his pocket and holding it up to the crowd. "It costs $299 for one of these little buggers, but it holds a thousand songs. They're amazing."
posted by tbogg at 4:19 PM
|
Why we blog
Cowboy Khalil.
I can't add much to what he has to say, other than to add that I do it because sometimes I have something to say, and sometimes I just like being a smart-ass.
Nothing much more than that.
posted by tbogg at 10:59 AM
|
More on Kristof
There's a great discussion of Kristof's column over at Atrios, which contains this quote:
"We must respect the other fellow's religion, but only in the sense and to the extent that we respect his theory that his wife is beautiful and his children smart." -- H.L. Mencken
contributed by Tresy.
Then there is this email I received from Matt:
"I was brought up to respect other people's religions (although nobody ever explained why...)"
Here's why:
"We have enough religion to hate each other, but not enough to love each other." -- Jonathan Swift
Or, one could argue quite easily, if UBL and his crew had grown up respecting other people's religions, Al Qaeda would not exist.
The problem with Kristof's article is that he jumps from disdain for *evangelicals* to disdain for *Christianity*, in the same way that incautious warbloggers might jump from condemning Wahabbism to condemning Islam.
It's an uncommon lapse in Kristof's usually solid intellectual rigor; perhaps he still has mixed emotions about once dating a girl from a Pentecostal denomination, and isn't quite ready to say that, although she was bright, she was also a follower of a religion that makes no freaking sense.
At any rate, he's wrong, but not entirely so--and I respectfully submit that you are making the same error (failing to distinguish between radical and mainstream) in reverse, if not to quite the same degree.
Very good points.
One serious flaw, pointed out by many over at Atrios, is that Kristof fails to differentiate between "evangelicals" and "fundamentalists". This is a nuance I failed to account for. I'm sure someone's god will forgive me.
posted by tbogg at 10:07 AM
|
Monday, March 03, 2003
Better living through dumbing down America.
Nicholas Kristof today takes time out to point out that educated Americans need to reach out to snake-handling, speaking-in-tongues, backwoods morons. Okay, maybe that's stretching the point a bit, but Kristof fails to convince me why I should respect the views of these people:
Evangelicals are increasingly important in every aspect of American culture. Among the best-selling books in America are Tim LaHaye's Christian "left behind" series about the apocalypse; about 50 million copies have been sold. One of America's most prominent television personalities is Benny Hinn, watched in 190 countries, but few of us have heard of him because he is an evangelist.
President Bush has said that he doesn't believe in evolution (he thinks the jury is still out). President Ronald Reagan felt the same way, and such views are typically American. A new Gallup poll shows that 48 percent of Americans believe in creationism, and only 28 percent in evolution (most of the rest aren't sure or lean toward creationism). According to recent Gallup Tuesday briefings, Americans are more than twice as likely to believe in the devil (68 percent) as in evolution.
He then says this:
I tend to disagree with evangelicals on almost everything, and I see no problem with aggressively pointing out the dismal consequences of this increasing religious influence. For example, evangelicals' discomfort with condoms and sex education has led the administration to policies that are likely to lead to more people dying of AIDS at home and abroad, not to mention more pregnancies and abortions.
But liberal critiques sometimes seem not just filled with outrage at evangelical-backed policies, which is fair, but also to have a sneering tone about conservative Christianity itself. Such mockery of religious faith is inexcusable.
Why is it inexcusable to point out the ridiculousness of those who seem hellbent on sending us back to the dark ages, who would let people die because of a misguided belief that sex and pleasure are sinful, who find evolution unbelievable yet unquestionably accept the notion of a unknown, unseen, cosmic producer/director who works in "mysterious ways", and who read crappy endtime pulp fiction written by a hack evangelist, but fear children's books written about a boy wizard? I was brought up to respect other people's religions (although nobody ever explained why...) but that was in a time when religion was a private matter, before evangelicals decided it was their mission to share their devotion to their god whether you wanted to hear it or not. Quite frankly, I don't find the god-smacked to be that interesting.
So sure that's sneering, but how should I approach the willfully ignorant who would dictate social policy? People's lives are at stake while they're playing theological Calvinball.
Kristof then writes:
Robert Fogel of the University of Chicago argues that America is now experiencing a fourth Great Awakening, like the religious revivals that have periodically swept America in the last 300 years
History is full of "Religious Awakenings" and, if I may be so humble to note, millions have died because of someone else's notion of "god" and what "he" wants. Quite simply, that joke's not funny anymore.
posted by tbogg at 11:17 PM
|
Minority Report
Below I linked to the story about Toni Smith, a brave young woman athlete standing up for what she believes. I think it also important to give acknowledgement to two more female athletes who are standing up for women playing sports everywhere: Donna de Varona and Julie Foudy.
It has been the Bush Administration modus operandi to appoint a "commission" that is stacked with like-minded members to confirm whatever is on the administration's agenda thereby giving it the thinnest patina of legitimacy available, without causing outrage or the threat of waking up a docile and generally compliant, press. Some of the show commissions flamed out spectacularly (revamping Social Security) and some are still stumbling around (the 9/11 commission and the Henry Kissinger debacle). One of these Potemkin commissions is Education Secretary Rod Paige's Commission on Opportunity in Athletics, with the ostensible task of reviewing Title IX. The end result was a predictable attempt to seriously weaken opportunities for female athletes in order to reassert male athletic financial dominance at the collegiate level.
Fortunately de Varona and Foudy (two of the US's more famous and respected athletes) chose to not toe the line, and insisted on issuing a minority report that can be used as a 'backdoor" into all the weaknesses and double-talk of the commissions report. From their introduction:
After careful review and deliberation and unsuccessful efforts to include adequate discussion of our minority views within the majority report, we have reached the conclusion that we cannot join the report of the Commission. We are instead releasing this Minority Report and request that the Secretary include this document in the official records of the Commission’s proceedings.
Our decision is based on (1) our fundamental disagreement with the tenor, structure and significant portions of the content of the Commission’s report, which fails to present a full and fair consideration of the issues or a clear statement of the discrimination women and girls still face in obtaining equal opportunity in athletics; (2) our belief that many of the recommendations made by the majority would seriously weaken Title IX’s protections and substantially reduce the opportunities to which women and girls are entitled under current law; and (3) our belief that only one of the proposals would address the budgetary causes underlying the discontinuation of some men’s teams, and that others would not restore opportunities that have been lost.
This Minority Report is divided into three sections. The first presents the findings and recommendations that we believe the Commission should have included in its report — a substitute report. The second section addresses the reasons that we cannot support a number of the Commission’s key recommendations. The third section identifies some of the problems with the Commission’s process that we believe contributed to the problems with the report and with the recommendations that will weaken Title IX’s protections.
With regard to this last point, in our view, the problems with the report are the result of a process, established by the Commission staff, that did not adequately focus on critical issues, did not compile all of the evidence necessary to fully address the state of gender equity in our nation’s schools, and did not allow sufficient time for Commissioners to conduct either a careful review of the evidence that was compiled or an assessment of the potential impact of various recommendations.
The full Minority Report can be found here (in pdf. format)
posted by tbogg at 10:34 PM
|
What is in a word?
Larry Kramer is an activist, Eve Ensler is an activist, Morris Dees is an activist, and Ellen Malcolm is an activist.
James Charles Kopp is an accused murderer.
You would think CNN would know that.
posted by tbogg at 9:42 PM
|
Toni Smith...the quiet hero.
I'm sure I'm coming a little late to this story. I heard Charles Barkley mention Toni Smith last week on CNN but wasn't aware of the story.
Thankfully good folks like Democratic Veteran are on top of the story, and he provides a great link to ESPN's Ralph Wiley.
Two million hits on a once-lonely Manhattanville College Web site in response says the Quiet War of Toni Smith has been effectively transmitted out to the world. This was not her intent, to become TV programming, to become debate material for the rest of us. She is a 21-year-old sociology major who stands facing away from the American flag during the playing of the pregame National Anthem before her collegiate games. Big deal. She did not begin doing this for notoriety. It was her quiet, private expression to herself of her own thoughts, her own ideas and moral judgments.
Things you'd want your own 21-year-old daughter to do.
Go read this...
posted by tbogg at 7:20 PM
|
Lee Greenwood to pass flag to a new generation of patriotic crapmeisters
Ted Barlow points us in the direction of the next big thing that will thankfully only last about 9 minutes in America's collective cultural consciousness.
Have You Forgotten
I hear people saying we don't need this war
I say there's some things worth fighting for
What about our freedom and this piece of ground
We didn't get to keep 'em by backing down
Now they say we don't realize the mess we're getting in
Before you start your preaching let me ask you this my friend
Have you forgotten how it felt that day?
To see your homeland under fire
And her people blown away
Have you forgotten when those towers fell?
We had neighbors still inside going thru a living hell
And you say we shouldn't worry 'bout bin Laden
Have you forgotten?
They took all the footage off my T.V.
Said it's too disturbing for you and me
It'll just breed anger that's what the experts say
If it was up to me I'd show it everyday
Some say this country's just out looking for a fight
Well after 9/11 man I'd have to say that's right
Have you forgotten how it felt that day?
To see your homeland under fire
And her people blown away
Have you forgotten when those towers fell?
We had neighbors still inside going thru a living hell
And you say we shouldn't worry 'bout bin Laden
Have you forgotten?
Now I've been there with the soldiers
Who've gone away to war
And you can bet that they remember
Just what they're fightin' for
Have you forgotten all the people killed?
Some went down like heros in that Pennsylvania field
Have you forgotten about our Pentagon?
And all the loved ones that we lost and those left to carry on
Don't you tell me not to worry about bin Laden
Have you forgotten?
Have you forgotten how it felt that day?
To see your homeland under fire
And her people blown away
Have you forgotten when those towers fell?
We had neighbors still inside going thru a living hell
And you say we shouldn't worry 'bout bin Laden
Have you forgotten?
Have you forgotten?
Have you forgotten?
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Well, that certainly was a steaming pile. So who is this month's Toby Keith?
Darryl Worley.
With the requisite just-so facial hair, that lets us know he's manly, and a kicky post-yuppie hairstyle that says: 'sensitive', Darryl's fifteen minutes of fame has started, so don't blink or he could be gone faster than you can say "Billy Ray Cyrus". And considering the sterling work his publicist is doing, he could be gone even sooner.
From his own promotional website, they link to a USA Today article about this newest flag-wavin' country heartthrob.
DARRYL FEATURED IN USA TODAY
By Brian Mansfield, Special for USA TODAY
Country artist Darryl Worley is first out of the gate with a record that endorses war with Iraq. The top new song on this week's country chart at No. 43, Have You Forgotten? may seem to equate Saddam Hussein with Osama bin Laden, but the record is striking a chord.
" Almost everybody that calls wants to know: a) how can I get it? and b) will you play it again right now?" says Scott Lindy of WPOC-FM in Baltimore. (Related item:Read Have You Forgotten? lyrics.)
Worley and Wynn Varble wrote the song, which will appear on Worley's next album in May, after Worley traveled to Afghanistan with the USO in December. The West Tennessee native, who topped the country charts last year with I Miss My Friend, premiered Have You Forgotten? at the Grand Ole Opry in January.
"We did four separate performances of that song out there that weekend," he says. "Every one of them was a standing ovation."
Of course Worley and his crack A&R team hope that you are like most country music fans and get tired of all that fancy city readin' stuff. Then you won't read this from the same article:
Steve Warren, who consults for about 40 country radio stations, wouldn't have applauded. "Singing a song about going to war with Saddam because bin Laden hit us is a leap of logic that I don't think any informed people outside the White House can make," Warren says. "I wouldn't play the thing, no matter how many requests I got for the sucker."
Whoops. How did that get in there? Got to love the promo picture though. It just screams...Wal-Mart endcap...$8.94.
posted by tbogg at 7:01 PM
|
Brought to you by Lockheed and Viagra...Official Sponsors of ShrubCo LLC
Oliver Willis has the lowdown on reality TV...coming to all the major networks this fall.
posted by tbogg at 4:57 PM
|
No! It's my flag! Gimmeeeeeeeeeeee..!!!!
Brent Bozell's Scaife-funded Media Resource Center has it's long woolen-undergarments-that-hide-their-evil-dirty-naughty-parts in a twist over Bill Moyers decision to wear a flag lapel pin on TV.
Bill Moyers sported flag lapel pin on Friday night's Now on PBS, not to proclaim his patriotism and/or pride in the U.S., but to “take” the flag “back” which has been “hijacked and turned into a logo -- the trademark of a monopoly on patriotism.” Citing how President Bush and Vice President Cheney wear flag lapel pins, Moyers was reminded of communism: “When I see flags sprouting on official lapels, I think of the time in China when I saw Mao's little Red Book on every official's desk, omnipresent and unread.”
Moyers went on to complain that “more galling than anything are all those moralistic ideologues in Washington sporting the flag in their lapels while writing books and running Web sites and publishing magazines attacking dissenters as un-American.”
Moyers decided to wear the flag for one night as a “modest riposte” to the “people whose ardor for war grows disproportionately to their distance from the fighting. They're in the same league as those swarms of corporate lobbyists wearing flags and prowling Capitol Hill for tax breaks even as they call for more spending on war.”
I had no idea that Bozell had laid claim to the American Flag lapel pin for his party. You would think they would they would be satisfied with exclusive rights to the Cheneymaster 3000™ Defibrillator/Bacon Fryer, and the Lil' Himmler Buttplug that was all the rage at this year's Heritage Foundation Trophy Wife Swap and Gun Show.
posted by tbogg at 2:05 PM
|
The all-important 21-65 year old demographic was unimpressed.
Charlotte Beers is being outsourced to the private sector where she will be re-branded as a Bush Administration Failure™.
Charlotte Beers, the former advertising executive who has been the Bush administration's point person in efforts to improve America's image among Muslims, is quitting her State Department job after 17 months, the State Department said today.
Secretary of State Colin L. Powell said Ms. Beers, who is 67, was resigning for health reasons. Another department official said her resignation would become effective in about two weeks.
[snip...]
Mr. Powell came to the defense of Ms. Beers soon after she was appointed. "Guess what?" he told a group of senators in November 2001. "There is nothing wrong with getting somebody who knows how to sell something."
Ms. Beers concentrated on ways to erase stereotypes about Americans that are widespread in Islamic countries.
She acknowledged only last week that her mission has been daunting. "The gap between who we are and how we wish to be seen and how we are in fact seen is frighteningly wide," she testified before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Ms. Beers is expected to use the next few months to " stop looking so dead" when her picture is taken.
posted by tbogg at 1:28 PM
|
Selling the networks an empty suit.
Day in and day out, Ari Fleischer goes before the press and... lies. So why were the major networks suprised when Ari talked them into carrying President Hooked on Phonic's speech before the AEI last week? Do the heads of the news divisions even watch their own programs?
ABC, CBS and NBC broke into regular programming to carry President Bush's speech on the Middle East Wednesday evening after White House spokesman Ari Fleischer made off-the-record calls to their Washington bureau chiefs. But when Bush's address to the American Enterprise Institute, also aired by the cable news networks, dealt only generally with the future of a post-Saddam Middle East, some network bigwigs felt they'd been had.
The White House had been "lobbying" for live coverage of Bush's remarks, ABC's Ted Koppel said on "Nightline," but "in one form or another, he has said all of these things before."
Fleischer says no formal request was made and that his calls had "nothing" to do with the fact that Hussein was getting an hour of airtime that night in Dan Rather's "60 Minutes II" interview.
"It wasn't sold one way or another," Fleischer says. "I read them paragraphs from the president's speech, a very factual read-through. They made their own decision. . . . None of them on the phone suggested to me that it doesn't sound newsworthy."
Says one network executive: "The White House was incredibly heavy-handed with the request. At a time when we're leading up to war, they said it was going to make news." An executive at another network allows that "they didn't bully us. . . . They don't quite ask for time, but they say it's going to be quite important."
Fool me once, shame on me. Fool me twice...I'll hire Michael Savage for "balance".
...and speaking of the Savage Weiner...looks like he's off to a rousing start:
Savage is angrily threatening to counterattack "with all the abilities I have," including filing lawsuits and, if necessary, mobilizing his army of listeners.
"I'm not Dr. Laura and I'm not going to lift my skirts and run," Savage told The Post, referring to the tough radio shrink whose 2000 TV show was set upon by gay-rights groups that scared away advertisers and, arguably, forced a toned-down program that few watched, resulting in an early demise.
"If we let these bastards win, they will have elevated themselves to being a de facto national television censorship board," said Savage.
The Bronx-raised Savage says he's being persecuted because of "my conservative beliefs, pure and simple" and vows to counterattack if he feels his career is threatened - alleging, if necessary, a litany of abuses like "civil and/or religious rights violations, hate crimes, economic terrorism" and even racketeering.
Yeah. yeah. Everyone from the Bronx is real tough....especially guys named Weiner who have to change their names to Savage. Too bad "Wolf Blitzer" was already taken...
posted by tbogg at 8:19 AM
|
So I guess that we can go from yellow alert down to eggshell or maybe taupe...
The war on terrorism must be almost over. Let's attack Iraq, says Andy Sullivan:
A MAJOR VICTORY: The capture of KSM is big news. In fact, it's surely the biggest news in the war on terror in months. The nabbing followed previous arrests and interrogations, all of which have clearly helped stymie and disorient al Qaeda. In terms of the broader debate about the war, one conclusion is obvious. It's time to retire the frayed notion that somehow we cannot go to war against Saddam and al Qaeda at the same time. In fact, it would be hard to think of a more perfect refutation. Could the administration be more preoccupied with Iraq than it is today? It's a little hopeful to think that this phony argument against waging war on more than one front will now be retired. But it is useful to remember that, as an argument, it was never based on any actual assessment of how the government works. It was an argument entirely designed to make the Democrats look tough on terror while they were counseling appeasement of Saddam. It was a pretty obvious ploy at the time. Now it's transparent. I'm glad we've finally cleared it up.
I'm sure the invasion by 200,000 American soldiers following the "shock and awe" bombing of Iraq that may kill thousands of civilians, including women and children, will cause terrorism to just disappear much like Andy's Pulitzer hopes.
posted by tbogg at 12:44 AM
|
I guess Gray Davis is on the wrong side of the hemp issue...
Looks like the 'trust-afarians' who make up what is aptly called the Green Party feel like they haven't done enough damage to the country.
Democratic Gov. Gray Davis, facing a recall threat from conservatives, may have to fight the battle on two fronts -- with former Green Party candidate for governor Peter Camejo saying he is "seriously" preparing to organize Democrats and independents in support of the recall and put his name on the ballot.
"I'm going to start getting ready . . . to put forward a candidate who can really win," Camejo said in an interview with The Chronicle.
Camejo said Green Party executive committee members are scheduled to meet Monday to decide whether they'll join the recall effort.
A Green candidate who "can really win".
Words fail me.....
While he stressed that not all Greens support it -- and internal debate is continuing -- Camejo said it may present a crucial chance to "test the protest vote" and get their voices heard.
But, Camejo added, "We don't want the Republicans to get control because that's going from the frying pan into the fire."
Jeez, yuh think so, Pete?
Lemmings have more common sense than members of the Green Party.
(thanks David)
posted by tbogg at 12:30 AM
|
Math for snobs...
Peggy Noonan let's us in on why she became a Republican. Democrats are snobs.
There is another problem. You have become the party of snobs. You have become the party of Americans who think they're better than other Americans.
...and Peggy points out another problem for Democrats:
All of it came together bit by bit, and I started to become a conservative, and in time a Republican. And for the very reasons that my father was a Democrat.
Not a word of what I am saying is new. You've heard stories like this before. But it is still fiercely pertinent to your fortunes, because the journey I describe was common. It was the journey millions and tens of millions of people were taking at the same time, in the same era, for the same reasons. By the '80s their numbers were massive. They were the ground troops of the Reagan revolution. They left the Democratic Party. They left you. Here's your problem: To this day they haven't come back.
At the risk of flaunting my math skills, acquired through fancy-pants book learnin', I thought I would help Peggy overcome that "fuzzy math" problem that seems endemic to Republicans:
1992 election
Clinton 44,909,806
Bush 39,104,550
1996 election
Clinton 44,300,236
Dole 36,985,693
2000 election
Gore 50,996,582
Bush 50,456,062
Just thought I would point that out to rural-jes'-common-folk-barefoot-and-pregnant-Upper-East-Side Peggy Noonan.
posted by tbogg at 12:10 AM
|
Sunday, March 02, 2003
We had to take all of our legal affairs reporters and put them on the Monica beat...
The Washington Times Lite, formerly the Washington Post, is still having a problem understanding why the Democrats are blocking the vote on stealth candidate, Miguel Estrada. The Times Lite/Post is taking a "pox upon both your houses" approach to criticizing both parties involved...but then they end up putting the onus on the Democrats.
The question at stake in the Democratic filibuster of Mr. Estrada's nomination ultimately has nothing to do with race or with Mr. Estrada's allegedly inadequate answers. It is simply whether a conservative president can reliably place on an appeals court a qualified conservative against whom no serious complaint has been made. The answer must be yes; for if he cannot, the courts will become the province of those anodyne centrists whose views don't offend anyone with power. Former Clinton Justice Department official Walter Dellinger noted in a recent op-ed article that the Democrats' problem is not really Mr. Estrada but the monochromatically conservative nature of the larger slate of nominees this administration has advanced. But while it is tempting to attach a name and a face to the problem, it is also wrong. Democrats should, as Mr. Dellinger suggests, make recommendations, and President Bush should listen and accommodate. The future of the judiciary is certainly a legitimate electoral issue. But a presidential election does not take place each time the Senate must vote on a judge.
Leaving aside the absurd notion that Bush should "listen and accomodate", seeing as he only answers to God according to the latest Howard Fineman blowfest, it would seem that the Post purged all legal reporting prior to the 2000 election. Let's refresh their memory:
May 23, 2000
Senate Republicans and Democrats agreed Tuesday to bring up a package of long-stalled presidential nominations, which includes judges and a controversial appointment to the Federal Election Commission.
The Senate will debate and vote this week on a package of 65 of President Bill Clinton's nominations, including the 16 judges who have been approved by the Senate Judiciary Committee.
In exchange for Republicans allowing votes on judicial nominees, many of whom GOP senators view as too "activist" for lifetime appointments, Democrats agreed to stop blocking the Republicans' pick for the Federal Election Commission, Bradley Smith.
John Ashcroft
The issue isn't just appointments. Women and minorities have been disproportionately at odds with Senator Ashcroft because those rising from their midst often have policy differences with him, which shouldn't be surprising given that their life experiences are so different. He is wedded to the values of the Assembly of God church and has little tolerance for these differences. He is not a racist in the usual sense. It's just that he is so locked into the rightness of his views that he sees spokespersons for those who differ as enemies to be destroyed rather than opponents to be debated. Senator Ashcroft is constantly described as a man of integrity, but what does that mean if it leaves him free to use government office to destroy the reputation of others for political expedience.
That is what many Missourians believe he did to Ronnie White. It wasn't just African Americans who were offended. He blocked a highly respected Missouri Supreme Court judge from a federal position through deliberate misrepresentation and character assassination in order to create a law and order issue for his race against Mel Carnahan. He played the race card with court-ordered desegregation to advance his prospects to become governor. Someone rooted in religious values should set an example. Instead, his actions worsened race relations in a state that continues to struggle to improve interracial understanding. They diminished respect for justice and the courts at a time when more than ever we need to restore confidence in the law and the courts. They lowered the tone of debate between candidates and political parties. John Ashcroft polarized Missourians; his appointment will do the same for the country.
Or maybe the Post could just go here for a primer on judicial obstruction:
Won’t Republicans at least admit that their own inaction during the Clinton Administration created the judicial vacancy crisis?
When Democrats gained controlled of the Senate, they inherited 110 judicial vacancies – almost twice as many vacancies as existed when Republicans took control in 1995 (63). Today, after 80 confirmations, vacancies have decreased to 77 (including an additional 47 vacancies that have arisen since the shift in majority). By approving far more judicial nominees for this President than past Senates did for other Presidents, the Democratic-led Senate has reduced the number of vacancies and brought relief to the federal judiciary.
Also, vacancies on the Circuit Courts more than doubled during the period of Republican control of the Senate, increasing from 16 to 33. Two-thirds of these vacancies (22) were considered "judicial emergencies" by the Administrative office of the U.S. Courts because of high caseloads. Republicans blocked Clinton nominees who were waiting to be confirmed to 15 of these 22 “emergency” vacancies.
The Democratic-led Judiciary Committee held the first hearing for a Fifth Circuit nominee in seven years, the first hearings for Sixth Circuit nominees in almost five years, the first hearing for a Tenth Circuit nominee in six years, and the first hearings for Fourth Circuit nominees in three years.
Speaking of delays, why did Republicans block more than 50 Clinton judicial nominees by refusing to give them hearings or votes?
Republicans must know, but they' not talking. More than a dozen, well-qualified Clinton nominees had to wait over 500 days to be confirmed, including nine who waited over 700 days, four who waited over 900 days, two who waited over 1,000 days, and one, Richard Paez, who waited 1,520 days from nomination to confirmation.
Imagine that.....
posted by tbogg at 10:55 PM
|
Making short work of it....
I honestly expected to read Moonie Times columnist Suzanne Fields entire column about the anti-war protestors, but only got as far as this:
The worldwide antiwar movement hasn't accomplished much, but it has made George Bush and not Saddam Hussein the villain in certain European precincts. The demonstrators, who might have attacked Franklin D. Roosevelt instead of Adolf Hitler two generations ago, are looking through the wrong end of their binoculars. They're appealing to abstract notions of compassion instead of real issues of humanity.
To point out the obvious, once again:
The demonstrators, who might have attacked Franklin D. Roosevelt instead of Adolf Hitler two generations ago
No need to read anything she has to say after that....
posted by tbogg at 10:00 PM
|
Apropos of nothing...
The Pointless, Yet Poignant, Crisis of a Co-Ed
~~Dar Williams
I'm not a leader, i'm not a left-wing rhetoric mobilizing force of one,
But there was a time way back, many years ago in college, don't laugh,
But I thought I was a radical, I ran the Hemp Liberation Group with my boyfriend,
It was true love, with a common cause, and besides that, he was a Sagittarius.
We used to say that our love was like hemp rope, three times as strong as the rope that you buy domestically,
And we would bond in the face of oppression from big business and the deans,
But I knew there was a problem, every time the group would meet everyone would light up,
That made it difficult to discuss glaucoma and human rights, not to mention chemotherapy.
Well sometimes, life gives us lessons sent in ridiculous packaging,
And so I found him in the arms of a Student Against the Treacherous use of Fur,
And he gave no apology, he just turned to me, stoned out to the edge of oblivion,
He didn't pull up the sheets and I think he even smiled as he said to me,
"Well, I guess our dreams went up in smoke."
And I said, No, our dreams went up in dreams, you stupid pothead,
And another thing, what kind of a name is Students Against the Treacherous Use of Fur?
Fur is already dead, and besides, a name like that doesn't make a good acronym.
I am older now, I know the rise and gradual fall of a daily victory.
And I still write to my senators, saying they should legalize cannabis,
And I should know, cause I am a horticulturist, I have a husband and two children out in Lexington, Mass.
And my ex-boyfriend can't tell me I've sold out, because he's in a cult.
And he's not allowed to talk to me.
posted by tbogg at 8:23 PM
|
Saturday, March 01, 2003
At least John Ashcroft can start returning their calls....
"I'm sorry. The Beast isn't in. Can I take a number and have him call you back when he gets in from his date with Lynne Cheney?"
posted by tbogg at 10:06 PM
|
Sweetie....run down to the store and pick up mama's prescription....
You have to hand it to Florida....they're a special kind of stupid there:
Not long after school lets out, the cool and elegant home of Wayne LaRue Smith and Daniel Skahen, on a shady street near the historic district here, is transformed by the boisterous whoops of two boys.
They exclaim at a bee on the porch, at the lime tree in the backyard, at the consequences of mixing dirt with water. They jump in the pool and welcome a visitor's applause at each twisting fall and cannonball.
One is 5, the other 6; one white, the other of mixed race. They are bursting out of their skins with questions and energy.
Mr. Smith, a 47-year-old lawyer, and Mr. Skahen, a 36-year-old real estate broker, would like to adopt the boys, who have lived with them as foster children for about two years each. But they are a gay couple and Florida is the only state that forbids any adoption by a homosexual.
On Tuesday, a federal appeals court in Atlanta will hear their challenge to the law.
Gay people are the only group categorically restricted from adopting children in Florida. Even people who have abused drugs and alcohol or people who have a history of domestic violence may adopt under some circumstances.
Meet your new mom, boys...
posted by tbogg at 9:52 PM
|
Waving their little flags...
Look like the big Freeper rally in DC to support the war wasn't the big draw they thought it would be.
About 150 backers of President Bush's policy toward Iraq gathered in the gray, slushy cold near the Washington Monument yesterday to express support for U.S. military forces gathering in the Persian Gulf and to urge the prompt ouster of Saddam Hussein.
Former U.S. representative Robert K. Dornan (R-Calif.) and other speakers pilloried both Hussein -- whom Dornan dubbed a "mini-me Hitler" -- and the millions of protesters who have thronged Washington and other world capitals in recent months to oppose war in Iraq.
The Bush supporters countered with yellow "Don't Tread on Me" flags and signs calling for the liberation of Iraq. One man wearing a rubber Hussein mask held a sign that said, "Thank You Anti-War Protesters, Love, Saddam."
"We are the good guys," said Dornan, a former Air Force fighter pilot and longtime conservative firebrand. "Never again will we put up with this kind of person who tortures children in front of their parents."
Of the war protesters, Dornan said, "They were wrong during Vietnam, and they're wrong today." He also called Sen. John F. Kerry (D-Mass.), a candidate for president who fought in Vietnam and then led protests against it, "a Judas Catholic." Kerry has criticized Bush's handling of Iraq.
How sad is it when Great White can draw a bigger crowd than a rally to support Operation Inigo Montoya?
posted by tbogg at 9:35 PM
|
Wednesday, February 26, 2003
Out the porthole....down the rope...and onto the pier.
Glenn Hubbard has decided that he's done enough damage. Time to abandon ship.
Looks like he ran out on a $300 billion tab still sitting on the table.
posted by tbogg at 5:17 PM
|
Live from the AEI! It's the Bush Pie In The Sky Show.
In a nutshell. A superpower wants to go into a sovereign country and kill it's leader...and this will promote Democracy.
How did we ever come to be led by a smirking suit-monkey?
Don't answer that.....
posted by tbogg at 5:07 PM
|
Stuck inside of Florida with those California Blues again
Here I am, stuck in Delray Beach, which is truly God's waiting room (why don't they call it AARP City?) just working and hoping to get back home soon. I've been here since Sunday and have been out of the loop politically and socially. Here's what I have seen:
~~I got to see Ann Coulter (for the first time!) on Bill Maher's new HBO show last night. As I've mentioned before, I don't really watch TV, so this was my first exposure to the notorious man/woman. I can see why she isn't taken seriously; it's all schtick (as my new friends here in Florida might call it). She is no more a serious political commentator than Limbaugh or your average air conditioner repairman. She just throws shit out there (as Maher pointed out several times) as well as baldfaced lies (which Maher also pointed out), and then fails to back anything up, choosing instead to change the subject. I wouldn't call her a dumb blonde since she lacks their more endearing qualities. Just call her a wasp-y self-promoter who's closer to the end of her 15 minutes of fame than the beginning.
~~Looks like the press is finally starting to really ask questions about the cost of the war. About time....slackers.
~~I actually enjoyed seeing Ari Fleischer at work (also for the first time). You have to admire him in the same way that you can admire Pete Rose; a sleazy, reprehensible, slimeball who is good at a couple of things. In Ari's case it's lying & slithering around questions.
~~My flight from San Diego was full of Christian Missionaries going to Houston. Too bad the Rapture didn't happen. I could have used the leg room.
~~Why does anyone employ Margaret Carlson? She's a more moderate Mona Charen....and equally worthless.
~~Florida sucks
~~Dial-up sucks more
~~The Bush administration sucks the most.
I wanna go home.
posted by tbogg at 1:45 PM
|
Friday, February 21, 2003
Tbogg has left the building...
Since I have to leave town on a rare business trip, I don't expect that I will be blogging again until next weekend 3/1.
You'll get over it.
I will be in lovely Delray Beach, Florida for the duration...lucky me. Florida with a flight change in Houston. Proof that god hates atheists.
In the meantime please keep up to date by checking in with all the good folks in the Hot Links. Because someone has to keep an eye on President Cowardly Lyin'.
Now...a little song to fill your mind for the next 170+ hours. Everybody sing:
It's a world of laughter
A world of tears
It's a world of hopes
And a world of fears
There's so much that we share
That it's time we're aware
It's a small world after all
There is just one moon
And one golden sun
And a smile means
Friendship to ev'ryone
Though the mountains divide
And the oceans are wide
It's a small world after all
It's a small world after all
It's a small world after all
It's a small world after all
It's a small, small world
(repeat until you go insane....)
It's a small world after all
It's a small world after all
It's a small world after all
It's a small, small world...........
posted by tbogg at 9:29 PM
|
"You talkin' to me?"
One of the joys of writing a blog, besides the supermodels and non-stop oral sex, is looking at where my visitors come from. This one was a suprise, to say the least, until I looked at the lead article:
Pope hits out against sarcasm
Pope John Paul II described sarcasm as a modern form of martyrdom, suggesting a sarcastic person delights in "isolating the righteous with mockery and irony".
"We know that the persecutor does not always assume the violent and macabre countenance of the oppressor," he told this week's Wednesday audience at the Vatican.
The Pope's comments on sarcasm were part of a series of catechetical talks on the Psalms and Canticles of the Old Testament.
For those I have mocked and disparaged: the Virgin Ben, Steven Den Beste, Matt Hoy, Shania Twain, Michael Kelly, Charles Krauthammer, the Other Virgin Erika Harold*, everyone in Indiana, Andrew Sullivan, President t-Ball, the late Ronald Reagan, Scott Stapp, all the Freepers in Freepville, Glenn Reynolds, Jenna Bush and the other Bush twin, Howard Fineman, Mike Taylor the androgynous Senate candidate, and especially Peggy Noonan...
Welcome to martyrdom. Enjoy your stay.....
As for Lynne Cheney and Ann Coulter: here's a strap-on. Start to freakin'....
* Why does this picture not suprise me one bit.
posted by tbogg at 1:28 PM
|
Elsewhere....
Maru over at WTF has lots of good stuff up.
(thanks Kimberly)
and Nathan Newman points out that Big Brother eBay is watching you.
We don't make you show a subpoena, except in exceptional cases," Sullivan told his listeners. "When someone uses our site and clicks on the `I Agree' button, it is as if he agrees to let us submit all of his data to the legal authorities. Which means that if you are a law-enforcement officer, all you have to do is send us a fax with a request for information, and ask about the person behind the seller's identity number, and we will provide you with his name, address, sales history and other details - all without having to produce a court order. We want law enforcement people to spend time on our site," he adds. He says he receives about 200 such requests a month, most of them unofficial requests in the form of an email or fax.
The meaning is clear. One fax to eBay from a lawman - police investigator, NSA, FBI or CIA employee, National Park ranger - and eBay sends back the user's full name, email address, home address, mailing address, home telephone number, name of company where seller is employed and user nickname. What's more, eBay will send the history of items he has browsed, feedbacks received, bids he has made, prices he has paid, and even messages sent in the site's various discussion groups.
Now I really wish I hadn't bid on that Osama & The Pussycats lunch box.
posted by tbogg at 12:15 PM
|
Who says warbloggers don't have a sense of humor?
Stefan Sharkansky is just a stitch when it comes to topical humor. Prepare to have your sides split:
Most importantly, I am also organizing as a counter-protest a "Virtual March on Hollywood", where the virtual marchers send jars of mayonnaise to the various celebrity spokeshairdos for the Virtual March on Washington -- Janeane Garofalo, Martin Sheen, Mike Farrell, Anjelica Huston, et al
Why jars of mayonnaise? So these actors can refill their heads when they start to leak.
How did Def-Jam Comedy Night miss this guy?
I gotta go lay down.
posted by tbogg at 11:55 AM
|
Virtual March on Washington
Lisa over at Ruminate This has all you need to know about next weeks Virtual March on Washington.
Glenn Reynolds is advocating that people who support the war also fax that day. Works for me. The politicians should be so swamped with emails and faxes against the war, they won't be reading but a few, if any at all. Many pro-war messages will just get counted in with the anti-war.
posted by tbogg at 11:24 AM
|
Okay. This is just funny.
"Joe Millionaire" runnerup Sarah Kozer is fit to be tied over the way she was treated by the blockbuster TV reality show.
She said she and the other 20 women who flew to the French chateau where the show was taped were duped by the show's producer, who never even told them "there was going to be a guy there."
"I thought it was going to be 'Sex and the City' in France," said Kozer, 29, breaking her network-imposed silence from her home in Beverly Hills, Calif.
"The way [they described it], it was going to be 20 single, sophisticated women in France, looking for romance and adventure. Then, once we got there, [they said] 'Oh, it's going to be a dating show.' It was a setup from the get-go. We didn't know what we were getting into."
"20 single, sophisticated women " and Kozer.
"I'm hoping to do ... a cookbook, and [there's talk of] a reality cooking show," said Kozer, who has a broadcasting degree from George Mason University. "I've also had some hosting offers. I've got an audition with E! for a style show
Yup. Sounds about right.
Tonight on SarahStyle we discuss what to do when your underwire gives out.....
posted by tbogg at 10:55 AM
|
Letterman Top Ten
Top Ten Ways Dumb Guys Are Preparing For A Terrorist Attack
posted by tbogg at 10:47 AM
|
Not ready for the Catskills....
Ben Shapiro, still winded from writing that Poli-Sci paper " What Wall? The East German Appeasement Monkeys" has taken to writing a separate "lighter side" column called " straight from the hip" which is like the coolest title ever. In it, Ben shares the kind of humor those wacky college kids are into these days. Hey...he's trying, cut him some slack.
But I think he needs to explain this comment:
The other day, I watched the 1946 classic "The Best Years of Our Lives." Every patriot should see that movie. Rent it tonight.
I think that maybe he didn't understand the movie. It's not exactly a testament to the glory of war. Here's a synopsis:
The Best Years of Our Lives (1946) is producer Samuel Goldwyn's classic, significant American film about the difficult adjustments (unemployment, adultery, alcoholism, and ostracism) that three returning veteran servicemen experienced in the aftermath of World War II. Major stars (Fredric March, Dana Andrews, and WWII vet Russell), each giving the performances of their lives, are involved in three romances (with Myrna Loy, Virginia Mayo and Teresa Wright, and Cathy O'Donnell).
The germinal idea for the literate, meticulously-constructed film came from a Time Magazine pictorial article (August 1944) that was then re-fashioned into a novel titled Glory for Me by MacKinlay Kantor. Kantor's blank-verse novel was the basis for an adapted screenplay by distinguished Pulitzer Prize winning scriptwriter Robert E. Sherwood (his earlier works were The Petrified Forest and Idiot's Delight).
The ironic title refers to the troubling fact that many servicemen had 'the best years of their lives' in wartime, not in their experiences afterwards in peacetime America when they were forced to adapt to the much-changed demands and became the victims of dislocating forces. [Photographs in the houses of each of the returning servicemen recall an earlier time that was irretrievably past.] The poignant, moving film realistically transports its present-day audiences back to the setting of the late 1940s, where the film's three typical protagonists return from their honored wartime roles to their past, altered middle-American lives and are immediately thrust into domestic tragedies, uncertainties, conflicts and awkward situations - handicapped (both physically and emotionally) by their new civilian roles.
Yeah. I bet they're showing this to the troops on their way to Kuwait.....
Why is it, every time I write about Ben, I feel like I can hear Bobby Goldsborough singing "... me and God watching Scotty grow" in the background?
I apologize to all who now have that song stuck in their head.
posted by tbogg at 10:34 AM
|
The Bill Bennett "Well that's different" Award.
Charles Krauthammer, who has crushing self-esteem issues, is down on Chirac (meaning his fax machine and the fax machine at the RNC are both working) for bullying all those brand new countries that just showed up on the US doorstep, like Christopher Buckley's baby, and want Bush to be their daddy. You know, obscure little spots like Poland, Estonia, Romania, Lithuania...call them "New Europe".
The division between the New Europe (newly liberated Eastern Europe) and the Old Europe (centered on France and Germany) has long been visible. As the center of gravity of American influence in Europe has shifted east to the Iron Curtain countries, it is no accident, comrade, that the only state dinner President Bush has hosted (apart from the traditional one for the president of Mexico) was for the president of Poland.
Europe did not take to the streets against America last weekend; only Western Europe did. The streets of Eastern Europe were silent. The Poles, and their Eastern European neighbors, have an immediate personal experience of life under tyranny -- and of being liberated from that tyranny by American power. The French and their neighbors are six decades removed from their liberation. They think freedom is as natural as the air they breathe, rather than purchased at the price of blood -- American blood in no small measure.
This division in experience sets the stage for the division in politics. And for France's fury at finding an American fifth column in the New Europe. When 13 Eastern European states came out in support of the United States on Iraq, Chirac lost all reserve. His scolding of the Eastern Europeans has inadvertently demonstrated how much France's current dispute with the United States is not really about Iraq.
Sure, France has contracts and loans that will be jeopardized if Saddam Hussein is deposed. And French leaders may have dirty hands from dirty dealings that will show up when Hussein's archives are opened after a war.
Leaving aside the fact that the American Tourister luggage set full of bio-toxins sitting in Saddam's guestroom have 'D. Rumsfeld' on the luggage tags, Krauthammer (the irony of that name never fails to amuse me) fails to point out what each of these fledgling democracies has to offer in the war with Iraq...and what they are being offered for their support. Somehow I don't think that they are getting Turkey kind of money, but, like Turkey, they better get it in writing. Just ask Afghanistan or the NYC firemen.
The "New Europe" shouldn't be suprised after spending the evening with One Night Stand George if he never calls them again.
...and one more thing. Krauthammer writes:
France is reaching to become not only the leading power in Europe (hence the pique with those pesky Eastern Europeans) but also the leader of a new pole of world power opposite the American "hyperpower."
Not a bad vocation for a country whose closest brush with glory and empire today consists of patrolling the swamps of Ivory Coast.
Not to mention the botch job they did on Vietnam. Good thing we went in and cleaned up that mess.....
posted by tbogg at 10:05 AM
|
I only read it because Noonan was included....
Slate provides us with a list of, well, semi-famous people who are supposed to have a clue about politics and war and stuff to give their opinions regarding the upcoming war festivities. Mark Green is the most reasoned one and Tony Kushner seem the most passionate. This one is the only (intentional) funny one:
Ben Karlin is co-executive producer of The Daily Show With Jon Stewart.
Do I favor a U.S. invasion of Iraq? I am only in favor of war with Iraq if the entire affair takes place between the morning of February 21st and the evening of Sunday March 2nd. This is because The Daily Show will be on hiatus during this period, and, historically, massive loss of life has proven not conducive to producing a comedy news program. I would remind the president as he and his generals go about their plan that in a war, the first casualty is the ease of my job
posted by tbogg at 9:40 AM
|
"Sound science" is for the environment...this is about 'splodin stuff.
Digby has a link and comments on the rush to get the Missile Defense System up and going...even if it doesn't work, cause, you know, it might.
This is good news in case North Korea attacks us with mylar ballons with homing beacons attached to the strings...and they let us know that they are launching them...and its during the day....and we don't mind if a few of them get through.
Feel safer yet?
posted by tbogg at 9:14 AM
|
I'll say it...because nobody else will.
While the deaths of 54 85(!) 95(!!!) people at a night club in Rhode Island is tragic.... they were there to see Great White.
Yeah. Great White.
Let your inner music critic take it from there.....
(Added) Reader Matt Writes:
When the clock radio woke me up this morning, the first story was about this fire. And the first thing that came to mind after the initial shock of two nightclub disasters in one week was "Who knew there were still 54 Great White fans?"
I feel guilty when my inner cynic gets the best of me, but what can you do?
Notes from Atlanta also comments.
posted by tbogg at 9:03 AM
|
Well, I "signed on" ....but only to wave a flag from the curb...
Sullivan is slightly disturbed that the Bush Administration isn't any more a fan of democracy in Iraq, then they are at home.
But the administration needs to be put on notice by its supporters as well as its opponents. Many of us signed onto this war not merely to protect the West from terrorists with weapons of mass destruction, but as an attempt to grasp the nettle of Arab autocracy. If we make no effort to foster democratic institutions, the rule of law and representative government in Iraq, then we will lose the peace as surely as we will have won the Iraq war. And losing that peace means losing the wider war on terror as well.
Looks like Andy is starting to realize that he was promoted from "idiot" to "useful idiot" without his knowledge.
posted by tbogg at 8:55 AM
|
You try and fill three hours with Toby Keith
According to the Drudge Report (yeah...I know...) liberal media giant CBS is telling artists that they may get their microphone silenced if they attempt to make any anti-war comments during the Grammy's.
Top CBS executives are deeply concerned that Sunday night's GRAMMY Awards may turn from a celebration of music -- into a giant anti-war politically rally, the DRUDGE REPORT has learned.
The GRAMMY broadcast, which is set to air live from New York City, will feature performances by Eminem, Sheryl Crow, Springsteen, Coldplay, James Taylor and others.
Word has reached network suites how one star is allegedly planning a dramatic anti-war gesture.
"I would hope the artists will remember they are on stage because of their music," a top CBS source told the DRUDGE REPORT Friday morning.
The CBS executive warned microphones may be unplugged on Sunday night if live performances turn political.
"It, of course, is a final option [to cut the microphone.] But it's a very real option," said the top source, who demanded anonymity.
"There is a time for political commentary, this is not one of them!"
Although this may very well be a ploy to get people to watch the Grammy's to see what happens (let's face it...the Grammy's are crap), you have to wonder what CBS will do if an artist chooses to not make a comment during an acceptance speech, but instead, stops mid-song during a performance to make a statement? Will they pull the plug if Sheryl Crow switches in mid-song from "Soak Up the Sun" to "Masters of War"? I don't think so.
It would send a strong message if the somewhat independent-minded Dixie Chicks suprised CBS with a cover of Tracy Chapman's " Subcity".
That would be must-see-TV.
posted by tbogg at 8:48 AM
|
Thursday, February 20, 2003
Blogger is all screwed up
Sorry. I'll post again tomorrow.
posted by tbogg at 5:40 PM
|
I guess we're just supposed to shut up and take it...
Proving once again that there is some truth to the phrase "Those that can...do. Those that can't...teach", Prof. Reynolds gives us a lesson in cause and effect:
"PEACE" PROTESTS MAKE WAR MORE LIKELY:
BAGHDAD, Iraq, Feb. 19 -- President Saddam Hussein's government, apparently emboldened by antiwar sentiment at the U.N. Security Council and in worldwide street protests, has not followed through on its promises of increased cooperation with U.N. arms inspectors, according to inspectors in Iraq.
No Iraqi scientist involved in biological, chemical or missile technology has consented to a private interview with the inspectors since Feb. 7, the day before the two chief U.N. inspectors arrived here for talks with Iraqi officials. The United Nations also has not received additional documents about past weapons programs, despite the government's pledge to set up a commission to scour the country for evidence sought by the inspectors, U.N. officials said.
Useful idiots? Looks that way to me.
Reynolds can afford to be glib. I mean it's not as if terrorists will be retaliating against the US in Knoxville. Their beef is with western civilization, so I guess Cooter's Biscuit and Gun Emporium down on Kingston Pike is safe, what with the Cracker Barrel-Maginot line screening out all the “swarthy” types.
posted by tbogg at 1:18 PM
|
"...he is potentially very dangerous both for America and the world."
It ain't the guy with the mustache.
No More Mr Nice Blog directs us to this great column in the New York Observer by Will Hutton formerly of the London Observer:
These apprehensions may be mocked and derided by the American administration and its take-no-prisoners outriders, who dominate the American media and national conversation, but that does not mean that our fears are not genuine—or well-founded. The majority on the European street is extremely wary about the doctrine of pre-emptive, unilateral intervention and the willingness to disregard international law and the U.N. process if it produces the "wrong" results; but that doesn’t make us anti-American. Rather, we want America to be the better Europe that generations of European immigrants set out to make it, believing in the promise of a new continent with its Enlightenment Constitution and passionate commitment to opportunity, liberty and an equal chance.
posted by tbogg at 11:18 AM
|
Tens of Bush Supporters Take To the Streets In Support of the President
The unsinkable Betty Bowers
"You know, when you are sitting in your BVDs and holster before breakfast, reading hundreds of posts that say exactly what you had typed late last night, it is a real affirmation knowing that there are so many people who don't question the same things you don't," said Felix Willinghouse. "But to see almost five of my fellow Freepers care enough about what they are typing to actually show up to shout down the peacenik jerks was a real rush. I haven't been this choked up since my seven-year-old bludgeoned an effigy of Janet Reno with his scooter on our front lawn during all that mess over that little commie Cuban boy."
Better yet..here is an actual Freeper response:
This woman is a rude, crude, socially unacceptable, and even tacky liar.
2 posted on 02/20/2003 9:52 AM PST by Quilla
See? Reality is funnier.
posted by tbogg at 10:00 AM
|
Like clockwork
You can just about set your watch to it. Every time President Blown Surplus talks about the economy...the Dow gets droopier than Bob Dole's dick. Down 70 points.
President Bush, on a day that new government reports documented a troubled economy, argued Thursday that his multibillion-dollar tax cut plan would significantly improve the business outlook.
Bush traveled to Georgia not only to tout his stimulus plan but to single out Sen. Zell Miller, the only Senate Democrat who has come out in support of his economic proposals.'
"I agree with Zell, with this economic theory that when a person has more money in his pocket, they're likely to demand that somebody produce them a good or a service," he said. Miller, who accompanied the president to the stage stood alongside, applauding Bush's remarks.
As English speakers aound the world cringed, Miller noted that President Bush uses his mouth "purtier than a $20 whore".
Ari Fleischer had no comment...thankfully.
posted by tbogg at 9:39 AM
|
All shook down
Nitpicker invites us to a sing-along as we travel merrily, merrily down the road to destruction.
Julia over at Sysiphus Shrugged thinks that black leaders in Georgia are being boneheads...mainly because they are.
The Daily Kos points out that it looks like the White House has found a scapegoat for why they haven't been able to get their war on yet. One hint: he's no longer valuable since his credibility is in the crapper. Looks like Harry Belafonte was right after all.
Media Whores Online has been working overtime. Lots on the bashing of le French. When are the neo-cons going to start picking on China and Russia? And what about those money-grubbing Turks? When will we start getting the Midnight Express references?
Today's Doonesbury.
Tom Toles
Ann Telnaes
...and Andy Sullivan directs us to this highly amusing quote from Tina Brown, of all people:
Is it just the residue of fashion week that makes me wish there were more, or should I say any, gay men in the Bush Administration? At The Sunday Times in the Seventies one top editor used to shake his head when the paper became too humourlessly high-testosterone and say that what it needed that week was 'more pooftah power'. In lieu of outright womanhood — except for Condoleezza Rice, who crosses the gender barriers by becoming the most zealous enabler — perhaps an injection of androgyny could be brought to bear on diplomatic relations in this moment of crisis. The Bush crowd's only management style, like that of many who subscribe to the outmoded cult of America’s Toughest Bosses, is to unzip and thwack it on the table.
More from Brown:
The offence of it is enhanced by the fact that we know how unauthentic Bush is in this role of macho man. Unlike the war vet Powell, who never swaggers, he has no credentials for talking the tough talk.
And finally.....yesterday I bought my first $30 tank of gas. Just want to say to the oilmen who are in charge:
Thanks!..............................dickheads.
posted by tbogg at 8:36 AM
|
After the deluge...
Kevin Drum over at CalPundit asks some very good questions about the upcoming war (the one in Iraq, not to be confused with all the other ones that will be a part of the continuing re-election drive known as Operation Manhood).
Read the links....ponder his questions.
There'll be a test later, and you must show work....
posted by tbogg at 8:04 AM
|
Wednesday, February 19, 2003
Goodbye...soon
I admit it. I'm a geek for comic strips. Growing up I was a avid reader of comic books: Classics Illustrated, Batman, Fantastic Four, Silver Surfer, Flash, Green Lantern, all kinds. I wasn't a collector, I was a reader. I moved on to the little paperbacks of Peanuts, BC (back when it was funny), Tumbleweeds, and The Wizard of ID. As I hit high school it was Doonesbury strips and the books that soon followed. Then there was the late great Bloom County, taken from us too soon. But I have always read the comic strips in the paper. From the greatest of them all, Calvin and Hobbes, to the high school bizarro-world of Gil Thorpe (which is now too painful to even glance at these days). These days popular favorites like Dilbert, Baby Blues, and Foxtrot mix with more obscure regional favorites like Sherman's Lagoon, Pooch Cafe (I luv Pooch Cafe), and The Duplex. Hell, I even read Family Circus even though it makes me cringe and causes my eyes to bleed. Comic strips are the comfort food of reading. They make us laugh, they make us put them up on the refrigerator or on a cubicle wall, and sometimes they even make us think about our lives and our family and what is is to grow up and to grow old.
Which brings me to this report of the imminent demise of a strip that has done all of the good things that I believe that the creator set out to do: For Better or for Worse.
She was raised in British Columbia, where her parents ran a jewelry store. Her mother "should have been a career woman," Johnston said, while her father was the more gregarious of the two and found it easier to deal with children. "You couldn't have put two more unlikely individuals together, yet they were devoted to each other." They died only a few months apart.
"I respected my parents. They were talented, resourceful and kind," Johnston said, yet they were two people whom she "didn't really love."
Contrast that with Johnston's loving but realistic portraits of the Patterson family — Elly, John and their kids Michael, Elizabeth and April — and their extended circle of friends and relations. Her humorous, often touching style has struck a chord with millions of readers. "For Better or for Worse" appears in more than 2,000 newspapers worldwide, including The Seattle Times, and is translated into several languages.
But the end is near for the 24-year-old strip. Well, maybe not "near," but in sight. Johnston plans to end the strip in four years, when her contract with distribution syndicate United Media runs out. She then intends to write a book to tie up the loose ends and reveal what happens to her characters.
"I'm ready to wrap up the strip and end it because all things come to an end," Johnston said in a phone interview. She also wants to avoid dealing with production deadlines when she's in her 60s.
Unlike many strips, the characters in FBFW have grown up (no arrested development like Family Circus, here), they have had parents and pets pass away, children move out and start families of their own. The main characters have grown older and have shown us that you never stop having growing pains; that they are a permanent condition of life. A teenaged boy came out...and was rejected by his mother. A daughter has her heart broken. A lonely widower moves in with a widow and starts a new life. In FBFW things happen like that, life is lived and time rushes by.
That's why I love For Better or For Worse, and I'm going to miss it when it goes away, probably in a lot of the same ways that the Patterson's miss their beloved dog Farley; because he had become an indispensable part of the family.
posted by tbogg at 10:00 PM
|
"...not to mention a lack of representation by squinty-eyed ideologues..."
They brought out the armas grandes for El Topo Miguel Estrada today. Well, at least the biggest guns a lily-white party that is trying to play the racecard can muster. Featuring a Hispanic Republican Senato---whoops they don't have one of those. Okay, featuring a Hispanic Republican Congressma--- uh oh. Okay, they dug up some guy named Robert de Posada of The Latino Coalition to be the front man.
"This is a very serious issue for our community and no politician can take this quietly."
Race pimp.
Anyway, apparently Mr. de Posada was unfamiliar with Jorge Rangel, Enrique Moreno, and Christine Arguello. Perhaps this will refresh his memory:
Some Senate Republicans have attempted to dismiss concerns about Mr. Estrada’s nomination. Senator Rick Santorum said at a pro-Estrada rally, “`This is Clarence Thomas all over again. If you're conservative and a minority, they hate you.’” Suggesting that Mr. Estrada’s ethnicity has anything to do with concerns over this nomination ignores the Republicans’ own history in blocking highly capable Hispanic nominees during the Clinton years. Fifth Circuit nominees Jorge Rangel and Enrique Moreno, both rated Well Qualified by the American Bar Association, and 10th Circuit nominee Christine Arguello never received hearings under the Republican-controlled Senate, and it took the Senate a record four years to confirm Richard Paez to the 9th Circuit. In the case of Paez, 31 Republican Senators voted to indefinitely postpone the final vote on his nomination, including then-Senator Ashcroft, Senators Lott and Santorum, and current Judiciary Committee members Brownback, DeWine, Grassley, McConnell, Sessions, and Thurmond, all of whom ultimately voted against his confirmation.
Debe haber deslizado su mente. Cómo suprising!
posted by tbogg at 8:30 PM
|
Threat assessments, geo-political ramifications, and that long-haired guy who got all the ass back in college.
Good to see that President Frat House is using his best judgement when it comes to understanding the millions who are demonstrating against Operation Inigo Montoya. According to Royal Court Fellator, Howard Fineman, the Cheerleader King is having college flashbacks:
Images of global demonstrations against war with Iraq linger in the minds of heads of state and talking heads: millions of citizens marching in the name of peace in streets from London and Glasgow to Rome and Tokyo. But I can tell you that the marchers impressed President George W. Bush, too. They convinced him — if he needed more convincing — that he is surely on the right course in confronting Saddam Hussein.
Shaped by the Yale of the ’60s and by his own father’s career, the president views the demonstrators as weak-willed moral relativists, afraid to take on — as only faith-filled and freedom-loving leaders can — forces of evil on earth.
The president’s stark, black-and-white outlook stems from many sources, among them his Bible-centered faith, his success at quitting drinking “cold turkey,” his upbringing on the playgrounds of West Texas and the fierce sense of mission he found on the morning of 9/11/01.
But his view of the wider world was shaped as much by Yale as by anything else. The New Haven of the mid-’60s was divided into two cultural worlds, and Bush knew only one of them. He was a fraternity man — a fraternity leader, in fact — who had little sympathy or contact with the “other side” of the campus, the portion then helping to nurture a radical “Black Power” crusade and the potent antiwar student protests of the late Vietnam years.
Bush was a loyal son (his dad was a prowar member of Congress), a defender of the Old Social Order at Yale (though Bush himself was utterly without its preppy snobbery, racism or anti-Semitism) and a proud DKE who saw the increasingly dominant liberals on campus as pretentious hypocrites (because, he said, many “radicals” had trust funds). Above all, they were that species most despised by the frat house world: intellectual show-offs.
....meaning people who could speak in sentences of more than twelve words, and no, "uh" doesn't count as a word.
Anyway, there you have it. Untroubled by the fears of a world that believes that he is about to start World War III, Bush harkens back to the day when American students were protesting the Vietnam war, while he was concerned with more important issues such as how many pimento-stuffed olives a pledge had to have shoved up his butt before he could become a DKE.
My confidence in him has never been higher. Really.
posted by tbogg at 7:37 PM
|
America Shrugged
Many politicians have come into office inspired by great books, great deeds, a commitment to public service, or a vision of a better tomorrow. With this Administration's disdain for foreign relations, Rumsfeld's criticism of "Old Europe", and now the desire to start building new improved nuclear weapons in violation of established arms treaties, we have to ask: what is it that has inspired the George W. Bush Administration to take these bold steps? On what new road have they taken us that we may obtain the fulfillment of our Manifest Destiny?
Michael Tomasky, over at Altercation, submits that is is based on a document called the Defense Planning Guidance written back in the spring of 1992.
The document described for the first time the Cheneyite vision for America’s role in the post-Cold War world. It spelled out a policy toward the rest of the world, even our allies, that was far more unilateral and belligerent than anything that any postwar American president, Ronald Reagan included, had ever envisioned.
It said that the United States had to be, as Colin Powell put it at the time, “the bully on the block.” This meant that other nations would have to understand that it’s our world, they’re just living in it; no other superpower could even think about emerging; collective action was rejected (NATO won a partial exemption here, but only partial) in favor of “ad hoc assemblies, often not lasting beyond the crisis being confronted”; preventive military action would prove necessary, somewhere, just to make the point that it was our prerogative to do so (the DPG mentioned Poland, Lithuania, the Philippines, North Korea, and Iraq); and more. The writing of the document was overseen by Paul Wolfowitz.
Evidence suggests that the guiding philosophy goes back much further; all the way back in the spring of 1972 during the Nixon Administration. A mere few months before the infamous Watergate break-in, an obscure Californian penned a treatise contained in a folio entitled " Sail Away" that suggested a bold vision of a dominant America astride the planet and brooking no dissent. Daring, yet succinct, it has provided a roadmap for the men of this administration who were just coming of age at the time of its publication.
Published under the title " Political Science", we can see how captivating its siren call must be to these strong-willed and passionately focused men we call "our leaders":
*****
No one likes us
I don't know why.
We may not be perfect
But heaven knows we try.
But all around even our old friends put us down.
Let's drop the big one and see what happens.
We give them money
But are they grateful?
No they're spiteful
And they're hateful.
They don't respect us so let's surprise them;
We'll drop the big one and pulverize them.
Now Asia's crowded
And Europe's too old.
Africa's far too hot,
And Canada's too cold.
And South America stole our name.
Let's drop the big one; there'll be no one left to blame us.
Bridge:
We'll save Australia;
Don't wanna hurt no kangaroo.
We'll build an all-American amusement park there;
They've got surfing, too.
Well, boom goes London,
And boom Paris.
More room for you
And more room for me.
And every city the whole world round
Will just be another American town.
Oh, how peaceful it'll be;
We'll set everybody free;
You'll have Japanese kimonos, baby,
There'll be Italian shoes for me.
They all hate us anyhow,
So let's drop the big one now.
Let's drop the big one now.
posted by tbogg at 3:29 PM
|
Meanwhile, in cockfighting news...
Looks like Richard Perle and Paul Wolfowitz are going to go to the front lines and fight for America's freedom.
posted by tbogg at 2:16 PM
|
...and don't forget your Ranger Ridge™ Decoder Rings too.
Lucky-to-have-a-job Tom Ridge has some handy tips for your Surviving Dubya's Reign of Error goodie bag.
Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge on Wednesday unveiled a national campaign to advise families on what they can do to protect themselves against terrorism, urging vigilance because terrorists “seek to turn our neighborhoods into battlefields.”
“TERRORISTS FORCE us to make a choice. We can be afraid, or we can be ready,” Ridge said in a speech in Cincinnati, a city he hailed as a model for how it has prepared for terrorist attacks.
Dubbed the Ready Campaign, it will include television ads advising Americans how to prepare for the worst. The ads don’t have a single catch phrase, although most of them include the words, “Be ready” and “Arm yourself with information.”
Other phrases to be used include:
"Whoops! We misunderestimated them...again"
"Are you ready for the Rapture?"
"But Condi said she didn't think they would do that"
"Laura has the car keys. Get off of the road...NOW!"
"It wouldn't hurt to buy a share of Halliburton, just in case, y'know."
and
"Stock up on plenty of mixers. You never know when Jenna will drop by"
posted by tbogg at 2:01 PM
|
It's a good thing Blogger is free.
I couldn't get on all day. I thought they were bought by Google, not Microsoft.
Anyway...I love this post over at Digby's place:
It’s too late to be wondering whether this amateur hour of a foreign policy team is capable of handling so many crises’ at the same time, seeing as they “don’t even like to travel.” And the fact that they “spend so much time infighting over policy” is a direct result of not having a real President who guides policy, but one who is guided by whomever is in favor or has his ear at a given time.
It is too late to be wondering whether a party that would spend 100 million dollars to install a callow, empty suit like George W. Bush as President of the United States purely because he had “brand name recognition” is serious enough and smart enough to be leading this country into war. It certainly appears that the rest of the world is very, very nervous about the caliber of our leadership.
Go read the whole thing.
posted by tbogg at 1:47 PM
|
Tuesday, February 18, 2003
Well, at least he's off of Howell Raine's ass....
Poor Andy Sullivan. He's only one man, but now he has to take on both the New York Times and the BBC (or as he calls it: The Baghdad Broadcasting Corporation...lol, bump, ping). Four rambling posts that point out that...the BBC doesn't agree with him. I did enjoy the treatment given to Tony Blair by a BBC interviewer:
*******************
TONY BLAIR: Well I can assure you I've said every time I'm asked about this, the [sanctions] have contained [Saddam] up to a point and the fact is the sanctions regime was beginning to crumble, it's why ... we had a whole series of negotiations about tightening the sanctions regime but the truth is the inspectors were put out of Iraq so -
JEREMY PAXMAN: They were not put out of Iraq, Prime Minister, that is just not true. The weapons inspectors left Iraq after being told by the American government that bombs will be dropped on the country.
TONY BLAIR: I'm sorry, that is simply not right. What happened is that the inspectors told us that they were unable to carry out their work, they couldn't do their work because they weren't being allowed access to the sites. They detailed that in the reports to the Security Council. On that basis, we said they should come out because they couldn't do their job properly.
JEREMY PAXMAN: That wasn't what you said, you said they were thrown out of Iraq -
TONY BLAIR: Well they were effectively because they couldn't do the work they were supposed to do
JEREMY PAXMAN: No, effectively they were not thrown out of Iraq, they withdrew.
TONY BLAIR: No I'm sorry Jeremy, I'm not allowing you to get away with that, that is completely wrong. Let me just explain to you what happened.
JEREMY PAXMAN: You've just said the decision was taken by the inspectors to leave the country. They were therefore not thrown out.
TONY BLAIR: They were effectively thrown out for the reason that I will give you
**********************
Can you imagine President Thin Skin actually sitting down with a reporter for a chat like this?
No. I can't either...
posted by tbogg at 11:56 PM
|
General Powell's Coalition of the Lemmings
Looks like Colin Powell did a real bang-up job at the UN:
Nation after nation from all parts of the globe demanded weapons inspectors have a chance to disarm Iraq peacefully, defying intentions by the United States and Britain to seek a resolution authorizing war.
Only Australia, Japan, Argentina and Peru, in varying degrees, supported the tough U.S.-British position during 27 presentations on Tuesday by U.N. members who do not have seats on the 15-nation Security Council. Another 29 ambassadors address the council on Wednesday.
But most speakers, many from developing nations in Asia, Africa and Latin America as well as Iraq's neighbors in the Middle East, spoke out against war and backed France's position to let arms inspectors have more time to account for Baghdad's weapons of mass destruction programs.
So did Greece, New Zealand, Ukraine and Belarus.
South Africa's U.N. ambassador, Dumisani Kumalo, head of the 115-member Non-Aligned movement, which called for the meeting, said that "Resorting to war without fully exhausting all other options represents an admission of failure by the Security Council in carrying out its mandate."
Iran's ambassador, Javad Zarif, whose country was invaded by neighboring Iraq in 1980, said "the prospect of another destabilizing war in our immediate vicinity is a nightmare scenario of death and destruction."
Zarif said that war would produce "the prospect of appointing a foreign military commander to run an Islamic and Arab country is all the more destabilizing and only indicative of prevailing delusions."
posted by tbogg at 11:45 PM
|
Oh Crap....
More nukes is good nukes for the warmongers in power.
The Bush administration is planning a secret meeting in August to discuss the construction of a new generation of nuclear weapons, including "mini-nukes", "bunker-busters" and neutron bombs designed to destroy chemical or biological agents, according to a leaked Pentagon document.
The meeting of senior military officials and US nuclear scientists at the Omaha headquarters of the US Strategic Command would also decide whether to restart nuclear testing and how to convince the American public that the new weapons are necessary.
The leaked preparations for the meeting are the clearest sign yet that the administration is determined to overhaul its nuclear arsenal so that it could be used as part of the new "Bush doctrine" of pre-emption, to strike the stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons of rogue states.
Greg Mello, the head of the Los Alamos Study Group, a nuclear watchdog organisation that obtained the Pentagon documents, said the meeting would also prepare the ground for a US breakaway from global arms control treaties, and the moratorium on conducting nuclear tests.
"It is impossible to overstate the challenge these plans pose to the comprehensive test ban treaty, the existing nuclear test moratorium, and US compliance with article six of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty," Mr Mello said
Think about this...They want to have "tactical nukes" so they can "pre-emptively" attack sovereign countries who might just have weapons like...the United States. Forget about an American Empire in the Middle East. That's kid's stuff. This is world domination.
And it gets worse:
The panel would also contemplate the "requirements for low-yield weapons, EPWs [earth-penetrating weapons], enhanced radiation weapons, agent defeat weapons".
This is the menu of weapons being actively considered by the Pentagon. Low-yield means tactical warheads of less than a kiloton, "mini-nukes", which advocates of the new arsenal say represent a far more effective deterrent than the existing huge weapons, because they are more "usable".
"Usable".
The Bush administration has been working to reduce the amount of warning the test sites in the western US desert would need to be reactivated after 10 years lying dormant.
One more time...Thanks Ralph....you assclown.
posted by tbogg at 11:22 PM
|
Yeah, sure...and I want a pony...
For all of his world travels and reputation for expertise when it comes to reporting on foreign relations/policy you have to wonder how Thomas Friedman manages to remain so naive. He's honest enough to make the following observation:
Tell people the truth. Saddam does not threaten us today. He can be deterred. Taking him out is a war of choice — but it's a legitimate choice. It's because he is undermining the U.N., it's because if left alone he will seek weapons that will threaten all his neighbors, it's because you believe the people of Iraq deserve to be liberated from his tyranny, and it's because you intend to help Iraqis create a progressive state that could stimulate reform in the Arab/Muslim world, so that this region won't keep churning out angry young people who are attracted to radical Islam and are the real weapons of mass destruction.
That's the case for war — and it will require years of occupying Iraq and a simultaneous effort to defuse the Israeli-Palestinian conflict to create a regional context for success. If done right, such a war could shrink Al Qaeda's influence — but Al Qaeda is a separate enemy that will have to be fought separately, and will remain a threat even if Saddam is ousted.
Then he goes all "wish-upon-a-star":
Some of this we can't control. But some we can, which is why it's time for the Bush team to shape up — dial down the attitude, start selling this war on the truth, give us a budget that prepares the nation for a war abroad, not a party at home, and start doing everything possible to create a global context where we can confront Saddam without the world applauding for him.
The Bush Administration has had months to do any and all of this, but they haven't, and they won't, because they don't think they have to. Besides, that would mean admitting that the Cheney-Rice-Powell-Rumsfeld Axis of Incompetence have been leading us down a two-year boondoggle. Those four wasted the world's sympathy following 9/11 by exhibiting every possible facet of ugly-Americanism: arrogance, thoughtlessness, bullying, anti-intellectualism, self-righteousness, and provincial religiosity. Let's face it; they have been mirroring the best attributes of the Boy Emperor.
So Tom Friedman had best disabuse himself of hoping for a change for the better. The Bush Administration can no more change its spots than George Bush can change the yellow stripe down his back.
(Added)
Andy Sullivan mentions the Friedman column and makes this statement:
IS CHIRAC BUSH'S FAULT? Tom Friedman seems to think so. I wish I thought that the visceral hostility of Chirac and Schroder were a function of George Bush's bad diplomacy. But I fear their positions would be the same whatever president was in power, if he were trying to accomplish the magnitude of what Bush is aiming for in the war on terror.
Whoa there, Prince of Provincetown....
"whatever President was in power"?
If another President were in power, say the guy who got more votes, we wouldn't be beating the wardrums about Iraq. Last I heard, Saddam never made an attempt on the late Sen. Gore.
Oh, and as for this:
And does Friedman think Colin Powell's ceaseless efforts around the globe were window-dressing?
See this
Window-dressing would be putting a positive spin on it. After last week, Powell's credibility is approaching Michael Jackson territory.
posted by tbogg at 10:30 PM
|
Cut it out! I'm being serious here..really.
Global analyst, Howell Raines scourge, and Pet Shop Boys aficionado Andy Sullivan noted this the other day:
A WASTE OF SPACE: Reading Maureen Dowd's characteristically inane column today, I asked myself once again why, at this moment of gravity and importance, a major American columnist has simply nothing to say, except occasional lame pop-cultural associations and a superficial account of the views of others. I'm not the only one.
Here's Andy during today's moment of gravity and importance:
SHOW US THE PHALLUS!: In an encouraging sign of non-p.c.-ness (what a word), Harvard students busied themselves over the weekend building a large penis out of snow. It was quite a work of art, apparently, and was featured in the Crimson, under the headline, 'Winter Wonder." But now the photo is nowhere in the web and the usual suspects are "offended." A letter-writer to the Crimson wondered whether the Crimson would ever show a photo of a snowy vagina. I think this deep and troubling issue cannot be fully understood or debated until we actually have a picture online of the great white monster, don't you? C'mon, fellow Harvardians. Post it!
I guess we should give Andy the benefit of the doubt and assume that he wishes to enlighten us with his views on both political correctness and the anti-phallocentrism permeating our leftward-leaning institutes of higher education in this era of deep seriousness and rising Islamo-fascism.
Or he just wants to see the big snow dick...
I report...you deride.
posted by tbogg at 1:54 PM
|
Ready for a good shearing...
Ann Telnaes
(thanks Kim)
posted by tbogg at 1:17 PM
|
Too bad ctrl+alt+delete doesn't cause regime change at home.
War for dummies
(thanks Chris)
posted by tbogg at 1:10 PM
|
We'd like to leave no child behind...but we're using that money to buy a friend.
The Bush administration's plans for a northern front against Iraq reached a critical point today, as Turkish leaders ruled out a deal to allow American combat troops to use their country without agreement first on a multibillion dollar economic aid package.
With time running out, a senior Turkish official said the government would present its final offer to American diplomats tonight. If the Bush administration agreed to the proposal, the official said, Parliament would probably vote this week to allow American combat troops to use the country as a base against Iraq.
If the Americans rejected the offer, the official said, Turkish leaders would decline to put the question to Parliament this week. In all likelihood, the Turkish official said, such a decision would mean that the American plans for a northern front from Turkey would be all but dead.
[snip...]
A senior Bush administration official said American aides told the Turks that the White House's offer of $26 billion — $6 billion in grants and $20 billion in loans — was "final."
Turkey requested more than twice that sum, the official said, but President Bush made clear that he would go no higher and that time for the Turks to make a decision was short.
Obvious question: wouldn't it just be cheaper to offer Saddam a billion dollars to go away? The we could use another, say, $5 billion to buy Bush some manhood, and we would be $20 billion ahead.
Oh yeah. And a bunch of people would still be alive....
posted by tbogg at 10:55 AM
|
Where can we get us one of those "leaders"?
George W. Bush who spent most of his younger days in a drunken stupor, who dodged the draft by going into the National Guard, and then proceeded to desert, and who became our first appointed President with the help of his father's friends had this to say today about why he is still going to go to war:
"Size of protest, it's like deciding, 'Well I'm going to decide policy based up on a focus group.' The role of a leader is to decide policy based upon the security - in this case - security of the people."
Then again, a leader would make a case for going to war which Bush and his bumbling, stumbling Administration have completely failed to do. This ignorant, brain-damaged frat boy is about to plunge the country into a war that may see countless American soldiers killed or wounded, that will surely result in an increase in terrorism against American citizens both here and abroad, that will further destroy an American economy already reeling from his mis-administration, and that will serve as a pretext for the further erosion of our freedoms.
George Bush is killing America.
posted by tbogg at 10:06 AM
|
Monday, February 17, 2003
I know that Saddam and Osama sound a lot alike....
Why exactly is it that the warbloggers can't figure out that Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11? I really hesitate to link to some of the "take that hill, hoo-yah" hyperbole that comes so naturally from those who will be watching the war front-row-center on Fox news, with a Zima in one hand and a box of Screaming Yellow Zonkers in the other, but this is so over the top that I thought it was fairly amusing in a watching-the-guy-in-the-wifebeater-tank-on- COPS kinda way.
We're in a war at the moment, a war that might get very very ugly before its over, but nevertheless the consequences of NOT fighting it are very likely to be even WORSE.
And we're the only damn CO on the planet. Or, at the very least, the only nation capable of backing up our claim to the rank, a rank that we never asked for in the first place.
But we're on Omaha Beach right now, pinned down by enemy machinegun fire from the bunkers up ahead, watching our fellow soldiers being cut down by the Grim Reaper while we cower behind the obstacles on the beach, every logical fibre of our being screaming to us to keep hugging the ground rather than advancing into the killing fields ahead.
But deep within, at the back of our minds and as a result of our training, we KNOW that if we don't knock out those positions up ahead, we'll all end up dead sooner or later, so it's up to us or somebody else to stand up and cry "who wants to live forever?, ON ME!" and charge up towards the sea wall.
And we're the only ones likely to take the initiative. If we do, the rest will get the message and follow, but if we wait for somebody else to jump of first, we're likely to get disappointed... And dead...
It's time to put our mouthes(sic) where our money is, to show the world why we're the strongest nation on Earth and to leave them to either follow or piss off into infamy as the filthy cowards they are.
U-S-A! U-S-A! U-S-A! (....repeat until all logical thought and facts are just misty water-colored memories of the people we were....)
posted by tbogg at 11:34 PM
|
Selling the war.
Paul Krugman takes on the media, particularly cable news:
What would someone watching cable news have seen? On Saturday, news anchors on Fox described the demonstrators in New York as "the usual protesters" or "serial protesters." CNN wasn't quite so dismissive, but on Sunday morning the headline on the network's Web site read "Antiwar rallies delight Iraq," and the accompanying picture showed marchers in Baghdad, not London or New York.
Krugman's assertion is that the networks who see the war as inevitable are selling it as their patriotic duty. Let me add my cynical voice in agreement, but also add that it's also about ratings. CNN's glory days harken back to the forst Gulf War and they would love to see those numbers again. As for Fox...they'd show America's Funniest Lynchings if they thought they could get a 24 share.
posted by tbogg at 10:31 PM
|
Disturbing...but not too suprising.
New York Times.
Overall the entire article is disturbing in that, with all that is discussed within it, the Administration is still is rushing headlong into war. But I've underlined something that I thought was illuminating in the way it was phrased by authors David Sager and Thom Shanker:
Senior Bush administration officials are for the first time openly discussing a subject they have sidestepped during the buildup of forces around Iraq: what could go wrong, and not only during an attack but also in the aftermath of an invasion.
Secretary of Defense Donald H. Rumsfeld has a four- to five-page, typewritten catalog of risks that senior aides say he keeps in his desk drawer. He refers to it constantly, updating it with his own ideas and suggestions from senior military commanders, and discussing it with President Bush.
His list includes a "concern about Saddam Hussein using weapons of mass destruction against his own people and blaming it on us, which would fit a pattern," Mr. Rumsfeld said. He said the document also noted "that he could do what he did to the Kuwaiti oil fields and explode them, detonate, in a way that lost that important revenue for the Iraqi people."
That item is of particular concern to administration officials' postwar planning because they are counting on Iraqi oil revenues to help pay for rebuilding the nation.
As I read this, they are "particularly" concerned about losing the oil revenues than they are about Hussein using weapons of mass destruction against his own people, and even then they're only concerned with being blamed for it.
Oh, wait...Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld, Don Evans....never mind. Nothing too suprising here...
posted by tbogg at 9:54 PM
|
"This is Ashleigh Banfield reporting...from The Rhumba Room at the Kuwait Hilton"
Look's like a good time to stock up on bush jacket futures and world-weary expressions. The journalists are coming...the journalists are coming....:
For the first time since World War II and on a scale never before seen in the American military, journalists covering any United States attack on Iraq will have assigned slots with combat and support units and accompany them throughout the conflict
[snip...]
According to a Pentagon document outlining some of the rules of journalistic engagement, reports of live, continuing action cannot be released without the permission of the commanding officer.
There will be strict prohibitions on any reporting of future operations or postponed or canceled operations, the document further states. The date, time and place of military action, as well as the outcomes of mission results, can be described only in general terms. Other ground rules remain to be spelled out.
Yet both the Pentagon and news executives welcomed the initiative. It is a sharp about-face from the restrictive news policies the Pentagon has maintained since the Vietnam War, which to many commanders showed the psychological perils of broadcasting a war into the nation's living rooms. In the Persian Gulf war, for example, only pool reporters were given regular front-line access.
"Psychological perils"....Americans dying, civilians dying, destruction, horror...You know. War stuff. Reality.
Only, to the XBox generation, you can't hit restart on your controller, and a dead child or woman is neither "collateral damage" nor free. They're just dead.
***********
A good resource for excellent war reportage from that era of "psychological perils" is Library of America's Reporting Vietnam vols. I & II. Among other pieces it contains Michael Herr's complete Dispatches.
posted by tbogg at 9:39 PM
|
Lyrically speaking
I thought I would put this up before Norah Vincent does and tries to claim it as her own
Lives in the Balance
I've been waiting for something to happen
For a week or a month or a year
With the blood in the ink of the headlines
And the sound of the crowd in my ear
You might ask what it takes to remember
When you know that you've seen it before
Where a government lies to a people
And a country is drifting to war
And there's a shadow on the faces
Of the men who send the guns
To the wars that are fought in places
Where their business interest runs
On the radio talk shows and the T.V.
You hear one thing again and again
How the U.S.A. stands for freedom
And we come to the aid of a friend
But who are the ones that we call our friends--
These governments killing their own?
Or the people who finally can't take any more
And they pick up a gun or a brick or a stone
There are lives in the balance
There are people under fire
There are children at the cannons
And there is blood on the wire
There's a shadow on the faces
Of the men who fan the flames
Of the wars that are fought in places
Where we can't even say the names
They sell us the President the same way
They sell us our clothes and our cars
They sell us every thing from youth to religion
The same time they sell us our wars
I want to know who the men in the shadows are
I want to hear somebody asking them why
They can be counted on to tell us who our enemies are
But they're never the ones to fight or to die
And there are lives in the balance
There are people under fire
There are children at the cannons
And there is blood on the wire
-Jackson Browne
(c) 1986 SWALLOW TURN MUSIC, ASCAP
posted by tbogg at 9:17 PM
|
This "snow" that you speak of..it is white, yes?
As a native born San Diegan, and having never lived anywhere else, I look at those pictures of the east socked in snow and wonder how you folks who dwell in those parts live with something like that. We get two inches of rain here and panic sets in. Barry over at bloggy makes the snow seem so damn pretty.
Hang in there everyone...
.
posted by tbogg at 8:48 PM
|
Wimpy candy-assed coating outside, chewy ass-kicking Teamster inside...
Much has been written today about Rod Dreher's comments quoted in the Moonie Times:
National Review's Rod Dreher was around Grand Central Station in New York on Saturday after the anti-war demonstration ended, and he did not like what he saw.
"I grant that there are morally serious people against the war. I just didn't see any of them today. This is what I saw: a child whose parents hung a poster around her neck that read: 'More candy and ice cream/less war and bigotry.' I'm not making that up.
"I also saw this slogan on a poster: 'The Iraqi people need our love, not our bombs.' Ooh yeah, and mean people are bad," Mr. Dreher writes in the Corner on the magazine's Web site.
But that was not the worst of it.
"I also saw a woman carrying a poster that had an image of President Bush with a Hitler mustache drawn on.
"I nearly lost it over that. What kind of decent person would have anything to do with a movement that likened the president of the United States to a genocidal mass murderer?
"Just to see them walking the street is to put oneself in touch with one's inner Teamster."
Fortunately Dreher's anger management skills kept him from beating up a woman (looks like Morgan Pillsbury fell in with the wrong guy...), but then again, this is the incredible fearsome Mr. Dreher. Jeez, he makes Justin Timberlake seem awfully butch.
It looks to me that, even if Dreher tag-teamed with compatriot Christian film critic Michael Medved, they'd be hard pressed to beat up a 12 year-old blind girl.
posted by tbogg at 5:54 PM
|
Ich bin ein Ashcroftian...
Digby has a link and a few words to say about the Justice Department under John "Does goose-stepping count as dancing?" Ashcroft.
posted by tbogg at 4:20 PM
|
The Laura-Bush-Well-Groomed-No-Terrorism-All-Clear-Alert
There is much in Peggy Noonan's latest to make fun of: reading people's minds (again), assumptions about how people are going about their lives:
Something that is happening is that the leaders of networks and the executive producers of shows and the managing editors of magazines are all fully aware that they set the tone for their organization. The young look to them for cues and clues. So they kiss the wife or husband goodbye and hug the kids and leave the house in the morning wondering if today is the terrible day and they won't get home again. Then they get into work and lounge against the wall in front of their office as if this is a snoozy Tuesday in August. They glide through the halls making jokes and referring to plans for the big summer meeting in July. They're cool as a cuke for the kids in the hall.
but this is my favorite:
Wednesday I was in town for a lunch for Laura Bush, who had been invited to the mauve walled dining room of Good Housekeeping magazine to speak about literacy. About halfway through her speech there came from the streets a howl of sudden sirens, and no one moved or altered his expression. Mrs. Bush continued talking.
I looked at my watch: 1:37 pm. I wondered if the journalists around me were going through the same thought-stream I was. 1. Oh no, is this the trouble? 2. I'm with the first lady at a dramatic moment in history, take notes. 3. Maybe being with the president's wife isn't a bad place to be; her Secret Service detail knows how to handle things like this and they must carry gas masks, etc. Then a romantic sense of history kicked in: Maybe this is like being with Mary Todd Lincoln the morning of first Bull Run. In five seconds or so the sirens died down and moved on. Mrs. Bush seemed wholly unaffected.
Earlier, when I'd asked how she was doing, she said she was fine, this is obviously a difficult time for people but anxiety has a way of diminishing with time, people get used to it and then don't feel it so sharply. I asked how the staffers in the White House were doing, and again she said fine; she was mindful that they'd been forced to flee the White House by foot on 9/11 and had had some hard days. She mentioned to the table that she thought people were watching things like Michael Jackson and Joe Millionaire "to distract ourselves." In her remarks she said, "I know we will get through this," and that she finds herself thinking, "This too will pass."
She was poised and composed in the way of someone who isn't trying, and she was humorous. When Good Housekeeping's editor, Ellen Levine, stepped in to pick the first questioner in the ensuing Q&A, a bright woman in eyeglasses began to ask a question. Mrs. Bush asked her to identify herself and her organization. She gave her name and said she was the deputy editor of . . . Good Housekeeping. "Oh great, this must be the setup," Mrs. Bush said, to laughter.
She was in a well-tailored dove-gray wool suit, collarless and double-breasted, with a knee-length skirt, dark-gray heels and pearl earrings. Her makeup had been applied with some art, her auburn hair was subtly highlighted, and her nails were professionally manicured, with red-orange nail polish. I mention this because sometimes grooming is a statement. Mrs. Bush said: Don't worry too much, we'll all be fine; if I didn't know this I wouldn't have been able to put on my eyeliner in such a straight line. Good grooming and a cheerful demeanor are sometimes heroic.
Using this as a barometer, the next time Laura Bush shows up in public with uncombed hair, in a housecoat, with a scotch in one hand and a cigarette hanging off her lip....kiss your ass goodbye.
posted by tbogg at 10:19 AM
|
San Diego...conservative Navy town no more...
Since I don't have time to do much this morning, I thought I would share a few letters from the normally conservative San Diego Union. It is the Union's policy to publish letters proportionate to the sides of an issue involved. Please note that all six letters are critical of President Get Your War On. My favorite:
Bush says it's time for people to show "some backbone." He's right. Let's start with him.
He can have a press conference and go before the American people in a forum that isn't as staged as his gatherings with Republicans, hand-picked religious groups or tightly controlled appearances at military bases. He can stand up and answer questions that aren't offered up by his administration's selected reporters.
After all, he is asking for a commitment that will kill hundreds of thousands of mostly innocent people, a fact that is the least talked about part of his patriotic bravado.
To ask people to support such a war, Bush needs to give them more than catch phrases without substance. Americans are probably the bravest, kindest people in the world; but there are things they won't forgive– such as being misled.
If Bush cannot stand in front of this country and answer hard questions, he has no business plunging the United States and the rest of the world into this war.
MARION LEWISH
San Diego
|
|